Key Points
-
This review examines the cellular functions of the DNA topoisomerases from a mechanistic point of view. The following points are summarized.
-
Classification of DNA topoisomerases into four subfamilies IA, IB, IIA and IIB, and the unique mechanistic features of each subfamily.
-
The topological problems of various cellular transactions of DNA, such as replication and transcription, and the plausible roles of different subfamilies of DNA topoisomerases in each of these processes.
-
The presence of at least one IA enzyme in all known living organisms, and plausible roles of this subfamily that cannot be fulfilled by any of the other subfamilies of DNA topoisomerases.
-
The DNA topoisomerases presumably evolved to solve the topological problems of DNA as it became longer and longer or ring-shaped. These elegant solutions nevertheless introduce weak spots into intracellular DNA because of the necessity of transiently breaking DNA strands. So, the DNA topoisomerases might have become the unwitting targets of a plethora of natural and synthesized compounds.
Abstract
DNA topoisomerases are the magicians of the DNA world — by allowing DNA strands or double helices to pass through each other, they can solve all of the topological problems of DNA in replication, transcription and other cellular transactions. Extensive biochemical and structural studies over the past three decades have provided molecular models of how the various subfamilies of DNA topoisomerase manipulate DNA. In this review, the cellular roles of these enzymes are examined from a molecular point of view.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
07 June 2002
yes
Notes
*Citations to FIG 3C have been changed to read FIG 3B throughout.
*The text in parentheses has been added.
*This sentence has been added.
References
Wang, J. C. DNA topoisomerases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65, 635–692 (1996).
Nitiss, J. L. Investigating the biological functions of DNA topoisomerases in eukaryotic cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1400, 63–81 (1998).A comprehensive review of the cellular functions of eukaryotic DNA topoisomerases.
Champoux, J. J. DNA topoisomerases: structure, function, and mechanism. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70, 369–413 (2001).
Wang, J. C. Interaction between DNA and an Escherichia coli protein ω. J. Mol. Biol. 55, 523–533 (1971).This reports the discovery of the first DNA topoisomerase, and proposes the transesterification mechanism of DNA strand breakage and rejoining.
Kirkegaard, K. & Wang, J. C. Bacterial DNA topoisomerase I can relax positively supercoiled DNA containing a single-stranded loop. J. Mol. Biol. 185, 625–637 (1985).
Tse, Y. & Wang, J. C. E. coli and M. luteus DNA topoisomerase I can catalyze catenation or decatenation of double-stranded DNA rings. Cell 22, 269–276 (1980).
Lima, C. D., Wang, J. C. & Mondragon, A. Three-dimensional structure of the 67K N-terminal fragment of E. coli DNA topoisomerase I. Nature 367, 138–146 (1994).
Brown, P. O. & Cozzarelli, N. R. Catenation and knotting of duplex DNA by type 1 topoisomerases: a mechanistic parallel with type 2 topoisomerases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78, 843–847 (1981).
Wang, J. C. Moving one DNA double helix through another by a type II DNA topoisomerase: the story of a simple molecular machine. Q. Rev. Biophys. 31, 107–144 (1998).
Bergerat, A. et al. An atypical topoisomerase II from Archaea with implications for meiotic recombination. Nature 386, 414–417 (1997).A report on the discovery of the type IIB topoisomerase.
Forterre, P. Genomics and early cellular evolution. The origin of the DNA world. C. R. Acad. Sci. III 324, 1067–1076 (2001).
Berger, J. M., Gamblin, S. J., Harrison, S. C. & Wang, J. C. Structure and mechanism of DNA topoisomerase II. Nature 379, 225–232 (1996).
Nichols, M. D., DeAngelis, K., Keck, J. L. & Berger, J. M. Structure and function of an archaeal topoisomerase VI subunit with homology to the meiotic recombination factor Spo11. EMBO J. 18, 6177–6188 (1999).
Kampranis, S. C., Bates, A. D. & Maxwell, A. A model for the mechanism of strand passage by DNA gyrase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8414–8419 (1999).
Cook, P. R. The organization of replication and transcription. Science 284, 1790–1795 (1999).
Postow, L., Crisona, N. J., Peter, B. J., Hardy, C. D. & Cozzarelli, N. R. Topological challenges to DNA replication: conformations at the fork. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8219–8226 (2001).A detailed review of the topological problems of DNA chain elongation during replication, and their plausible solutions by the DNA topoisomerases, especially the type II enzymes. Much of the discussions, however, deal with cases in which rotation of the replication machinery is unconstrained.
Harmon, F. G., DiGate, R. J. & Kowalczykowski, S. C. RecQ helicase and topoisomerase III comprise a novel DNA strand passage function: a conserved mechanism for control of DNA recombination. Mol. Cell 3, 611–620 (1999).
Kim, R. A. & Wang, J. C. Function of DNA topoisomerases as replication swivels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Mol. Biol. 208, 257–267 (1989).
Zhang, C. X., Chen, A. D., Gettel, N. J. & Hsieh, T. S. Essential functions of DNA topoisomerase I in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev. Biol. 222, 27–40 (2000).An elegant study of the cellular roles of DNA topoisomerase I through its controlled expression from a heat-shock-gene promoter.
Hiasa, H. & Marians, K. J. Topoisomerase III, but not topoisomerase I, can support nascent chain elongation during θ-type DNA replication. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 32655–32659 (1994).
Redinbo, M. R., Stewart, L., Kuhn, P., Champoux, J. J. & Hol, W. G. Crystal structures of human topoisomerase I in covalent and noncovalent complexes with DNA. Science 279, 1504–1513 (1998).
Sundin, O. & Varshavsky, A. Arrest of segregation leads to accumulation of highly intertwined catenated dimers: dissection of the final stages of SV40 DNA replication. Cell 25, 659–669 (1981).The first demonstration of the formation of multiple intertwined pairs of newly replicated DNA rings in the absence of activities that can resolve them.
Hiasa, H., DiGate, R. J. & Marians, K. J. Decatenating activity of Escherichia coli DNA gyrase and topoisomerases I and III during oriC and pBR322 DNA replication in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 2093–2099 (1994).
Spell, R. M. & Holm, C. Nature and distribution of chromosomal intertwinings in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 1465–1476 (1994).This report shows clearly that chromosome loss and/or breakage in the absence of a type II DNA topoisomerase is particularly severe for larger chromosomes.
Crooke, E., Hwang, D. S., Skarstad, K., Thony, B. & Kornberg, A. E. coli minichromosome replication: regulation of initiation at oriC. Res. Microbiol. 142, 127–130 (1991).
Liu, L. F. & Wang, J. C. Supercoiling of the DNA template during transcription. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 84, 7024–7027 (1987).This proposes a 'twin-supercoiled-domain' model when rotation of a transcription assembly in the cellular milieu is hindered, and discusses how various DNA topoisomerases might act to remove the positive and negative supercoils that are generated in the DNA template.
Norris, V. Hypothesis: chromosome separation in Escherichia coli involves autocatalytic gene expression, transertion and membrane-domain formation. Mol. Microbiol. 16, 1051–1057 (1995).
Lodge, J. K., Kazic, T. & Berg, D. E. Formation of supercoiling domains in plasmid pBR322. J. Bacteriol. 171, 2181–2187 (1989).
Cook, D. N., Ma, D., Pon, N. G. & Hearst, J. E. Dynamics of DNA supercoiling by transcription in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 10603–10607 (1992).
Lynch, A. S. & Wang, J. C. Anchoring of DNA to the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane through cotranscriptional synthesis of polypeptides encoding membrane proteins or proteins for export: a mechanism of plasmid hypernegative supercoiling in mutants deficient in DNA topoisomerase I. J. Bacteriol. 175, 1645–1655 (1993).
Drolet, M. et al. Overexpression of RNase H partially complements the growth defect of an Escherichia coli ΔtopA mutant: R-loop formation is a major problem in the absence of DNA topoisomerase I. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 3526–3530 (1995).
Pruss, G. J., Manes, S. H. & Drlica, K. Escherichia coli DNA topoisomerase I mutants: increased supercoiling is corrected by mutations near gyrase genes. Cell 31, 35–42 (1982).
DiNardo, S., Voelkel, K. A., Sternglanz, R., Reynolds, A. E. & Wright, A. Escherichia coli DNA topoisomerase I mutants have compensatory mutations in DNA gyrase genes. Cell 31, 43–51 (1982).
Richardson, S. M., Higgins, C. F. & Lilley, D. M. The genetic control of DNA supercoiling in Salmonella typhimurium. EMBO J. 3, 1745–1752 (1984).
Bhriain, N. N. & Dorman, C. J. Isolation and characterization of a topA mutant of Shigella flexneri. Mol. Microbiol. 7, 351–358 (1993).
Kato, J. et al. New topoisomerase essential for chromosome segregation in E. coli. Cell 63, 393–404 (1990).
Iborra, F. J., Jackson, D. A. & Cook, P. R. Coupled transcription and translation within nuclei of mammalian cells. Science 293, 1139–1142 (2001).
Shaiu, W. L. & Hsieh, T. S. Targeting to transcriptionally active loci by the hydrophilic N-terminal domain of Drosophila DNA topoisomerase I. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 4358–4367 (1998).
Uemura, T. & Yanagida, M. Isolation of type I and II DNA topoisomerase mutants from fission yeast: single and double mutants show different phenotypes in cell growth and chromatin organization. EMBO J. 3, 1737–1744 (1984).
Thrash, C., Bankier, A. T., Barrell, B. G. & Sternglanz, R. Cloning, characterization, and sequence of the yeast DNA topoisomerase I gene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 82, 4374–4378 (1985).
Wang, M. D. et al. Force and velocity measured for single molecules of RNA polymerase. Science 282, 902–907 (1998).
Matera, A. G. Nuclear bodies: multifaceted subdomains of the interchromatin space. Trends Cell Biol. 9, 302–309 (1999).
Misteli, T. Protein dynamics: implications for nuclear architecture and gene expression. Science 291, 843–847 (2001).
Felsenfeld, G., Clark, D. & Studitsky, V. Transcription through nucleosomes. Biophys. Chem. 86, 231–237 (2000).
Mondal, N. & Parvin, J. D. DNA topoisomerase IIα is required for RNA polymerase II transcription on chromatin templates. Nature 413, 435–438 (2001).
Merino, A., Madden, K. R., Lane, W. S., Champoux, J. J. & Reinberg, D. DNA topoisomerase I is involved in both repression and activation of transcription. Nature 365, 227–232 (1993).
Kretzschmar, M., Meisterernst, M. & Roeder, R. G. Identification of human DNA topoisomerase I as a cofactor for activator-dependent transcription by RNA polymerase II. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 11508–11512 (1993).
Shykind, B. M., Kim, J., Stewart, L., Champoux, J. J. & Sharp, P. A. Topoisomerase I enhances TFIID–TFIIA complex assembly during activation of transcription. Genes Dev. 11, 397–407 (1997).
Wang, J. C. DNA topoisomerases: why so many? J. Biol. Chem. 266, 6659–6662 (1991).
Wang, J. C., Caron, P. R. & Kim, R. A. The role of DNA topoisomerases in recombination and genome stability: a double-edged sword? Cell 62, 403–406 (1990).
Keeney, S., Giroux, C. N. & Kleckner, N. Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88, 375–384 (1997).
Cox, M. M. et al. The importance of repairing stalled replication forks. Nature 404, 37–41 (2000).
Kuzminov, A. DNA replication meets genetic exchange: chromosomal damage and its repair by homologous recombination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8461–8468 (2001).A summary of a recent colloquium on the roles of recombination in DNA replication. This issue of the journal contains many other contributions to the colloquium, including reference 16.
Zhu, Q., Pongpech, P. & DiGate, R. J. Type I topoisomerase activity is required for proper chromosomal segregation in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 9766–9771 (2001).
Wallis, J. W., Chrebet, G., Brodsky, G., Rolfe, M. & Rothstein, R. A hyper-recombination mutation in S. cerevisiae identifies a novel eukaryotic topoisomerase. Cell 58, 409–419 (1989).The first report of a type IA DNA topoisomerase in eukaryotes.
Maftahi, M. et al. The top3+ gene is essential in Schizosaccharomyces pombe and the lethality associated with its loss is caused by Rad12 helicase activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 4715–4724 (1999).
Goodwin, A., Wang, S. W., Toda, T., Norbury, C. & Hickson, I. D. Topoisomerase III is essential for accurate nuclear division in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 4050–4058 (1999).
Gangloff, S., McDonald, J. P., Bendixen, C., Arthur, L. & Rothstein, R. The yeast type I topoisomerase Top3 interacts with Sgs1, a DNA helicase homolog: a potential eukaryotic reverse gyrase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 8391–8398. (1994).This study reported the identification of the first suppressor of top3 and established physical and functional interactions between a type IA DNA topoisomerase and a RecQ family helicase.
Bennett, R. J., Sharp, J. A. & Wang, J. C. Purification and characterization of the Sgs1 DNA helicase activity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 9644–9650 (1998).
van Brabant, A. J., Stan, R. & Ellis, N. A. DNA helicases, genomic instability, and human genetic disease. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 1, 409–459 (2000).
Shen, J. C. & Loeb, L. A. The Werner syndrome gene: the molecular basis of RecQ helicase-deficiency diseases. Trends Genet. 16, 213–220 (2000).
Wu, L. & Hickson, I. D. RecQ helicases and topoisomerases: components of a conserved complex for the regulation of genetic recombination. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 58, 894–901 (2001).
Kitao, S., Lindor, N. M., Shiratori, M., Furuichi, Y. & Shimamoto, A. Rothmund-Thomson syndrome responsible gene, RECQL4: genomic structure and products. Genomics 61, 268–276 (1999).
Bennett, R. J., Noirot-Gros, M. F. & Wang, J. C. Interaction between yeast Sgs1 helicase and DNA topoisomerase III. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 26898–26905 (2000).
Fricke, W. M., Kaliraman, V. & Brill, S. J. Mapping the DNA topoisomerase III binding domain of the Sgs1 DNA helicase. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 8848–8855 (2001).
Shimamoto, A., Nishikawa, K., Kitao, S. & Furuichi, Y. Human RecQ5β, a large isomer of RecQ5 DNA helicase, localizes in the nucleoplasm and interacts with topoisomerases 3α and 3β. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 1647–1655 (2000).
Gangloff, S., de Massy, B., Arthur, L., Rothstein, R. & Fabre, F. The essential role of yeast topoisomerase III in meiosis depends on recombination. EMBO J. 18, 1701–1711 (1999).
Kaliraman, V., Mullen, J. R., Fricke, W. M., Bastin-Shanower, S. A. & Brill, S. J. Functional overlap between Sgs1-Top3 and the Mms4-Mus81 endonuclease. Genes Dev. 15, 2730–2740 (2001).
Keeney, S. Mechanism and control of meiotic recombination initiation. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 52, 1–53 (2001).
Buhler, C., Gadelle, D., Forterre, P., Wang, J. C. & Bergerat, A. Reconstitution of DNA topoisomerase VI of the thermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus shibatae from subunits separately overexpressed in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 5157–5162 (1998).
Koshland, D. & Strunnikov, A. Mitotic chromosome condensation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 12, 305–333 (1996).
Gordon, G. S. & Wright, A. DNA segregation in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 54, 681–708 (2000).
Nordstrom, K. & Dasgupta, S. Partitioning of the Escherichia coli chromosome: superhelicity and condensation. Biochimie 83, 41–48 (2001).
Losada, A. & Hirano, T. Shaping the metaphase chromosome: coordination of cohesion and condensation. Bioessays 23, 924–935 (2001).
Uemura, T. et al. DNA topoisomerase II is required for condensation and separation of mitotic chromosomes in S. pombe. Cell 50, 917–925 (1987).
Durrieu, F. et al. DNA topoisomerase IIα interacts with CAD nuclease and is involved in chromatin condensation during apoptotic execution. Curr. Biol. 10, 923–926 (2000).
Castano, I. B., Heath-Pagliuso, S., Sadoff, B. U., Fitzhugh, D. J. & Christman, M. F. A novel family of TRF (DNA topoisomerase I-related function) genes required for proper nuclear segregation. Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 2404–2410 (1996).
Castano, I. B., Brzoska, P. M., Sadoff, B. U., Chen, H. & Christman, M. F. Mitotic chromosome condensation in the rDNA requires TRF4 and DNA topoisomerase I in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 10, 2564–2576 (1996).
Hartsuiker, E., Bahler, J. & Kohli, J. The role of topoisomerase II in meiotic chromosome condensation and segregation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 2739–2750 (1998).
Miller, C. A., Beaucage, S. L. & Cohen, S. N. Role of DNA superhelicity in partitioning of the pSC101 plasmid. Cell 62, 127–133 (1990).
Conley, D. L. & Cohen, S. N. Effects of the pSC101 partition (par) locus on in vivo DNA supercoiling near the plasmid replication origin. Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 701–707 (1995).
Austin, S. J. & Eichorn, B. G. Random diffusion can account for topA-dependent suppression of partition defects in low-copy-number plasmids. J. Bacteriol. 174, 5190–5195 (1992).
Sawitzke, J. A. & Austin, S. Suppression of chromosome segregation defects of Escherichia coli muk mutants by mutations in topoisomerase I. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 1671–1676 (2000).
Varga-Weisz, P. D. et al. Chromatin-remodelling factor CHRAC contains the ATPases ISWI and topoisomerase II. Nature 388, 598–602 (1997).
LeRoy, G., Loyola, A., Lane, W. S. & Reinberg, D. Purification and characterization of a human factor that assembles and remodels chromatin. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 14787–14790 (2000).
Warburton, P. E. & Earnshaw, W. C. Untangling the role of DNA topoisomerase II in mitotic chromosome structure and function. Bioessays 19, 97–99 (1997).
Gasser, S. M., Laroche, T., Falquet, J., Boy de la Tour, E. & Laemmli, U. K. Metaphase chromosome structure. Involvement of topoisomerase II. J. Mol. Biol. 188, 613–629 (1986).
Bhat, M. A., Philp, A. V., Glover, D. M. & Bellen, H. J. Chromatid segregation at anaphase requires the barren product, a novel chromosome-associated protein that interacts with topoisomerase II. Cell 87, 1103–1114 (1996).
Christensen, M. O. et al. Dynamics of human DNA topoisomerases IIα and IIβ in living cells. J. Cell Biol. 157, 31–44 (2002).
Lewis, R. J., Tsai, F. T. & Wigley, D. B. Molecular mechanisms of drug inhibition of DNA gyrase. Bioessays 18, 661–671 (1996).
Maxwell, A. DNA gyrase as a drug target. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 27, 48–53 (1999).
Li, T. K. & Liu, L. F. Tumor cell death induced by topoisomerase-targeting drugs. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 41, 53–77 (2001).
Vizan, J. L., Hernandez-Chico, C., del Castillo, I. & Moreno, F. The peptide antibiotic microcin B17 induces double-strand cleavage of DNA mediated by E. coli DNA gyrase. EMBO J. 10, 467–476 (1991).
Miki, T., Park, J. A., Nagao, K., Murayama, N. & Horiuchi, T. Control of segregation of chromosomal DNA by sex factor F in Escherichia coli. Mutants of DNA gyrase subunit A suppress letD (ccdB) product growth inhibition. J. Mol. Biol. 225, 39–52 (1992).
Bernard, P. & Couturier, M. Cell killing by the F plasmid CcdB protein involves poisoning of DNA-topoisomerase II complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 226, 735–745 (1992).
Wang, H. et al. Stimulation of topoisomerase II-mediated DNA damage via a mechanism involving protein thiolation. Biochemistry 40, 3316–3323 (2001).
Yang, X., Li, W., Prescott, E. D., Burden, S. J. & Wang, J. C. DNA topoisomerase IIβ and neural development. Science 287, 131–134 (2000).
Krogh, B. O. & Shuman, S. A poxvirus-like type IB topoisomerase family in bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 1853–1858 (2002).The first report of the presence of a type IB DNA topoisomerase in prokaryotes.
Zhang, H. et al. Human mitochondrial topoisomerase I. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 10608–10613 (2001).A report of the discovery of the newest DNA topoisomerase gene in humans.
Morham, S. G., Kluckman, K. D., Voulomanos, N. & Smithies, O. Targeted disruption of the mouse topoisomerase I gene by camptothecin selection. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 6804–6809 (1996).
Li, W. & Wang, J. C. Mammalian DNA topoisomerase IIIα is essential in early embryogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 1010–1013 (1998).
Kwan, K. Y. & Wang, J. C. Mice lacking DNA topoisomerase IIIβ develop to maturity but show a reduced mean lifespan. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5717–5721 (2001).
Szostak, J. W., Orr-Weaver, T. L., Rothstein, R. J. & Stahl, F. W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell 33, 25–35 (1983).
Schwacha, A. & Kleckner, N. Identification of double Holliday junctions as intermediates in meiotic recombination. Cell 83, 783–791 (1995).An elegant study that establishes the formation of the double Holliday junction in meiotic recombination. The potential requirement for a type I DNA topoisomerase in resolving a subset of such structures was also raised. The idea that a type II DNA topoisomerase might be able to resolve some of the double Holliday junctions, however, differed from the view that is presented in this review.
Gilbertson, L. A. & Stahl, F. W. A test of the double-strand break repair model for meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 144, 27–41 (1996).
Zou, H. & Rothstein, R. Holliday junctions accumulate in replication mutants via a RecA homolog-independent mechanism. Cell 90, 87–96 (1997).
Michel, B. Replication fork arrest and DNA recombination. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 173–178 (2000).
Sekiguchi, J., Seeman, N. C. & Shuman, S. Resolution of Holliday junctions by eukaryotic DNA topoisomerase I. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 785–789 (1996).
Champoux, J. J. Renaturation of complementary single-stranded DNA circles: complete rewinding facilitated by the DNA untwisting enzyme. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 74, 5328–5332 (1977).
Bennett, R. J., Keck, J. L. & Wang, J. C. Binding specificity determines polarity of DNA unwinding by the Sgs1 protein of S. cerevisiae. J. Mol. Biol. 289, 235–248 (1999).
Karow, J. K., Constantinou, A., Li, J. L., West, S. C. & Hickson, I. D. The Bloom's syndrome gene product promotes branch migration of Holliday junctions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 6504–6508 (2000).
Doe, C. L., Dixon, J., Osman, F. & Whitby, M. C. Partial suppression of the fission yeast rqh1− phenotype by expression of a bacterial Holliday junction resolvase. EMBO J. 19, 2751–2762 (2000).
Chen, S. J. & Wang, J. C. Identification of active site residues in Escherichia coli DNA topoisomerase I. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 6050–6056 (1998).
Stivers, J. T., Shuman, S. & Mildvan, A. S. Vaccinia DNA topoisomerase I: single-turnover and steady-state kinetic analysis of the DNA strand cleavage and ligation reactions. Biochemistry 33, 327–339 (1994).
Wigley, D. B., Davies, G. J., Dodson, E. J., Maxwell, A. & Dodson, G. Crystal structure of an N-terminal fragment of the DNA gyrase B protein. Nature 351, 624–629 (1991).
Acknowledgements
I thank A. Bergerat, K. Kwan and E. Marcotte for their help in confirming the presence of at least one type IA DNA topoisomerase-coding region in genomes of known nucleotide sequences. Work in my laboratory on DNA topoisomerases has been supported mainly by grants from the National Institutes of Health. Part b in Box 2 figure is based on one by Henry M Sobel.* Footnote 3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Related links
Related links
DATABASES
Flybase
LocusLink
<i>Saccharomyces</i> Genome Database
Glossary
- NEGATIVELY AND POSITIVELY SUPERCOILED DNA
-
A loop of a double-stranded DNA segment will become contorted if one end of it is turned around its helical axis at that end while the other end is kept stationary in space (much like the spatial coiling of a rubber tubing when similarly handled). The number of supercoils that are introduced into this loop is a parameter that is used to quantify the distortion of the looped DNA segment; one negative supercoil is said to be introduced into the DNA loop by each full turn of the rotating end in the direction that tends to unwind the right-handed double helix; one positive supercoil is said to be introduced by each full turn of the rotating end in the direction that tends to overwind the right-handed double helix.
- SEMICONSERVATIVE REPLICATION
-
A common mode of replication in which both strands of a DNA double helix are copied by the replication machinery to give a pair of progeny DNA molecules.
- R-LOOPING
-
Refers to a structure in a double-stranded DNA segment in which a single-stranded RNA pairs with a portion of one DNA strand to displace a portion of the other DNA strand in a single-stranded state.
- HOLLIDAY JUNCTION
-
A DNA structure named after Robin Holliday, who first described it in 1964 as a plausible recombination intermediate between a pair of homologous DNA molecules.
- ENDONUCLEASE
-
An enzyme that catalyses hydrolytic cleavage of DNA in the middle of a DNA strand or double helix.
- DNA STRAND-TRANSFERASE
-
An enzyme that transfers a donor group of one DNA strand (for example, a 5′ phosphoryl group) to a receiving group of another DNA strand (for example, a 3′ hydroxyl group).
- BRANCH MIGRATION
-
The movement of a junction formed by multiple DNA or RNA strands of complementary nucleotide sequences that results from nearly simultaneous breakage and formation of base pairs among them.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, J. Cellular roles of DNA topoisomerases: a molecular perspective. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3, 430–440 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm831
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm831
This article is cited by
-
Neddylation inhibitor MLN4924 sensitizes head and neck squamous carcinoma cells to (S)-10-hydroxycamptothecin
European Journal of Medical Research (2023)
-
Germline-related molecular phenotype in Metazoa: conservation and innovation highlighted by comparative transcriptomics
EvoDevo (2023)
-
Predicting the relationship between pesticide genotoxicity and breast cancer risk in South Indian women in in vitro and in vivo experiments
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
N-terminal domain of tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase I regulates topoisomerase I-induced toxicity in cells
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
The mitotic spindle-related seven-gene predicts the prognosis and immune microenvironment of lung adenocarcinoma
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology (2023)