Abstract
The significance of inflammation in carcinoma of the breast is controversial. Little attention has been paid to different patterns of inflammation or inflammation associated with different histological types of carcinoma. We have looked at the pattern of inflammation in 123 invasive mammary carcinomas (including 46 lobular), and characterised the inflammatory cells with immunohistochemistry in 21. We found different patterns of inflammation in ductal and lobular carcinoma. Diffuse inflammation was seen more in ductal carcinoma, particularly of high grade, and was predominantly composed of macrophages and T cells. It was associated with necrosis, but the correlation was weak, suggesting that other factors are important. Perilobular inflammation was seen most frequently in lobular and high-grade ductal carcinomas, particularly at the tumour edge. Perivascular inflammation was also largely at the tumour edge, but was not more common in any tumour type. In contrast to the diffuse inflammation, the perivascular and perilobular inflammation was composed of T and B cells. Normal lobules at the tumour edge showed consistent expression of HLA-DR, whereas lobules away from the tumour were negative. A combination of perilobular and perivascular inflammation composed of B and T cells with epithelial expression of HLA-DR mimicking lymphocytic lobulitis was seen more frequently in lobular than ductal carcinoma.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 24 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $10.79 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, A., Happerfield, L., Millis, R. et al. Inflammatory infiltrate in invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma of the breast. Br J Cancer 74, 796–801 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1996.438
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1996.438