Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Nonmalignant portal vein thrombosis in adults

Abstract

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) consists of two different entities: acute PVT and chronic PVT. Acute PVT usually presents as abdominal pain. When the thrombus extends to the mesenteric venous arches, intestinal infarction can occur. Chronic PVT is usually recognized after a fortuitous diagnosis of hypersplenism or portal hypertension, or when there are biliary symptoms related to portal cholangiopathy. Local risk factors for PVT, such as an abdominal inflammatory focus, can be identified in 30% of patients with acute PVT; 70% of patients with acute and chronic PVT have a general risk factor for PVT, most commonly myeloproliferative disease. Early initiation of anticoagulation therapy for acute PVT is associated with complete and partial success in 50% and 40% of patients, respectively. A minimum of 6 months' anticoagulation therapy is recommended for the treatment of acute PVT. For patients with either form of PVT, permanent anticoagulation therapy should be considered if they have a permanent risk factor. In patients with large varices, β-adrenergic blockade or endoscopic therapy seems to prevent bleeding as a result of portal hypertension, even in patients on anticoagulation therapy. In patients with jaundice or recurrent biliary symptoms caused by cholangiopathy, insertion of a biliary endoprosthesis is the first treatment option. Overall, the long-term outcome for patients with PVT is good, but is jeopardized by cholangiopathy and transformation of underlying myeloproliferative disease into myelofibrosis or acute leukemia.

Key Points

  • Acute or chronic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) suggests the presence of one or several underlying prothrombotic disorders

  • Myeloproliferative disease that lacks the usual diagnostic features is the most frequent prothrombotic disorder in patients with PVT

  • Major complications comprise intestinal infarction, chronic portal hypertension, and portal cholangiopathy, while liver function is preserved

  • In most patients with acute PVT, complete or partial recanalization is achieved with early anticoagulation therapy

  • Permanent anticoagulation should be considered in patients with permanent prothrombotic disorders who present with acute or chronic PVT

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Acute thrombosis of the portal vein.
Figure 2: Acute thrombosis of the right branch of the portal vein.
Figure 3: Acute thrombosis of the main portal vein.
Figure 4: Acute portal vein thrombosis.
Figure 5: Venous intestinal ischemia.
Figure 6: Mesenteric vein and portal vein gas.
Figure 7: Cavernous transformation of the portal vein in a patient with chronic portal vein thrombosis.
Figure 8: Portal cholangiopathy in a patient with chronic portal vein thrombosis.
Figure 9: Portal vein thrombosis in a patient with cirrhosis.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Primignani M et al. (2005) Risk factors for thrombophilia in extrahepatic portal vein obstruction. Hepatology 41: 603–608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Condat B et al. (2001) Current outcome of portal vein thrombosis in adults: risk and benefit of anticoagulant therapy. Gastroenterology 120: 490–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. El-Karaksy H et al. (2004) Prevalence of factor V Leiden mutation and other hereditary thrombophilic factors in Egyptian children with portal vein thrombosis: results of a single-center case-control study. Ann Hematol 83: 712–715

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Arora NK et al. (1998) Portal hypertension in north Indian children. Indian J Pediatr 65: 585–591

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ueno N et al. (1997) Color Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of cavernous transformation of the portal vein. J Clin Ultrasound 25: 227–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mathieu D et al. (1985) Portal thrombosis: dynamic CT features and course. Radiology 154: 737–741

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ide T (2003) Early development of cavernomatous vasculatures in portal venous thrombosis: morphometric kinetics in rabbit model. Hepatology Research 27: 136–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar S et al. (2001) Mesenteric venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med 345: 1683–1688

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Webb LJ and Sherlock S (1979) The aetiology, presentation and natural history of extra-hepatic portal venous obstruction. Q J Med 192: 627–639

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sheen CL et al. (2000) Clinical features, diagnosis and outcome of acute portal vein thrombosis. Q J Med 93: 531–534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Condat B et al. (2000) Recent portal or mesenteric venous thrombosis: increased recognition and frequent recanalization on anticoagulant therapy. Hepatology 32: 466–470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Denninger MH et al. (2000) Etiology of splanchnic venous thrombosis in adults: the role of mutiple concurrent factors. Hepatology 31: 587–591

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Janssen HL et al. (2000) Factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin gene mutation, and deficiencies in coagulation inhibitors associated with Budd–Chiari syndrome and portal vein thrombosis: results of a case–control study. Blood 96: 2364–2368

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chamouard P et al. (1999) Frequent factor II G20210A mutation in idiopathic portal vein thrombosis. Gastroenterology 116: 144–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mahmoud AE et al. (1997) Prevalence of the factor V Leiden mutation in hepatic and portal vein thrombosis. Gut 40: 798–800

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhattacharyya M et al. (2004) Inherited prothrombotic defects in Budd–Chiari syndrome and portal vein thrombosis: a study from North India. Am J Clin Pathol 121: 844–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mohanty D et al. (2001) Hereditary thrombophilia as a cause of Budd–Chiari syndrome: a study from Western India. Hepatology 34: 666–670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hassn AM et al. (2000) Portal vein thrombosis following splenectomy. Br J Surg 87: 362–373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Valla D et al. (1988) Etiology of portal vein thrombosis in adults: a prospective evaluation of primary myeloproliferative disorders. Gastroenterology 94: 1063–1069

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chait Y et al. (2005) Relevance of the criteria commonly used to diagnose myeloproliferative disorder in patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis. Br J Haematol 129: 553–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cardin F et al. (1992) Adult “idiopathic” extrahepatic venous thrombosis. Importance of putative “latent” myeloproliferative disorders and comparison with cases with known etiology. Dig Dis Sci 37: 335–339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lamy T et al. (1997) Inapparent polycythemia vera: an unrecognized diagnosis. Am J Med 102: 14–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. James C et al. (2005) A unique clonal JAK2 mutation leading to constitutive signalling causes polycythaemia vera. Nature 434: 1144–1148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Levine RL et al. (2005) Activating mutation in the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and myeloid metaplasia with myelofibrosis. Cancer Cell 7: 387–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Baxter EJ et al. (2005) Acquired mutation of the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in human myeloproliferative disorders. Lancet 365: 1054–1061

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kralovics R et al. (2005) A gain-of-function mutation of JAK2 in myeloproliferative disorders. N Engl J Med 352: 1779–1790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ginsberg JS (1996) Management of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 335: 1816–1828

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Baril N et al. (1996) The role of anticoagulation in pylephlebitis. Am J Surg 172: 449–452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lagasse JP et al. (1997) Acute thrombosis of the portal system. Treatment with alteplase and heparin or with heparin alone in 10 patients. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 21: 919–923

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rahmouni A et al. (1992) Value of CT scan and sonography in the conservative management of acute splenoportal and superior mesenteric venous thrombosis. Gastrointest Radiol 17: 135–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. De Franchis R (2005) Evolving consensus in portal hypertension. Report of the Baveno IV consensus workshop on methodology of diagnosis and therapy in portal hypertension. J Hepatol 43: 167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hollingshead M et al. (2005) Transcatheter thrombolytic therapy for acute mesenteric and portal vein thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16: 651–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Plemmons RM et al. (1995) Septic thrombophlebitis of the portal vein (pylephlebitis): diagnosis and treatment in the modern era. Clin Infect Dis 21: 1114–1120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Joh JH and Kim DI (2005) Mesenteric and portal vein thrombosis: treated with early initiation of anticoagulation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 29: 204–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Eugene C et al. (1995) Small intestinal stricture complicating superior mesenteric vein thrombosis. A study of three cases. Gut 37: 292–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Condat B et al. (2003) Portal cavernoma-associated cholangiopathy: a clinical and MR-cholangiography coupled with MR-portography imaging study. Hepatology 37: 1302–1308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lai L and Brugge WR (2004) Endoscopic ultrasound is a sensitive and specific test to diagnose portal venous system thrombosis. Am J Gastroenterol 99: 40–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kreft B et al. (2000) Detection of thrombosis in the portal venous system: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 216: 86–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Vilgrain V et al. The atrophy/hypertrophy complex in patients with portal cavernoma: a CT study. Radiology, in press

  40. Palazzo L et al. (2000) Biliary varices on endoscopic ultrasonography: clinical presentation and outcome. Endoscopy 32: 520–524

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Dumortier J et al. (2003) Diagnosis and treatment of biliary obstruction caused by portal cavernoma. Endoscopy 35: 446–450

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Orr DW et al. (2005) Chronic portomesenteric and portosplenomesenteric venous thrombosis: evaluation of long term follow up and determinants of survival [abstract]. Hepatology 42 (Suppl 1): 212A

    Google Scholar 

  43. Celinska-Cedro D et al. (2003) Endoscopic ligation of esophageal varices for prophylaxis of first bleeding in children and adolescents with portal hypertension: preliminary results of a prospective study. J Pediatr Surg 38: 1008–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Voorhees AB Jr and Price JB Jr (1974) Extrahepatic portal hypertension. A retrospective analysis of 127 cases and associated clinical implications. Arch Surg 108: 338–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Senzolo M et al. (2006) Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for portal vein thrombosis with and without cavernous transformation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 23: 767–775

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Chaudhary A et al. (1998) Bile duct obstruction due to portal biliopathy in extrahepatic portal hypertension: surgical management. Br J Surg 85: 326–329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Okuda K et al. (1985) Incidence of portal vein thrombosis in liver cirrhosis. An angiographic study in 708 patients. Gastroenterology 89: 279–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Tublin ME et al. (1997) Benign and malignant portal vein thrombosis: differentiation by CT characteristics. Am J Roentgenol 168: 719–723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Dodd GD et al. (1995) Portal vein thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis: does sonographic detection of intrathrombus flow allow differentiation of benign and malignant thrombus? Am J Roentgenol 165: 573–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. De Sio I et al. (1995) Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of portal vein thrombosis in liver cirrhosis: results in 15 patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 10: 662–665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Amitrano L et al. (2004) Risk factors and clinical presentation of portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis. J Hepatol 40: 736–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Nonami T et al. (1992) The incidence of portal vein thrombosis at liver transplantation. Hepatology 16: 1195–1198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Amitrano L et al. (2000) Inherited coagulation disorders in cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis. Hepatology 31: 345–348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Erkan O et al. (2005) Thrombophilic gene mutations in cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 17: 339–343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Amitrano L et al. (2002) Portal vein thrombosis after variceal endoscopic sclerotherapy in cirrhotic patients: role of genetic thrombophilia. Endoscopy 34: 535–538

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Freedman AM et al. (1993) Complications of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a comprehensive review. Radiographics 13: 1185–1210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Rossi P et al. (1976) Portal thrombosis: high incidence following splenectomy for portal hypertension. Gastrointest Radiol 1: 225–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Jin GL and Rikkers LF (1991) The significance of portal vein thrombosis after distal splenorenal shunt. Arch Sur 126: 1011–1015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Francoz C et al. (2005) Splanchnic vein thrombosis in candidates for liver transplantation: usefulness of screening and anticoagulation. Gut 54: 691–697

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Cavallari A et al. (2001) Treatment of vascular complications following liver transplantation: multidisciplinary approach. Hepatogastroenterology 48: 179–183

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Settmacher et al. (2000) Venous complications after orthotopic liver transplantation. Clin Transplant 14: 235–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are most indebted to Valérie Vilgrain (Service de Radiologie), Marie-Hélène Denninger (Service d'Immunohématologie), Dominique Cazals-Hatem (Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques), and Jean Brière and Jean-Jacques Kiladjian (Service d'Hématologie), Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, for their collaboration. Supported in part by the fifth framework program of the European Union (EN-Vie QLG1-CT-2002-16786), GIS Maladies Rares, and French Ministère de la Santé (Centre de référence des Maladies Vasculmaires du Foie).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominique Valla.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Condat, B., Valla, D. Nonmalignant portal vein thrombosis in adults. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 3, 505–515 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep0577

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep0577

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing