Abstract
Two studies were conducted to examine the significance of gender for how employees define workplace bullying and how severe they rate different forms of bullying to be. The first study showed that female employees emphasized emotional abuse and professional discredit more than male employees in their definitions of bullying, while men emphasized abusive working conditions more than women. The second study showed that female employees rated the severity of many types of negative acts as somewhat more severe than men did. These studies question the prevailing assumption that bullying is a gender-neutral phenomenon and instead provide converging support for the notion that perceptions of bullying are gendered. The discussion addresses implications for interventions and HR practice.
References
2009). Sample size rules of thumb. Evaluating three common practices. In , Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Received doctrine, verity, and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 267–286). New York, NY: Routledge.
(2007). Occupational epidemiology and work related inequalities in health: A gender perspective for two complementary approaches to work and health research. Journal of Epidemiological Community Health, 61, 39–45.
(2010). Valutare il rischio mobbing nelle organizzazioni. Contributo alla validazione italiana dello Short Negative Acts Questionnaire (S-NAQ)
([Assessing the mobbing risk in organizations: Contribution to the Italian validation of the Short Negative Acts Questionnaire (S-NAQ)] . Psicologia Sociale, 1, 141–161.2009). Predicting workplace aggression and violence. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 671–692.
(2007). Harassment based on sex: Protecting social status in the context of gender hierarchy. Academy of Management Review, 32, 641–658.
(2006). Workplace harassment: Double jeopardy for minority women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 426–436.
(1994). Sex differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 27–33.
(1999). Gender, interpersonal power, and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 81–99.
(1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
(2009). When small effect sizes tell a big story, and when large effect sizes don’t. In , Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Received doctrine, verity, and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 287–308). New York, NY: Routledge.
(2009). Patterns and profiles of response to incivility in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 272–288.
(2009). Cliques, rumors, and gossip by the water cooler: Female bullying in the workplace. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 12, 97–110.
(2009). Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised. Work & Stress, 23, 24–44.
(2011). Workplace bullying: Developments in theory, research and practice. London, UK and New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
(2007). A feminist analysis of organizational research on sex differences. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1121–1143.
(2010). Development and validation of the workplace bullying scale “EAPA-T”. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 10, 519–539.
(2009). Perceived severity of various bullying behaviours at work and the relevance of exposure to bullying. Work & Stress, 23, 191–205.
(2011). Workers’ perception of workplace bullying: A cross-cultural study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 178–205.
(2010). The global gender gap report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
(2011). Individual consequences of workplace bullying/mobbing. In , Workplace bullying: Developments in theory, research and practice (pp. 107–128). London, UK and New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
(2010). Workplace bullying policy in the Australian public sector: Why has gender been ignored?. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69, 47–60.
(2010). Indicadores demográficos básicos. Retrieved from www.ine.es
. (2010). Centro Centroamericano de Población. Estimaciones y proyecciones de población 1950–2050. Retrieved from www.inec.go.cr.
. (2006). Bullying among mentally-ill patients detained in a high-secure hospital: An exploratory study of the perceptions of staff and patients into how bullying is defined. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 451–463.
(2006). Drawing boundaries: Exploring the relationship between sexual harassment, gender and bullying. Women’s Studies International Forum, 29, 147–158.
(2005). Sexual versus nonsexual workplace aggression and victims’s overall job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 155–169.
(2002). Gendered workplace bullying in the restructured UK Civil Service. Personnel Review, 31, 205–227.
(2001). Perceptions of bullying in organizations. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 2, 48–63.
(2006). Recognition of workplace bullying: A qualitative study of women targets in the public sector. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 119–135.
(2005). Women’s experiences of workplace bullying: Changes in social relationships. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 29–47.
(2011). How workplace bullying changes how women promote their health. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 4, 48–86.
(2010). The gendered nature of workplace mistreatment. , Handbook of gender research in psychology, 5, 423–441.
(2004). Accounting for differences in norms of respect: A study of assessments of incivility through the lenses of race and gender. Group & Organization Management, 29, 248–268.
(2011). Measuring exposure to workplace bullying. In , Workplace bullying: Developments in theory, research and practice (pp. 149–174). London, UK and New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
(2011). Exploring risk groups and risk factors for workplace bullying. Industrial Health, 49, 73–88.
(2007). Bullying in the workplace: Survey Reports 2007. Reports to the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment. The Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin, Ireland.
(2004). Coping with bullying in the workplace: The effect of gender, age and type of bullying. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 32, 319–333.
(2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
(2007). Social context of human aggression: Are we paying too much attention to gender?. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 417–426.
(2010). Categorization and hierarchy of workplace bullying strategies: A Delphi survey. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13, 297–308.
(2010). Posttraumatic symptoms among victims of workplace bullying: Exploring gender differences and shattered assumptions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 2616–2635.
(2001). A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 914–922.
(2003). The significance of gender in the prevalence, forms, and perceptions of workplace bullying. Nordiske Organisasjonsstudier, 5, 30–50.
(2009). Organisational responses to workplace harassment: An exploratory study. Personnel Review, 38, 26–44.
(2011). The significance of gender for third parties’ perceptions of negative interpersonal behaviour: Labelling and explaining negative acts. Gender, Work, and Organization, 18, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00465.x 571–591.
(2011). Organisational causes of workplace bullying. In , Workplace bullying: Developments in theory, research and practice (pp. 227–243). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
(2004). Dangerous work: the gendered nature of bullying in the context of higher education. Gender, Work, and Organization, 11, 163–186.
(2010). Does trait anger, trait anxiety or organisational position moderate the relationship between exposure to negative acts and self-labelling as a victim of workplace bullying? Nordic Psychology, 62 (3), 67–79.
(2007). Twenty years later: explaining the persistence of the glass ceiling for women leaders. Women in Management Review, 22, 482–496.
(2011). Empirical findings on prevalence and risk groups of bullying in the workplace. In , Workplace bullying: Developments in theory, research and practice (pp. 75–105). London, UK and New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
(