Skip to main content
Log in

Watching as an ordinary affect: Care and mothers’ preemption of injury in child supervision

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Subjectivity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As unintentional injuries continue to be the leading cause of hospitalization and death for toddlers between the ages of 1 and 4, the Centers for Disease Control has argued that child supervision is a key factor in reducing these injuries and fatalities. This article focuses on the affective relationships in the concept of supervision and practice of watching as an injury prevention method. Three parts frame our argument. First, we describe how watching is an ordinary affect. Second, as part of the ethos of caring, watching is embedded in a temporal frame of anticipation and gives rise to an affectsphere of watching and to a parents’ subjectivity as ‘good’ or ‘bad’ supervisors. Third, these affective relationships generate seemingly contradictory outcomes wherein children are expected to gain independence and experience injury. The affective qualities of watching provide a critique of the individualizing forces of supervision and an analysis of subjectivities generated by gender and class.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Human subjects approval was received by the University of California, Riverside’s Human Research Review Committee #HS-06–065.

  2. WIC is a federally funded program that assists families by providing financial and social support to supplement the purchasing of nutritional food, education and help in finding health care for their children.

  3. The injury prevention field uses the terminology ‘unintentional injury’ rather than ‘accident’ because of the seemingly randomness that accidents evoke. Accidents just happen, cannot be predicted and rarely can anything be done about the event. Reframing the terminology to ‘unintentional injury’ allows researchers to count how many injuries occur, to note the type of injury, the cause of the injury, and develop interventions before the occurrence of the injury. It is argued that this switch in terminology has produced a more rigorous scientific field (IOM, 1999).

References

  • Adams, V., Murphy, M. and Clarke, A.E. (2009) Anticipation: Technoscience, life, affect, temporality. Subjectivity 28 (1): 246–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumrind, D. (1971) Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology. Monograph, 4 (1, pt2): 1–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, L. (2010a) Cruel Optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, L. (2010b) Risky bigness: On obesity, eating, and the ambiguity of ‘health’. In: J. Metzl and A. Rutherford Kirkland (eds.) Against Health: How Health Became the New Morality. New York: New York University Press, pp. 26–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2002) CDC Injury Research Agenda. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2006) CDC Injury Fact Book. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.

  • Clough, P.T. (2007) The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland-Thomson, R. (2009) Staring: How We Look. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M. (1999) Affective labor. Boundary 26 (2): 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M. (2007) What are affects good for. In: P. Ticineto Clough and J. Halley. The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. ix–xiii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, S. (1996) The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine (1999) Reducing the Burden of Injury: Advancing Prevention and Treatment. In: R.J. Bonnie, C.E. Fulco and C.T. Liverman (eds.) Washington DC: National Acadamies Press.

  • Kusserow, A. (2004) American Individualisms: Child-rearing and Social Class in Three Neighborhoods. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Landen, M.G., Bauer, U. and Kohn, M. (2003) Inadequate supervision as a cause of injury deaths among young children in Alaska and Louisiana. Pediatrics 111 (2): 328–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, B. (2002) Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P.J., Sandel, T., Liang, C. and Fung, H. (2001) Narrating transgressions in Longwood: The discourses, meanings and paradoxes of an American socializing practice. Ethos 29 (2): 159–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrongiello, B.A., Corbett, M., McCourt, M. and Johnston, N. (2006) Unintentional injuries in young children: I. A contextual analysis of caregiver supervision of children at home. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 31 (6): 529–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrongiello, B.A. and Schell, S.L. (2010) Child injury: The role of supervision in prevention. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine 4 (1): 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, E. and Izquierdo, C. (2009) Responsibility in childhood: Three developmental trajectories. Ethos 37 (4): 391–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B. (1984) Language acquisition and socialization: Three developmental stories and their implications. In: R.A. Shweder and R. LeVine (eds.) Culture Theory: Essays on Mind, Self and Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 276–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, N. (2005) Universals in child-rearing. Anthropological Theory 5 (4): 477–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwebel, D.C. and Kendrick, D. (2009) Caregiver supervision and injury risk for young children: Time to re-examine the issue. Injury Prevention 15 (4): 217–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seigworth, G.J. and Gregg, M. (eds.) (2010) An inventory of shimmers. In: The Affect Theory Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skenazy, L. (2009) Free-range Kids: Giving Our Children the Freedom We had without Going Nuts with Worry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G.S., Bowman, M.J., Luria, J.S. and Sheilds, B.J. (1997) Baby walker related injuries continue despite warning labels in public education. Pediatrics 100 (2):el.

  • Spinoza, B. (1959) Ethics; On the Correction of Understanding. London: Everyman’s Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, K. (2007) Ordinary Affects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • US Census Bureau (2010) American Community Survey for Riverside City, California http://factfinder.census.gov/, accessed 8 January 2011.

  • Whiting, B.B. (ed.) (1963) Six Cultures: Studies of Child-rearing. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winn, D.G., Agran, P.F. and Castillo, D.N. (1990) Pedestrian injuries to children less than five years of age. Pediatrics 88 (4): 776–782.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the mothers who participated in the study. The anonymous reviewers comments were insightful and helped us to develop a stronger argument. Chikako Takeshita, Sheila McMullin, Leo Chavez, Christina Schwenkel, Sang-Hee Lee and the SIP research team read earlier drafts and were instrumental in the development of this work. This research was supported by a grant from the National Institute for Child Health and Development R01HD050637–04.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McMullin, J., Dao, A. Watching as an ordinary affect: Care and mothers’ preemption of injury in child supervision. Subjectivity 7, 171–189 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2014.2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2014.2

Keywords

Navigation