Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Category specificity in reading and writing: the case of number words

Abstract

In standard models, word meanings contribute to reading words aloud and writing them to dictation1,2,3. It is known that categories of knowledge and the associated word meanings can be spared or impaired selectively4, but it has not been possible to demonstrate that category-specific effects apply to reading and writing. Here we report the case of a neurodegenerative patient with selectively spared numerical abilities whose brain damage left him able to read and write only number words.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ellis, A. W. & Young, A. W. Human Cognitive Neuropsychology (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hove, Sussex, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hillis, A. & Caramazza, A. Brain Lang. 40, 106–144 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Plaut, D., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. & Patterson, K. Psychol. Rev. 103, 56–115 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Warrington, E. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 27, 187–199 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zorzi, M., Houghton, G. & Butterworth, B. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24, 1–31 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McCloskey, M. Cognition 44, 107–157 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Moss, H. E., Cappelletti, M., De Mornay Davies, P., Jaldow, E. & Kopelman, M. Brain Lang. 32, 350–354 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hodges, J. R., Patterson, K., Oxbury, S. & Funnell, E. Brain Lang. 115, 1783–1806 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Snowden, J. S., Goulding, P. J. & Neary, D. Behav. Neurol. 2, 167–182 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Patterson, K. & Hodges, J. Neuropsychologia 10, 1025–1040 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cipolotti, L. & Butterworth, B. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 124, 375–390 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cipolotti, L. & van Harskamp, N. in Handbook of Neuropsychology 2nd. edn. Vol. 3 (ed. Berndt, R. S.) 305–331 (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dehaene, S., Dehaene Lambertz, G. & Cohen, L. Trends Neurosci. 21, 355–361 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Farah, M. J. & McClelland, J. L. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 120, 339–357 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Caramazza, A. & Shelton, J. R. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 11, 1–34 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Wellcome Trust and the Special Trustees of St. Thomas's Hospital, Kings' College London.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Butterworth.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Butterworth, B., Cappelletti, M. & Kopelman, M. Category specificity in reading and writing: the case of number words. Nat Neurosci 4, 784–786 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/90484

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/90484

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing