Abstract
The longterm use of clean intermittent self catheterisation as an option for bladder management in the care of spinal cord injury patients has shown the possible risk of urethral trauma and chronic infections being developed over time. The basic properties of the catheters being used need to be evaluated. In this crossover study of 14 male spinal cord injury patients, two commercial hydrophilic catheters were compared, as to the maximum friction force during the removal of the catheters after bladder emptying. The friction force, measured by a dynamometer twice daily, showed significant lower values for LoFric (0.87/0.84 N) than for EsiCath/Conveen (1.38/1.27 N). Sticking to the urethral epithelium was reported three times (two patients) with the LoFric catheter, and 42 times (nine patients) with the EasiCath catheter. Osmolality of the outer layer of the catheters was measured using a freezing-point reduction technique. The greater than 10 times higher osmolality (∼900 mOsm/kg) of the Lofric catheter may explain the results.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Waller, L., Telander, M. & Sullivan, L. The importance of osmolality in hydrophilic urethral catheters: a crossover study. Spinal Cord 35, 229–233 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3100390
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3100390
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Catheters for intermittent catheterization: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Spinal Cord (2021)
-
Prevalence and Cost of Catheters to Manage Neurogenic Bladder
Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports (2018)
-
Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic urinary catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analyses
BMC Urology (2017)
-
Outcome comparison of different approaches to self-intermittent catheterization in neurogenic patients: a systematic review
Spinal Cord (2017)
-
Management of bladder dysfunction in multiple sclerosis patients: the nurse’s point of view
Neurological Sciences (2008)