Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Science and Society
  • Published:

Genetic counselling and customary consanguineous marriage

Abstract

Consanguineous marriage is customary in many societies, but leads to an increased birth prevalence of infants with severe recessive disorders. It is therefore often proposed that consanguineous marriage should be discouraged on medical grounds. However, several expert groups have pointed out that this proposal is inconsistent with the ethical principles of genetic counselling, overlooks the social importance of consanguineous marriage and is ineffective. Instead, they suggest that the custom increases the possibilities for effective genetic counselling, and recommend a concerted effort to identify families at increased risk, and to provide them with risk information and carrier testing when feasible.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Patrilineal kinship patterns can have very different social implications.
Figure 2: Outcomes of viable pregnancies of North European and British Pakistani couples, in which the fetus has a congenital or genetic disorder.

References

  1. Bittles, A. H. The role and significance of consanguinity as a demographic variable. Popul. Dev. Rev. 20, 561–584 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization 1985 Advisory Group on Hereditary Diseases. Community approaches to the control of hereditary diseases. Unpublished WHO document: HMG/WG/85.10. Available at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1985-86/HDP_WG_85.10.pdf

  3. Bittles, A. H. Consanguineous marriage: current global incidence and its relevance to demographic research. Research report no. 90-186 (Population Studies Center, University of Michigan, 1990). Data available at http://www.consang.net

  4. Bittles, A. H. & Neel, J. A. The costs of human inbreeding and their implications for variations at the DNA level. Nature Genet. 8, 117–121 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Modell, B. in Culture, Kinship and Genes. Towards Cross-Cultural Genetics (eds Clarke, A. & Parsons, E.) 27–39 (Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK, 1997).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Greb, A. in A Guide to Genetic Counseling (eds Baker, D. L., Schuette, J. L. & Uhlman, W. R.) (Wiley–Liss, New York, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kavanagh, K. H. & Kennedy, P. H. Promoting Cultural Diversity. Strategies for Health Care Professionals (Sage, London, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alwan, A. A. & Modell, B. Community Control of Genetic and Congenital Disorders. EMRO Technical Publication Series 24 (WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean Region, Egypt, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Darr, A. in Culture, Kinship and Genes. Towards Cross-Cultural Genetics (eds Clarke, A. & Parsons, E.) 83–96 (Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK, 1997).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Modell, B. Social and genetic implications of customary consanguineous marriage among British Pakistanis. Report of a meeting held at the Ciba Foundation on 15 January 1991. J. Med. Genet. (1991).

  11. Bittles, A. H., Mason, W. M., Greene, J. & Rao, A. R. Reproductive behaviour and health in consanguineous marriages. Science 252, 789–794 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Khlat, M., Halabi, S., Khudr, A. & Der Kaloustian, V. M. Perception of consanguineous marriages and their genetic effects among a sample of couples from Beirut. Am. J. Med. Genet. 25, 299–306 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hussain, R. Community perceptions of reasons for preference for consanguineous marriages in Pakistan. J. Biosocial Sci. 31, 449–461 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fox, R. Kinship and Marriage (Pelican Books, London, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Darr, A. The Social Implications of Thalassaemia among Muslims of Pakistani Origin in England — Family Experience and Service Delivery. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. London (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rajab, A. & Patton, M. A. Analysis of the population structure in Oman. Commun. Genet. 2, 23–26 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Modell, B. Consanguineous marriage. Br. Med. J. 300, 1662–1663 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Qureshi, N. in Culture, Kinship and Genes. Towards Cross-Cultural Genetics (eds Clarke, A. & Parsons, E.) 111–119 (Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK, 1997).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Modell, B. et al. Informed choice in genetic screening for thalassaemia during pregnancy: audit from a national confidential enquiry. Br. Med. J. 320, 325–390 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Petrou, B., Modell, B., Shetty, S. & Ward, R. H. T. Long-term effects of prospective detection of high genetic risk on couples' reproductive life: data for thalassaemia. Prenat. Diagn. 20, 469–474 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahmed, S. et al. Prenatal diagnosis of β-thalassaemia in Pakistan: experience in a Muslim country. Prenat. Diagn. 20, 378–383 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vogel, F. & Motulsky, A. G. Human Genetics: Problems and Approaches 2nd edn (Springer, Heidelberg, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Czeizel, A. & Sankaranarayanan, K. The load of genetic and partly genetic disorders in man. 1. Congenital anomalies: estimates of detriment in terms of years of life lost and years of impaired life. Mutat. Res. 128, 73–103 (1984).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Baird, P. A., Anderson, T. W., Newcombe, H. B. & Lowry, R. B. Genetic disorders in children and young adults: a population study. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 42, 677–693 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Harper, P. S. Practical Genetic Counselling 5th edn (Butterworth–Heinemann, Oxford, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stoltenberg, C., Magnus, P., Lie, R. T., Daltveit, A. K. & Irgens, L. M. Birth defects and parental consanguinity in Norway. Am. J. Epidemiol. 145, 439–448 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bennett, R. L., Hudgins, L., Smith, C. O. & Motulsky, A. D. Inconsistencies in genetic counseling and screening for consanguineous couples and their offspring: the need for practice guidelines. Genet. Med. 1, 286–292 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bundey, S. & Aslam, H. A five-year prospective study of the health of children in different ethnic groups, with particular reference to the effect of inbreeding. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 1, 206–219 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ahmed, S. An Approach for the Prevention of Thalassaemia in Pakistan. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. London (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Morton, R., Sharma, V., Nicholson, J., Broderick, M. & Poyser, J. Disability in children from different ethnic populations. Child Care Health Dev. (in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernadette Modell.

Related links

Related links

DATABASES

OMIM 

cerebral palsy

cystic fibrosis

Down syndrome

thalassaemia

FURTHER INFORMATION

Alan Bittles' International Consortium on Consanguinity 

Genetic counselling

Information materials designed for patients and primary care workers in haemoglobin disorders

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Modell, B., Darr, A. Genetic counselling and customary consanguineous marriage. Nat Rev Genet 3, 225–229 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg754

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg754

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing