Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sex differences in the relationship between creativity and hemispheric information selection at the global and local levels

  • Published:
Human Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sex-related differences in creativity-related hemispheric selective processes at the global and local levels were studied using hierarchically presented letters under the conditions of their identification and comparison. The results showed that, irrespective of the sex and the type of creative thinking, its originality was associated with the acceleration of right-hemispheric processes of information selection at the global level and deceleration of interhemispheric communication. Relationships between the originality of ideas and hemispheric attentional characteristics were stronger in men during the solution of verbal creative problems and in women during figurative original thinking. The originality of verbal activity in men was more closely associated with the success of selective processes in the left hemisphere; in women, with the selective functions of both hemispheres. Figurative thinking in men was less related to hemispheric characteristics of attention compared to women. An increase in figurative originality in women was accompanied by the acceleration of information selection in the right hemisphere and a higher efficiency of local attention and speeds of global processing in the left hemisphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Volf, N.V., Tarasova, I.V., and Razumnikova, O.M., Sex Differences in Changes of Coherence of Brain Cortex Biopotentials during Imagery Thinking: Relation to the Efficirncy of Activity, Zh. Vyssh. Nervn. Deyat. im. I.P. Pavlova, 2009, vol. 59, no. 4, p. 429.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Razumnikova, O.M., Vol’f, N.V., and Tarasova, I.V., Strategy and Results: Sex Differences in Electrographic Correlates of Verbal and Figural Creativity, Human Physiol., 2009, vol. 35, no. 3, p. 285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vol’f, N.V., Razumnikova, O.M., and Vasil’ev, O.V., Differences of Latent Inhibition in Men and Women during Use of Imagery-Spatial Masking Task, Zh. Vyssh. Nervn. Deyat. im. I.P. Pavlova, 2001, vol. 51, no. 5, p. 558.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vol’f, N.V., Razumnikova, O.M., Bryzgalov, A.O., et al., Neurophysiological Bases of Sex Differences of Hemispheric Organization of Selective Attention and Verbal Memory, Byull. Sib. Otd. Ross. Akad. Med. Nauk, 2004, no. 2, p. 83.

  5. Meyer-Levy, J. and Madeswaran, D., Exploring Differences in Males’ and Females’ Processing Strategy, J. Consumer Res., 1991, vol. 18, p. 63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Razumnikova, O.M. and Volf, N.V., Gender Differences in Interhemispheric Interactions during Distributed and Directed Attention, NeuroSci. Behav. Physiol., 2007, vol. 37, no. 5, p. 429.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Razumnikova, O.M. and Vol’f, N.V., Information Processing Specialization during Interference between Global and Local Aspects of Visual Hierarchical Stimuli in Men and Women, Human Physiol., 2011, vol. 37, no. 2, p. 137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Razumnikova, O.M., Myshlenie i funktsional’naya asimmetriya mozga (Thinking and Functional Asymmetry of the Brain), Novosibirsk: SO RAMN, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jung-Beeman, M., Bowden, E.M., Haberman, J., et al., Neural Activity When People Solve Verbal Problems with Insight, PLoS. Biol., 2004, vol. 2, p. 500.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Howard-Jones, P.A., Blakemore, S.J., Samuel, E.A., et al., Semantic Divergence and Creative Story Generation: An fMRI Investigation, Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res., 2005, vol. 25, no. 1, p. 240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mihov, K.M., Denzler, M., and Forster, J. Hemispheric Specialization and Creative Thinking: A Meta-Analytic Review of Lateralization of Creativity, Brain Cogn., 2010, vol. 72, p. 442.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vol’f, N.V., Razumnikova, O.M., and Onishchenko, M.A., Relationship between Processes of Hemispheric Information Selection in the Modified Strup Task and the Efficiency of Creative Activity, Zh. Vyssh. Nervn. Deyat. im. I.P. Pavlova, 2007, vol. 57, no. 6, p. 780.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vol’f, N.V., Razumnikova, O.M., Bryzgalov, A.O., et al., Neurophysiological Analysis of Mechanisms of Sex Dimorphism of Cognitive Strategy: Role of Selective Processes, Byull. Sib. Otd. Ross. Akad. Med. Nauk, 2010, vol. 30, no. 4, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Navon, D., Forest Before Trees: The Precedence of Global Features in Visual Perception, Cogn. Psychol., 1977, vol. 9, p. 353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Volberg, G. and Hübner, R., Hemispheric Differences for the Integration of Stimulus Levels and Their Contents: Evidence from Bilateral Presentations, Percept. Psychophys., 2006, vol. 68, p. 1274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuhn, J.-T. and Holling, H., Exploring the Nature of Divergent Thinking: A Multilevel Analysis, Thinking Skills Creat., 2009, vol. 4, p. 116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Passarotti, A.M., Banich, M.T., Sood, R.K., and Wang, J.M., A Generalized Role of Interhemispheric Interaction Under Attentionally Demanding Conditions: Evidence from the Auditory and Tactile Modality, Neuropsychologia, 2002, vol. 40, p. 1082.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kimura, D., Sex, Sexual Orientation and Sex Hormones Influence Human Cognitive Function, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 1996, vol. 6, p. 259.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Vol’f, N.V., Polovye razlichiya funktsional’noi organizatsii protsessov polusharnoi obrabotki rechevoi informatsii (Sex Differences of Functional Organization of Processes of Hemispheric Processing of Verbal Information), Rostov-on-Don: TsVVR, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kosslyn, S.M., Thompson, W.L., Sukel, K.E., and Alpert, N., Two Types of Image Generation: Evidence from PET, Cognit. Affective Behav. Neurosci., 2005, vol. 5, p. 41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vartanian, O., Martindale, C., and Kwiatkowski, J., Creative Potential, Attention, and Speed of Information Processing, Person. Ind. Differ., 2007, vol. 43, p. 1470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Institute of Physiology, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, 630117, Russia

    O. M. Razumnikova & N. V. Volf

Authors
  1. O. M. Razumnikova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. V. Volf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Original Russian Text © O.M. Razumnikova, N.V. Volf, 2012, published in Fiziologiya Cheloveka, 2012, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 33–42.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Razumnikova, O.M., Volf, N.V. Sex differences in the relationship between creativity and hemispheric information selection at the global and local levels. Hum Physiol 38, 478–486 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119712040111

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119712040111

Keywords

Search

Navigation