skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

A Design Exploration of Health-Related Community Displays

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 April 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The global population is ageing, leading to shifts in healthcare needs. It is well established that increased physical activity can improve the health and wellbeing of many older adults. However, motivation remains a prime concern. We report findings from a series of focus groups where we explored the concept of using community displays to promote physical activity to a local neighborhood. In doing so, we contribute both an understanding of the design space for community displays, as well as a discussion of the implications of our work for the broader CSCW community. We conclude that our work demonstrates the potential for developing community displays for increasing physical activity amongst older adults.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Schlomann A. 2017. A case study on older adults' long-term use of an activity tracker. Gerontechnology 16 (2017), 114--125. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2017.16.2.007.00Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Maliha Agha and Riaz Agha. 2017. The rising prevalence of obesity, part A, impact on public health. International journal of surgery. Oncology 2, 7 (2017), e17. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJ9.0000000000000017Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Nabil Alshurafa, Jayalakshmi Jain, Rawan Alharbi, Gleb Iakovlev, Bonnie Spring, and Angela Pfammatter. 2018. Is More Always Better? Discovering Incentivized MHealth Intervention Engagement Related to Health Behavior Trends. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2, 4, Article 153 (Dec. 2018), 26 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287031Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Moritz Behrens, Nina Valkanova, Ava Fatah gen. Schieck, and Duncan P. Brumby. 2014. Smart Citizen Sentiment Dashboard: A Case Study Into Media Architectural Interfaces. In Proceedings of The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Copenhagen, Denmark) (PerDis '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 19--24. https://doi.org/10.1145/2611009.2611036Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Liz Bickerdike, Alison Booth, Paul M Wilson, Kate Farley, and Kath Wright. 2017. Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence. BMJ Open 7, 4 (2017), e013384. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen- 2016-013384 arXiv:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/4/e013384.full.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Jon Bird and Yvonne Rogers. 2010. The pulse of tidy street: Measuring and publicly displaying domestic electricity consumption.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Susan M. Blake, Carl J. Caspersen, John Finnegan, Richard A. Crow, Maurice B. Mittlemark, and Kevin R. Ringhofer. 1996. The Shape up Challenge: A Community-Based Worksite Exercise Competition. American Journal of Health Promotion 11, 1 (1996), 23--34. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-11.1.23Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Tone Bratteteig and Ina Wagner. 2012. Disentangling Power and Decision-Making in Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1 (Roskilde, Denmark) (PDC '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 41--50. https://doi.org/10.1145/2347635.2347642Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Clara Caldeira, Matthew Bietz, and Yunan Chen. 2016. Looking for the Unusual: How Older Adults Utilize Self- Tracking Techniques for Health Management. In Proceedings of the 10th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (Cancun, Mexico) (PervasiveHealth '16). ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), Brussels, BEL, 227--230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Clara Caldeira and Yunan Chen. 2019. Seniors and Self-tracking Technology. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 67--79. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06076-3_5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Karen Church, Eve Hoggan, and Nuria Oliver. 2010. A Study of Mobile Mood Awareness and Communication through MobiMood. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries (Reykjavik, Iceland) (NordiCHI '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 128--137. https://doi.org/10.1145/1868914.1868933Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Sofie Compernolle, Corneel Vandelanotte, Greet Cardon, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, and Katrien De Cocker. 2015. Effectiveness of a Web-Based, Computer-Tailored, Pedometer-Based Physical Activity Intervention for Adults: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 17, 2 (09 Feb 2015), e38. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3402Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Artur Direito, Leila Pfaeffli Dale, Emma Shields, Rosie Dobson, Robyn Whittaker, and Ralph Maddison. 2014. Do physical activity and dietary smartphone applications incorporate evidence-based behaviour change techniques? BMC Public Health 14, 646 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Rod K. Dishman. 2001. The Problem of Exercise Adherence: Fighting Sloth in Nations With Market Economies. Quest 53, 3 (2001), 279--294. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2001.10491745Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Shelly Farnham, David Keyes, Vicky Yuki, and Chris Tugwell. 2012. Puget Sound off: Fostering Youth Civic Engagement through Citizen Journalism. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Seattle, Washington, USA) (CSCW '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 285--294. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145251Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Clare Farrance, Fotini Tsofliou, and Carol Clark. 2016. Adherence to community based group exercise interventions for older people: A mixed-methods systematic review. Preventive Medicine 87 (2016), 155--166. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.037Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Duggan M Fox S. 2013. Tracking for health. Pew Research Center's Internet and American Life Project.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Thomas Fritz, Elaine M. Huang, Gail C. Murphy, and Thomas Zimmermann. 2014. Persuasive Technology in the Real World: A Study of Long-Term Use of Activity Sensing Devices for Fitness. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 487--496. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557383Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Sarah Gallacher, Jenny O'Connor, Jon Bird, Yvonne Rogers, Licia Capra, Daniel Harrison, and Paul Marshall. 2015. Mood Squeezer: Lightening up the Workplace through Playful and Lightweight Interactions. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CSCW '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 891--902. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675170Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Katarina L. Gidlund. 2012. Designing for All and No One - Practitioners Understandings of Citizen Driven Development of Public e-Services. In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1 (Roskilde, Denmark) (PDC '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 11--19. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2347635.2347638Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Daniel Gooch, Matthew Barker, Lorraine Hudson, Ryan Kelly, Gerd Kortuem, Janet Van Der Linden, Marian Petre, Rebecca Brown, Anna Klis-Davies, Hannah Forbes, Jessica Mackinnon, Robbie Macpherson, and Clare Walton. 2018. Amplifying Quiet Voices: Challenges and Opportunities for Participatory Design at an Urban Scale. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 25, 1, Article 2 (Jan. 2018), 34 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3139398Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Daniel Gooch, Ryan M. Kelly, Alexandra Stiver, Janet [van der Linden], Marian Petre, Mike Richards, Anna Klis-Davies, Jessica MacKinnon, Robbie Macpherson, and Clare Walton. 2020. The benefits and challenges of using crowdfunding to facilitate community-led projects in the context of digital civics. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 134 (2020), 33--43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.10.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Rúben Gouveia, Evangelos Karapanos, and Marc Hassenzahl. 2018. Activity Tracking in Vivo. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 362, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173936Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Andrea Grimes, Martin Bednar, Jay David Bolter, and Rebecca E. Grinter. 2008. EatWell: Sharing Nutrition-Related Memories in a Low-Income Community. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (San Diego, CA, USA) (CSCW '08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 87--96. https: //doi.org/10.1145/1460563.1460579Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Rebecca Gulotta, Jodi Forlizzi, Rayoung Yang, and Mark Wah Newman. 2016. Fostering Engagement with Personal Informatics Systems. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Brisbane, QLD, Australia) (DIS '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 286--300. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2901790.2901803Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Derek L. Hansen, Jes A. Koepfler, Paul T. Jaeger, John C. Bertot, and Tracy Viselli. 2014. Civic Action Brokering Platforms: Facilitating Local Engagement with ACTion Alexandria. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (CSCW '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1308--1322. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531714Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Christina N. Harrington, Lauren Wilcox, Kay Connelly, Wendy Rogers, and Jon Sanford. 2018. Designing Health and Fitness Apps with Older Adults: Examining the Value of Experience-Based Co-Design. In Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (New York, NY, USA) (PervasiveHealth '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 15--24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240925.3240929Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Louise C. Hawkley, Ronald A. Thisted, and John T. Cacioppo. 2009. Loneliness predicts reduced physical activity: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Health Psychology 28 (2009), 354--363. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014400Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Simo Hosio, Vassilis Kostakos, Hannu Kukka, Marko Jurmu, Jukka Riekki, and Timo Ojala. 2012. From School Food to Skate Parks in a Few Clicks: Using Public Displays to Bootstrap Civic Engagement of the Young. In Pervasive Computing, Judy Kay, Paul Lukowicz, Hideyuki Tokuda, Patrick Olivier, and Antonio Krüger (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 425--442.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Noura Howell, Laura Devendorf, Rundong (Kevin) Tian, Tomás Vega Galvez, Nan-Wei Gong, Ivan Poupyrev, Eric Paulos, and Kimiko Ryokai. 2016. Biosignals as Social Cues: Ambiguity and Emotional Interpretation in Social Displays of Skin Conductance. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Brisbane, QLD, Australia) (DIS'16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 865--870. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901850Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Joseph Hughey and Paul W. Speer. 2002. Community, Sense of Community, and Networks. Springer US, Boston, MA, 69--84. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0719-2_4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Julie S. Hui, Michael D. Greenberg, and Elizabeth M. Gerber. 2014. Understanding the Role of Community in Crowdfunding Work. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (CSCW '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 62--74. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531715Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Sarah E. Jackson, Rebecca J. Beeken, and Jane Wardle. 2015. Obesity, perceived weight discrimination, and psychological well-being in older adults in England. Obesity 23, 5 (2015), 1105--1111. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.21052 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/oby.21052Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Andrea Kavanaugh, John M. Carroll, Mary Beth Rosson, Debbie D. Reese, and Than T. Zin. 2004. Participating in civil society: the case of networked communities. Interacting with Computers 17, 1 (11 2004), 9--33. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2004.10.006 arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/iwc/article-pdf/17/1/9/2289037/iwc17-0009.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. "Clare Killingback, Fotini Tsofliou, and Carol Clark". 2017. Older people's adherence to community-based group exercise programmes: a multiple-case study. BMC Public Health 17, 115 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4049-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Predrag Klasnja, Sunny Consolvo, and Wanda Pratt. 2011. How to Evaluate Technologies for Health Behavior Change in HCI Research. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3063--3072. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 1978942.1979396Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaitundefined, Yvonne Rogers, and Jon Bird. 2014. What Chalk and Tape Can Tell Us: Lessons Learnt for Next Generation Urban Displays. In Proceedings of The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Copenhagen, Denmark) (PerDis '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 130--135. https://doi.org/10.1145/2611009.2611018Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Jonna Koivisto and Juho Hamari. 2014. Demographic differences in perceived benefits from gamification. Computers in Human Behavior 35 (2014), 179--188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Hyosun Kwon, Joel E. Fischer, Martin Flintham, and James Colley. 2018. The Connected Shower: Studying Intimate Data in Everyday Life. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2, 4, Article 176 (Dec. 2018), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287054Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Amanda Lazar and Emma E. Dixon. 2019. Safe Enough to Share: Setting the Dementia Agenda Online. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 85 (Nov. 2019), 23 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359187Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Brian Y. Lim, Judy Kay, andWeilong Liu. 2019. How Does a NationWalk? Interpreting Large-Scale Step Count Activity withWeekly Streak Patterns. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob.Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 3, 2, Article 57 (June 2019), 46 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328928Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Stephen Lindsay, Daniel Jackson, Guy Schofield, and Patrick Olivier. 2012. Engaging Older People Using Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1199--1208. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208570Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Diane Maloney-Krichmar and Jenny Preece. 2005. A Multilevel Analysis of Sociability, Usability, and Community Dynamics in an Online Health Community. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 12, 2 (June 2005), 201--232. https: //doi.org/10.1145/1067860.1067864Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Siobhan K McMahon, Beth Lewis, Michael Oakes,Weihua Guan, Jean FWyman, and Alexander J Rothman. 2016. Older Adults' Experiences Using a Commercially Available Monitor to Self-Track Their Physical Activity. JMIR mHealth uHealth 4, 2 (13 Apr 2016), e35. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.5120Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Siobhan K McMahon, Beth Lewis, Michael Oakes,Weihua Guan, Jean FWyman, and Alexander J Rothman. 2016. Older Adults' Experiences Using a Commercially Available Monitor to Self-Track Their Physical Activity. JMIR mHealth uHealth 4, 2 (13 Apr 2016), e35. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.5120Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Marion E. T. McMurdo, Jacqui Sugden, Ishbel Argo, Paul Boyle, Derek W. Johnston, Falko F. Sniehotta, and Peter T. Donnan. 2010. Do Pedometers Increase Physical Activity in Sedentary Older Women? A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 58, 11 (2010), 2099--2106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532--5415.2010.03127.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Kathleen Mikkelsen, Lily Stojanovska, Momir Polenakovic, Marijan Bosevski, and Vasso Apostolopoulos. 2017. Exercise and mental health. Maturitas 106 (2017), 48--56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.09.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Vivian Genaro Motti and Kelly Caine. 2015. Users' Privacy Concerns About Wearables. In Financial Cryptography and Data Security, Michael Brenner, Nicolas Christin, Benjamin Johnson, and Kurt Rohloff (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 231--244.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Alan F. Newell and Peter Gregor. 2000. 'User Sensitive Inclusive Design"- in Search of a New Paradigm. In Proceedings on the 2000 Conference on Universal Usability (Arlington, Virginia, USA) (CUU '00). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 39--44. https://doi.org/10.1145/355460.355470Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. NHS. 2016. Health Survey for England: Adult overweight and obesity. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/ publications/statistical/health-survey-for-england/health-survey-for-england-2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. US Department of Health Services and Human. 2016. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Technical Report. https://health.gov/PAGuidelines.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Stefanie Painter, Gary Ditsch, Rezwan Ahmed, Nicholas Buck Hanson, Kevin Kachin, and Jan Berger. 2016. Retrofit Weight-Loss Outcomes at 6, 12, and 24 Months and Characteristics of 12-Month High Performers: A Retrospective Analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 4, 3 (22 Aug 2016), e101. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.5873Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Andrea Parker, Vasudhara Kantroo, Hee Rin Lee, Miguel Osornio, Mansi Sharma, and Rebecca Grinter. 2012. Health Promotion as Activism: Building Community Capacity to Effect Social Change. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 99--108. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207692Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Josée Poirier, Wendy L Bennett, Gerald J Jerome, Nina G Shah, Mariana Lazo, Hsin-Chieh Yeh, Jeanne M Clark, and Nathan K Cobb. 2016. Effectiveness of an Activity Tracker- and Internet-Based Adaptive Walking Program for Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 18, 2 (09 Feb 2016), e34. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5295Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Neil Postman. 1985. Amusing Ourselves to Death. Penguin, Harmondsworth, England.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Kimberly C. Preusse, Tracy L. Mitzner, Cara Bailey Fausset, and Wendy A. Rogers. 2017. Older Adults' Acceptance of Activity Trackers. Journal of Applied Gerontology 36, 2 (2017), 127--155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464815624151 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464815624151Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. P. Rasche, M. Wille, S. Theis, K. Schäefer, C. M. Schlick, and A. Mertens. 2015. Activity Tracker and Elderly. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing. IEEE, Liverpool, UK, 1411--1416.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Toni Robertson and Ina Wagner. 2013. Engagement, representation and politics-in-action. The Handbook of Participatory Design, edited by J. Simonsen and T. Robertson., 64--85 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Marcela D. Rodriguez, Jose R. Roa, Alberto L. Moran, and Sandra Nava-Munoz. 2012. Persuasive Strategies for Motivating Elders to Exercise. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops., 219--223 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Richard M. Ryan and Edward L. Deci. 2000. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25, 1 (2000), 54--67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Herman Saksono, Carmen Castaneda-Sceppa, Jessica Hoffman, Magy Seif El-Nasr, Vivien Morris, and Andrea G. Parker. 2019. Social Reflections on Fitness Tracking Data: A Study with Families in Low-SES Neighborhoods. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 313, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300543Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Deborah A. Salem, G. Anne Bogat, and Christina Reid. 1997. Mutual help goes on-line. Journal of Community Psychology 25, 2 (1997), 189--207. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199703)25:2189::AID-JCOP73.0.CO;2-TGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Anna Schlomann, Katja von Storch, Peter Rasche, and Christian Rietz. 2016. Means of Motivation or of Stress? The Use of Fitness Trackers for Self-Monitoring by Older Adults. HBScience 7 (2016), 111--116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s16024- 016-0275-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Karen A. Schutzer and B.Sue Graves. 2004. Barriers and motivations to exercise in older adults. Preventive Medicine 39, 5 (2004), 1056 -- 1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.04.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Leah M. Scolere, Eric P.S. Baumer, Lindsay Reynolds, and Geri Gay. 2016. Building Mood, Building Community: Usage Patterns of an Interactive Art Installation. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA) (GROUP '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 201--212. https://doi.org/10.1145/2957276.2957291Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Alexander Seifert, Anna Schlomann, Christian Rietz, and Hans Rudolf Schelling. 2017. The use of mobile devices for physical activity tracking in older adults' everyday life. DIGITAL HEALTH 3 (2017), 2055207617740088. https: //doi.org/10.1177/2055207617740088Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Anika Steinert, Marten Haesner, Aileen Tetley, and Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen. 2016. Self-Monitoring of Health- Related Goals in Older Adults with Use of a Smartphone Application. Activities, Adaptation & Aging 40, 2 (2016), 81--92. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924788.2016.1158569Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Ann Taket, Beth R. Crisp, Annemarie Nevill, Greer Lamaro, Melissa Graham, and Sarah Barter-Godfrey. 2009. Theorising Social Exclusion. Routledge, 2 Park Square, Abingdon, Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Nick Taylor and Keith Cheverst. 2010. Creating a Rural Community Display with Local Engagement. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Aarhus, Denmark) (DIS '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 218--227. https://doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858209Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Nick Taylor, Justin Marshall, Alicia Blum-Ross, John Mills, Jon Rogers, Paul Egglestone, David M. Frohlich, Peter Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2012. Viewpoint: Empowering Communities with Situated Voting Devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1361--1370. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208594Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Warren G. Thompson, Carol L. Kuhle, Gabriel A. Koepp, Shelly K. McCrady-Spitzer, and James A. Levine. 2014. ?Go4Life" exercise counseling, accelerometer feedback, and activity levels in older people. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 58, 3 (2014), 314--319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2014.01.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Akke K [van der Bij], Miranda G.H Laurant, and Michel Wensing. 2002. Effectiveness of physical activity interventions for older adults: a review1 1The full text of this article is available via AJPM Online at www.elsevier.com/locate/ajpmonline. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 22, 2 (2002), 120--133. https: //doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(01)00413-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Tiffany C Veinot, Hannah Mitchell, and Jessica S Ancker. 2018. Good intentions are not enough: how informatics interventions can worsen inequality. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 25, 8 (05 2018), 1080--1088. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy052 arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/jamia/article-pdf/25/8/1080/25430904/ocy052.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. John Vines, Rachel Clarke, Peter Wright, John McCarthy, and Patrick Olivier. 2013. Configuring Participation: On How We Involve People in Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 429--438. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470716Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Jon Whittle. 2014. How Much Participation is Enough? A Comparison of Six Participatory Design Projects in Terms of Outcomes. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1 (Windhoek, Namibia) (PDC '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 121--130. https://doi.org/10.1145/2661435.2661445Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Rayoung Yang, Eunice Shin, Mark W. Newman, and Mark S. Ackerman. 2015. When Fitness Trackers Don't 'Fit": End-User Difficulties in the Assessment of Personal Tracking Device Accuracy. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (Osaka, Japan) (UbiComp '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 623--634. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2804269Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A Design Exploration of Health-Related Community Displays

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 5, Issue CSCW1
      CSCW
      April 2021
      5016 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3460939
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 April 2021
      Published in pacmhci Volume 5, Issue CSCW1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader