Abstract
The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is required to block sister chromatid separation until all chromosomes are properly attached to the mitotic apparatus. The SAC prevents cells from entering anaphase by inhibiting the ubiquitylation of cyclin B1 and securin by the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) ubiquitin ligase. The target of the SAC is the essential APC/C activator Cdc20. It is unclear how the SAC inactivates Cdc20 but most current models suggest that Cdc20 forms a stable complex with the Mad2 checkpoint protein. Here we show that most Cdc20 is not in a complex with Mad2; instead Mad2 is required for Cdc20 to form a complex with another checkpoint protein, BubR1. We further show that during the SAC, the APC/C ubiquitylates Cdc20 to target it for degradation. Thus, ubiquitylation of human Cdc20 is not required to release it from the checkpoint complex, but to degrade it to maintain mitotic arrest.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pines, J. Mitosis: a matter of getting rid of the right protein at the right time. Trends Cell Biol. 16, 55–63 (2006).
Musacchio, A. & Salmon, E. D. The spindle assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 379–393 (2007).
Hwang, L. H. et al. Budding yeast Cdc20: a target of the spindle checkpoint. Science 279, 1041–1044 (1998).
Kim, S. H., Lin, D. P., Matsumoto, S., Kitazono, A. & Matsumoto, T. Fission yeast Slp1: an effector of the Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint. Science 279, 1045–1047 (1998).
Peters, J. M. The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome: a machine designed to destroy. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 644–656 (2006).
Sironi, L. et al. Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1–Mad2 core complex: implications of a 'safety belt' binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J. 21, 2496–2506 (2002).
Mapelli, M., Massimiliano, L., Santaguida, S. & Musacchio, A. The mad2 conformational dimer: structure and implications for the spindle assembly checkpoint. Cell 131, 730–743 (2007).
Luo, X., Tang, Z., Rizo, J. & Yu, H. The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein undergoes similar major conformational changes upon binding to either Mad1 or Cdc20. Mol. Cell 9, 59–71. (2002).
Tang, Z., Bharadwaj, R., Li, B. & Yu, H. Mad2-Independent inhibition of APCCdc20 by the mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1. Dev. Cell 1, 227–237. (2001).
Fang, G. Checkpoint protein BubR1 acts synergistically with Mad2 to inhibit anaphase-promoting complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 755–766 (2002).
Reddy, S. K., Rape, M., Margansky, W. A. & Kirschner, M. W. Ubiquitination by the anaphase-promoting complex drives spindle checkpoint inactivation. Nature 446, 921–925 (2007).
Stegmeier, F. et al. Anaphase initiation is regulated by antagonistic ubiquitination and deubiquitination activities. Nature 446, 876–881 (2007).
Pan, J. & Chen, R. H. Spindle checkpoint regulates Cdc20p stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 18, 1439–1451 (2004).
King, E. M., van der Sar, S. J. & Hardwick, K. G. Mad3 KEN boxes mediate both Cdc20 and Mad3 turnover, and are critical for the spindle checkpoint. PLoS ONE 2, e342 (2007).
Clute, P. & Pines, J. Temporal and spatial control of cyclin B1 destruction in metaphase. Nature Cell Biol. 1, 82–87 (1999).
Brito, D. A. & Rieder, C. L. Mitotic checkpoint slippage in humans occurs via cyclin B destruction in the presence of an active checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 16, 1194–1200 (2006).
Kallio, M. J., Beardmore, V. A., Weinstein, J. & Gorbsky, G. J. Rapid microtubule-independent dynamics of Cdc20 at kinetochores and centrosomes in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 158, 841–847 (2002).
Howell, B. J. et al. Spindle checkpoint protein dynamics at kinetochores in living cells. Curr. Biol. 14, 953–964 (2004).
den Elzen, N. & Pines, J. Cyclin A is destroyed in prometaphase and can delay chromosome alignment and anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 153, 121–136. (2001).
Geley, S. et al. Anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome-dependent proteolysis of human cyclin A starts at the beginning of mitosis and is not subject to the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 153, 137–148 (2001).
Hayes, M. J. et al. Early mitotic degradation of Nek2A depends on Cdc20-independent interaction with the APC/C. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 607–614 (2006).
Schwab, M., Neutzner, M., Mocker, D. & Seufert, W. Yeast Hct1 recognizes the mitotic cyclin Clb2 and other substrates of the ubiquitin ligase APC. EMBO J. 20, 5165–5175. (2001).
Vodermaier, H. C., Gieffers, C., Maurer-Stroh, S., Eisenhaber, F. & Peters, J. M. TPR subunits of the anaphase-promoting complex mediate binding to the activator protein CDH1. Curr. Biol. 13, 1459–1468 (2003).
Sudakin, V., Chan, G. K. & Yen, T. J. Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2. J. Cell Biol. 154, 925–936. (2001).
Camasses, A., Bogdanova, A., Shevchenko, A. & Zachariae, W. The CCT chaperonin promotes activation of the anaphase-promoting complex through the generation of functional Cdc20. Mol. Cell 12, 87–100 (2003).
Ditchfield, C. et al. Aurora B couples chromosome alignment with anaphase by targeting BubR1, Mad2, and Cenp-E to kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 161, 267–280 (2003).
Hardwick, K. G., Johnston, R. C., Smith, D. L. & Murray, A. W. MAD3 encodes a novel component of the spindle checkpoint which interacts with Bub3p, Cdc20p, and Mad2p. J. Cell Biol. 148, 871–882. (2000).
Wolthuis, R. et al. Cdc20 and Cks direct the spindle checkpoint-independent destruction of cyclin a. Mol. Cell 30, 290–302 (2008).
Acquaviva, C., Herzog, F., Kraft, C. & Pines, J. The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome is recruited to centromeres by the spindle assembly checkpoint. Nature Cell Biol. 6, 892–898 (2004).
Davenport, J., Harris, L. D. & Goorha, R. Spindle checkpoint function requires Mad2-dependent Cdc20 binding to the Mad3 homology domain of BubR1. Exp. Cell Res. 312, 1831–1842 (2006).
Millband, D. N. & Hardwick, K. G. Fission yeast Mad3p is required for Mad2p to inhibit the anaphase-promoting complex and localizes to kinetochores in a Bub1p-, Bub3p-, and Mph1p-dependent manner. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 2728–2742 (2002).
Garci-Higuera, I. et al. Genomic stability and tumour suppression by the APC/C cofactor Cdh1. Nature Cell Biol. 10, 802–811 (2008).
Meraldi, P., Draviam, V. M. & Sorger, P. K. Timing and checkpoints in the regulation of mitotic progression. Dev. Cell 7, 45–60 (2004).
Brito, D. A., Yang, Z. & Rieder, C. L. Microtubules do not promote mitotic slippage when the spindle assembly checkpoint cannot be satisfied. J. Cell Biol. (2008).
Di Fiore, B. & Pines, J. Emi1 is needed to couple DNA replication with mitosis but does not regulate activation of the mitotic APC/C. J. Cell Biol. 177, 425–437 (2007).
Kodumal, S. J. et al. Total synthesis of long DNA sequences: synthesis of a contiguous 32-kb polyketide synthase gene cluster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 15573–15578 (2004).
Villalobos, A., Ness, J. E., Gustafsson, C., Minshull, J. & Govindarajan, S. Gene Designer: a synthetic biology tool for constructing artificial DNA segments. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 285 (2006).
Acknowledgements
We thank Daisuke Izawa for pioneering APC3 and APC11 siRNA depletion, Paola Marco for help with the BubR1 constructs, Stephen Taylor, Gowei Fang and Andrea Musacchio for reagents, Athanassios Giannis for dimethylanastron, Mercedes Pardo and Lu Yu of the Mass Spectroscopy group at the Sanger Centre for mass spectroscopy, and Andrea Musacchio and members of our laboratory for helpful discussions. M.Y. is particularly grateful to Takahiro Matsusaka for help with microscopy and microinjection. J.N. was supported by fellowships from the Carlsberg Foundation and the Danish Cancer Society, M.Y. was supported by a Yousef Jameel scholarship. This work was supported by a Program Grant from Cancer Research UK to J.P. (C29/A3211).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.N. performed the biochemical experiments; M.Y. performed the imaging experiments; J.M. constructed the Lys-less Cdc20 and control Cdc20 constructs; J.N., M.Y. and J.P. designed the experiments; J.P. wrote the paper with help from J.N. and M.Y.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information (PDF 1254 kb)
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Movie 1 (MOV 630 kb)
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Movie 2 (MOV 2086 kb)
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Movie 3 (MOV 2564 kb)
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Movie 4 (MOV 1483 kb)
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Movie 5 (MOV 2619 kb)
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Movie 6 (MOV 2587 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nilsson, J., Yekezare, M., Minshull, J. et al. The APC/C maintains the spindle assembly checkpoint by targeting Cdc20 for destruction. Nat Cell Biol 10, 1411–1420 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1799
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1799
This article is cited by
-
MAPK-dependent control of mitotic progression in S. pombe
BMC Biology (2024)
-
Alternative CDC20 translational isoforms tune mitotic arrest duration
Nature (2023)
-
Principles and dynamics of spindle assembly checkpoint signalling
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (2023)
-
Mitotic phosphorylation of tumor suppressor DAB2IP maintains spindle assembly checkpoint and chromosomal stability through activating PLK1-Mps1 signal pathway and stabilizing mitotic checkpoint complex
Oncogene (2022)
-
Mitotic slippage is determined by p31comet and the weakening of the spindle-assembly checkpoint
Oncogene (2020)