Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Short Communication
  • Published:

Targeting Tankyrase 1 as a therapeutic strategy for BRCA-associated cancer

Abstract

The BRCA1 and BRCA2 proteins are involved in the maintenance of genome stability and germ-line loss-of-function mutations in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 strongly predispose carriers to cancers of the breast and other organs. It has been demonstrated previously that inhibiting elements of the cellular DNA maintenance pathways represents a novel therapeutic approach to treating tumors in these individuals. Here, we show that inhibition of the telomere-associated protein, Tankyrase 1, is also selectively lethal with BRCA deficiency. We also demonstrate that the selectivity caused by inhibition of Tankyrase 1 is associated with an exacerbation of the centrosome amplification phenotype associated with BRCA deficiency. We propose that inhibition of Tankyrase 1 could be therapeutically exploited in BRCA-associated cancers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ame JC, Spenlehauer C, de Murcia G . (2004). The PARP superfamily. Bioessays 26: 882–893.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant HE, Schultz N, Thomas HD, Parker KM, Flower D, Lopez E et al. (2005). Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Nature 434: 913–917.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang W, Dynek JN, Smith S . (2003). TRF1 is degraded by ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis after release from telomeres. Genes Dev 17: 1328–1333.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang W, Dynek JN, Smith S . (2005). NuMA is a major acceptor of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation by tankyrase 1 in mitosis. Biochem J 391: 177–184.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chi NW, Lodish HF . (2000). Tankyrase is a Golgi-associated mitogen-activated protein kinase substrate that interacts with IRAP in GLUT4 vesicles. J Biol Chem 275: 38437–38444.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • d'Adda di Fagagna F, Reaper PM, Clay-Farrace L, Fiegler H, Carr P, Von Zglinicki T et al. (2003). A DNA damage checkpoint response in telomere-initiated senescence. Nature 426: 194–198.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Lange T . (2005). Shelterin: the protein complex that shapes and safeguards human telomeres. Genes Dev 19: 2100–2110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DelloRusso C, Welcsh PL, Wang W, Garcia RL, King MC, Swisher EM . (2007). Functional characterization of a novel BRCA1-null ovarian cancer cell line in response to ionizing radiation. Mol Cancer Res 5: 35–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dynek JN, Smith S . (2004). Resolution of sister telomere association is required for progression through mitosis. Science 304: 97–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer H, McCabe N, Lord CJ, Tutt AN, Johnson DA, Richardson TB et al. (2005). Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature 434: 917–921.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iorns E, Lord CJ, Turner N, Ashworth A . (2007). Utilizing RNA interference to enhance cancer drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 6: 556–568.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaelin Jr WG . (2005). The concept of synthetic lethality in the context of anticancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 5: 689–698.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kleine H, Poreba E, Lesniewicz K, Hassa PO, Hottiger MO, Litchfield DW et al. (2008). Substrate-assisted catalysis by PARP10 limits its activity to mono-ADP-ribosylation. Mol Cell 32: 57–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe N, Turner NC, Lord CJ, Kluzek K, Bialkowska A, Swift S et al. (2006). Deficiency in the repair of DNA damage by homologous recombination and sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition. Cancer Res 66: 8109–8115.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nigg EA . (2002). Centrosome aberrations: cause or consequence of cancer progression? Nat Rev Cancer 2: 815–825.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seimiya H . (2006). The telomeric PARP, tankyrases, as targets for cancer therapy. Br J Cancer 94: 341–345.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seimiya H, Muramatsu Y, Ohishi T, Tsuruo T . (2005). Tankyrase 1 as a target for telomere-directed molecular cancer therapeutics. Cancer Cell 7: 25–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seimiya H, Muramatsu Y, Smith S, Tsuruo T . (2004). Functional subdomain in the ankyrin domain of tankyrase 1 required for poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of TRF1 and telomere elongation. Mol Cell Biol 24: 1944–1955.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seimiya H, Smith S . (2002). The telomeric poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, tankyrase 1, contains multiple binding sites for telomeric repeat binding factor 1 (TRF1) and a novel acceptor, 182-kDa tankyrase-binding protein (TAB182). J Biol Chem 277: 14116–14126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silva JM, Li MZ, Chang K, Ge W, Golding MC, Rickles RJ et al. (2005). Second-generation shRNA libraries covering the mouse and human genomes. Nat Genet 37: 1281–1288.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith S, de Lange T . (1999). Cell cycle dependent localization of the telomeric PARP, tankyrase, to nuclear pore complexes and centrosomes. J Cell Sci 112 (Part 21): 3649–3656.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith S, Giriat I, Schmitt A, de Lange T . (1998). Tankyrase, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase at human telomeres. Science 282: 1484–1487.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turner N, Tutt A, Ashworth A . (2004). Hallmarks of ‘BRCAness’ in sporadic cancers. Nat Rev Cancer 4: 814–819.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tutt A, Gabriel A, Bertwistle D, Connor F, Paterson H, Peacock J et al. (1999). Absence of Brca2 causes genome instability by chromosome breakage and loss associated with centrosome amplification. Curr Biol 9: 1107–1110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tutt AN, Lord CJ, McCabe N, Farmer H, Turner N, Martin NM et al. (2005). Exploiting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells in the design of new therapeutic strategies for cancer. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 70: 139–148.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Weaver Z, Linke SP, Li C, Gotay J, Wang XW et al. (1999). Centrosome amplification and a defective G2–M cell cycle checkpoint induce genetic instability in BRCA1 exon 11 isoform-deficient cells. Mol Cell 3: 389–395.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by Breakthrough Breast Cancer and Cancer Research UK. We thank Jill Williamson and Dave Robertson for assistance with karyotyping and microscopy, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Ashworth.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Oncogene website (http://www.nature.com/onc)

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCabe, N., Cerone, M., Ohishi, T. et al. Targeting Tankyrase 1 as a therapeutic strategy for BRCA-associated cancer. Oncogene 28, 1465–1470 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2008.483

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2008.483

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links