Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Surgery Insight: management of failed sling surgery for female stress urinary incontinence

Nature Clinical Practice Urology volume 3, pages 666–674 (2006)Cite this article

Abstract

Sling surgery has replaced Burch colposuspension as the most common surgery for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). While incontinence surgery has become a routine part of urologic care, the management of surgical complications and recurrent incontinence can be quite difficult. It is important that the urologic surgeon is well informed about the most common complications that are associated with sling surgery, and how to best manage them. In addition, the management of recurrent incontinence following sling surgery should follow a stepwise approach, with appropriate diagnostic studies, conservative treatment if possible, and surgery if necessary. While sling surgery in the patient with urethral hypermobility is often straightforward, reoperation for recurrent incontinence can be more technically challenging. In the patient with a fixed and incompetent urethra, periurethral bulking agents, pubovaginal sling, spiral sling, or artificial urinary sphincter placement may be indicated.

Key Points

  • Sling surgery is associated with predictable, yet often unavoidable complications; intraoperative complications include bleeding and urethral or bladder injury

  • Postoperative complications can include sling extrusion and erosion, osteitis and osteomyelitis, urinary retention and voiding dysfunction, and recurrent urinary incontinence

  • Careful evaluation of the patient experiencing postoperative complications or recurrent urinary incontinence requires a detailed history and physical examination, and in difficult diagnostic cases, urodynamics might be indicated; only after an accurate diagnosis is made can rational treatment be offered

  • Conservative management usually involves behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy, followed by surgical intervention if necessary

  • Repeat operation for a failed sling is associated with a higher complication rate and a lower success rate than initial sling surgery

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Eroded urethral sling in a patient who presented with recurrent urinary tract infections.
Figure 2: Lateral bladder wall with sling inadvertently placed intravesically.
Figure 3: Algorithm for the evaluation and treatment of postoperative voiding dysfunction and recurrent incontinence.
Figure 4: Cystoscopic demonstration of intrinsic sphincter deficiency.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhargava S and Chapple CR (2004) Rising awareness of the complications of synthetic slings. Curr Opin Urol 14: 317–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Delome E et al. (2004) Transobturator tape (Urotape): a new minimally-invasive procedure to treat female urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 45: 203–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Deval B et al. (2006) Objective and subjective cure rates after trans-obturator tape (OBTAPE) treatment of female urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 49: 373–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tseng LH et al. (2005) Randomized comparison of the suprapubic arc sling procedure vs tension-free vaginal taping for stress incontinent women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16: 230–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mourtzinos A et al. (2006) Update on a simple, inexpensive, synthetic sling. Contemporary Urol 18: 30–41

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kuuva N and Nilsson CG (2002) A nationwide analysis of complications associated with the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81: 72–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lebret T et al. (2001) Evaluation of tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Eur Urol 40: 543–547

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Meschia M et al. (2001) Tension-free vaginal tape: analysis of outcomes and complications in 404 stress incontinent women. Int Urogynecol J 12: S24–S27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Meltomaa S et al. (2004) Concomitant vaginal surgery did not affect outcome of tension-free vaginal tape operation during a prospective 3-year follow-up study. J Urol 172: 222–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. de Leval J (2003) Novel surgical technique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: transobturator vaginal tape inside out. Eur Urol 44: 724–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Katske FA and Raz S (1983) Use of Foley catheter to obtain transvaginal tamponade. Urology 21: 627

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dwyer NT and Kreder KJ (2005) An update on slings. Curr Opin Urol 15: 244–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Flock F et al. (2004) Hemmorhagic complications associated with tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Obstet Gynecol 104: 989–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leach GE et al. (1997) Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 158: 875–880

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Elliott DS and Boone TB (2000) Is fascia lata allograft material trustworthy for pubovaginal sling repair? Urology 56: 772–776

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gandhi S et al. (2005) Histopathologic changes of porcine dermis xenografts for transvaginal suburethral slings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192: 1643–1648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Debodinance P et al. (1994) The hazards of using Gore-Tex sling in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 23: 665–670

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Weinberger MW and Ostegard DR (1995) Long-term clinical and urodynamic evaluation of the polytetrafluorethylene suburethral sling for treatment of genuine stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 86: 92–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kobashi KC et al. (1999) Erosion of woven polyester pubovaginal sling. J Urol 162: 2070–2072

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cody J et al. (2003) Systemic review of the clinical effectiveness of tension-free vaginal tape for treatment of urinary stress incontinence. Health Technol Assess 7: 21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Morgan JE (1970) A sling operation using marlex polypropylene mesh for treatment of recurrent stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 106: 369–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Comiter CV and Colegrove PM (2004) High rate of vaginal extrusion of silicone-coated polyester sling. Urology 63: 1066–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Giberti C and Rovida S (2000) Transvaginal bone-anchored synthetic sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: an outcomes analysis. Urology 56: 956–961

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Duckett JR and Constantine G (2000) Complications of silicone sling insertion for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 163: 1835–1837

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Volkmer BG et al. (2003) Surgical intervention for complications of tension-free vaginal tape procedure. J Urol 169: 570–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kobashi KC and Govier FE (2003) Management of vaginal erosion of polypropyplene mesh slings. J Urol 169: 2242–2243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Blaivas JG and Sandhu J (2004) Urethral reconstruction after erosion of slings in women. Curr Opin Urol 14: 335–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Clemens JQ et al. (2000) Urinary tract erosions after synthetic pubovaginal slings: diagnosis and management strategy. Urology 56: 589–594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Amundsen CL et al. (2003) Urethral erosion after synthetic and nonsythetic pubovaginal slings: differences in management and continence outcome. J Urol 170: 134–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Frederick RW et al. (2004) Osseous complications after transvaginal bone anchor fixation in female pelvic reconstructive surgery: report from single largest prospective series and literature review. Urology 64: 669–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Goldberg RP et al. (2004) Incidence of pubic osteomyelitis after bladder neck suspension using bone anchors. Urology 63: 704–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rackley RR et al. (2001) Bone anchor infections in female pelvic reconstructive procedures: a literature review of series and case reports. J Urol 165: 1975–1978

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Levin I et al. (2004) Surgical complications and medium-term outcome results of tension-free vaginal tape: a prospective study of 313 consecutive patients. Neurourol Urodyn 23: 7–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Klutke C et al. (2001) Urinary retention after tension free vaginal tape procedure: incidence and treatment. Urology 58: 697–701

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Miller EA et al. (2003) Preoperative urodynamic evaluation may predict voiding dysfunction in women undergoing pubovaginal sling. J Urol 169: 2234–2237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yoshimura Y et al. (2001) The voiding after the suburethral sling operation, obstructive or non-obstructive? [Japanese] Hinyokika Kiyo 47: 83–88

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sokol AI et al. (2005) Incidence and predictors of prolonged urinary retention after TVT with and without concurrent prolapse surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192: 1537–1543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Thiel DD et al. (2005) Long-term urinary continence rates after simple sling incision for relief of urinary retention following fascia lata pubovaginal slings. J Urol 174: 1878–1881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Goldman HB (2003) Simple sling incision for the treatment of iatrogenic urethral obstruction. Urology 62: 714–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Long CY et al. (2004) Lateral excision of tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of iatrogenic urethral obstruction. Obstet Gynecol 104: 1270–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Leng WW et al. (2004) Delayed treatment of bladder outlet obstruction after sling surgery: association with irreversible bladder dysfunction. J Urol 172: 1379–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Margulis V et al. (2004) Urinary retention after tension-free vaginal tape procedure: from incision to excision... to complete urethrolysis. Urology 64: 590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Petrou SP and Young PR (2002) Rate of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after retropubic urethrolysis. J Urol 167: 613–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Nitti VW et al. (1999) Diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction in women. J Urol 161: 1535–1540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Nitti VW and Raz S (1994) Obstruction following anti-incontinence procedures: diagnosis and treatment with transvaginal urethrolysis. J Urol 152: 93–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Gorton E et al. (1999) Periurethral collagen injection: a long-term follow-up study. BJU Int 84: 966–971

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Chrouser KL et al. (2004) Carbon coated zirconium beads in beta-glucan gel and bovine glutaraldehyde cross-linked collagen injections for intrinsic sphincter deficiency: continence and satisfaction after extended followup. J Urol 171: 1152–1155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Tamanini JT et al. (2004) Treatment of intrinsic sphincter deficiency using the Macroplastique Implantation System: two-year follow-up. J Endourol 18: 906–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Madjar S et al. (2003) New periurethral bulking agent for stress urinary incontinence: modified technique and early results. J Urol 170: 2327–2329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Herschorn S (2001) Current status of injectable agents for female stress urinary incontinence. Can J Urol 8: 1281–1289

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Haab F et al. (1997) Urinary stress incontinence due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency: experience with fat and collagen periurethral injections. J Urol 157: 1283–1286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Stothers L et al. (1998) Complications of periurethral collagen injection for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 159: 806–807

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Pannek J et al. (2001) Particle migration after transurethral injection of carbon coated beads for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 166: 1350–1353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Henly DR et al. (1995) Particulate silicone for use in periurethral injections: local tissue effects and search for migration. J Urol 153: 2039–2043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Stothers L and Goldenberg SL (1998) Delayed hypersensitivity and systemic arthralgia following transurethral collagen injection for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 159: 1507–1509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. McLennan MT and Bent AE (1998) Suburethral abscess: a complication of periurethral collagen injection therapy. Obstet Gynecol 92: 650–652

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Bergman A et al. (1989) Negative Q-tip test as a risk factor for failed incontinence surgery in women. J Reprod Med 34: 193–197

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Nilsson CG et al. (2001) Long-term results of the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 12 (Suppl 2): S5–S14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Miller J et al. (2006) Is trans-obturator tape as effective as tension-free vaginal tape in patients with a borderline maximal urethral closure pressure? Am J Obstet Gynecol [doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.07.011]

  60. Amaye-Obu FA and Drutz HP (1999) Surgical management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence: a 12-year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181: 1296–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Su TH et al. (1999) Is modified in situ vaginal wall sling operation the treatment of choice for recurrent genuine stress incontinence? J Urol 162: 2073–2077

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Wilson WJ and Winters JC (2005) Is there still a place for the pubovaginal sling at the bladder neck in the era of the midurethral sling? Curr Urol Rep 6: 335–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Moore RD et al. (2006) Tension-free vaginal tape sling for recurrent stress incontinence after transobturator tape sling failure. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct [doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0149-z]

  64. Lo TS et al. (2006) Treatment for unsuccessful tension-free vaginal tape operation by shortening pre-implanted tape. J Urol 175: 2196–2199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Rutman MP et al. (2006) Spiral sling salvage anti-incontinence surgery in female patients with a nonfunctional urethra: technique and initial results. J Urol 175: 1794–1798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Appell RA (1988) Techniques and results in the implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter in women with type III stress urinary incontinence by a vaginal approach. Neurourol Urodyn 7: 613–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Hadley RH (1991) The artificial sphincter in the female. Probl Urol 5: 123–133

    Google Scholar 

  68. Costa P et al. (2001) The use of an artificial urinary sphincter in women with type III incontinence and a negative Marshall test. J Urol 165: 1172–1176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Associate Professor of Surgery and Urology, and Chief, Section of Urology, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ, USA

    Craig V Comiter

Authors
  1. Craig V Comiter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Craig V Comiter.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Comiter, C. Surgery Insight: management of failed sling surgery for female stress urinary incontinence. Nat Rev Urol 3, 666–674 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0657

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0657

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing