skip to main content
research-article

Experiencing EVA Park, a Multi-User Virtual World for People with Aphasia

Published:05 October 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Virtual worlds are used in wide-ranging ways by many people with long-term health conditions, but their use by people with aphasia (PWA) has been limited. In contrast, this article reports the use of EVA Park, a multi-user virtual world designed for PWA to practice conversations, focusing on people's emotional, social, and conversational experiences. An analysis of observation and interview data collected from 20 people with aphasia who participated in a 5-week therapy intervention revealed key themes related to user experience. The themes offer a rich insight into aspects of the virtual world experience for PWA that go beyond therapeutic outcomes. They are as follows: affect (positive and negative); types of conversation, miscommunication, and misunderstanding; immersion in the virtual world; social presence and initiative and flow. Overall, the study showed that participants experienced positive emotional and social outcomes. We argue that this was achieved as a consequence of EVA Park being not only accessible but also a varied and entertaining environment within which PWA experienced both the realistic and the quirky while engaging with others and having fun.

References

  1. Myzoon Ali, Patrick Lyden, and Marian Brady. 2015. Aphasia and dysarthria in acute stroke: Recovery and functional outcome. Int. J. Stroke 10, 3 (2015), 400--406 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Abdullah Al Mahmud and Jean-Bernard Martens. 2016. Social networking through email: studying email usage patterns of persons with aphasia. Aphasiology 30, 2--3 (2016), 186--210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ana Amaya, Celia Woolf, Niamh Devane, Julia Galliers, Richard Talbot, Stephanie Wilson, and Jane Marshall (submitted).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Page L. Anderson, Elana Zimand, Larry F. Hodges, and B. Rothbaum. 2005. Cognitive behavioural therapy for public-speaking anxiety using virtual reality for exposure. Depress. Anxiety 22, 3 (2005), 156--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Lisa M. D. Archibald, Joseph B. Orange, and Donald J. Jamieson. 2009. Implementation of computer-based language therapy in aphasia. Therapy Arch. Neurol. Disord. 2 (2009), 299--311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Suzanne Beeke, Firle Beckley, Wendy Best, Fiona Johnson, Susan Edwards, and Jane Maxim. 2013. Extended turn construction and test question sequences in the conversations of three speakers with agrammatic aphasia. Clin. Ling. Phonet. 27, 10--11 (2013), 784--804.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Tom Boellstorff. 2012. Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method. Princeton University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Marian C. Brady, Helen Kelly, Jon Godwin, and Pam Enderby. 2016. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 6, CD000425. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Jeanne H. Brockmyer, Christine M. Fox, Kathleen A. Curtiss, Evan McBroom, Kimberly M. Burkhart, and Jacquelyn N. Pidruzny. 2009. The development of the game engagement questionnaire: A measure of engagement in video game-playing. J. Exper. Soc. Psychol. 45, 4 (2009), 624--634. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Shelley B. Brundage and Adrienne B. Hancock. 2015. Real enough: Using virtual public speaking environments to evoke feelings and behaviours targeted in stuttering assessment and treatment. Am. J. Speech-Lang. Pathol. 24 (2015), 139--149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Saniye T. Bulu. 2012. Place presence, social presence, co-presence, and satisfaction in virtual worlds. Comput. Educ. 58, 1 (2012), 154--161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Paul Cairns, Anna L. Cox, Nadia Berthouze, Charlene Jennett, and S. Dhoparee. 2006. Quantifying the experience of immersion in games. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Science of Games and Gameplay (CogSci’06). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Marcella Carragher, Paul Conroy, Karen Sage, and Ray Wilkinson. 2012. Can impairment-focused therapy change the everyday conversations of people with aphasia? A review of the literature and future directions. Aphasiology 26, 7 (2012), doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2012.676164 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Leora R. Cherney, Anita S. Halper, and Rosalind C. Kaye. 2011. Computer based script training for aphasia: Emerging themes from post-treatment interviews. J. Commun. Disord. 44 (2011), 493—501. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Leora R. Cherney and Sarel Van Vuuren. 2012. Telerehabilitation, virtual therapists, and acquired neurologic speech and language disorders. Semin. Speech Langu. 33 (2012), 243--257. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Paul Conroy, Karen Sage, and Matt Lambon-Ralph. 2009. Improved vocabulary production after naming therapy in aphasia: Can gains in picture naming generalise to connected speech? Int. J. Lang. Commun. Disord. 44, 6 (2009), 1036--1062.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. COSPATIAL. ND. Retrieved December 15, 2016 from http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-social-sciences/education/CospatialflyerforESRCwebsite.pdf. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Madeleine Cruice, Linda Worrall, and Louise Hickson. 2010. Reporting on psychological well-being of older adults with chronic aphasia in the context of unaffected peers. Disabil. Rehabil. 33, 3 (2010), 219--228. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Madeleine Cruice, Linda Worrall, and Louise Hickson. 2006. Quantifying aphasic people's social lives in the context of non-aphasic peers. Aphasiology 20 (2006), 1210--1225. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Bronwyn Davidson, Linda Worrall, and Louise Hickson. 2008. Exploring the interactional dimension of social communication: A collective case study of older people with aphasia. Aphasiology 22, 3 (2008), 235--257. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Suzanne Doesborgh, Mieke van de Sandt-Koenderman, Diederik Dippel, Frans van Harskamp, Peter Koudstaal, and Evy Visch-Brink. 2004. Cues on request: The efficacy of multicue, a computer program for wordfinding therapy. Aphasiology. 18 (2004), 213--222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Judith F. Duchan and Dana Kovarsky. 2011. Rapport and Relationships in Clinical Interactions. Top. Lang. Disord. 31, 4 (2011), 297--299. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Daniel W. Furnas and Lisa A. Edmonds. 2014. The Effect of Computerized Verb Network Strengthening Treatment on Lexical Retrieval in Aphasia. Aphasiology 28 (2014), 401--420.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Noëmi Eggenberger, Basil C. Preisig, Rahel Schumacher, Simone Hopfner, Tim Vanbellingen, Thomas Nyffeler. 2016. Comprehension of co-speech gestures in aphasic patients: An eye movement study. PLoS ONE 11, 1, e0146583. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146583. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Robert J. Fourie. 2009. Qualitative study of the therapeutic relationship in speech and language therapy: Perspectives of adults with acquired communication and swallowing disorders. Int. J. Lang. Commun. Disord. 44, 6 (2009), 979--999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Julia Galliers and Stephanie Wilson. 2013. An exploratory study into the accessibility of a multi-user virtual world for young people with aphasia. In Proceedings of the 27th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference. British Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Alessandra Gorini, Claret S. Capideville, Giannucia De Leo, Fabrizia Mantovani and Giuseppe Riva. 2011. The role of immersion and narrative in mediated presence: The virtual hospital experience. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Network. 14, 3, 99--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Maree L. Hackett and Kristen Pickles. 2014. Part I: frequency of depression after stroke: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Int. J. Stroke 9, 8 (2014), 1017--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Sandra R. Harris, Robert L. Kemmerling and Max M. North. 2002. Brief virtual reality therapy for public speaking anxiety. CyberPsychol. Behav. 5, 543--550. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. John E. Harrison, Pauline Buxton, Masud Husain, and Richard Wise. 2000. Short test of semantic and phonological fluency: Normal performance, validity and test-retest reliability. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 39 (2000), 181--191. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Nancy Helm-Estabrooks. 2002. Cognition and aphasia: A discussion and a study. J. Commun. Disord. 35, 2 (2002), 171--186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Audrey L. Holland, Carol Frattali, and Davida Fromm. 1999. Communication activities of daily living: CADL-2. Pro-Ed. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Simon Horton. 2008. Learning‐in‐interaction: Resourceful work by people with aphasia and therapists in the course of language impairment therapy. Aphasiology 22, 9 (2008), 985--1014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Guangying Hua and Dominique Haughton. 2009. Virtual worlds adoption: A research framework and empirical study. Online Inf. Rev. 33, 5 (2009), 889--900. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Janet L. Ingles, Gail A. Eskes, and Stephen J. Phillips. 1999. Fatigue after stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 80, 2, 173--178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Wijnand IJsselsteijn, Wouter Van Den Hoogen, Christoph Klimmt, Yvonne De Kort, Craig Lindley, Klaus Mathiak, Karolien Poels, Niklas Ravaja, Marko Turpeinen, and Peter Vorderer. 2008. Measuring the experience of digital game enjoyment. In Proceedings of Measuring Behavior.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Faustina Hwang and Christos Salis. 2016. Digital technology and aphasia. Aphasiology 30, 2--3 (2016), 109—111. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Gitit Kave. 2005. Phonemic fluency, semantic fluency, and difference scores: Normative data for adult Hebrew speakers. J. Clin. Exper. Neuropsychol. 27 (2005), 690--699.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Thomas Kohler, Johann Fueller, Kurt Matzler, Daniel Stieger, and Johann Füller. 2011. Co-creation in virtual worlds: The design of the user experience. MIS Quart. 35, 3 (2011), 773--788. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Michelle Lawton, Gillian Haddock, Paul Conroy, and Karen Sage. 2016. Therapeutic alliances in stroke rehabilitation: A meta-ethnography. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 97, 11 (2016), 1979--1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Hyejin Lee, Yuna Lee, Hyunsoo Choi, and Sung-Bom Pyun. 2015. Community integration and quality of life in aphasia after stroke. Yonsei Med. J. 56, 6 (2015), 1694--1702. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Marcia Linebarger, Denise McCall, Telana Virata, and Rita Sloan Berndt. 2007. Widening the temporal window: Processing support in the treatment of aphasic language production. Brain Lang. 100 (2007), 53--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Jane Marshall, Tracey Booth, Niamh Devane, Julia Galliers, Helen Greenwood, Katerina Hilari, Richard Talbot, Stephanie Wilson, and Celia Woolf. 2016. Evaluating the benefits of aphasia intervention delivered in virtual reality: Results of a quasi-randomised study. PLoS ONE. 11 (2016), 8: e0160381. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160381Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Laura Millen, Rob Edlin-White, and Sue Cobb. 2010. The development of educational collaborative virtual environments for children with autism. In Proceedings of the 5th Cambridge Workshop on Universal Access and Assistive Technology. Cambridge 1, 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Sarah Northcott and Katerina Hilari. 2011. Why do people lose their friends after a stroke? Int. J. Lang. Commun. Disord. 6, 5, 524--534. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Sarah Northcott, Jane Marshall, and Katerina Hilari. 2016. What Factors Predict Who Will Have a Strong Social Network Following a Stroke? J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 59, 4 (2016), 772--783. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Rebecca Palmer, Pam Enderby, Cindy Cooper, Nick Latimer, Stephen Julious, Gail Paterson, and Munyaradzi Dimairo. 2012. Computer therapy compared with usual care for people with long-standing aphasia poststroke: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 43 (2012), 1904--1911 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Rebecca Palmer, Pam Enderby, and Gail Paterson. 2013. Using computers to enable self management of aphasia therapy exercises for word finding. Int. J. Lang. Commun. Disord. 48 (2013), 508--521. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Sarah Parsons and Sue Cobb. 2011. State-of-the-art of virtual reality technologies for children on the autism spectrum. Eur. J. Spec. Needs Educ. 26, 3 (2011), 355--366 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Karolien Poels, Yvonne de Kort, and Wijnand Ijsselsteijn. 2007. It is always a lot of fun!: exploring dimensions of digital game experience using focus group methodology. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Future Play. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. S. Ramsing, C. Blomstrand, and M. Sullivan. 1991. Prognostic factors for return to work in stroke patients with aphasia. Aphasiology 5, 6 (1991), 583--588. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Giuseppe Riva, Fabrizia Mantovani, Claret Samantha Capideville, Alessandra Preziosa, Francesca Morganti, Daniela Villani, Andrea Gaggioli, Cristina Botella, and Mariano Alcañiz. 2007. Affective interactions using virtual reality: The link between presence and emotions. CyberPsychol. Behav. 10, 1 (2007), 45--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Ghaydaa Shehata, Taha El Mistikawi, Risha Al Sayed, and Huda S. Hassan. 2015. The effect of aphasia upon personality traits, depression and anxiety among stroke patients. J. Affect. Disord. 172 (2015), 312--314. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.027 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Nina N. Simmons‐Mackie and Jack S. Damico. 2007. Access and social inclusion in aphasia: Interactional principles and applications. Aphasiology 21, 1 (2007), 81--97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Jacqueline Stark, Christiane Pons and Csaba Daniel. 2013. Integrating face to face language therapy with virtual reality applications for persons with aphasia. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Virtual Reality. Philadelphia. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Karen Stendal, Susan Balandin, and Judith Molka-Danielsen. 2011. Virtual worlds: A new opportunity for people with lifelong disability? J. Intell. Dev. Disabil. 36, 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Karen Stendal. 2012. How do people with disability use and experience virtual worlds and ICT: A literature review. (submitted) doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4101/jvwr.v5i1.6173.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Kate Swinburn, Gillian Porter, and David Howard. 2004. Comprehensive Aphasia Test. Psychology Press, Hove.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Cynthia K. Thompson, JungWon J. Choy, Audrey Holland, and Ronald Cole. 2010. Sentactics®: Computer-automated treatment of underlying forms. Aphasiology 24 (2010), 1242--1266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Mieke Van De Sandt-Koenderman. 2011. Aphasia rehabilitation and the role of computer technology: Can we keep up with the times? Int. J. Speech-Lang. Pathol. 13 (2011), 21--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Sarel Van Vuuren and Leora R. Cherney. 2014. A virtual therapist for speech and language therapy. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 8637 LNAI:438-448. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Candace P. Vickers. 2010. Social networks after the onset of aphasia: The impact of aphasia group attendance. Aphasiology 24 (2010), 902—913. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Julia Wade and Jane Mortley. 2003. Talk about IT: Views of people with aphasia and their partners on receiving remotely monitored computer-based word finding therapy. Aphasiology 17 (2003), 1031--1056. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Eric N. Wiebe, Allison Lamb, Megan Hardy, and David Sharek. 2014. Measuring engagement in video game-based environments: Investigation of the user engagement scale. Comput. Hum. Behav. 32 (2014), 123--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Stephanie Wilson, Abi Roper, Jane Marshall, Julia Galliers, Niamh Devane, Tracey Booth, and Celia Woolf. 2015. Codesign for people with aphasiathrough tangible design languages. CoDesign 11, 1 (2015), 21--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Linda Worrall, Brooke Ryan, Kyla Hudson, Ian Kneebone, Nina Simmons-Mackie, Asaduzzaman Khan, Tammy Hoffmann, Emma Power, Leanne Togher, and Miranda Rose. 2016. Reducing the psychosocial impact of aphasia on mood and quality of life in people with aphasia and the impact of caregiving in family members through the aphasia action success knowledge (aphasia ASK) program: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 171 (2016), 7. doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1257-9 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Kristin Williams, Karyn Moffatt, Denise McCall, and Leah Findlater. 2015. Designing conversation cues on a head-worn display to support persons with aphasia. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 231--240.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Celia Woolf, Anna Caute, Zula Haigh, Julia Galliers, Stephanie Wilson, Awurabena Kessie, Shashi Hirani, Barbara Hegarty, and Jane Marshall. 2016. A comparison of remote therapy, face to face therapy and an attention control intervention for people with aphasia: A quasi-randomised controlled feasibility study. Clin. Rehabil.. 30, 4 (2016), 359--373. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Maarten Woudstra, Abdullah Al Mahmud, and Jean-Bernard Martens. 2011. A snapshot diary to support conversational storytelling for persons with aphasia. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, 641—646. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Nick Yee. 2006. The demographics, motivations, and derived experiences of users of massively multi-user online graphical environments. Presence 15, 3 (2006), 309--329. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Experiencing EVA Park, a Multi-User Virtual World for People with Aphasia

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
        ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing  Volume 10, Issue 4
        October 2017
        129 pages
        ISSN:1936-7228
        EISSN:1936-7236
        DOI:10.1145/3131767
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 October 2017
        • Accepted: 1 August 2017
        • Revised: 1 July 2017
        • Received: 1 December 2016
        Published in taccess Volume 10, Issue 4

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader