Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Resource
  • Published:

Intronic splicing enhancers, cognate splicing factors and context-dependent regulation rules

Abstract

Most human genes produce multiple splicing isoforms with distinct functions. To systematically understand splicing regulation, we conducted an unbiased screen and identified >100 intronic splicing enhancers (ISEs), clustered by sequence similarity. All ISEs functioned in multiple cell types and in heterologous introns, and patterns of distribution and conservation across pre-mRNA regions were similar to those of exonic splicing silencers. Consistently, all ISEs inhibited use of splice sites from exons. Putative trans-factors of each ISE group were identified and validated. Five distinct groups were recognized by hnRNP H and hnRNP F, whose C-terminal domains were sufficient to render context-dependent activities of ISEs. The sixth group was controlled by factors that either activate or suppress splicing. We provide a comprehensive picture of general ISE activities and suggest new models of how single elements can function oppositely, depending on locations and binding factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Identification and validation of ISEs.
Figure 2: Identification and validation of the core motifs of FAS-ISEs.
Figure 3: Similarity between FAS-ISE and FAS-ESSs.
Figure 4: FAS-ISEs function as splicing silencers in exonic contexts.
Figure 5: HnRNP H and hnRNP F recognize distinct ISE groups to control splicing mediated by their C-terminal domains.
Figure 6: Multiple factors with antagonistic activities bind ISE group F motifs to control splicing.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang, E.T. et al. Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes. Nature 456, 470–476 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pan, Q., Shai, O., Lee, L.J., Frey, B.J. & Blencowe, B.J. Deep surveying of alternative splicing complexity in the human transcriptome by high-throughput sequencing. Nat. Genet. 40, 1413–1415 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Castle, J.C. et al. Expression of 24,426 human alternative splicing events and predicted cis regulation in 48 tissues and cell lines. Nat. Genet. 40, 1416–1425 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Black, D.L. Mechanisms of alternative pre-messenger RNA splicing. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 72, 291–336 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Matlin, A.J., Clark, F. & Smith, C.W. Understanding alternative splicing: towards a cellular code. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 386–398 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, Z. & Burge, C.B. Splicing regulation: from a parts list of regulatory elements to an integrated splicing code. RNA 14, 802–813 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nilsen, T.W. & Graveley, B.R. Expansion of the eukaryotic proteome by alternative splicing. Nature 463, 457–463 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Barash, Y. et al. Deciphering the splicing code. Nature 465, 53–59 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tian, H. & Kole, R. Selection of novel exon recognition elements from a pool of random sequences. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 6291–6298 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, H.X., Zhang, M. & Krainer, A.R. Identification of functional exonic splicing enhancer motifs recognized by individual SR proteins. Genes Dev. 12, 1998–2012 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fairbrother, W.G., Yeh, R.F., Sharp, P.A. & Burge, C.B. Predictive identification of exonic splicing enhancers in human genes. Science 297, 1007–1013 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, X.H. & Chasin, L.A. Computational definition of sequence motifs governing constitutive exon splicing. Genes Dev. 18, 1241–1250 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, Z. et al. Systematic identification and analysis of exonic splicing silencers. Cell 119, 831–845 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stadler, M.B. et al. Inference of splicing regulatory activities by sequence neighborhood analysis. PLoS Genet. 2, e191 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Goren, A. et al. Comparative analysis identifies exonic splicing regulatory sequences–the complex definition of enhancers and silencers. Mol. Cell 22, 769–781 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu, Y. et al. Dynamic regulation of alternative splicing by silencers that modulate 5′ splice site competition. Cell 135, 1224–1236 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ke, S. et al. Quantitative evaluation of all hexamers as exonic splicing elements. Genome Res. 21, 1360–1374 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fairbrother, W.G., Holste, D., Burge, C.B. & Sharp, P.A. Single nucleotide polymorphism-based validation of exonic splicing enhancers. PLoS Biol. 2, E268 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xiao, X., Wang, Z., Jang, M. & Burge, C.B. Coevolutionary networks of splicing cis-regulatory elements. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 18583–18588 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lam, B.J. & Hertel, K.J. A general role for splicing enhancers in exon definition. RNA 8, 1233–1241 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ke, S., Zhang, X.H. & Chasin, L.A. Positive selection acting on splicing motifs reflects compensatory evolution. Genome Res. 18, 533–543 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, Z., Xiao, X., Van Nostrand, E. & Burge, C.B. General and specific functions of exonic splicing silencers in splicing control. Mol. Cell 23, 61–70 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yeo, G.W., Van Nostrand, E.L. & Liang, T.Y. Discovery and analysis of evolutionarily conserved intronic splicing regulatory elements. PLoS Genet. 3, e85 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Voelker, R.B. & Berglund, J.A. A comprehensive computational characterization of conserved mammalian intronic sequences reveals conserved motifs associated with constitutive and alternative splicing. Genome Res. 17, 1023–1033 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yeo, G.W., Van Nostrand, E., Holste, D., Poggio, T. & Burge, C.B. Identification and analysis of alternative splicing events conserved in human and mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 2850–2855 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chou, M.Y., Rooke, N., Turck, C.W. & Black, D.L. hnRNP H is a component of a splicing enhancer complex that activates a c-src alternative exon in neuronal cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 69–77 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. McCullough, A.J. & Berget, S.M. G triplets located throughout a class of small vertebrate introns enforce intron borders and regulate splice site selection. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 4562–4571 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, E., Mueller, W.F., Hertel, K.J. & Cambi, F.G. Run-mediated recognition of proteolipid protein and DM20 5′ splice sites by U1 small nuclear RNA is regulated by context and proximity to the splice site. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 4059–4071 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, E., Dimova, N. & Cambi, F. PLP/DM20 ratio is regulated by hnRNPH and F and a novel G-rich enhancer in oligodendrocytes. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 4164–4178 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Xiao, X. et al. Splice site strength-dependent activity and genetic buffering by poly-G runs. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 1094–1100 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ule, J. et al. CLIP identifies Nova-regulated RNA networks in the brain. Science 302, 1212–1215 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Brudno, M. et al. Computational analysis of candidate intron regulatory elements for tissue-specific alternative pre-mRNA splicing. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 2338–2348 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Underwood, J.G., Boutz, P.L., Dougherty, J.D., Stoilov, P. & Black, D.L. Homologues of the Caenorhabditis elegans Fox-1 protein are neuronal splicing regulators in mammals. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 10005–10016 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Blencowe, B.J. Alternative splicing: new insights from global analyses. Cell 126, 37–47 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Agrawal, R., Imielinski, T. & Swami, A. Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. in Proc.1993 ACM-SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data 207–216 (1993).

  36. Dominski, Z., Yang, X.C., Kaygun, H., Dadlez, M. & Marzluff, W.F. A 3′ exonuclease that specifically interacts with the 3′ end of histone mRNA. Mol. Cell 12, 295–305 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Huelga, S.C. et al. Integrative genome-wide analysis reveals cooperative regulation of alternative splicing by hnRNP proteins. Cell Rep 1, 167–178 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Pastor, T. & Pagani, F. Interaction of hnRNPA1/A2 and DAZAP1 with an Alu-derived intronic splicing enhancer regulates ATM aberrant splicing. PLoS ONE 6, e23349 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Lai, M.C., Kuo, H.W., Chang, W.C. & Tarn, W.Y. A novel splicing regulator shares a nuclear import pathway with SR proteins. EMBO J. 22, 1359–1369 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen, C.D., Kobayashi, R. & Helfman, D.M. Binding of hnRNP H to an exonic splicing silencer is involved in the regulation of alternative splicing of the rat beta-tropomyosin gene. Genes Dev. 13, 593–606 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Dominguez, C., Fisette, J.F., Chabot, B. & Allain, F.H. Structural basis of G-tract recognition and encaging by hnRNP F quasi-RRMs. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 853–861 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Graveley, B.R. & Maniatis, T. Arginine/serine-rich domains of SR proteins can function as activators of pre-mRNA splicing. Mol. Cell 1, 765–771 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Del Gatto-Konczak, F., Olive, M., Gesnel, M.C. & Breathnach, R. hnRNP A1 recruited to an exon in vivo can function as an exon splicing silencer. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 251–260 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang, Y., Cheong, C.G., Hall, T.M. & Wang, Z. Engineering splicing factors with designed specificities. Nat. Methods 6, 825–830 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Goina, E., Skoko, N. & Pagani, F. Binding of DAZAP1 and hnRNPA1/A2 to an exonic splicing silencer in a natural BRCA1 exon 18 mutant. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 3850–3860 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Kar, A., Havlioglu, N., Tarn, W.Y. & Wu, J.Y. RBM4 interacts with an intronic element and stimulates tau exon 10 inclusion. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 24479–24488 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Markus, M.A. et al. WT1 interacts with the splicing protein RBM4 and regulates its ability to modulate alternative splicing in vivo. Exp. Cell Res. 312, 3379–3388 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Lin, J.C. & Tarn, W.Y. Exon selection in alpha-tropomyosin mRNA is regulated by the antagonistic action of RBM4 and PTB. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 10111–10121 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Culler, S.J., Hoff, K.G., Voelker, R.B., Berglund, J.A. & Smolke, C.D. Functional selection and systematic analysis of intronic splicing elements identifies active sequence motifs and associated splicing factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 5152–5165 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Cook, K.B., Kazan, H., Zuberi, K., Morris, Q. & Hughes, T.R. RBPDB: a database of RNA-binding specificities. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D301–D308 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Hui from the Shanghai Institute of Biological Science, Shanghai, China and W.-Y. Tarn from the Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, China for providing the expression constructs and B. Marzluff and C. Burge for critical reading of manuscripts. We thank. Z. Dominski for helping in RNA affinity purifications. This work is supported by an American Heart Association grant (0865329E) and US National Institutes of Health grant (R01CA158283) to Z.W.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.W. and Z.W. designed the research and performed the experiments. M.M. and X.X. developed computational methods to analyze the data. Y.W. and Z.W. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zefeng Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–6, Supplementary Tables 1–7 and Supplementary Note (PDF 4849 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Ma, M., Xiao, X. et al. Intronic splicing enhancers, cognate splicing factors and context-dependent regulation rules. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19, 1044–1052 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2377

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2377

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing