Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

The visual attention network untangled

Goals are represented in prefrontal cortex and modulate sensory processing in visual cortex. A new study combines TMS, fMRI and EEG to understand how feedback improves retention of behaviorally relevant visual information.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Outline of the study by Zanto et al.4.

References

  1. Desimone, R. & Duncan, J. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 193–222 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller, E.K. & Cohen, J.D. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 167–202 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kastner, S. & Ungerleider, L.G. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 23, 315–341 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zanto, T.P., Rubens, M.T., Thangavel, A., & Gazzaley, A. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 656–661 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Driver, J., Blankenburg, F., Bestmann, S., Vanduffel, W. & Ruff, C.C. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 319–327 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moore, T. & Armstrong, K.M. Nature 421, 370–373 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Awh, E., Vogel, E.K. & Oh, S.H. Neuroscience 139, 201–208 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zanto, T.P., Rubens, M.T., Bollinger, J. & Gazzaley, A. Neuroimage 53, 736–745 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Corbetta, M. & Shulman, G.L. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 201–215 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hillyard, S.A., Vogel, E.K. & Luck, S.J. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353, 1257–1270 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fries, P. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 474–480 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gross, J. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 13050–13055 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Siegel, M., Donner, T.H., Oostenveld, R., Fries, P. & Engel, A.K. Neuron 60, 709–719 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Buschman, T.J. & Miller, E.K. Science 315, 1860–1862 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gregoriou, G.G., Gotts, S.J., Zhou, H. & Desimone, R. Science 324, 1207–1210 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sander Nieuwenhuis or Tobias H Donner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nieuwenhuis, S., Donner, T. The visual attention network untangled. Nat Neurosci 14, 542–543 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2812

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2812

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing