Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Statistics in clinical nutrition

Back-transformation of treatment differences—an approximate method

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

Transformation of outcomes is frequently used in the analysis of studies in clinical nutrition. However, back-transformation of estimated treatment means and differences is complicated by the nonlinear nature of the transformations. It is not straightforward to obtain an estimated treatment difference that can be interpreted without any reference to the additional predictors included in the statistical model; and moreover, standard errors are not easily available. The aim of this work was to provide a generally applicable, yet operational procedure for obtaining back-transformed estimated differences, and corresponding standard errors and 95% confidence intervals.

Subjects/Methods:

Based on data from two randomized controlled studies and an exemplary data set that had all previously been published, we evaluated our approximate procedure by comparing results for different approaches for showing back-transformed estimated treatment differences.

Results:

Estimated differences obtained on logarithm, square root and reciprocal square root-transformed scales were back-transformed into estimated differences on the original scales, and these estimates were in good agreement with the results reported by the original studies.

Conclusions:

The proposed approximate procedure provides a flexible approach for obtaining quite accurate back-transformed estimated differences in terms of medians and for deriving the corresponding standard errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Belenchia AM, Tosh AK, Hillman LS, Peterson CA . Correcting vitamin D insufficiency improves insulin sensitivity in obese adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2013; 97: 774–781.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Damsgaard CT, Frokiaer H, Andersen AD, Lauritzen L . Fish oil in combination with high or low intakes of linoleic acid lowers plasma triacylglycerols but does not affect other cardiovascular risk markers in healthy men. J Nutr 2008; 138: 1061–1066.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Damsgaard CT, Lauritzen L, Kjaer TM, Holm PM, Fruekilde MB, Michaelsen KF et al. Fish oil supplementation modulates immune function in healthy infants. J Nutr 2007; 137: 1031–1036.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Thankachan P, Selvam S, Surendran D, Chellan S, Pauline M, Abrams SA et al. Efficacy of a multi micronutrient-fortified drink in improving iron and micronutrient status among schoolchildren with low iron stores in India: a randomised, double-masked placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Clin Nutr 2013; 67: 36–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Burns-Whitmore BL, Haddad EH, Sabate J, Jaceldo-Siegl K, Tanzman J, Rajaram S . Effect of n-3 fatty acid enriched eggs and organic eggs on serum lutein in free-living lacto-ovo vegetarians. Eur J Clin Nutr 2010; 64: 1332–1337.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahuja KD, Ashton EL, Ball MJ . Effects of a high monounsaturated fat, tomato-rich diet on serum levels of lycopene. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003; 57: 832–841.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Altman DG . Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman & Hall/CRC: London, UK, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Manning WG . The logged dependent variable, heteroscedasticity, and the retransformation problem. J Health Econ 1998; 17: 283–295.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Duan N . Smearing Estimate: a Nonparametric Retransformation Method. J Am Stat Assoc 1983; 78: 605–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Keene ON . The log transformation is special. Stat Med 2007; 14: 811–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Feng C, Wang H, Lu N, Tu XM . Log transformation: application and interpretation in biomedical research. Stat Med 2013; 32: 230–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bland JM, Altman DG, Rohlf FJ . In defence of logarithmic transformations. Stat Med 2013; 32: 3766–3769.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stratton RJ, Stubbs RJ, Elia M . Bolus tube feeding suppresses food intake and circulating ghrelin concentrations in healthy subjects in a short-term placebo-controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 88: 77–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Thurnham DI, McCabe LD, Haldar S, Wieringa FT, Northrop-Clewes CA, McCabe GP . Adjusting plasma ferritin concentrations to remove the effects of subclinical inflammation in the assessment of iron deficiency: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 2010; 92: 546–555.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zimmermann MB, Hess SY, Molinari L, De BB, Delange F, Braverman LE et al. New reference values for thyroid volume by ultrasound in iodine-sufficient schoolchildren: a World Health Organization/Nutrition for Health and Development Iodine Deficiency Study Group Report. Am J Clin Nutr 2004; 79: 231–237.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bland JM, Altman DG . The use of transformation when comparing means. BMJ 1996; 312: 1153.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. van der Vaart AW . Asymptotic Statistics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P . Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models. Biom J 2008; 50: 346–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Swayne BG, Behan NA, Williams A, Stover PJ, Yauk CL, MacFarlane AJ . Supplemental dietary folic acid has no effect on chromosome damage in erythrocyte progenitor cells of mice. J Nutr 2012; 142: 813–817.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hebert JR, Hurley TG, Peterson KE, Resnicow K, Thompson FE, Yaroch AL et al. Social desirability trait influences on self-reported dietary measures among diverse participants in a multicenter multiple risk factor trial. J Nutr 2008; 138: 226S–234S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Core Team. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2013, URL http://www.R-project.org/.

  22. Weisberg S . Applied Linear Regression 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C Ritz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on European Journal of Clinical Nutrition website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laursen, R., Dalskov, SM., Damsgaard, C. et al. Back-transformation of treatment differences—an approximate method. Eur J Clin Nutr 68, 277–280 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2013.259

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2013.259

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links