Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

A systematic review and meta-analysis of transcranial direct-current stimulation effects on cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer’s disease

Abstract

Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) appears to enhance cognitive function in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Accordingly, over the last two decades, the number of studies using tDCS for AD has grown. This study aimed to provide a quantitative assessment of the efficacy of tDCS in improving cognitive function in patients with AD. We systematically searched the literature until May 2021 to identify relevant publications for inclusion in our systematic review and meta-analysis. Eligible studies were sham-controlled trials assessing the impacts of anodal or cathodal tDCS on cognitive function in patients with AD. The outcome measure of this study was the effects of tDCS on distinct cognitive domains including memory, attention, and global cognitive function. The initial search yielded a total of 323 records. Five other articles were found using manual search of the databases. Of these, 13 publications (14 different studies) with a total of 211 patients of various degrees of AD severity underwent meta-analysis. Meta-analysis revealed the non-significant effects of tDCS on attention (0.425 SMD, 95% CI, −0.254 to 1.104, p = 0.220), and significant positive impacts on the amelioration of general cognitive measures (1.640 SMD, 95% CI, 0.782 to 2.498, p < 0.000), and memory (1.031 SMD, 95% CI, 0.688 to 1.373, p < 0.000) dysfunction in patients with AD. However, the heterogeneity of the studies were high in all subdomains of cognition (ϰ2 = 22.810, T2 = 0.552, d.f. = 5, I2 = 78.80%, p < 0.000 for attention, ϰ2 = 96.29, T2 = 1.727, d.f. = 10, I2 = 89.61%, p < 0.000 for general cognition, and ϰ2 = 7.253, T2 = 0.085, d.f. = 5, I2 = 31.06%, p = 0.203 for memory). Improved memory and general cognitive function in patients with AD was shown in this meta-analysis. However, due to the small number of studies and the high heterogeneity of the data, more high-quality studies using standardized parameters and measures are needed before tDCS can be considered as a treatment for AD.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: PRISMA flow diagram.
Fig. 2: Forest plot of standardized mean difference (SMD) for attention after transcranial direct-current stimulation in patients with Alzheimer’s disease.
Fig. 3: Forest plot of standardized mean difference (SMD) for general cognitive measures after transcranial direct-current stimulation in patients with Alzheimer’s disease.
Fig. 4: Forest plot of standardized mean difference (SMD) for memory after transcranial direct-current stimulation in patients with Alzheimer’s disease.
Fig. 5: Percentage of different levels of risk of bias for each item in included studies.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Prince M, Bryce R, Albanese E, Wimo A, Ribeiro W, Ferri CP. The global prevalence of dementia: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9:63–75.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2012.11.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2021. Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2021;17:327–406. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12328.

  3. Fried I. Brain stimulation in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2016;54:789–91. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-160719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. van Boekholdt L, Kerstens S, Khatoun A, Asamoah B, Mc Laughlin M. tDCS peripheral nerve stimulation: a neglected mode of action? Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26:456–61. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-00962-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Riggs A, Patel V, Paneri B, Portenoy RK, Bikson M, Knotkova H. At-home transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with telehealth support for symptom control in chronically-Ill patients with multiple symptoms. Front Behav Neurosci. 2018;12:93. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00093.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Woods AJ, Antal A, Bikson M, Boggio PS, Brunoni AR, Celnik P, et al. A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;127:1031–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000;527:633–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Vanneste S, Mohan A, Yoo HB, Huang Y, Luckey AM, McLeod SL, et al. The peripheral effect of direct current stimulation on brain circuits involving memory. Sci Adv. 2020;6. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax9538.

  9. Adair D, Truong D, Esmaeilpour Z, Gebodh N, Borges H, Ho L, et al. Electrical stimulation of cranial nerves in cognition and disease. Brain Stimul. 2020;13:717–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2020.02.019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Roncero C, Kniefel H, Service E, Thiel A, Probst S, Chertkow H. Inferior parietal transcranial direct current stimulation with training improves cognition in anomic Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;3:247–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2017.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrucci R, Mameli F, Guidi I, Mrakic-Sposta S, Vergari M, Marceglia S, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves recognition memory in Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2008;71:493–8. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000317060.43722.a3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boggio PS, Ferrucci R, Mameli F, Martins D, Martins O, Vergari M, et al. Prolonged visual memory enhancement after direct current stimulation in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Stimul. 2012;5:223–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2011.06.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Boggio PS, Khoury LP, Martins DC, Martins OE, de Macedo EC, Fregni F. Temporal cortex direct current stimulation enhances performance on a visual recognition memory task in Alzheimer disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80:444–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2007.141853.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Summers JJ, Kang N, Cauraugh JH. Does transcranial direct current stimulation enhance cognitive and motor functions in the ageing brain? A systematic review and meta- analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2016;25:42–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2015.11.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dedoncker J, Brunoni AR, Baeken C, Vanderhasselt MA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in healthy and neuropsychiatric samples: influence of stimulation parameters. Brain Stimul. 2016;9:501–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2016.04.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Horne KS, Filmer HL, Nott ZE, Hawi Z, Pugsley K, Mattingley JB, et al. Evidence against benefits from cognitive training and transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy older adults. Nat Hum Behav. 2021;5:146–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00979-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Toril P, Reales JM, Ballesteros S. Video game training enhances cognition of older adults: a meta-analytic study. Psychol Aging. 2014;29:706–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bystad M, Grønli O, Rasmussen ID, Gundersen N, Nordvang L, Wang-Iversen H, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation as a memory enhancer in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2016;8:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-016-0180-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Inagawa T, Narita Z, Sugawara N, Maruo K, Stickley A, Yokoi Y, et al. A meta-analysis of the effect of multisession transcranial direct current stimulation on cognition in dementia and mild cognitive impairment. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2019;50:273–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1550059418800889.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sadigh-Eteghad S, Majdi A, McCann SK, Mahmoudi J, Vafaee MS, Macleod MR. D-galactose-induced brain ageing model: a systematic review and meta-analysis on cognitive outcomes and oxidative stress indices. PloS ONE. 2017;12:e0184122. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Cruz Gonzalez P, Fong KNK, Chung RCK, Ting KH, Law LLF, Brown T. Can transcranial direct-current stimulation alone or combined with cognitive training be used as a clinical intervention to improve cognitive functioning in persons with mild cognitive impairment and dementia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018;12:416. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00416.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR Jr., Kawas CH, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7:263–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Bmj. 2011;343:d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Motavalli A, Majdi A, Hosseini L, Talebi M, Mahmoudi J, Hosseini SH, et al. Pharmacotherapy in multiple sclerosis-induced cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020;46:102478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2020.102478.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2010;1:97–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zwetsloot PP, Van Der Naald M, Sena ES, Howells DW, IntHout J, De Groot JA, et al. Standardized mean differences cause funnel plot distortion in publication bias assessments. Elife. 2017;6. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24260.

  28. Borenstein M, Hedges L, Higgins J, Rothstein H. Introduction to meta analysis (statistics in practice) Chichester: Wiley–Blackwell; 2009.

  29. Gangemi A, Colombo B, Fabio RA. Effects of short- and long-term neurostimulation (tDCS) on Alzheimer’s disease patients: two randomized studies. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021;33:383–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-020-01546-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gangemi A, Fabio RA. Transcranial direct current stimulation for Alzheimer disease. Asian J Gerontol Geriatr. 2020;15:5–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-020-01546-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Inagawa T, Yokoi Y, Narita Z, Maruo K, Okazaki M, Nakagome K. Safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation for cognitive rehabilitation in patients with mild or major neurocognitive disorders: a randomized Sham-Controlled Pilot study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019;13:273. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00273.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu CS, Herrmann N, Gallagher D, Rajji TK, Kiss A, Vieira D, et al. A Pilot study comparing effects of bifrontal versus bitemporal transcranial direct current stimulation in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer disease. J ECT. 2020;36:211–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/yct.0000000000000639.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Cespón J, Rodella C, Miniussi C, Pellicciari MC. Behavioural and electrophysiological modulations induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy elderly and Alzheimer’s disease patients: a pilot study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2019;130:2038–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2019.08.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Khedr EM, Salama RH, Abdel Hameed M, Abo Elfetoh N, Seif P. Therapeutic role of transcranial direct current stimulation in Alzheimer disease patients: double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019;33:384–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968319840285.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Suemoto CK, Apolinario D, Nakamura-Palacios EM, Lopes L, Leite RE, Sales MC, et al. Effects of a non-focal plasticity protocol on apathy in moderate Alzheimer’s disease: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Brain Stimul. 2014;7:308–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2013.10.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cai M, Guo Z, Xing G, Peng H, Zhou L, Chen H, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves cognitive function in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease: a meta-analysis. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2019;33:170–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/wad.0000000000000304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Roncero C, Kniefel H, Service E, Thiel A, Probst S, Chertkow H. Inferior parietal transcranial direct current stimulation with training improves cognition in anomic Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;3:247–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2017.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Im JJ, Jeong H, Bikson M, Woods AJ, Unal G, Oh JK, et al. Effects of 6-month at-home transcranial direct current stimulation on cognition and cerebral glucose metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Stimul. 2019;12:1222–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2019.06.003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Khedr EM, Gamal NF, El-Fetoh NA, Khalifa H, Ahmed EM, Ali AM, et al. A double-blind randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of cortical direct current stimulation for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014;6:275. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00275.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Brunoni AR, Moffa AH, Fregni F, Palm U, Padberg F, Blumberger DM, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation for acute major depressive episodes: meta-analysis of individual patient data. Br J Psychiatry. 2016;208:522–31. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.115.164715.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Bridgman S, Engebretsen L, Dainty K, Kirkley A, Maffulli N. Practical aspects of randomization and blinding in randomized clinical trials. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:1000–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2003.09.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Huo L, Zhu X, Zheng Z, Ma J, Ma Z, Gui W, et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on episodic memory in older adults: a meta-analysis. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021;76:692–702. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbz130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zheng X, Alsop DC, Schlaug G. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on human regional cerebral blood flow. NeuroImage. 2011;58:26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Marshall L, Mölle M, Hallschmid M, Born J. Transcranial direct current stimulation during sleep improves declarative memory. J Neurosci. 2004;24:9985–92. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2725-04.2004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Liebetanz D, Nitsche MA, Tergau F, Paulus W. Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain. 2002;125:2238–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awf238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Stagg CJ, Best JG, Stephenson MC, O’Shea J, Wylezinska M, Kincses ZT, et al. Polarity-sensitive modulation of cortical neurotransmitters by transcranial stimulation. J Neurosci. 2009;29:5202–6. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4432-08.2009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Hansen N. Action mechanisms of transcranial direct current stimulation in Alzheimer’s disease and memory loss. Front Psychiatry. 2012;3:48. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00048.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Fernández A, Maestú F, Amo C, Gil P, Fehr T, Wienbruch C, et al. Focal temporoparietal slow activity in Alzheimer’s disease revealed by magnetoencephalography. Biol Psychiatry. 2002;52:764–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01366-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lefaucheur JP, Antal A, Ayache SS, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Cogiamanian F, et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;128:56–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.087.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Andrade SM, de Mendonça CTPL, Pereira TCL, Fernandez-Calvo B, Araújo RCN, Alves NT. Adjuvant transcranial direct current stimulation for treating Alzheimer’s disease: A case study. Dement Neuropsychol. 2016;10:156–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-5764-2016DN1002013.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Costa V, Brighina F, Piccoli T, Realmuto S, Fierro B. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the right hemisphere improves auditory comprehension in a case of dementia. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;41:567–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-162062.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Masse C et al. Improvement of Response to Cueing after Left Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Alzheimers disease. Neuropsychiatry. 2018:1461–4.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design: AM and MML. Data extraction and analyses: AM and SSE. Additional input and interpretation: AM, LvB, and MML. Paper drafted by AM with input from LvB and MML. All authors reviewed and approved the submitted paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myles Mc Laughlin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Majdi, A., van Boekholdt, L., Sadigh-Eteghad, S. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of transcranial direct-current stimulation effects on cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Psychiatry 27, 2000–2009 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01444-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01444-7

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links