Skip to main content
Original Article

The Impact of Learning Demands, Work-Related Resources, and Job Stressors on Creative Performance and Health

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000127

We propose an integrated model of learning demands, work-related resources, and job stressors that incorporates core assumptions of work design in predicting processes of learning and performance as well as health impairment. The model was tested in a heterogeneous sample of 830 employees using structural equation modeling. Empirical results largely support theoretical assumptions. Learning demands and work-related resources were positively related to intrinsic motivation and creative performance. Job stressors and low work-related resources were predictive for health impairment. The suggested tripartite taxonomy reconciles inconsistent research findings on the impact of work characteristics. The model provides practical guidance for work analysis and design by clarifying relationships between established work characteristics, job performance, and worker health.

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40, 39–58. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309–328. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Belkic, K. L., Landsbergis, P. A., Schnall, P. l., & Baker, D. (2004). Is job strain a major source of cardiovascular disease risk? A critical review of the empirical evidence, with a clinical perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 30, 85–128. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brähler, E., Hinz, A., & Scheer, J. W. (2008). GBB-24 Gießener Beschwerdebogen [GBB-24 Giessen Subjective Complaints List] (3rd rev. ed. with new norms). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Büssing, A., & Glaser, J. (2000). The “four-stage process model of core factors of burnout”. The role of work stressors and work-related resources. Work & Stress, 14, 329–346. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Büssing, A., & Glaser, J. (2002). Das Tätigkeits- und Arbeitsanalyseverfahren für das Krankenhaus–Selbstbeobachtungsversion (TAA-KH-S) [Activity and work analysis in hospitals–self-report version (TAA-KH-S)]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work-family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 169–198. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell, D. J. (1988). Task complexity: A review and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 13, 40–52. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among US managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 65–74. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cook, J. D., Hepworth, S. J., Wall, T. D., & Warr, P. B. (1981). The experience of work. A compendium and review of 249 measures and their use. London, UK: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Crawford, E. R., Le Pine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 834–848. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Devereux, J. J., Rydstedt, L. W., & Cropley, M. (2011). Psychosocial work characteristics, need for recovery and musculoskeletal problems predict psychological distress in a sample of British workers. Ergonomics, 54, 840–848. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • de Lange, A. H., Taris, T., Jansen, P., Kompier, M. A. J., Houtman, I. L. D., & Bongers, P. M. (2010). On the relationships among work characteristics and learning-related behavior: Does age matter? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 925–950. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • de Lange, A. H., Taris, T. W., Kompier, M., Houtman, I. L. D., & Bongers, P. M. (2003). The very best of the millennium: Longitudinal research and the demand-control-(support) model. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8, 282–305. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • de Witte, H., Verhofstadt, E., & Omey, E. (2007). Testing Karasek’s learning and strain hypotheses on young workers in their first job. Work & Stress, 21, 131–141. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eurofound . (2010). Work-related stress. Dublin, Ireland: Eurofound. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • European Agency for Safety and Health at Work . (2000). The changing world of work. Luxembourg, Europe: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1994). Action as the core of work psychology: A German approach. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough, (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 4, (2nd ed.). (pp. 271–340). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fried, Y., & Ferris, G. R. (1987). The validity of the job characteristics model: A review and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 40, 287–322. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Geurts, S. A. E., & Sonnentag, S. (2006). Recovery as an explanatory mechanism in the relation between acute stress reactions and chronic health impairment. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 32, 482–492. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greiner, B. A., Ragland, D. R., Krause, N., Syme, S. L., & Fisher, J. M. (1997). Objective measurement of occupational stress factors: An example with San Francisco urban transit operators. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2, 325–342. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hacker, W. (2003). Action regulation theory: A practical tool for the design of modern work processes? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12, 105–130. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250–279. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Herbig, B., & Glaser, J. (2013). Kreativität und Gesundheit im Arbeitsprozess–Bestandsaufnahme, Intervention und Evaluation [Creativity and health at work–inventory, intervention, and evaluation]. Berlin, Germany: Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA). First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Höge, T. (2009). When work strain transcends psychological boundaries: An inquiry into the relationship between time pressure, irritation, work-family conflict and psychosomatic complaints. Stress and Health, 25, 41–51. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hornung, S., Weigl, M., Glaser, J., & Angerer, P. (2013). Is it so bad or am I so tired? Cross-lagged relationships between job stressors and emotional exhaustion of hospital physicians. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12, 124–131. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Houtman, I. L., Bongers, P. M., Smulders, P. G., & Kompier, M. A. (1994). Psychosocial stressors at work and musculoskeletal problems. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health, 20, 139–145. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1128–1145. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285–308. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Karasek, R. A., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work. Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. New York, NY: Basis Books. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kubicek, B., Korunka, C., & Ulferts, H. (2013). Acceleration in the care of older adults: New demands as predictors of employee burnout and engagement. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69, 1525–1538. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kulik, C. T., Oldham, G. R., & Hackman, J. R. (1987). Work design as an approach to person-environment fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 278–296. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, J., Ochsmann, E., Kraus, T., & Lang, J. W. (2012). Psychosocial work stressors as antecedents of musculoskeletal problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis of stability-adjusted longitudinal studies. Social Science & Medicine, 75, 1163–1174. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mohr, G., Müller, A., Rigotti, T., Aycan, Z., & Tschan, F. (2006). The assessment of psychological strain in work contexts: Concerning the structural equivalency of nine language adaptations of the irritation scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 198–206. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Nijhof, W. J. (2005). Lifelong learning as a European skill formation policy. Human Resource Development Review, 4, 401–417. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nixon, A. E., Mazzola, J. J., Bauer, J., Krueger, J. R., & Spector, P. E. (2011). Can work make you sick? A meta-analysis of the relationships between job stressors and physical symptoms. Work & Stress, 25, 1–22. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosa, H., & Scheuerman, W. E. (2009). High-speed society: Social acceleration, power, and modernity. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shalley, C. E., Gilson, L. L., & Blum, T. C. (2009). Interactive effects of growth need strength, work context, and job complexity on self-reported creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 489–505. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spector, P. E. (1986). Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations, 39, 1005–1016. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spreitzer, G., Sutcliffe, K., Dutton, J., Sonenshein, S., & Grant, A. M. (2005). A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organization Science, 16, 537–549. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Taris, T. W., Kompier, M. A. J., Geurts, S. A. E., Houtman, I. L. D., & Heuvel, F. F. M. (2010). Professional efficacy, exhaustion, and work characteristics among police officers: A longitudinal test of the learning-related predictions of the demand-control model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 267–552. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tofighi, D., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2011). RMediation: An R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 692–700. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D., & Carter, A. (2005). Creative requirement: A neglected construct in the study of employee creativity? Group & Organization Management, 30, 541–560. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Buuren, S. (2012). Flexible imputation of missing data. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Buuren, S., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). MICE: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45, 1–67. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Viswesvaran, C., Sanchez, J. I., & Fisher, J. (1999). The role of social support in the process of work stress: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 314–334. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • World Health Organization [WHO] . (1986). Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wright, K. B. (2005). Researching Internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10, doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.x. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 682–696. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zhou, Q., Hirst, G., & Shipton, H. (2012). Promoting creativity at work: The role of problem-solving demand. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 61, 56–80. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar