Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

A cross-sectional survey of the opinions on weight loss treatments of adult obese patients attending a dietetic clinic

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the views and opinions on weight loss treatments of adult obese patients attending a dietetic clinic.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey.

SUBJECTS: 161 adults attending dietetic outpatients clinics in Portsmouth for obesity with a body mass index of at least 30 kg/m2.

MEASUREMENTS: Self-administered questionnaire developed from a series of focus groups with obese adults. Key topics were previous attempts to lose weight, methods used, the role of physical activity and patients’ views about treatment from health professionals.

RESULTS: The preferences and usefulness of different methods to lose weight varied according to the number of attempts to lose weight, gender, age, body mass index and medical condition of the patient. Men were less likely to use special slimming products, attend slimming groups and swimming than women (odds ratios (95% confidence interval), 0.1 (0.03–0.6) for slimming groups other than Weight Watchers, 0.3 (0.1–0.80) for special slimming products and 0.3 (0.1–0.6) for swimming). Men were more likely to use physical activity (2.6 (1.1–6.2)) and in particular walking (3.7 (1.0–13.6)) and cycling (2.8 (1.0–7.6)) and were more likely to see the dietitian (3.8 (1.4–9.9)) than women. Those with more than 10 attempts to lose weight were more likely to see the dietitian (3.6(1.6–8.2)), use Weight Watchers (2.5 (1.1–5.6)) and newspapers and magazines (4.4 (1.8–10.9)) than those with fewer attempts. The younger age group were more likely to use more vigorous forms of exercise (4.2 (1.6–11.2) for keep fit and 3.7 (1.5–9.6) for cycling) than the older subjects. The most obese were more likely to have negative views on their treatment by health professionals (4.4 (1.9–9.8) ‘chairs are never big enough’ and 4.0 (1.8–8.8) ‘I am regarded as a second class citizen’) than those who were less obese. Those without a medical condition were more likely to exercise (2.8 (1.3–6.3)) and use books (4.8 (2.0–11.2)) than those with a medical condition.

CONCLUSION: The views of obese people should be considered when planning services for the treatment of obesity and a variety of options should be available.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHO . Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic. A report of a WHO consultation on obesity Geneva, 3–5 June 1997. WHO: Geneva, 1998.

  2. Bost L, Primatesta P, Dong W . Anthropometric measures and children's iron status. Health Survey for England 1996. Stationary Office: Department of Health, London, 1998.

  3. Department of Health . Obesity: Reversing the increasing problem of obesity in England. A report from the Nutrition and Physical Activity Task Forces. Department of Health: London, 1995.

  4. Glanville J, Glenny A-M, Melville A, O'Meara S, Sharp F, Sheldon T, Wilson C . The prevention and treatment of obesity Effect Health Care 1997 3: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hankey C, Lean M . The benefits of weight reduction and the maintenance of weight loss. Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh Working Group on Obesity, 1995.

  6. Harvey EL, Glenny A, Kirk SFL, Summerbell CD . Improving health professionals’ management and the organisation of care for overweight and obese people (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Update Software: Oxford, 1999.

  7. Hiddink GJ, Hautvast JGAJ, van Woerkum CMJ, Fieren CJ, van't Hof MA . Nutrition guidance by primary-care physicians: Perceived barriers and low involvement Eur J Clin Nutr 1995 49: 842–851.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoppé R, Ogden J . Practice nurses’ beliefs about obesity and weight related interventions in primary care Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1997 21: 141–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cade J, O'Connell S . Management of weight problems and obesity: Knowledge, attitudes and current practice of general practitioners Br J Gen Pract 1991 41: 147–150.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Mattfeldt MK, Corrigan SA, Stevens VJ, Sugars CP, Dalcin AT, Givi J, Copeland KC . Participants’ evaluation of a weight-loss program J Am Diet Assoc 1999 99: 66–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Murphee D . Patient attitudes toward physician treatment of obesity J Family Pract 1994 38: 45–48.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Department of Health . Our healthier nation. Stationary Office: London, 1998.

  13. Why and how should adults lose weight? Drug Ther Bull 1998 36: 89–92.

  14. Pavlou KN, Krey S, Strefee WP . Exercise as an adjunct to weight loss and maintenance in moderately obese subjects Am J Clin Nutr 1989 49 (Suppl 5): 1115–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Levy BT, Williamson PS . Patient perceptions and weight loss of obese adults J Family Pract 1988 27: 285–290.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Noreen Kickham from Portsmouth and South East Hampshire Health Authority and the dietitians from Portsmouth for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to RL Thompson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, R., Thomas, D. A cross-sectional survey of the opinions on weight loss treatments of adult obese patients attending a dietetic clinic. Int J Obes 24, 164–170 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801102

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801102

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links