Register      Login
Australian Journal of Primary Health Australian Journal of Primary Health Society
The issues influencing community health services and primary health care
RESEARCH ARTICLE

General practice capacity for behavioural risk factor management: A SNAP-shot of a needs assessment in Australia

Cheryl Amoroso, Coletta Hobbs and Mark F Harris

Australian Journal of Primary Health 11(2) 120 - 127
Published: 2005

Abstract

The objective of this study is to examine current activities, barriers, and capacity needs for the assessment and management of smoking, nutrition, alcohol and physical activity behavioural risk factors in rural and urban general practices. A cross-sectional survey of 287 general practitioners (GPs) was conducted in a rural and urban Division of General Practice in NSW. A total of 146 GPs responded yielding Divisional response rates of 51% rural and 61% urban. For each of the SNAP risk factors, between 37% and 46% of GPs report using guidelines. Verbal advice is given "very often" for smoking by 68% of GPs, for nutrition and alcohol by 48%, and physical activity by 60%. Guideline use is associated with increased frequency of advising patients. Patient compliance is the most frequently reported barrier to giving advice, especially for smoking and alcohol. GPs report that they "often" or "very often" refer patients due to nutritional risk factors (48%), with lower referral rates reported for physical activity and alcohol risk factors (28% and 27% respectively). Only 10% refer patients "often" or "very often" for smoking management, and referral for smoking management and physical activity increase as a result of training in these areas. There is considerable variability in smoking, nutrition, alcohol and physical activity risk factor intervention and management in the general practice setting. A range of strategies is required to improve the systematic management of risk factors including training, use of guidelines, referral networks, and patient education.

https://doi.org/10.1071/PY05030

© La Trobe University 2005

Committee on Publication Ethics


Export Citation Cited By (15)

View Dimensions