skip to main content
10.1145/3411764.3445146acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Studying the Formation of an Older Adult-Led Makerspace

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 May 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Makerspaces are being introduced in a wide variety of settings, including community settings such as schools and libraries. Older adults are one group for whom making agendas are being pursued, with envisioned outcomes such as supporting agency and well-being. However, research on making and DIY with older adults typically study individuals who are already engaged in making practices or bring individuals in to a technology environment that has already been created. In this paper, we study the older adult-driven formation of a makerspace in an independent living community. Through an ethnographically-informed approach, we studied the ways that individuals considered appropriate allocation of resources towards a makerspace, scoped activities, evaluated goals, and made trade-offs. Our analysis is centered around describing the way that this makerspace formed as well as three ways that individuals made sense of the makerspace as the planning unfolded: the openness of a space that promises to cater to interests of the population; the promise of a makerspace to involve more residents in technology, but the need to obscure the technology to make it appealing; and a valuation of the return on investment for limited financial and space resources. Our discussion contributes to supporting and studying early adoption of technology by older adults, complicates visions of “making for all,” and presents considerations regarding the often under-specified community of a makerspace.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. AccessEngineering. 2015. Making a Makerspace? Guidelines for Accessibility and Universal Design. Retrieved September 4, 2020 from https://www.washington.edu/doit/making-makerspace-guidelines-accessibility-and-universal-designGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Aloha Hufana Ambe, Margot Brereton, Alessandro Soro, Min Zhen Chai, Laurie Buys, and Paul Roe. 2019. Older People Inventing Their Personal Internet of Things with the IoT Un-Kit Experience. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19), 322:1-322:15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300552Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Morgan G. Ames. 2015. Charismatic technology. In Proceedings of The Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives (CA ’15), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21199Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Genna Angello, Sharon Lynn Chu, Osazuwa Okundaye, Niloofar Zarei, and Francis Quek. 2016. Making as the New Colored Pencil: Translating Elementary Curricula into Maker Activities. In Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’16), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1145/2930674.2930723Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Michelle Annett, Tovi Grossman, Daniel Wigdor, and George Fitzmaurice. 2019. Exploring and Understanding the Role of Workshop Environments in Personal Fabrication Processes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 26, 2: 10:1-10:43. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301420Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, and Austin Toombs. 2014. “Now That's Definitely a Proper Hack”: Self-Made Tools in Hackerspaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’14), 473–476. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557221Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. David Bar-El and Oren Zuckerman. 2016. Maketec: A Makerspace as a Third Place for Children. In Proceedings of the TEI ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI ’16), 380–385. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2856556Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cynthia L. Bennett, Burren Peil, and Daniela K. Rosner. 2019. Biographical Prototypes: Reimagining Recognition and Disability in Design. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’19), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322376Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Robin Brewer and Anne Marie Piper. 2016. “Tell It Like It Really Is”: A Case of Online Content Creation and Sharing Among Older Adult Bloggers. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’16), 5529–5542. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858379Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Leah Buechley and Benjamin Mako Hill. 2010. LilyPad in the wild: how hardware's long tail is supporting new engineering and design communities. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS ’10), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858206Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Oliver Burmeister. 2012. What seniors value about online community. Journal of Community Informatics 8, 1: 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Tara Capel, Bernd Ploderer, and Margot Brereton. 2020. The Wooden Quilt: Carving Out Personal Narratives in a Women-Only Makerspace. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’20), 1059–1071. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395562Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kayla Carucci and Kentaro Toyama. 2019. Making Well-being: Exploring the Role of Makerspaces in Long Term Care Facilities. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300699Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kathy Charmaz. 2006. Constructing grounded theory. Sage Publications, London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Graeme W. Coleman, Lorna Gibson, Vicki L. Hanson, Ania Bobrowicz, and Alison McKay. 2010. Engaging the disengaged: how do we design technology for digitally excluded older adults? In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS ’10), 175–178. https://doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858202Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sara J. Czaja, Neil Charness, Arthur D. Fisk, Christopher Hertzog, Sankaran N. Nair, Wendy A. Rogers, and Joseph Sharit. 2006. Factors Predicting the Use of Technology: Findings From the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and aging 21, 2: 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Jiamin Dai and Karyn Moffatt. 2020. Making Space for Social Sharing: Insights from a Community-Based Social Group for People with Dementia. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376133Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Dale Dougherty. 2012. Maker Market Study. Retrieved from https://cdn.makezine.com/make/bootstrap/img/etc/Maker-Market-Study.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. M. Ann Garrison Darrin, Jerry A. Krill, and Jerry A. Krill. 2016. Infusing Innovation Into Organizations: A Systems Engineering Approach. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b19481Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Maitraye Das, Katya Borgos-Rodriguez, and Anne Marie Piper. 2020. Weaving by Touch: A Case Analysis of Accessible Making. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376477Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jeannette Durick, Toni Robertson, Margot Brereton, Frank Vetere, and Bjorn Nansen. 2013. Dispelling Ageing Myths in Technology Design. In Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration (OzCHI ’13), 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1145/2541016.2541040Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Kate Farina and Michael Nitsche. 2015. Outside the brick: exploring prototyping for the elderly. In Proceedings of the 2015 British HCI Conference (British HCI ’15), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/2783446.2783571Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Sarah Fox. 2015. Feminist Hackerspaces as Sites for Feminist Design. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C ’15), 341–342. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757226.2764771Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Paul P. Freddolino, Vincent W. P. Lee, Chi-Kwong Law, and Cindy Ho. 2010. To Help and to Learn: An Exploratory Study of Peer Tutors Teaching Older Adults about Technology. Journal of Technology in Human Services 28, 4: 217–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2011.565458Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Emilie Giles, Janet van der Linden, and Marian Petre. 2018. Weaving Lighthouses and Stitching Stories: Blind and Visually Impaired People Designing E-textiles. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’18), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174044Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Leonardo Giusti, Eleonora Mencarini, and Massimo Zancanaro. 2010. “Luckily, I Don'T Need It”: Elderly and the Use of Artifacts for Time Management. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries (NordiCHI ’10), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1145/1868914.1868940Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Philip J. Guo. 2017. Older Adults Learning Computer Programming: Motivations, Frustrations, and Design Opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’17), 7070–7083. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025945Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Christina N. Harrington, Katya Borgos-Rodriguez, and Anne Marie Piper. 2019. Engaging Low-Income African American Older Adults in Health Discussions Through Community-based Design Workshops. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19), 593:1-593:15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300823Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Avneet Hira, Cole H. Joslyn, and Morgan M. Hynes. 2014. Classroom makerspaces: Identifying the opportunities and challenges. In 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2014.7044263Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Julie S. Hui and Elizabeth M. Gerber. 2017. Developing Makerspaces as Sites of Entrepreneurship. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW ’17), 2023–2038. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998264Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Amy Hurst and Jasmine Tobias. 2011. Empowering individuals with do-it-yourself assistive technology. In The proceedings of the 13th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (ASSETS ’11), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/2049536.2049541Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Ben Jelen, Anne Freeman, Mina Narayanan, Kate M. Sanders, James Clawson, and Katie A. Siek. 2019. Craftec: Engaging Older Adults in Making through a Craft-Based Toolkit System. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI ’19), 577–587. https://doi.org/10.1145/3294109.3295636Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Anna Kalma, Bernd Ploderer, and Laurianne Sitbon. 2018. Ageing and making: a positive framing for human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OzCHI ’18), 194–199. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292147.3292181Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Bran Knowles and Vicki L. Hanson. 2018. Older Adults’ Deployment of ‘Distrust.’ ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 25, 4: 21:1-21:25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196490Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Amanda Lazar, Mark Diaz, Robin Brewer, Chelsea Kim, and Anne Marie Piper. 2017. Going Gray, Failure to Hire, and the Ick Factor: Analyzing How Older Bloggers Talk About Ageism. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW ’17), 655–668. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998275Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Silvia Lindtner, Garnet D. Hertz, and Paul Dourish. 2014. Emerging sites of HCI innovation: hackerspaces, hardware startups & incubators. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’14), 439–448. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557132Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Owen G. McGrath. 2016. Making a Makerspace: Designing User Services to Serve Designing Users. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGUCCS Annual Conference (SIGUCCS ’16), 95–98. https://doi.org/10.1145/2974927.2974949Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Janis Lena Meissner, John Vines, Janice McLaughlin, Thomas Nappey, Jekaterina Maksimova, and Peter Wright. 2017. Do-It-Yourself Empowerment as Experienced by Novice Makers with Disabilities. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS ’17), 1053–1065. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064674Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Eric Michaud. 2012. How To Start A Hackerspace. Adafruit Industries - Makers, hackers, artists, designers and engineers! Retrieved September 4, 2020 from https://blog.adafruit.com/2012/11/12/how-to-start-a-hackerspace/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Tracy L. Mitzner, Julie B. Boron, Cara Bailey Fausset, Anne E. Adams, Neil Charness, Sara J. Czaja, Katinka Dijkstra, Arthur D. Fisk, Wendy A. Rogers, and Joseph Sharit. 2010. Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior 26, 6: 1710–1721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.020Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Jarkko Moilanen. 2012. Emerging Hackerspaces – Peer-Production Generation. In Open Source Systems: Long-Term Sustainability (IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33442-9_7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Maggie Mort, Celia Roberts, and Blanca Callén. 2013. Ageing with telecare: care or coercion in austerity? Sociology of Health & Illness 35, 6: 799–812. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01530.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Louis Neven. 2010. ‘But obviously not for me’: robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test users. Sociology of Health & Illness 32, 2: 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01218.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Steven Pryor. 2014. Implementing a 3D Printing Service in an Academic Library. Journal of Library Administration 54, 1: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2014.893110Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Jie Qi, Leah Buechley, Andrew “bunnie” Huang, Patricia Ng, Sean Cross, and Joseph A. Paradiso. 2018. Chibitronics in the Wild: Engaging New Communities in Creating Technology with Paper Electronics. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’18), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173826Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Valeria Righi, Sergio Sayago, and Josep Blat. 2017. When We Talk About Older People in HCI, Who Are We Talking About? Towards a Turn to Community in the Design of Technologies for a Growing Ageing Population. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 108, C: 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.06.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Yvonne Rogers, Jeni Paay, Margot Brereton, Kate L. Vaisutis, Gary Marsden, and Frank Vetere. 2014. Never too old: engaging retired people inventing the future with MaKey MaKey. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI ’14, 3913–3922. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557184Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Daniela K. Rosner, Samantha Shorey, Brock R. Craft, and Helen Remick. 2018. Making Core Memory: Design Inquiry into Gendered Legacies of Engineering and Craftwork. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’18), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174105Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Shelby Pope. 2017. Hacking Insulin. Retrieved September 4, 2020 from http://www.oaklandmagazine.com/October-2017/Hacking-Insulin/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Oliver Stickel, Dominik Hornung, Konstantin Aal, Markus Rohde, and Volker Wulf. 2015. 3D Printing with Marginalized Children – An Exploration in a Palestinian Refugee Camp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20499-4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Yuling Sun, Silvia Lindtner, Xianghua Ding, Tun Lu, and Ning Gu. 2015. Reliving the Past & Making a Harmonious Society Today: A Study of Elderly Electronic Hackers in China. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW ’15), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675195Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Tess J Tanenbaum, Amanda M. Williams, Audrey Desjardins, and Karen Tanenbaum. 2013. Democratizing technology: pleasure, utility and expressiveness in DIY and maker practice. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’13), 2603–2612. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481360Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Nick Taylor, Ursula Hurley, and Philip Connolly. 2016. Making Community: The Wider Role of Makerspaces in Public Life. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’16), 1415–1425. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858073Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Austin Toombs, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. Becoming Makers: Hackerspace Member Habits, Values, and Identities. Journal of Peer Production. Retrieved September 10, 2020 from https://www.academia.edu/9043637/Becoming_Makers_Hackerspace_Member_Habits_Values_and_IdentitiesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Austin L. Toombs. 2017. Hackerspace Tropes, Identities, and Community Values. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS ’17), 1079–1091. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064760Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. P. Turner, S. Turner, and G. Van De Walle. 2007. How older people account for their experiences with interactive technology. Behaviour & Information Technology 26, 4: 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290601173499Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. John Vines, Gary Pritchard, Peter Wright, Patrick Olivier, and Katie Brittain. 2015. An Age-Old Problem: Examining the Discourses of Ageing in HCI and Strategies for Future Research. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 22, 1: 2:1-2:27. https://doi.org/10.1145/2696867Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Dhaval Vyas. 2019. Altruism and Wellbeing as Care Work in a Craft-based Maker Culture. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, GROUP: 239:1-239:12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3361120Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Dhaval Vyas and John Vines. 2019. Making at the Margins: Making in an Under-resourced e-Waste Recycling Center. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW: 188:1-188:23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359290Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Jenny Waycott, Frank Vetere, Sonja Pedell, Lars Kulik, Elizabeth Ozanne, Alan Gruner, and John Downs. 2013. Older adults as digital content producers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’13, 39. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470662Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Jenny Waycott, Frank Vetere, Sonja Pedell, Amee Morgans, Elizabeth Ozanne, and Lars Kulik. 2016. Not For Me: Older Adults Choosing Not to Participate in a Social Isolation Intervention. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’16, 745–757. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858458Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Amanda Toler Woodward, Paul P. Freddolino, Dona J. Wishart, Louanne Bakk, Rie Kobayashi, Caitlin Tupper, John Panci, and Christina M. Blaschke-Thompson. 2013. Outcomes from a peer tutor model for teaching technology to older adults. Ageing & Society 33, 8: 1315–1338. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X12000530Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. HackerspaceWiki. Retrieved September 10, 2020 from https://wiki.hackerspaces.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Cricut Home. Retrieved January 12, 2021 from https://www.cricut.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    May 2021
    10862 pages
    ISBN:9781450380966
    DOI:10.1145/3411764

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 7 May 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format