Abstract
From the original concepts that tumors require a vascular supply to grow and that blocking angiogenesis could suppress tumor growth, the oncology field has witnessed clinical successes of VEGF-targeted antiangiogenic medicine. The field is now facing the challenge of overcoming resistance to VEGF-targeted therapy, and therefore additional angiogenesis inhibitors are being developed. Studies on how endothelial 'tip, stalk and phalanx cells' form sprouts have identified promising candidate targets with complementary mechanisms to VEGF. This Review provides a conceptual framework in which molecular discoveries and principles are discussed in light of clinical opportunities to develop new antiangiogenic agents.
Key Points
-
Tumors require a vascular supply to grow, and blocking angiogenesis can suppress tumor growth; however, the oncology field is now facing the challenge of overcoming resistance to VEGF-targeted therapy
-
A vessel branching morphogenesis model postulates that an endothelial 'tip cell' leads the nascent vessel sprouts at the forefront, while a trailing endothelial 'stalk cell' elongates the stalk of this sprout
-
By stimulating excess formation of tip cells, inhibition of delta-like ligand 4/Notch signaling causes nonproductive angiogenesis of hypoperfused tumor vessels, and inhibits tumor growth, alone and in combination with VEGF inhibitors
-
Antiangiogenic agents (for example, antagonists of VEGFR3, placental growth factor, neuropilin-1 and neuropilin-2) enhance the anticancer effect of VEGF inhibitors via complementary mechanisms, including inhibition of angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis, inflammation or via stimulation of vessel maturation
-
Traditional antiangiogenic agents cause hypoperfused vessels and induce hypoxia, which promotes tumor invasiveness and metastasis
-
Inhibition of the oxygen sensor, prolyl hydroxylase domain 2 protein, in endothelial cells normalizes tumor vessels by forming a phalanx of streamlined quiescent endothelial cells, improving tumor perfusion, oxygenation, and reducing metastasis
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Affolter, M. & Caussinus, E. Tracheal branching morphogenesis in Drosophila: new insights into cell behavior and organ architecture. Development 135, 2055–2064 (2008).
Gerhardt, H. et al. VEGF guides angiogenic sprouting utilizing endothelial tip cell filopodia. J. Cell Biol. 161, 1163–1177 (2003).
Ruhrberg, C. et al. Spatially restricted patterning cues provided by heparin-binding VEGF-A control blood vessel branching morphogenesis. Genes Dev. 16, 2684–2698 (2002).
Mazzone, M. et al. Heterozygous deficiency of PHD2 restores tumor oxygenation and inhibits metastasis via endothelial normalization. Cell 136, 839–851 (2009).
Jain, R. K. Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in anti-angiogenic therapy. Science 307, 58–62 (2005).
Crawford, Y. & Ferrara, N. VEGF inhibition: insights from preclinical and clinical studies. Cell Tissue Res. 335, 261–269 (2009).
Ellis, L. M. & Hicklin, D. J. VEGF-targeted therapy: mechanisms of anti-tumor activity. Nat. Rev. Cancer 8, 579–591 (2008).
Stalmans, I. et al. Arteriolar and venular patterning in retinas of mice selectively expressing VEGF isoforms. J. Clin. Invest. 109, 327–336 (2002).
Lee, S. et al. Autocrine VEGF signaling is required for vascular homeostasis. Cell 130, 691–703 (2007).
Eremina, V. et al. Glomerular-specific alterations of VEGF-A expression lead to distinct congenital and acquired renal diseases. J. Clin. Invest. 111, 707–716 (2003).
Ferrara, N. et al. Heterozygous embryonic lethality induced by targeted inactivation of the VEGF gene. Nature 380, 439–442 (1996).
Carmeliet, P. et al. Abnormal blood vessel development and lethality in embryos lacking a single VEGF allele. Nature 380, 435–439 (1996).
Baluk, P., Hashizume, H. & McDonald, D. M. Cellular abnormalities of blood vessels as targets in cancer. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 15, 102–111 (2005).
Potenta, S., Zeisberg, E. & Kalluri, R. The role of endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in cancer progression. Br. J. Cancer 99, 1375–1379 (2008).
Greenberg, J. I. et al. A role for VEGF as a negative regulator of pericyte function and vessel maturation. Nature 456, 809–813 (2008).
Loges, S., Mazzone, M., Hohensinner, P. & Carmeliet, P. Silencing or fueling metastasis with VEGF inhibitors: antiangiogenesis revisited. Cancer Cell 15, 167–170 (2009).
Paez-Ribes, M. et al. Anti-angiogenic therapy elicits malignant progression of tumors to increased local invasion and distant metastasis. Cancer Cell 15, 220–231 (2009).
Noguera-Troise, I. et al. Blockade of Dll4 inhibits tumor growth by promoting non-productive angiogenesis. Nature 444, 1032–1037 (2006).
Ridgway, J. et al. Inhibition of Dll4 signaling inhibits tumor growth by deregulating angiogenesis. Nature 444, 1083–1087 (2006).
Dufraine, J., Funahashi, Y. & Kitajewski, J. Notch signaling regulates tumor angiogenesis by diverse mechanisms. Oncogene 27, 5132–5137 (2008).
Funahashi, Y. et al. A notch1 ectodomain construct inhibits endothelial notch signaling, tumor growth, and angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 68, 4727–4735 (2008).
D'Souza, B., Miyamoto, A. & Weinmaster, G. The many facets of Notch ligands. Oncogene 27, 5148–5167 (2008).
Hofmann, J. J. & Iruela-Arispe, M. L. Notch signaling in blood vessels: who is talking to whom about what? Circ. Res. 100, 1556–1568 (2007).
Phng, L. K. et al. Nrarp coordinates endothelial Notch and Wnt signaling to control vessel density in angiogenesis. Dev. Cell 16, 70–82 (2009).
Hellström, M. et al. Dll4 signaling through Notch1 regulates formation of tip cells during angiogenesis. Nature 445, 776–780 (2007).
Suchting, S. et al. The Notch ligand Delta-like 4 negatively regulates endothelial tip cell formation and vessel branching. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3225–3230 (2007).
Siekmann, A. F. & Lawson, N. D. Notch signaling limits angiogenic cell behavior in developing zebrafish arteries. Nature 445, 781–784 (2007).
Scehnet, J. S. et al. Inhibition of Dll4-mediated signaling induces proliferation of immature vessels and results in poor tissue perfusion. Blood 109, 4753–4760 (2007).
Poellinger, L. & Lendahl, U. Modulating Notch signaling by pathway-intrinsic and pathway-extrinsic mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 18, 449–454 (2008).
Hayward, P., Kalmar, T. & Arias, A. M. Wnt/Notch signaling and information processing during development. Development 135, 411–424 (2008).
Tammela, T. et al. Blocking VEGFR-3 suppresses angiogenic sprouting and vascular network formation. Nature 454, 656–660 (2008).
Dou, G. R. et al. RBP-J, the transcription factor downstream of Notch receptors, is essential for the maintenance of vascular homeostasis in adult mice. FASEB J. 22, 1606–1617 (2008).
Li, J. L. et al. Delta-like 4 Notch ligand regulates tumor angiogenesis, improves tumor vascular function, and promotes tumor growth in vivo. Cancer Res. 67, 11244–11253 (2007).
Hu, X. B. et al. Blockade of Notch signaling in tumor-bearing mice may lead to tumor regression, progression, or metastasis, depending on tumor cell types. Neoplasia 11, 32–38 (2009).
Koch, U. & Radtke, F. Notch and cancer: a double-edged sword. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 64, 2746–2762 (2007).
Xue, Y. et al. Embryonic lethality and vascular defects in mice lacking the Notch ligand Jagged1. Hum. Mol. Genet. 8, 723–730 (1999).
High, F. A. et al. Endothelial expression of the Notch ligand Jagged1 is required for vascular smooth muscle development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 1955–1959 (2008).
Zeng, Q. et al. Crosstalk between tumor and endothelial cells promotes tumor angiogenesis by MAPK activation of Notch signaling. Cancer Cell 8, 13–23 (2005).
Karpanen, T. & Alitalo, K. Molecular biology and pathology of lymphangiogenesis. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 3, 367–397 (2008).
Ny, A. et al. A genetic Xenopus laevis tadpole model to study lymphangiogenesis. Nat. Med. 11, 998–1004 (2005).
He, Y. et al. Suppression of tumor lymphangiogenesis and lymph node metastasis by blocking vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 signaling. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 94, 819–825 (2002).
Dumont, D. J. et al. Cardiovascular failure in mouse embryos deficient in VEGF receptor-3. Science 282, 946–949 (1998).
Shawber, C. J. et al. Notch alters VEGF responsiveness in human and murine endothelial cells by direct regulation of VEGFR-3 expression. J. Clin. Invest. 117, 3369–3382 (2007).
Haiko, P. et al. Deletion of vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C) and VEGF-D is not equivalent to VEGF receptor 3 deletion in mouse embryos. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 4843–4850 (2008).
Caunt, M. et al. Blocking neuropilin-2 function inhibits tumor cell metastasis. Cancer Cell 13, 331–342 (2008).
Batchelor, T. T. et al. AZD2171, a pan-VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, normalizes tumor vasculature and alleviates edema in glioblastoma patients. Cancer Cell 11, 83–95 (2007).
Padera, T. P. et al. Differential response of primary tumor versus lymphatic metastasis to VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3 kinase inhibitors cediranib and vandetanib. Mol. Cancer Ther. 7, 2272–2279 (2008).
Neufeld, G. & Kessler, O. The semaphorins: versatile regulators of tumor progression and tumor angiogenesis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 8, 632–645 (2008).
Bielenberg, D. R., Pettaway, C. A., Takashima, S. & Klagsbrun, M. Neuropilins in neoplasms: expression, regulation, and function. Exp. Cell. Res. 312, 584–593 (2006).
Vieira, J. M., Schwarz, Q. & Ruhrberg, C. Selective requirements for NRP1 ligands during neurovascular patterning. Development 134, 1833–1843 (2007).
Wang, L. et al. Neuropilin-1 modulates p53/caspases axis to promote endothelial cell survival. PLoS ONE 2, e1161 (2007).
Chittenden, T. W. et al. Selective regulation of arterial branching morphogenesis by synectin. Dev. Cell 10, 783–795 (2006).
Eichmann, A., Le Noble, F., Autiero, M. & Carmeliet, P. Guidance of vascular and neural network formation. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 15, 108–115 (2005).
Staton, C. A., Kumar, I., Reed, M. W. & Brown, N. J. Neuropilins in physiological and pathological angiogenesis. J. Pathol. 212, 237–248 (2007).
Soker, S., Takashima, S., Miao, H. Q., Neufeld, G. & Klagsbrun, M. Neuropilin-1 is expressed by endothelial and tumor cells as an isoform-specific receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor. Cell 92, 735–745 (1998).
Pan, Q. et al. Blocking neuropilin-1 function has an additive effect with anti-VEGF to inhibit tumor growth. Cancer Cell 11, 53–67 (2007).
Gerhardt, H. et al. Neuropilin-1 is required for endothelial tip cell guidance in the developing central nervous system. Dev. Dyn. 231, 503–509 (2004).
Miao, H. Q. et al. Neuropilin-1 mediates collapsin-1/semaphorin III inhibition of endothelial cell motility: functional competition of collapsin-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor-165. J. Cell Biol. 146, 233–242 (1999).
McLennan, R. & Kulesa, P. M. In vivo analysis reveals a critical role for neuropilin-1 in cranial neural crest cell migration in chick. Dev. Biol. 301, 227–239 (2007).
Siekmann, A. F., Covassin, L. & Lawson, N. D. Modulation of VEGF signaling output by the Notch pathway. Bioessays 30, 303–313 (2008).
Stella, M. C., Trusolino, L., Pennacchietti, S. & Comoglio, P. M. Negative feedback regulation of Met-dependent invasive growth by Notch. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 3982–3996 (2005).
Harrington, L. S. et al. Regulation of multiple angiogenic pathways by Dll4 and Notch in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Microvasc. Res. 75, 144–154 (2008).
Matthies, A. M., Low, Q. E., Lingen, M. W. & DiPietro, L. A. Neuropilin-1 participates in wound angiogenesis. Am. J. Pathol. 160, 289–296 (2002).
Yuan, L. et al. Abnormal lymphatic vessel development in neuropilin 2 mutant mice. Development 129, 4797–4806 (2002).
Shen, J. et al. Deficiency of neuropilin 2 suppresses VEGF-induced retinal neovascularization. Mol. Med. 10, 12–18 (2004).
Dallas, N. A. et al. Neuropilin-2-mediated tumor growth and angiogenesis in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 14, 8052–8060 (2008).
Autiero, M. et al. Role of PlGF in the intra- and intermolecular cross talk between the VEGF receptors Flt1 and Flk1. Nat. Med. 9, 936–943 (2003).
Fischer, C., Mazzone, M., Jonckx, B. & Carmeliet, P. FLT1 and its ligands VEGFB and PlGF: drug targets for anti-angiogenic therapy? Nat. Rev. Cancer 8, 942–956 (2008).
Carmeliet, P. et al. Synergism between vascular endothelial growth factor and placental growth factor contributes to angiogenesis and plasma extravasation in pathological conditions. Nat. Med. 7, 575–583 (2001).
Kappas, N. C. et al. The VEGF receptor Flt-1 spatially modulates Flk-1 signaling and blood vessel branching. J. Cell Biol. 181, 847–858 (2008).
Boulton, M. E., Cai, J. & Grant, M. B. gamma-Secretase: a multifaceted regulator of angiogenesis. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 12, 781–795 (2008).
Luttun, A. et al. Revascularization of ischemic tissues by PlGF treatment, and inhibition of tumor angiogenesis, arthritis and atherosclerosis by anti-Flt1. Nat. Med. 8, 831–840 (2002).
Kaplan, R. N. et al. VEGFR1-positive hematopoietic bone marrow progenitors initiate the pre-metastatic niche. Nature 438, 820–827 (2005).
Fischer, C. et al. Anti-PlGF inhibits growth of VEGF(R)-inhibitor-resistant tumors without affecting healthy vessels. Cell 131, 463–475 (2007).
Taylor, A. P., Rodriguez, M., Adams, K., Goldenberg, D. M. & Blumenthal, R. D. Altered tumor vessel maturation and proliferation in placenta growth factor-producing tumors: potential relationship to post-therapy tumor angiogenesis and recurrence. Int. J. Cancer 105, 158–164 (2003).
Kaelin, W. G., Jr & Ratcliffe, P. J. Oxygen sensing by metazoans: the central role of the HIF hydroxylase pathway. Mol. Cell 30, 393–402 (2008).
Carmeliet, P. et al. Role of HIF-1alpha in hypoxia-mediated apoptosis, cell proliferation and tumor angiogenesis. Nature 394, 485–490 (1998).
Wu, S. et al. Enhancement of angiogenesis through stabilization of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 by silencing prolyl hydroxylase domain-2 gene. Mol. Ther. 16, 1227–1234 (2008).
Nangaku, M. et al. A novel class of prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors induces angiogenesis and exerts organ protection against ischemia. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 27, 2548–2554 (2007).
Dor, Y. et al. Conditional switching of VEGF provides new insights into adult neovascularization and pro-angiogenic therapy. EMBO J. 21, 1939–1947 (2002).
Nasarre, P. et al. Host-derived angiopoietin-2 affects early stages of tumor development and vessel maturation but is dispensable for later stages of tumor growth. Cancer Res. 69, 1324–1333 (2009).
Kashiwagi, S. et al. Perivascular nitric oxide gradients normalize tumor vasculature. Nat. Med. 14, 255–257 (2008).
Jones, C. A. et al. Robo4 stabilizes the vascular network by inhibiting pathologic angiogenesis and endothelial hyperpermeability. Nat. Med. 14, 448–453 (2008).
Hamzah, J. et al. Vascular normalization in Rgs5-deficient tumors promotes immune destruction. Nature 453, 410–414 (2008).
Stockmann, C. et al. Deletion of vascular endothelial growth factor in myeloid cells accelerates tumorigenesis. Nature 456, 814–818 (2008).
Chen, J. X. & Stinnett, A. Ang-1 gene therapy inhibits hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha (HIF-1alpha)-prolyl-4-hydroxylase-2, stabilizes HIF-1alpha expression, and normalizes immature vasculature in db/db mice. Diabetes 57, 3335–3343 (2008).
Winkler, F. et al. Kinetics of vascular normalization by VEGFR2 blockade governs brain tumor response to radiation: role of oxygenation, angiopoietin-1, and matrix metalloproteinases. Cancer Cell 6, 553–563 (2004).
Kerbel, R. S. Anti-angiogenic therapy: a universal chemosensitization strategy for cancer? Science 312, 1171–1175 (2006).
Sullivan, C. J., Doetschman, T. & Hoying, J. B. Targeted disruption of the Fgf2 gene does not affect vascular growth in the mouse ischemic hindlimb. J. Appl. Physiol. 93, 2009–2017 (2002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
P. Carmeliet receives research support and is a patent holder and stock holder for ThromboGenics. P. Carmeliet declares to be named as an inventor on patents, claiming subject matter that is partially based on the results described in this review article. The aforementioned patents are licensed or submitted, which may result in a royalty payment to P. Carmeliet. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carmeliet, P., De Smet, F., Loges, S. et al. Branching morphogenesis and antiangiogenesis candidates: tip cells lead the way. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 6, 315–326 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.64
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.64
This article is cited by
-
eNOS controls angiogenic sprouting and retinal neovascularization through the regulation of endothelial cell polarity
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2022)
-
Hierarchical imaging and computational analysis of three-dimensional vascular network architecture in the entire postnatal and adult mouse brain
Nature Protocols (2021)
-
An adapted dorsal skinfold model used for 4D intravital followed by whole-mount imaging to reveal endothelial cell–pericyte association
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Cancer cell metabolic plasticity in migration and metastasis
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis (2021)
-
Combining transcatheter arterial embolization with iodized oil containing Apatinib inhibits HCC growth and metastasis
Scientific Reports (2020)