skip to main content
10.1145/2110363.2110394acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Human network data collection in the wild: the epidemiological utility of micro-contact and location data

Published:28 January 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Contagions - either pathogens spread through contact networks or societal memes spread through social networks - impact the occurrence and character of both epidemic and endemic diseases. While computational models explore disease parameters in the context of a given contact network, these models are always subject to the caveat that reality may not be consistent with the simplified assumptions regarding contact, contagion or network structure. More - and more accurate - data on the contact dynamics between people and places could alleviate some uncertainties, and make models more robust tools for policy-makers and researchers. Properly applied, consumer electronics can serve as a valuable source of this data. Using smartphones as sensor platforms rather than personal communications devices, it is possible to record high fidelity information on a participant's location, activity level, and contacts between both people and places. This paper describes the design, architecture and a preliminary deployment of a general smartphone-based epidemiological data collection system. The dataset, gathered over one month, contains over 45 million records related to the behavioral patterns of 39 participants. We provide an initial analysis of aggregate level statistics to demonstrate the power and scope of the technique for capturing relevant data. Demonstrating the potential for such data to inform decision-making, we further perform an agent-based simulation of a flu-like illness that uses the dataset to capture aspects of both person-person and environmental (place-person) transmission. We demonstrate that the data collection is possible, valuable, and scalable and that the data can be leveraged to inform detailed models capturing more complex physical interactions than were previously feasible.

References

  1. Anderson, R. M. and May, R. M. 1991. Infectious diseases of humans : dynamics and control. Oxford; New York: Oxford University PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Brauer, F., van den Driessche, P., and Wu, J. 2008. Spatial Structure: Partial Differential Equations Models Mathematical Epidemiology 1945 (2008), 191--203.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chunhua, O. and Jianhong, W. 2006. Spatial Spread of Rabies Revisited: Influence of Age Dependent Diffusion on Nonlinear Dynamics. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 67:1 (Nov. 2006) 138--163.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Codeco, C. 2001. Endemic and epidemic dynamics of cholera: the role of the aquatic reservoir. BMC Infectious Diseases, 1:1 (Feb. 2001), 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Dibble, C., Wendel, S., and Carle, K. 2007. Simulating pandemic influenza risks of US cities. Proceedings of the 39th Winter Simulation Conference, 1548--1550. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Eagle, N. and Pentland, A. 2006. Reality mining: sensing complex social systems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Volume 10 Issue 4, 255--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Eames K. T. D. and Keeling M. J. 2003. Contact tracing and disease control. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 270 (Dec. 2003), 2565--2571.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fall, K. 2003. A delay-tolerant network architecture for challenged internets, Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, August 25-29, 2003, Karlsruhe, Germany, 27--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. FluWatch, Public Health Agency of Canada, viewed 29 June 2011 http://origin.phac-aspc.gc.ca/fluwatch/09-10/w34_10/index-eng.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hagenaars, T. J., Donnelly, C. A., Ferguson, N. M., and Anderson, R. M. 2000. The transmission dynamics of the aetiological agent of scrapie in a sheep flock. Mathematical Biosciences, 168:2 (Dec. 2000), 117--135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Hashemian, M., Stanley, K., and Osgood, N. 2010. Flunet: Automated tracking of contacts during flu season. In Proc. of The 6th Intl. workshop on Wireless Network Measurements, (Avignon, France, May 31, 2010), 348--353.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hashemian, M., Stanley, K. G., 2011. Effective Utilization of Place as a Resource in Pocket Switched Networks, to be appeared in 36th IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks, (Bonn, Germany, October 4-7, 2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hethcote, H. W. and Yorke J. A. 1984. Gonorrhea transmission dynamics and control. Springer Lecture Notes in Biomathematics. Berlin, Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hui, P., Chaintreau, A., Scott, J., Gass, R., Crowcroft, J. and Diot, C. 2005. Pocket switched networks and human mobility in conference environments, In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Delay-tolerant networking, 244--251, August 26, 2005, Philadelphia, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Ionides, E. L., Breto, C., and King, A. A. 2006. Inference for nonlinear dynamical systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103:49 (Dec. 2006), 18438--18443.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Kermack, W. O. and A. G. McKendrick. 1927. A Contribution to the Mathematical Theory of Epidemics. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 115: 772 (Aug. 1927), 700--721.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Klovdahl, A., Graviss, E., Yaganehdoost, A., Ross, M., Wanger, A., Adams, G., et al. (2001). Networks and tuberculosis: an undetected community outbrea involving public places. Soc. Sci. Med., 52 (Mar. 2001), 681--694.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Latkin, C., Mandell, W., Vlahov, D., Oziemkowska, M., and Celentano, D. 1996. People and places: behavioral settings and personal network characteristics as correlates of needle sharing. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. Hum. Retrovirol., 13 (Nov. 1996), 273--280.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee, K., Hong, S., Kim, S. J., Rhee, I., and Chong, S. 2009. SLAW: A Mobility Model for Human Walks. In Proceedings of INFOCOM, (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, April 19-25, 2009), 855--863. DOI=10.1109/INFCOM.2009.5061995Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Madan, A., Cebrian, M., Lazer, D. and Pentland, A. 2010. Social Sensing for Epidemiological Behavior Change, In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Intl. conference on Ubiquitous computing(Copenhagen, Denmark, Sept. 26-29, 2010), 291--300. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. McBryde, E. S. and McElwain, D. L. S. 2006. A Mathematical Model Investigating the Impact of an Environmental Reservoir on the Prevalence and Control of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 193:10 (May 2006), 1473--1474.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Miller, M. W., Hobbs, N. T., and Tavener, S. J. 2006. Dynamics of prion disease transmission in mule deer. Ecological Applications, 16:6 (Dec. 2006), 2208--2214.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Morris, M. and Kretzschmar, M. 1995 Concurrent Partnerships and transmission dynamics in networks. Social Networks, 17:3-4 (Oct. 1995), 299--318.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Read, J. M., Eames, K. T. D., and Edmunds, W. J. 2008. Dynamic social networks and the implications for the spread of infectious disease. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 5 (Sept. 2008), 1001--1007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Rohani, P., Breban, R., Stallknecht, D. E., and Drake, J. M. 2009. Environmental transmission of low pathogenicity avian influenza viruses and its implications for pathogen invasion. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106:25, 10365--10369.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Salathe, M., Kazandjieva, M., Lee, J. W., Levis, P., Feldman, M. W., and Jones, J. H. 2010. A High-Resolution Human Contact Network for Infectious Disease Transmission. In Proc. of National Academy of Science, 107:51 (Dec. 2010).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Schneeberger, A., Mercer, C. H., Gregson, S. A. J., Ferguson, N. M., Nyamukapa, C. A., Anderson, R. M., et al. 2004. Scale-Free Networks and Sexually Transmitted Diseases: A Description of Observed Patterns of Sexual Contacts in Britain and Zimbabwe. Sexually transmitted diseases, 31:6 (Jun. 2004), 380--387.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Small T. and Hass A. 2005. Resource and Performance trade-offs in delay-tolerant wireless networks. In Proc. of the 2005 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Delay-Tolerant Networking, (Philadelphia, USA, August 22-26, 2005), 260--267. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Smieszek, T. 2009. A mechanistic model of infection: Why duration and intensity of contacts should be included in models of disease spread. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling (Nov. 2009), 6--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Song, C., Qu, Z., Blumm, N., and Barabási, A. 2010. Limits of Predictability in Human Mobility. Science 327(5968), 1018--1021, DOI=10.1126/science.1177170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Stanley, K. G. and Osgood N. D. 2011. The Potential of Sensor-Based Monitoring as a Health Care, Health Promotion, and Research Tool. Editorial in Annals of Family Medicine. vol. 9, 296--298.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Tuite, A. R., Greer, A. L., Whelan, M., Winter, A., Lee, B., Yan, P., Wu, J., Moghadas, S., Buckeridge, D., Pourbohloul, B. and Fisman, D. N. 2010. Estimated epidemiologic parameters and morbidity associated with pandemic H1N1 influenza. CMAJ, 182:2 (Dec. 2009), 131--136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Viboud, C., Bjørnstad, O. N., Smith, D. L., Simonsen, L., Miller, M. A., and Grenfell, B. T. 2006. Synchrony, Waves, and Spatial Hierarchies in the Spread of Influenza. Science, 312:5772 (Apr. 2006) 447--451.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Weber, T. P. and Stilianakis, N. I. 2008. Inactivation of influenza A viruses in the environment and modes of transmission: A critical review. Journal of Infection, 57:5 (Oct. 2008), 361--373.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Wylie, J. L., Shah, L., and Jolly, A. 2007. Incorporating geographic settings into a social network analysis of injection drug use and bloodborne pathogen prevalence. Health & Place, 13:3 (Sept. 2007), 617--628.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Human network data collection in the wild: the epidemiological utility of micro-contact and location data

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IHI '12: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium
      January 2012
      914 pages
      ISBN:9781450307819
      DOI:10.1145/2110363

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 January 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader