skip to main content
10.1145/2789187.2789193acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessmsocietyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A study of tweet chats for breast cancer patients

Published:27 July 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

One of the oldest patient communities on Twitter is characterized by the hashtag #bcsm, and it is a forum for breast cancer patients and survivors. This community has been hosting a weekly, moderated chat for the last three years. This paper describes work that analyzes the content of these chats and explores their effectiveness for the patients. The computational analysis compares the engagement, linguistic, and psychological facets of patients' tweets during the chats and out of the chats, and shows that there is a significant difference in the tweeting behavior by the patients in the two modes. The result shows the effectiveness of social media chats for cancer patients for the purposes of information exchange and support.

References

  1. Butcher, L. 2013. Profiles in oncology social media: Deanna Attai, MD,@ DrAttai. Oncology Times 35, 24, 40--42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Fox, S., and Duggan, M. 2013. Health online 2013. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Health.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Elkin, N. 2008. How America searches: health and wellness. Avalable at: http://www.icrossing.com/icrossing-how-america-searches (accessed 21 February 2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Tang, X., and Christopher, C. Y. 2012. Ranking user influence in healthcare social media. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 3, 4, 73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Domingo, M. C. 2010. Managing healthcare through social networks. Computer 43, 7, 20--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Rude, S., Gortner, E. M., and Pennebaker, J. 2004. Language use of depressed and depression-vulnerable college students. Cognition & Emotion 18, 8, 1121--1133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Graesser, A. C., et al. 2004. Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 36, 2, 193--202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Holmes, D., et al. 2007. Cognitive and emotional processing in narratives of women abused by intimate partners. Violence against women 13, 11, 1192--1205.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Tausczik, Y. R., and Pennebaker, J. W. 2010. The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29, 1, 24--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Thaler, R. H., and Sunstein, C. R. 2008. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. De Choudhury, M., Counts, S., and Horvitz, E. 2013. Predicting postpartum changes in emotion and behavior via social media. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM annual conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Pennebaker, James W., Matthias R. Mehl, and Kate G. Niederhoffer. 2003. Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual review of psychology 54, 1, 547--577.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. De Choudhury, M., Counts, S., and Horvitz, E. Major life changes and behavioral markers in social media: case of childbirth. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Golder, S. A., and Macy, M. W. 2011. Diurnal and seasonal mood vary with work, sleep, and daylength across diverse cultures. Science 333, 6051, 1878--1881.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. World Cancer Day Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/dcpc/resources/features/worldcancerday/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ginsberg, Jeremy, et al. 2009. Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data. Nature 4577232, 1012--1014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Healthcare Hashtag Project. http://www.symplur.com/healthcare-hashtags/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hawn, C. 2009. "Take two aspirin and tweet me in the morning: how Twitter, Facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care." Health affairs 28, 2, 361--368.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Sarasohn-Kahn, J. 2008. The wisdom of patients: Health care meets online social media. Oakland, CA: California HealthCare Foundation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Modahl, M., Tompsett, L., and Moorhead, T. 2011. Doctors, Patients & Social Media. http://www.quantiamd.com/q-qcp/social_media.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Buchanan, E. 2012. Ethical decision-making and internet research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Gruzd, A., and Haythornthwaite, C. 2013. Enabling community through social media. Journal of medical Internet research 15, 10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. De Choudhury, M., and De, Sushovan. 2014. Mental Health Discourse on reddit: Self-Disclosure, Social Support, and Anonymity. In International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Tighe, P. J., Goldsmith, R. C., Gravenstein, M., Bernard, H. R., Fillingim, R. B. 2015 The Painful Tweet: Text, Sentiment, and Community Structure Analyses of Tweets Pertaining to Pain. J Med Internet Res.17, 4, 84Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Symplur website for bcsm http://www.symplur.com/healthcare-hashtags/bcsm/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A study of tweet chats for breast cancer patients

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          SMSociety '15: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Social Media & Society
          July 2015
          122 pages
          ISBN:9781450339230
          DOI:10.1145/2789187

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 27 July 2015

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          SMSociety '15 Paper Acceptance Rate20of47submissions,43%Overall Acceptance Rate78of189submissions,41%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader