skip to main content
10.1145/333334.333358acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Theory and models for creating engaging and immersive ecommerce Websites

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 April 2000Publication History

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this paper is to describe theory and research from several disciplines, not generally understood by web developers, which the author believes are applicable to creating engaging and immersive ecommerce environments. These disciplines include aesthetic experience (AE), Flow, landscape assessment, and a proposed aesthetic framework. The link between these different areas is aesthetics, specifically aesthetic experience. Developing ecommerce sites based on models related to aesthetics can provide an organized means of designing engaging and immersive sites which are more likely to lead to positive user experience. IT personnel commonly understand the psychological aspects of human-computer interaction (HCI). Similarly, the toolbox of every web designer and Internet system architect should include knowledge of the concepts related to engaging and immersive environments.

References

  1. 1.Amheim, 1L Visual thinking. University of California Press, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Balmuth, M. M&A pulse column. Upside (September, 1996), 104-105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Barkow J'.H., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (eds.). The Adapted Mind. Oxford University Press, New York, I992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.Beardsley, M.C. Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism. Harcourt Brace, New York, 1958.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.Beardsley, M.C. Aesthetic experience regained. The Journal of Art Criticism, 28 (Fall 1969), 2-12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Beardsley, M.C. Aesthetic theory and educational theory. In Smith, R. (ed.), Aesthetic concepts and education pp. 3-20. University of Illinois Press, Chicago, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.Beardsley, M.C. Some persistent issues in aesthetics. In M.J. Wreen & D.M. Callen (eds.), The aesthetic point of view: Selected essays, pp. 285-287. Comell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.Bell, P.A., Fisher, J.D., Baron, A. and Greene, T.C. Environmental Psychology (3rd. ed.). Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Fort Worth, TX, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.Berleant, A. The Aesthetic Field: A Phenomenology of Aesthetic Experience. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.Berlyne, D.E. Aesthetics and Psychobiology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.Brandt, R.L. Porting to the web. Upside (September 1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.CasheI, J. Community as commodity. New Media (August 1999), 3 8-43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.Csikszentmihalyi, M. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: The Experience of Play in Work and Games. Jossey- Bass, San Francisco, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.Csikszentmihalyi, M. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper & Row, New York, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Robinson, R.E. The Art of Seeing: An Interpretation of the Aesthetic Encounter. J. Paul Getty Trust, Malibu, CA, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.Dewey, J. Art as Experience. Minton, Balch & Company, New York, 1934.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.Flow Facts. Flow Network Site (October, 1997) http ://wa~. fl ownetwork, e om/facts.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.Gierland, J. Go with the flow. Wired (September, 1996), 160-161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.Goodman, N. Art and inquiry. In M. Philipson & P.J. Gudel (eds.), Aesthetics Today, pp. 307-321. Meridian, New York, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.Graves, M. The art of color and design (2nd ed). McGraw-Hill, New York, 1951.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.Hertz, R, and Imber, J.B. (eds.). Studying Elites Using Qualitative Research Methods, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.Jennings, M.M. Principles of Design: Non-Visual Perceptions. Unpublished master thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.Jennings, M.M. An Aesthetic Framework Derived From the Creative and Conceptual Design Process of Master Designers of Educational and Game Environments: A Qualitative Research Perspective. Doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley (1998). UMI Dissertation Services, 9839536.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.Kaplan, R. and Kaplan, S. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.Kaplan, $. Environmental preferences in lmowledgeseeking, knowledge-using organisms. In J.H. Barkow, L. Cosmides & J. Toby (eds.), The Adapted Mind, pp. 580-598. Oxford University Press, New York, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.Kupfer, J.H. Experience as Art: Aesthetics in Everyday Life. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.Khaslavsky, J., and Shedroff, N. Understanding the seductive experience. Commun. ACM, 425, 1999, 45-49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. 28.Laurel, B. Computers as Theater. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. 29.Luskin, B. Toward an understanding of media psychology. T.H.E. Journal: Technological Horizons in Education, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.Malnar, J.M. and Vodvarka, F. The Interior Dimension: A Theoretical Approach to Enclosed Space. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.Orians, G.H. and Heerwagen, J.H. Evolved responses to landscape. In J.H. Barkow, L. Cosmides & J. Tooby (eds,), The Adapted Mind, pp. 555-579. Oxford University, New York, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.Roth, D. Five Myths That Could Kill Ecommerce. New Media (October, 1999), pp. 30-38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.Soukhanov, A.H. (ed.). Webster's II: New Riverside University Dictionary. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, I984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.Tedeschi, B.E. Ecommerce Report. New York Times (August 30, 1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.Venkatesh, V. and Smith, R.H. Creation of favorable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. M1S Quarterly 23, 2 (June 1999) 239- 260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. 36.Winograd, T. In T. Winograd (ed.). Bringing Design to Software, pp. v-ix. ACM Press, New York, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Theory and models for creating engaging and immersive ecommerce Websites

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCPR '00: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer personnel research
      April 2000
      200 pages
      ISBN:158113228X
      DOI:10.1145/333334

      Copyright © 2000 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 April 2000

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate300of480submissions,63%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader