This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Rahimtoola SH (1978) The problem of valve prosthesis–patient mismatch. Circulation 58: 20–24
Dumesnil JG et al. (1990) Validation and applications of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 16: 637–643
Pibarot P and Dumesnil JG (2006) Prosthesis–patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention. Heart 92: 1022–1029
Mohty D et al. (2006) Impact of prosthesis–patient mismatch on long-term survival in patients with small St Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in the aortic position. Circulation 113: 420–426
Blais C et al. (2003) Impact of prosthesis–patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 108: 983–988
Walther T et al. (2006) Patient prosthesis mismatch affects short- and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 30: 15–19
Ruel M et al. (2006) Prosthesis–patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement primarily affects patients with preexisting left ventricular dysfunction: effect on survival, freedom from heart failure, and left ventricular mass regression. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 131: 1036–1044
Kohsaka S et al. (2008) Prosthesis–patient mismatch affects long-term survival after mechanical valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135: 1076–1080
Mohty D et al. Impact of prosthesis–patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: influence of age, obesity, and left ventricular function. J Am Coll Cardiol, in press
Bleiziffer S et al. (2007) Prediction of valve prosthesis–patient mismatch prior to aortic valve replacement: which is the best method? Heart 93: 615–620
Castro LJ et al. (2002) Routine enlargement of the small aortic root: a preventive strategy to minimize mismatch. Ann Thorac Surg 74: 31–36
Dumesnil JG and Pibarot P (2008) Invited commentary. Ann Thorac Surg 85: 1308–1309
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
P Pibarot has received Speakers' Bureau honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Sorin, and St Jude Medical. He has also acted as a Consultant for Sorin and received research support from Edwards Lifesciences. JG Dumesnil received Speakers' Bureau honoraria from Medtronic and St Jude Medical.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pibarot, P., Dumesnil, J. The relevance of prosthesis–patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement. Nat Rev Cardiol 5, 764–765 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio1366
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio1366
This article is cited by
-
Surgical aortic valve replacement provides better left ventricular mass regression than transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with small aortic annulus
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2023)
-
Patient prosthesis mismatch and its impact on left ventricular regression following aortic valve replacement in aortic stenosis patients
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2019)
-
Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch after mitral valve replacement in rheumatic population: Does mitral position prosthesis-patient mismatch really exist?
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery (2017)
-
Aortic valve replacement and prosthesis-patient mismatch in the era of trans-catheter aortic valve implantation
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2016)
-
Patient–prosthesis mismatch increases the mean platelet volume in patients with aortic valve replacement
Surgery Today (2015)