Abstract
Uncontrolled hemorrhage is the most common preventable cause of death for soldiers wounded in combat. In live-tissue trauma training (LTTT), animals (mostly goats and pigs) are used to train physicians and paramedical personnel in how to treat severe traumatic injuries, including severe blood loss. Military personnel insist that such realistic training is necessary and has to date saved countless lives of soldiers. Animal rights groups, however, argue that the practice is inhumane and should be replaced with alternative methods. In this essay, the author explains how and why animals are used for LTTT and in military medical research (MMR), as well as why he feels that the continued use of animals for LTTT and MMR is justified. The author hopes to encourage wider discussion of this topic within the scientific, defense and animal welfare circles, leading to further refinements in the welfare and protection of animals used for these important, though often controversial, purposes.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Ex-vivo and live animal models are equally effective training for the management of a penetrating cardiac injury
World Journal of Emergency Surgery Open Access 31 August 2016
-
A hybrid simulator model for the control of catastrophic external junctional haemorrhage in the military environment
Advances in Simulation Open Access 09 February 2016
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
We are sorry, but there is no personal subscription option available for your country.
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine. Frequently asked questions: Implementing non-animal training methods in US Military Medical courses. Improving Military Medicine. <http://pcrm.org/research/edtraining/military/faqs-implementing-nonanimal-training-methods>.
Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). Guidelines on the Use of Animals for Training Interventional Medical Practitioners and Demonstrating Medical Equipment and Techniques. (Australian Government, Canberra, 2009).
Robson, S. & Kloeckner, M. Army looking to conduct combat medic training on live animals in Germany. Stars and Stripes <http://www.stripes.com/news/europe/army-looking-to-conduct-combat-medic-training-on-live-animals-in-germany-1.105621> (2010).
Gomez, A. 'Hibernation' research could help on battlefield, at home. USA Today <http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2009-12-20-hibernation-research_N.htm> (2009).
Chivers, C.J. Tending a fallen marine, with skill, prayer, and fury. New York Times <http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/02/world/middleeast/02medic.html> (2006).
National Humane Education Society. Vivisection may wane in military; still going strong at UW school of medicine. National Humane Education Society. <http://nhes.wordpress.com/2011/02/18/vivisection-may-wane-in-military-still-going-strong-at-uw-school-of-medicine/> (2011).
Blackwell, T. Hospitals bow to US group, quit using pigs. National Post <http://nationalpost.com/news/Hospitals+group+quit+using+pigs/4094341/story.html> (2011).
Keeping, J. University of Michigan response to PETA complaint: 'We have nothing to be ashamed of'. Ann Arbor <http://www.annarbor.com/news/university-of-michigan-to-peta-we-have-nothing-to-be-ashamed-of/> (2010).
Hanson, J. Save people, not pets: Banning medic training with live animals could kill our troops. The Washington Times <http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/may/25/save-people-not-pets/> (2010).
Sohn, V.Y. et al. From the combat medic to the forward surgical team: the Madigan model for improving trauma readiness of brigade combat teams fighting the Global War on Terror. J. Surg. Res. 138, 25–31 (2007).
Singer, P. Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for our Treatment of Animals (New York Review, New York, 1975).
Hull, D.L. The rights of animals. Science 192, 679–680 (1976).
Silverman, J. Sentience and sensation. Lab Anim. (NY) 37, 465–467 (2008).
Budkie, M.A. Military animal research. Medical Research Modernization Committee <http://www.mrmcmed.org/mar.html>.
Animal Welfare Act 9 CFR.
Martin, B. Animal studies save lives, limit suffering. Wisconsin State Journal <http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/opinion/column/guest/article_c2ba866e-80c2-11df-ba35-001cc4c03286.html> (2010).
Acknowledgements
I thank Professor Shounan Yi of the Xeno-Transplant Laboratory at the Centre for Transplant and Renal Research of the Westmead Millennium Institute of Medical Research and Dr. Julie Ferguson of Julie Ferguson Consulting for their critical review of the manuscript. The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author; they are not in any way the opinion or official policy of the Westmead Millennium Institute for Medical Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martinic, G. The use of animals in live-tissue trauma training and military medical research. Lab Anim 40, 319–322 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban1011-319
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban1011-319
This article is cited by
-
Ex-vivo and live animal models are equally effective training for the management of a penetrating cardiac injury
World Journal of Emergency Surgery (2016)
-
A hybrid simulator model for the control of catastrophic external junctional haemorrhage in the military environment
Advances in Simulation (2016)
