Skip to main content
Log in

Social solidarity and civil servants’ willingness for financial cross-subsidization in South Africa: Implications for health financing reform

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Public Health Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In South Africa, anticipated health sector reforms aim to achieve universal health coverage for all citizens. Success will depend on social solidarity and willingness to pay for health care according to means, while benefitting on the basis of their need. In this study, we interviewed 1330 health and education sector civil servants in four South African provinces, about potential income cross-subsidies and financing mechanisms for a National Health Insurance. One third was willing to cross-subsidize others and half favored a progressive financing system, with senior managers, black Africans, or those with tertiary education more likely to choose these options than lower-skilled staff, white, Indian or Asian respondents, or those with primary or less education. Insurance- and health-status were not associated with willingness to pay or preferred type of financing system. Understanding social relationships, identities, and shared meanings is important for any reform striving toward universal coverage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carrin, G., Mathauer, I., Xu, K. and Evans, D.B. (2008) Universal coverage of health services: Tailoring its implementation. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 86 (11): 857–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2010) The World Health Report – Health Systems Financing: The Path to Universal Coverage. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.

  • African National Congress. (2010) National Health Insurance: ANC National General Council, Additional Discussion Documents. Durban, South Africa: African National Congress.

  • Coovadia, H., Jewkes, R., Barron, P., Sanders, D. and McIntyre, D. (2009) The health and health system of South Africa: Historical roots of current public health challenges. Lancet 374 (9692): 817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balabanova, D. and McKee, M. (2004) Reforming health care financing in Bulgaria: The population perspective. Social Science & Medicine 58 (4): 753–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, R. (2002) Reconciliation in post-commission South Africa: Thick and thin accounts of solidarity. Canadian Journal of Political Science 35 (2): 323–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Gooby, P. and Martin, R. (2010) Fairness, equality and legitimacy: A qualitative comparative study of Germany and the UK. Social Policy & Administration 44 (1): 85–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullrich, C.G. (2002) Reciprocity, justice and statutory health insurance in Germany. Journal of European Social Policy 12 (2): 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, N.P., Sherwin, S.B. and Baylis, F.E. (2010) Re-visioning public health ethics: A relational perspective. Canadian Journal of Public Health 101 (1): 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefko-Everett, K. (2009) Jangling Discords or a Beautiful Symphony? Cape Town, South Africa: Institute for Justice and Reconciliation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B., wa Kikulu, M. and Davids, Y.D. (2010) South African Social Attitudes Second Report: The Age of Hope. Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, D., Goudge, J., Harris, B., Nxumalo, N. and Nkosi, M. (2009) Prerequisites for national health insurance in South Africa: Results of a national household survey. South African Medical Journal 99 (10): 725–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shisana, O., Rehle, T., Louw, J., Zungu-Dirwayi, N., Dana, P. and Rispel, L.C. (2006) Public perceptions on national health insurance: Moving towards universal health coverage in South Africa. South African Medical Journal 96 (9): 814–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • GEMS: Government Employees Medical Scheme. (2010) Fact sheet, http://www.gems.gov.za, accessed 2 December 2010.

  • Lee, S.Y., Suh, N.K. and Song, J.K. (2009) Determinants of public satisfaction with the national health insurance in South Korea. International Journal of Health Planning and Management 24 (2): 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, L. (1995) Health sector reforms in sub-Saharan Africa: Lessons of the last 10 years. Health Policy 32 (13): 215–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, D. and Gilson, L. (2000) Redressing dis-advantage: Promoting vertical equity within South Africa. Health Care Analysis 8 (3): 235–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood, B.R. and Sterne, J.A.C. (2003) Essential Medical Statistics, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bewaji, J.A.I. and Ramose, M.B. (2003) The Bewaji, Van Binsbergen and Ramose debate on Ubuntu. South African Journal of Philosophy 22 (4): 378–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman, L. (2008) Justice and justiciability: Advancing solidarity and justice through South Africans’ right to health jurisprudence. Medical Law 27 (3): 661–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costandius, E. (2009) Independent and interdependent concepts of self: A meeting of worlds. Acta Academica 41 (2): 158–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krosnick, J.A. (1999) Survey research. Annual Review of Psychology 50 (1): 537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, D. (2010) Private Sector Involvement in Funding and Providing Health Services in South Africa: Implications for Equity and Access to Health Care. Harare, Zimbabwe: EQUINET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kikuzawa, S., Olafsdottir, S. and Pescosolido, B.A. (2008) Similar pressures, different contexts: Public attitudes toward government intervention for health care in 21 nations. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 49 (4): 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, C.J. (2003) Observational research methods. Research design II: Cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies. Emergency Medicine Journal 20 (1): 54–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, J. (2005) Adapting to democracy: Societal mobilization and social policy in Taiwan and South Korea. Studies in Comparative International Development 40 (3): 88–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Social Determinants of Health. (2008) Closing the Gap in a Generation. Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Diane McIntyre for her conceptual input into the design of the social solidarity-related survey questions and framework underpinning this article. This research was funded by the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) (Grant number 103457) and the European Commission (Sixth Framework Programme; Specific Targeted Research Project no: 32289).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bronwyn Harris.

Additional information

This paper examines the willingness of South African civil servants to cross-subsidize the health care costs of others. The authors recommend that health sector reforms must consider social relationships, and identities, as well as technical and financing details.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harris, B., Nxumalo, N., Ataguba, J. et al. Social solidarity and civil servants’ willingness for financial cross-subsidization in South Africa: Implications for health financing reform. J Public Health Pol 32 (Suppl 1), S162–S183 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2011.23

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2011.23

Keywords

Navigation