Introduction

Dry eye is a common eye condition due to diminished tear production or increased tear evaporation, which results in ocular surface dysfunction,1, 2 and a typical spectrum of symptoms including burning or stinging, tearing, foreign-body sensation, photophobia, and blurred vision.3, 4, 5 The prevalence of symptomatic dry eye has been estimated to be between 15–33% in adult populations and is thought to be more common in elderly and females, and possibly Asians.6 In the United States, the cost of managing and treating dry eye patients in healthcare organizations is $700 000 per million patients.6

Dry eye is known to affect the quality of vision because of the irregularity of the tear film and the optical refracting surfaces associated with this condition.7, 8 Some studies suggest that severe symptomatic dry eye could result in a decreased ability to perform daily activities, thus having an impact on the quality of life.9, 10, 11 However, these studies have been largely confined to clinical trials involving relatively small sample sizes and selected patient groups,7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and the impact of dry eye on specific daily tasks and visual function in the general population remains unclear. In this study, we report the impact of symptomatic dry eye on vision-related daily activities in a large population-based study of Southwestern Asian Malay adults in Singapore.

Materials and methods

Study population

The Singapore Malay Eye Study was a population-based survey of Malay adults living in Singapore. The methodology has been published elsewhere.14 The sampling frame consisted of all Malays aged 40–79, living in designated study areas in southwestern Singapore. From a list of 16 069 names provided by the Ministry of Home Affairs, age-stratified random sampling was used to select 5600 names (1400 people from each decade of 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, 70–79 years). Out of the initial 5600 names, 4168 participants (74.4%) were determined to be eligible to participate based on pre-specified criteria.12 Out of this, 3280 individuals participated in the study, giving an overall response rate of 78.7% eligible participants. The participants (n=3280) and non-participants (n=888) did not differ in their gender composition (P=0.821), but there were significantly greater proportions of older-aged people among the non-participants (P<0.001), as reported previously.14

An interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect socioeconomic and medical information. Data collected include country of birth, marital status, education, occupation, current housing status, as well as lifestyle factors (past and present smoking), eye symptoms, systemic medical, surgical history, etc.

Assessment of dry eye

Each participant answered a questionnaire on the symptoms of dry eyes. These questions were described previously.14, 15, 16 They involved questions on feeling of dryness, grittiness, burning sensation, redness, crusting of lashes, and tendency to shut the eyes. The answers were classified into five categories: ‘never’, ‘rarely’ (at least once in 3 months), ‘sometimes’ (at least once in 2–4 weeks), ‘often’ (at least once a week), and ‘all the time’ (at least once daily). Symptomatic dry eye or symptoms of tear dysfunction were defined as the presence of at least one symptom that was ranked as ‘often’ or ‘all the time present’. The prevalence rates of symptomatic dry eye in this study sample have been reported recently;17 the percentages of people who suffered from dryness, grittiness, burning sensation, redness, crusting, and tendency to shut eyes, often or all the time as 5.4, 1.3, 1.8, 2.7, 1.9 and 0.6% respectively.

Assessment of visual function

All the participants underwent an interview using a supplementary questionnaire consisting of 11 questions on vision-related daily living activities that are relevant to the local population of both genders and including near, intermediate and distance visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity. These questions were validated and published elsewhere previously.18, 19 We assessed difficulties in activities such as navigating stairs, reading road signs, recognizing friends, watching television, reading newspapers, reading small print, driving at night, driving during daytime, cooking, playing chess/cards, and filling out 4-D or Toto (Lottery) forms. The response options were ‘no difficulty’, ‘a little difficulty’, and ‘more than a little difficulty’ (Supplementary file 1).

Both questionnaires were translated into Malay, and back translated into English by two different interpreters conversant in both the languages. During the questioning, the participant was given a choice to be interviewed in either language. All the interviewers were fluent in both the languages. With the consent of the subject, interviews were randomly recorded for the purposes of quality control.

Assessment of other factors

All participants were administered a detailed questionnaire and they underwent a physical examination. Data collected included socioeconomic factors (eg, education, occupation), systemic medical history (eg, thyroid eye disease, use of medications), ocular history (eg, previous ocular surgery, previous chemical injury to eye), and lifestyle factors (eg, cigarette smoking).

Presenting and best-corrected visual acuity for each eye were ascertained by Log MAR measurements as previously described.14 In cases wherein the two eyes had different presenting visual acuities, the visual function score for the better eye was chosen.

The protocol and ethics used in this study were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Singapore Eye Research Institute. All study procedures complied with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki on human studies.

Data analysis and definitions

We performed the analysis by comparing the difficulty in performing vision-related daily activities in persons with and without symptomatic dry eyes, both before (crude associations) and after adjusting for various factors. In model 1 we adjusted for age and gender, and in model 2, additionally adjusted for visual acuity in the better eye. We repeated the same analyses in subjects who did not have any visual impairment, which was defined by following the WHO definition20 All the analyses were performed using SPSS 15.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was set at the level of α=0.05.

Results

Out of 3280 participants who had dry eye data, 48% were men. Different numbers of respondents responded to each question on the vision-related activities. The minimum number of respondents to any question was 731 (22%) and the maximum 3259 (99%) (Table 1). Presumably, not all subjects participated in any one of the 11 vision-related activities being asked, so they did not respond to all the questions on activities. Out of 2537 participants with no visual impairment, 251 (9.9%) reported to have symptomatic dry eye.

Table 1 Association of symptomatic dry eye with difficulty in performing vision related daily activities

There was no gender difference among participants who experienced difficulty in reading road signs (9% in men vs 13% in women) (Figure 1a). Overall, more men drove at night compared with women (867/1576 vs 100/1704); however, a greater proportion of females (31% of those who drove at night) experienced difficulties driving at night compared with men (17% of those who drove at night) (Figure 1b). This difference was statistically significant (P=0.0006 using the chi-square test).

Figure 1
figure 1

Data showing difficulty in recognizing road signs (a) and driving at night (b). The percentages for difficulty in performing the activities in each subgroup are calculated from the total number of participants in the subgroup who responded to each activity. In (a), the percentages represent the proportion of the participants who had little or great difficulty recognizing road signs, among those who responded to the question on road signs. In (b), the percentages represent the proportion of the participants who had any difficulty in recognizing driving at night, among those who drove at night.

Symptomatic dry eye was found to be significantly associated with difficulty in performing 7 out of 11 vision-related daily activities evaluated in crude analysis (Table 1). After adjusting for age and gender (model 1), or additionally adjusting for visual acuity of the better eye (model 2), symptomatic dry eye was significantly associated with difficulty in performing 7 out of the 11 activities (Table 2, model 2). The higher the number (the odds ratio), the greater the strength of the association. The association was statistically significant (indicated by *) when the lower limit of the confidence interval exceeded 1.0. These seven activities were navigating stairs (odds ratio (OR)=1.96, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28–3.00), recognizing friends (OR=1.99, 95% CI: 1.45–2.73), reading road signs (OR=1.87, 95% CI: 1.36–2.57), reading newspaper (OR=1.50, 95% CI: 1.11–2.04), watching television (OR=1.90, 95% CI: 1.26–2.87), cooking (OR=1.94, 95% CI: 1.02–3.71), and driving at night (OR=2.06, 95% CI: 1.32–3.21).

Table 2 Association of symptomatic dry eye with experiencing difficulties in daily tasks after adjusting for age, gender, and visual acuity

When all the above analyses were repeated among participants with no visual impairment (N=2537) according to the WHO criteria, these observed associations were essentially unchanged (data not shown).

Discussion

We found that, in this population-based sample of Southeast Asian Malay persons aged 40 years in Singapore, symptomatic dry eye was significantly associated with difficulty in performing vision- related daily activities. These are ethnic Malay people who are currently living in Singapore, an island nation located at the tip of the Malay Peninsula within Southeast Asia. Importantly, this impact was independent of visual acuity level. The specific activities that persons with symptomatic dry eye were having difficulty with included navigating stairs, reading road signs, reading newspaper , recognizing friends, watching television, cooking, and driving at night.21

Our findings are in keeping with observations from previous studies, largely in clinic samples or trials (Table 3).3 For activities in which relatively few persons participated in our sample (for example, only 731 of 3265 participants reported playing chess/cards), the sample size may not be sufficient to enable us to detect statistically significant differences. Differences in some of the daily activities performed by the participants, ethnicity of the participants, and study methodology could explain some discrepancy in findings across studies.3 Pooled data from the women's health study and the physicians’ health study in the United States, with 690 participants (preponderance of female participants), showed that symptomatic dry eye was significantly associated with difficulty in reading, carrying out professional work, using a computer, watching television, and driving during the day and at night, after controlling for age, diabetes, hypertension, and other factors. However, in that study, only three questions, instead of six, were used to assess dry eye symptoms.3

Table 3 Comparison of experiencing difficulty in vision-related daily tasks in Singaporean and American population studies

Difficulty in performing the above activities may be related to prolonged gazing and reduced blinking due to greater visual demands in performing these activities and exposure to air-conditioning and low-humidity environments, which can result in instability and increased evaporation of the tear film leading to irregularity of the optical refracting surfaces. Previous studies have reported a significant reduction in the blinking rate associated with visual display terminal work,22 reading,8 and increased driving speed,8, 23 which can further result in instability of the tear film. Surface irregularity index, a measure of tear film irregularity due to tear instability, increased after sustained eye opening.23

The strengths of the present study include its large population-based sample, the first study of this kind conducted in Malay adults, and the use of previously validated questionnaires.18, 19 Conversely, we had no objective assessment of dry eyes using clinical and laboratory tests16 that were performed, because of the logistic difficulties associated with a large population-based study. In particular, self-reported dry symptoms may not only lack of specificity, but are also subject to variability in responses because of different subjective tolerance thresholds. In addition, some symptoms evaluated could be because of ocular surface conditions rather than dry eye, such as Meibomian gland diseases or allergic conjunctivitis. However, if dry eye tests were used, no consensus has been reached regarding the optimal appropriate diagnostic criterion are or combination of criteria.24, 25 We did not assess certain factors such as wearing of contact lens,26, 27, 28 LASIK surgery,29 keratoplasty12 eyelid and conjunctival disease,30 allergic conjunctivitis,31 seventh nerve palsy,32 gout,33 total body irradiation,34 Sjogren's syndrome,35 and participants’ compliance with dry eye treatment,36 which might be associated with symptomatic dry eye and diminished visual function.

In conclusion, we found that symptomatic dry eye was significantly associated with a reduced ability in performing several important vision-related daily tasks, independent of the actual visual acuity level. Symptomatic dry eye, therefore, has a significant impact on quality of life even in people with good vision.