Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Paper
  • Published:

The interaction of p53 with the nuclear matrix is mediated by F-actin and modulated by DNA damage

Abstract

The tumour suppressor protein p53 is localized in the cell nucleus where it serves to initiate cellular responses to a variety of stresses, particularly DNA damage and has the capacity to transactivate stress response genes. An emerging body of evidence indicates that its action is also exerted through direct protein–protein interactions. An approach to understanding p53 function has been to analyse its positioning in relation to nuclear structures and we have shown that p53 can associate with the nuclear matrix. A potential nuclear matrix component for this association is actin. Here we show that p53 interacts with nuclear F-actin and we map the domains involved in this interaction. Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer, we demonstrate that the partition of p53 between F-actin bound and unbound forms is not constant, but is modulated by the presence of DNA damage, which increases binding. Our results indicate that the dynamic interaction of p53 with the nuclear matrix has to be considered for a full understanding of the mechanisms of the p53-mediated cellular response to DNA damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albrechtsen N, Dornreiter I, Grosse F, Kim E, Wiesmuller L, Deppert W . 1999 Oncogene 18: 7706–7717

  • Andera L, Wasylyk B . 1997 Mol. Med. 3: 852–863

  • Bakalkin G, Selivanova G, Yakovleva T, Kiseleva E, Kashuba E, Magnusson KP, Szekely L, Klein G, Terenius L, Wiman KG . 1995 Cell 23: 362–369

  • Bastiaens PI, Majoul IV, Verveer PJ, Söling HD, Jovin TM . 1996 EMBO J. 15: 4246–4253

  • Cho Y, Gorina S, Jeffrey PD, Pavletich NP . 1994 Science 265: 346–355

  • Cook PR . 1991 Cell 66: 627–635

  • Deppert W, Haug M . 1986 Mol. Cell. Biol. 6: 2233–2240

  • Dutta A, Ruppert JM, Aster JC, Winchester E . 1993 Nature 365: 79–82

  • Fontoura BM, Sorokina EA, David E, Carroll RB . 1992 Mol. Cell. Biol. 12: 5145–5151

  • Giaccia AJ, Kastan MB . 1998 Genes Dev. 12: 2973–2983

  • Haugland RP . 1996 Handbook of fluorescent probes and research chemicals 6th Ed Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR

  • He D, Nickerson JA, Penman S . 1990 J. Cell Biol. 110: 569–580

  • Iborra FJ, Pombo A, Jackson DA, Cook PR . 1996 J. Cell Sci. 109: 1427–1436

  • Jares-Erijman EA, Jovin TM . 1996 J. Mol. Biol. 257: 597–617

  • Jiang M, Axe T, Holgate R, Rubbi C, Okorokov AL, Mee T, Milner J . 2001 Oncogene 20: 5449–5458

  • Jimenez GS, Khan SH, Stommel JM, Wahl GM . 1999 Oncogene 18: 7656–7665

  • Ko LJ, Shieh SY, Chen X, Jayaraman L, Tamai K, Taya Y, Prives C, Pan ZQ . 1997 Mol. Cell. Biol. 17: 7220–7229

  • Lee S, Elenbaas B, Levine A, Griffith J . 1995 Cell 81: 1013–1020

  • LĂ©veillard T, Andera L, Bissonette N, Schaeffer L, Bracco L, Egly JM, Wasylyk B . 1996 EMBO J. 15: 1615–1624

  • Ljungman M . 2000 Neoplasia 2: 208–225

  • Lu H, Fisher R, Bailey P, Levine AJ . 1997 Mol. Cell. Biol. 17: 5923–5934

  • Mancini MA, Shan B, Nickerson JA, Penman S, Lee WH . 1994 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 418–422

  • Marechal V, Elenbaas B, Piette J, Nicolas JC, Levine AJ . 1994 Mol. Cell. Biol. 14: 7414–7420

  • May P, May E . 1999 Oncogene 18: 7621–7636

  • McCready SJ, Cook PR . 1984 J. Cell Sci. 70: 189–196

  • Meek DW . 1999 Oncogene 18: 7666–7675

  • Metcalfe S, Weeds A, Okorokov A, Milner J, Cockman M, Pope B . 1999 Oncogene 18: 2351–2355

  • Mullenders LH, van Kesteren van Leeuwen AC, van Zeeland AA, Natarajan AT . 1988 Nucleic Acids Res. 16: 10607–10622

  • MĂĽller M, Strand S, Hug H, Heinemann EM, Walczak H, Hofmann WJ, Stremmel W, Krammer PH, Galle PR . 1997 J. Clin. Invest. 99: 403–413

  • Nakayasu H, Ueda K . 1985 Experimental Cell Res. 160: 319–330

  • Nguyen E, Besombes D, Debey P . 1998 Mol. Reprod. Dev. 50: 263–272

  • Oberosler P, Hloch P, Ramsperger U, Stahl H . 1993 EMBO J. 12: 2389–2396

  • Okorokov AL, Milner J . 1999 Mol. Cell. Biol. 19: 7501–7510

  • Pederson T . 1998 J. Molec. Biol. 277: 147–159

  • Rabinovitz I, Mercurio AM . 1997 J. Cell Biol. 139: 1873–1884

  • Rubbi CP, Milner J . 2000 Oncogene 19: 85–96

  • Szak ST, Pietenpol JA . 1999 J. Biol. Chem. 274: 3904–3909

  • Vogelstein B, Lane D, Levine AJ . 2000 Nature 408: 307–310

  • Walker KK, Levine AJ . 1996 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 15335–15340

  • Wang XW, Yeh H, Schaeffer L, Roy R, Moncollin V, Egly JM, Wang Z, Friedberg EC, Evans MK, Taffe BG, Bohr VA, Weeda G, Hoeijmakers JHJ, Forrester K, Harris CC . 1995 Nat. Genet. 10: 188–195

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Yorkshire Cancer Research program grant to J Milner.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jo Milner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Okorokov, A., Rubbi, C., Metcalfe, S. et al. The interaction of p53 with the nuclear matrix is mediated by F-actin and modulated by DNA damage. Oncogene 21, 356–367 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1205112

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1205112

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links