Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Clinical nutrition, enteral and parenteral nutrition

Energy intake and sources of nutritional support in patients with head and neck cancer—a randomised longitudinal study

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 67, pages 47–52 (2013)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Background/objectives:

Malnutrition decreases the cancer patient’s ability to manage treatment, affects quality of life and survival, and is common among head and neck (HN) cancer patients due to the tumour location and the treatment received. In this study, advanced HN cancer patients were included and followed during 2 years in order to measure their energy intake, choice of energy sources and to assess problems with dysphagia. The main purpose was to explore when and for how long the patients had dysphagia and lost weight due to insufficient intake and if having a PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) in place for enteral nutrition made a difference.

Subjects/methods:

One hundred thirty-four patients were included and randomised to either a prophylactic PEG for early enteral feeding or nutritional care according to clinical praxis. At seven time points weight, dysphagia and energy intake (assessed as oral, nutritional supplements, enteral and parenteral) were measured.

Results:

Both groups lost weight the first six months due to insufficient energy intake and used enteral nutrition as their main intake source; no significant differences between groups were found. Problems with dysphagia were vast during the 6 months. At the 6-, 12- and 24-month follow-ups both groups reached estimated energy requirements and weight loss ceased. Oral intake was the major energy source after 1 year.

Conclusions:

HN cancer patients need nutritional support and enteral feeding for a long time period during and after treatment due to insufficient energy intake. A prophylactic PEG did not significantly improve the enteral intake probably due to treatment side effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Paccagnella A, Morello M, Da Mosto MC, Baruffi C, Marcon ML, Gava A et al. Early nutritional intervention improves treatment tolerance and outcomes in head and neck cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Support Care Cancer 2010; 31: 867–876.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Larsson M, Hedelin B, Johansson I, Athlin E . Eating problems and weight loss for patients with head and neck cancer: a chart review from diagnosis until one year after treatment. Cancer Nurs 2005; 28: 425–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ravasco P, Monteiro-Grillo I, Vidal PM, Camilo ME . Nutritional deterioration in cancer: the role of disease and diet. Clin Oncol 2003; 15: 443–450.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kubrak C, Olson K, Jha N, Jensen L, McCargar L, Seikaly H et al. Nutrition impact symptoms: key determinants of reduced dietary intake, weight loss, and reduced functional capacity of patients with head and neck cancer before treatment. Head Neck 2009; 32: 290–300.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Petruson KM, Silander EM, Hammerlid EB . Quality of life as predictor of weight loss in patients with head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2005; 27: 302–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Capuano G, Grosso A, Gentile PC, Battista M, Bianciardi F, Di Palma A et al. Influence of weight loss on outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Head Neck 2008; 30: 503–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. van Bokhorst-de van der S, van Leeuwen PA, Kuik DJ, Klop WM, Sauerwein HP, Snow GB et al. The impact of nutritional status on the prognoses of patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Cancer 1999; 86: 519–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. van den Berg MG, Rasmussen-Conrad EL, van Nispen L, van Binsbergen JJ, Merkx MA . A prospective study on malnutrition and quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol 2008; 44: 830–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Garg S, Yoo J, Winquist E . Nutritional support for head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2010; 7: 223–225.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nugent B, Lewis S, O’Sullivan JM . Enteral feeding methods for nutritional management in patients with head and neck cancers being treated with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010 CD007904.

  11. Corry J, Poon W, McPhee N, Milner AD, Cruickshank D, Porceddu SV et al. Prospective study of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes versus nasogastric tubes for enteral feeding in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing (chemo)radiation. Head Neck 2009; 31: 867–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Silander E, Nyman J, Bove M, Johansson L, Larsson S, Hammerlid E . Impact of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy on malnutrition and quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer—a randomized study. Head Neck 2010; 3.

  13. Silander E, Nyman J, Bove M, Johansson L, Larsson S, Hammerlid E . The use of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and early enteral feeding in patients with advanced head and neck cancer-A prospective longitudinal study e-SPEN, the European e-Journal of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism 2010 e166–e172.

  14. Bingham SA, Cassidy A, Cole TJ, Welch A, Runswick SA, Black AE et al. Validation of weighed records and other methods of dietary assessment using the 24 h urine nitrogen technique and other biological markers. Br J Nutr 1995; 73: 531–550.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. The National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen) is a government agency in Sweden under the Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, 2011.

  16. Elia M, Stratton R . On the ESPEN guidelines for nutritional screening 2002. Clin Nutr 2004; 23: 131–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bjordal K, Hammerlid E, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, de Graeff A, Boysen M, Evensen JF et al. Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-H&N35. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 1008–1019.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fayers P, Bjordal K, Groenvold M, Curran D, Bottomoley A Eortc QLQ—C30 scoring manual. EORTC: Belgium, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, Zee B, Pater J . Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 139–144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nguyen NP, North D, Smith HJ, Dutta S, Alfieri A, Karlsson U et al. Safety and effectiveness of prophylactic gastrostomy tubes for head and neck cancer patients undergoing chemoradiation. Surg Oncol 2006; 15: 199–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. van den Berg MG, Rasmussen-Conrad EL, Gwasara GM, Krabbe PF, Naber AH, Merkx MA . A prospective study on weight loss and energy intake in patients with head and neck cancer, during diagnosis, treatment and revalidation. Clin Nutr [malnutrition] 2006; 25: 765–772.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jager-Wittenaar H, Dijkstra PU, Vissink A, Langendijk JA, van der Laan BF, Pruim J et al. Changes in nutritional status and dietary intake during and after head and neck cancer treatment. Head Neck 2010; 33: 863–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Decarli A, Franceschi S, Ferraroni M, Gnagnarella P, Parpinel MT, La Vecchia C et al. Validation of a food-frequency questionnaire to assess dietary intakes in cancer studies in Italy. Results for specific nutrients. Ann Epidemiol 1996; 6: 110–118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Luhrmann PM, Herbert BM, Gaster C, Neuhåuser-Berthold M . Validation of a self-administered 3-day estimated dietary record for use in the elderly. Eur J Nutr 1999; 38: 235–240.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nugent B, Lewis S, O’Sullivan JM . Enteral feeding methods for nutritional management in patients with head and neck cancers being treated with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 3: CD007904.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wiggenraad RG, Flierman L, Goossens A, Brand R, Verschuur HP, Croll GA et al. Prophylactic gastrostomy placement and early tube feeding may limit loss of weight during chemoradiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer, a preliminary study. Clin Otolaryngol 2007; 32: 384–390.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mekhail TM, Adelstein DJ, Rybicki LA, Larto MA, Saxton JP, Lavertu P . Enteral nutrition during the treatment of head and neck carcinoma: is a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube preferable to a nasogastric tube? Cancer 2001; 91: 1785–1790.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ahlberg A, al-Abany M, Alevronta E, Friesland S, Hellborg H, Mavroidis P et al. Esophageal stricture after radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer: experience of a single institution over 2 treatment periods. Head Neck 2010; 32: 452–461.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Langmore S, Krisciunas GP, Miloro KV, Evans SR, Cheng DM, Does PEG . use cause dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients? Dysphagia 2012; 27: 251–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Garcia-Peris P, Paron L, Velasco C, de la Cuerda C, Camblor M, Breton I et al. Long-term prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients: Impact on quality of life. Clin Nutr 2007; 26: 710–717.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by: Göteborg Medical Society; Assar Gabrielssons Foundaiton fund; Laryngfonden Foundation; The Research and Development Council Västra Götaland County (Sweden) and Adlerbertska Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg University, Sweden

    E Silander, I Jacobsson & E Hammerlid

  2. Department of Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden

    H Bertéus-Forslund

Authors
  1. E Silander
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I Jacobsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H Bertéus-Forslund
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E Hammerlid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E Silander.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silander, E., Jacobsson, I., Bertéus-Forslund, H. et al. Energy intake and sources of nutritional support in patients with head and neck cancer—a randomised longitudinal study. Eur J Clin Nutr 67, 47–52 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2012.172

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2012.172

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links