DNA hydrolysis is a biochemical process often associated with different forms of cell death, including apoptosis. In a recent paper published in Cell Discovery, Du et al. report that synaptic acetylcholinesterase (AChE-S) shows an unexpected enzymatic activity as DNase switched on after cytotoxic insults.
The controlled degradation of the genomic content in a cell committed to die has been the subject of intense research for decades. Several nucleases involved in DNA degradation during mammalian cell death have been identified. The nuclear DNA can be degraded either inside or outside the dying cell. The nucleases implicated in the DNA degradation inside the cell are broadly grouped as “cell-autonomous” nucleases. In later steps, DNA hydrolysis can also take place outside the cell. The endonucleases responsible for that are called “waste-management” DNases. Among the proposed roles for DNA degradation during cell death are the elimination of harmful DNAs, the amplification of death signals, the connection to DNA damage and repair pathways, the promotion of phagocytosis, and the avoidance of autoimmune diseases (reviewed in1).
Each form of cell death is associated with different patterns of DNA degradation, implying the activation of diverse nucleases2. During apoptosis, DNA degradation is a consequence of the digestion of chromatin by endogenous endonucleases that target linker DNA between the nucleosomes, yielding a characteristic pattern of low molecular weight DNA fragments known as DNA laddering. The main apoptotic nuclease is DNA fragmentation factor, 40-kDa subunit/caspase-activated DNase (DFF40/CAD), which is activated by caspases3. Other nucleases, such as endonuclease G (endoG), are also involved in apoptosis. EndoG does not discriminate between internucleosomal and nucleosomal DNA, giving a pattern of DNA degradation different from the DFF40/CAD-mediated DNA laddering4. In other types of non-apoptotic cell death (e.g., necrosis), proteases and DNases are released from lysosomes, leading to a smear of DNA as a result of the degradation of both DNA and DNA-bound proteins5.
In a recent paper published in Cell Discovery, Zhang's lab unveiled an unexpected DNase activity for synaptic acetylcholinesterase (AChE-S)6. The AChE gene can generate three mature mRNA transcripts by alternative splicing: “synaptic” AChE-S (also known as AChE-T), “erythrocytic” AChE-E (also known as AChE-H) and “readthrough” AChE-R. AChE-S is a critical enzyme regulating neurotransmission at cholinergic synapses. Besides that, the AChE gene has also emerged as a tumor suppressor gene7. Du et al.6 show that recombinant AChE-S holds intrinsic endonuclease activity, between amino acids 32-138, both in in vitro assays using plasmid DNA and in pre-fixed and detergent-permeabilized cells. However, whether AChE-S is a true apoptotic DNase in cellula needs to be further confirmed. In this sense, and unfortunately, the authors only performed TUNEL assay in AChE-S-overexpressing cells and, as recently described, TUNEL-positive cells do not necessarily undergo DNA laddering8. Therefore, further efforts are required to address this key issue. In any case, the identification of this new enzymatic activity of AChE-S opens a new avenue in the field of DNA degradation during physiological (e.g., for neural plasticity) and pathological cell death in, for example, cancer and neurological disorders (reviewed in7).
Regarding the antitumoral effects of AChE isoforms, their expression levels determine cell sensitivity towards cytotoxic agents. In this sense, different AChE variants are expressed in a broad battery of non-cholinergic cells as part of the cytotoxic response to various cellular insults7. Interestingly, in hepatocellular carcinomas, one of the most prevalent human malignancies worldwide, AChE inversely associates with tumor aggressiveness and patient prognosis9. In addition, Du and colleagues show that cells overexpressing nuclear-directed AChE-S impair tumorigenesis in BALB/c nude mice. More importantly, the tumor suppressor proprieties of AChE-S rely on its DNase activity, rather than its acetylcholinesterase activity, since cells overexpressing a truncated form of AChE-S lacking the nuclease region still maintain tumorigenic proprieties when injected in nude mice.
Although preliminary, another interesting result from Du et al. relies on the nuclear translocation of AChE-S in isolated primary hippocampal neurons cultured in the presence of β-amyloid peptide (25-35). The nuclear redistribution of AChE-S correlates with TUNEL staining, which led us to speculate about the potential role of the DNase activity of AChE-S in neurodegenerative disorders, particularly in Alzheimer's disease. Therefore, it should be of special interest to explore more deeply the cytotoxic mechanisms of AChE-S-related DNase activity to identify potential tools of therapeutic interest, different from the current approaches used clinically by inhibiting the acetylcholinesterase-related activity of AChE-S, which targets late aspects of the disease having a minimal impact on the disorder10.
In apoptotic cell death, AChE is necessary for apoptosome assembly and the activation of the initiator caspase-9 (reviewed in7; Figure 1). Interestingly, some non-cholinergic cells constitutively express different AChE variants but others do not. Therefore, a transcriptional response should exist to induce the expression of AChE isoforms after apoptotic stimuli. In this sense, AChE promoter contains AP1-like, ATF2 and Smad3/4 binding elements that allow transcriptional expression through c-jun, ATF2 and Smad311,12. The inhibition of c-jun, or its upstream activating kinase, JNK, abolishes cytotoxic-triggered transcriptional upregulation of AChE11. Therefore, a fine control of cytotoxic-mediated upregulation of AChE could be also of special interest to manipulate undesirable cellular responses in, for example, Alzheimer's disease.
Finally, another interesting point not addressed by Du and colleagues concerns the potential conception of AChE-S as a “waste-management” DNase involved in non-cell autonomous DNA degradation. To date, only DNase I (as secreted nuclease) and DNase II (as lysosomal non-secreted nuclease) are considered “waste-management” DNases (reviewed in1). It is necessary to stress that AChEs are secreted proteins. Data provided by Zhang's lab show that nuclease activity of AChE-S is optimal at physiological pH (around 7.5) and generates 3′ OH-free TUNEL-positive DNA ends. Interestingly, DNase I also shares these biochemical features (reviewed in1). Du and colleagues also demonstrate that, unlike DNase I, AChE-S is not inhibited by G-actin, a general and abundant cytoskeleton component often found in extracellular media after plasma membrane breakdown following, for example, necrotic cell death during inflammatory processes. Therefore, it is intriguing to speculate that the DNase activity of AChE-S might occur not only inside but also outside the cell, mimicking DNase I task in a G-actin-enriched extracellular environment.
References
Samejima K, Earnshaw WC . Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005; 6:677–688.
Higuchi Y . Biochem Pharmacol 2003; 66:1527–1535.
Widlak P, Garrard WT . J Cell Biochem 2005; 94:1078–1087.
Aleksandrushkina NI, Vanyushin BF . Biochemistry 2012; 77:1436–1451.
Festjens N, Vanden Berghe T, Vandenabeele P . Biochim Biophys Acta 2006; 1757:1371–1387.
Du A, Xie J, Guo K, et al. Cell Disc 2015 Apr 28. doi:10.1038/celldisc.2015.2
Zhang XJ, Greenberg DS . Front Mol Neurosci 2012; 5:40.
Iglesias-Guimarais V, Gil-Guinon E, Sanchez-Osuna M, et al. J Biol Chem 2013; 288:9200–9215.
Zhao Y, Wang X, Wang T, et al. Hepatology 2011; 53:493–503.
Kumar A, Singh A Ekavali . Pharmacol Rep 2015; 67:195–203.
Zhang JY, Jiang H, Gao W, et al. Cell Mol Life Sci 2008; 65:1435–1445.
Gao W, Zhu H, Zhang JY, Zhang XJ . Cell Mol Life Sci 2009; 66:2181–2193.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sánchez-Osuna, M., Yuste, V. AChE for DNA degradation. Cell Res 25, 653–654 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2015.52
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2015.52
This article is cited by
-
Autonomic nervous system and cancer
Clinical Autonomic Research (2018)