Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Effect of Instrument Precision on Estimation of Low Birth Weight Prevalence

Journal of Perinatology volume 25, pages 11–13 (2005)Cite this article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Reductions in prevalence of low birth weight (LBW) are likely to be achieved only through small increments, amplifying the importance of precision of measurement. This study compared two instruments for measuring birth weight to investigate the effect of instrument precision on estimates of LBW prevalence.

STUDY DESIGN:

Analysis was based on 497 infants born to mothers enrolled in an ongoing community-based trial of the effect of umbilical cord and skin antisepsis on neonatal mortality in Nepal. For each child, two birth weight measurements were recorded within 72 hours after delivery using weighing scales of differing precisions (100 vs 2 g).

RESULTS:

While continuous measures between the two instruments were similar, the prevalence of LBW among lower precision measurements (30%) was 11.3% lower than for higher precision measurements (34%). The difference in precision between the instruments accounted for 96% of the difference in LBW prevalence estimates.

CONCLUSIONS:

Differences in estimated LBW rates may be entirely due to differences in instrument precision. Conclusions concerning programmatic or research intervention impact, or comparisons of rates across populations should consider the effect of instrument precision on estimates of LBW.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. Low Birth Weight. A Tabulation of Available Information. WHO/MCH/92.2. Geneva: WHO; 1992.

  2. Macdonald PD, Ross SR, Grant L, Young D . Neonatal weight loss in breast and formula fed infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003;88:F472–F476.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Marchini G, Fried G, Ostlund E, Hagenas L . Plasma leptin in infants: relations to birth weight and weight loss. Pediatrics 1998;101:429–432.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wright CM, Parkinson KN . Postnatal weight loss in term infants: what is “normal” and do growth charts allow for it? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004;89:F254–F257.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pawar SD, Patil AV, Pratindhi AK . Retrospective prediction of birth weight by growth velocity curves during neonatal period. Indian J Pediatr 1996;63:385–392.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Enzunga A, Fischer PR . Neonatal weight loss in Zaire. Ann Trop Paediatr 1990;10:159–163.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Arifeen SE, Black RE, Caulfield LE, Antelman G, Baqui AH, Nahar Q, Alamgir S, Mahmud H . Infant growth patterns in the slums of Dhaka in relation to birth weight, intrauterine growth retardation, and prematurity. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;72 (4):1010–1017.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Luke C Mullany MHS, Gary L Darmstadt MD, Joanne Katz ScD & James M Tielsch PhD

  2. Nepal Nutrition Intervention Project, Sarlahi, Tripureswor, Katmandu, Nepal

    Subarna K Khatry MD

Authors
  1. Luke C Mullany MHS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gary L Darmstadt MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joanne Katz ScD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Subarna K Khatry MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. James M Tielsch PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mullany, L., Darmstadt, G., Katz, J. et al. Effect of Instrument Precision on Estimation of Low Birth Weight Prevalence. J Perinatol 25, 11–13 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211209

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211209

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links