Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review
  • Published:

Nasal respiratory support through the nares: its time has come

Journal of Perinatology volume 30, pages S67–S72 (2010)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is the most common respiratory morbidity in preterm infants. Surfactant therapy and invasive mechanical ventilation through the endotracheal tube (ETT) have been the cornerstones in RDS management. Despite improvements in the provision of mechanical ventilation, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), a multifactorial disease in which invasive mechanical ventilation is a known contributory factor, remains an important cause of morbidity among preterm infants. Barotrauma, volutrauma or oxygen-induced lung inflammation (oxy-trauma) contributes significantly to the development of BPD in neonates ventilated through an ETT. Recently, nasal respiratory support has been increasingly used in preterm infants in an attempt to decrease post-extubation failure and, perhaps, BPD, and for the treatment of apnea of prematurity in nonventilated neonates. Observational studies using noninvasive respiratory support, such as nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP), have shown a decrease in the incidence of BPD when used to avoid intubation or minimize the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation through the ETT. Moreover, synchronized as well as nonsynchronized nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV) have been shown to significantly decrease post-extubation failure compared with NCPAP and their use has been associated with a reduced risk of BPD in small randomized controlled clinical trials. More recently, early surfactant administration followed by extubation to NIPPV has been suggested to be synergistic in decreasing BPD. Although these findings are promising, additional studies evaluating different nasal interfaces, flow synchronization, synchronization using neurally adjusted ventilatory assist mode, and closed loop control of oxygen during nasal ventilation to minimize lung injury are needed in an attempt to further decrease the incidence of lung injury in preterm neonates requiring respiratory support.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Walsh MC, Yao Q, Gettner P, Hale E, Collins M, Hensman A et al. Impact of a physiologic definition of bronchopulmonary dysplasia rates. Pediatrics 2004; 114: 1305–1311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Crowley P, Chalmers I, Keirse MJNC . The effects of corticosteroid administration before preterm delivery: a review of the evidence from controlled trials. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 11–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Soll RF . Prophylactic natural surfactant extract for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000 Issue 2. Art. no.: CD000511.

  4. Jobe AH, Bancalari E . Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. NICHD-NHLBI-ORD Workshop. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 163: 1723–1729.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Watterberg KL, Demers LM, Scott SM, Murphy S . Chorioamnionitis and early lung inflammation in infants in whom bronchopulmonary dysplasia develops. Pediatrics 1996; 97: 210–215.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Groneck P, Gotze-Speer B, Oppermann M, Eiffert H, Speer CP . Association of pulmonary inflammation and increased microvascular permeability during the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a sequential analysis of inflammatory mediators in respiratory fluids of high-risk preterm neonates. Pediatrics 1994; 93: 712–718.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gonzalez A, Sosenko IRS, Chandar J, Hummler H, Claure N, Bancalari E . Influence of infection on patent ductus arteriosus and bronchopulmonary dysplasia in premature infants <1000 g. J Pediatr 1996; 128: 470–478.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi CW, Kim BI, Kim H, Park JD, Choi J, Son DW . Increase of interleukin-6 in tracheal aspirate at birth: a predictor of subsequent bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants. Acta Pediatr 2006; 95: 38–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bollen CW, Uiterwaal CS, van Vught AJ . Cumulative metaanalysis of high-frequency versus conventional ventilation in premature neonates. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 168: 1150–1155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gregory GA, Kitterman JA, Phibbs RH, Tooley WH, Hamilton WK . Treatment of idiopathic respiratory distress syndrome with continuous airway pressure. N Engl J Med 1971; 284 (24): 1333–1340.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sahni R, Ammari A, Suri MS, Milisavljevic V, Ohira-Kist K, Wung JT et al. Is the new definition of bronchopulmonary dysplasia more useful? J Perinatol 2005; 25: 41–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kahn DJ, Habib RH, Courtney SE . Effects of flow amplitude on intraprong pressures during bubble versus ventilator-generated nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants. Pediatrics 2008; 122 (5): 1009–1013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stefanescu BM, Murphy WP, Hansell BJ, Fuloria M, Morgan TM, Aschner JL . A randomized, controlled trial comparing two different continuous positive airway pressure systems for the successful extubation of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2003; 112: 1031–1038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Locke RG, Wolfson MR, Shaffer TH, Rubenstein SD, Greenspan JS . Inadvertent administration of positive end-distending pressure during nasal cannula flow. Pediatrics 1993; 91: 135–138.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chang GY, Cox CC, Shaffer TH . Nasal cannula, CPAP and vapotherm: effect of flow on temperature, humidity, pressure and resistance. Pediatr Acad Soc 2005; 57: 1231.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sreenan C, Lemke RP, Hudson-Mason A, Osiovich H . High-flow nasal cannulae in the management of apnea of prematurity: a comparison with conventional nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Pediatrics 2001; 107: 1081–1083.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Frey B, Shann F . Oxygen administration in infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003; 88: F84–F88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Davis P, Davies M, Faber B . A randomised controlled trial of two methods of delivering nasal continuous positive airway pressure after extubation to infants weighing less than 1000 g: binasal (Hudson) versus single nasal prongs. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001; 85: F82–F85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Robertson NJ, McCarthy LS, Hamilton PA, Moss AL . Nasal deformities resulting from flow driver continuous positive airway pressure. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1996; 75: F209–F212.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ridout R, Townsend S, Kelley P, Rosenberg AA, Parker TA . Nasal septal necrosis resulting from nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in VLBW infants. Pediatr Res 2002; 51: 348A/2025.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Avery ME, Tooley WH, Keller JB, Hurd SS, Bryan MH, Cotton RB et al. Is chronic lung disease in low birth weight infants preventable? A survey of eight centers. Pediatrics 1987; 79: 26–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Van Marter LJ, Allred EN, Pagano M, Sanocka U, Parad R, Moore M et al. Do clinical markers of barotrauma and oxygen toxicity explain interhospital variation in rates of chronic lung disease? The Neonatology Committee for the Developmental Network. Pediatrics 2000; 105: 1194–1201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Subramaniam P, Henderson-Smart DJ, Davis PG . Prophylactic nasal continuous positive airways pressure for preventing morbidity and mortality in very preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005Issue 3. Art. no.: CD001243.

  24. Stevens TP, Blennow M, Myers EH, Soll R . Early surfactant administration with brief ventilation vs selective surfactant and continued mechanical ventilation for preterm infants with or at risk for respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007 Issue 4. Art. no.: CD003063.

  25. Morley CJ, Davis PG, Doyle LW, Brion LP, Hascoet JM, Carlin JB et al. Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 700–708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Buettiker V, Hug MI, Baenziger O, Meyer C, Frey B . Advantages and disadvantages of different nasal CPAP systems in newborns. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 926–930.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kiciman NM, Andréasson B, Bernstein G, Mannino FL, Rich W, Henderson C et al. Thoracoabdominal motion in newborns during ventilation delivered by endotracheal tube or nasal prongs. Pediatr Pulmonol 1998; 25: 175–181.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Moretti C, Gizzi C, Papoff P, Lampariello S, Capoferri M, Calcagnini G et al. Comparing the effects of nasal synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nSIPPV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) after extubation in very low birth weight infants. Early Human Development 1999; 56: 166–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Aghai ZH, Saslow JG, Nakhla T, Milcarek B, Hart J, Lawrysh-Plunkett R et al. Synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) decreases work of breathing (WOB) in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP). Pediatr Pulmonol 2006; 41: 875–881.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Garland JS, Nelson DB, Rice T, Neu J . Increased risk of gastrointestinal perforations in neonates mechanically ventilated with either face mask or nasal prongs. Pediatrics 1985; 76: 406–410.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Friedlich P, Lecart C, Posen R, Ramicone E, Chan L, Ramanathan R . A randomized trial of nasopharyngeal-synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure in very low birth weight infants after extubation. J Perinatol 1999; 19: 413–418.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Barrington KJ, Bull D, Finer NN . Randomized trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2001; 107: 638–641.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Khalaf MN, Brodsky N, Hurley J, Bhandari V . A prospective randomized, trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive pressure as modes of extubation. Pediatrics 2001; 108: 13–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kugelman A, Feferkorn I, Riskin A, Chistyakov I, Kaufman B, Bader D . Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Pediatr 2007; 150: 521–526.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Moretti C, Giannini L, Fassi C, Gizzi C, Papoff P, Colarizi P . Nasal flow-synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation to facilitate weaning in very low-birthweight infants: unmasked randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics International 2008; 50 (1): 85–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bhandari V, Gavino RG, Nedrelow JH, Pallela P, Salvador A, Ehrenkranz RA et al. A randomized controlled trial of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in RDS. J Perinatol 2007; 27: 697–703.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ramanathan R, Sekar KC, Rasmussen M, Bhatia J, Soll RF . Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) after surfactant treatment for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants <30 weeks gestation: multicenter, randomized, clinical trial. Late-Breaker Abstract. Pediatrics 2009 A3212.6.

  38. Bhandari V, Finer NN, Ehrenkranz RA, Saha S, Das A, Walsh MC et al. Synchronized nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation and neonatal outcomes. Pediatrics 2009; 124: 517–526.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ramanathan R, Andaya S, Sardesai S, Cayabyab R, Garingo A, Seri I . Nasal respiratory support (NARES) in preterm infants: a novel means of delivering pressure and flow limited (PFL) IMV via nasal cannula (NC-IMV). Acta Pediatrica 2009; 98: s460, A1174.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center and Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    R Ramanathan

Authors
  1. R Ramanathan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R Ramanathan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Rangasamy Ramanathan was a consultant for Dey, LP.

Additional information

This paper resulted from the Evidence vs. Experience in Neonatal Practices Conference, 19 to 20 June 2009, sponsored by Dey LP.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramanathan, R. Nasal respiratory support through the nares: its time has come. J Perinatol 30 (Suppl 1), S67–S72 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2010.99

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2010.99

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links