Skip main navigation

Inappropriate Left Ventricular Mass in Patients With Primary Aldosteronism

Originally publishedhttps://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.114140Hypertension. 2008;52:529–534

Abstract

Assessment of appropriateness of left ventricular mass (LVM) for a given workload may better stratify hypertensive patients. Inappropriate LVM may reflect the interaction of genetic and neurohumoral factors other than blood pressure playing a significant role in myocardial growth. Primary aldosteronism (PA) represents a clinical model useful in assessing the effect of aldosterone increase on LVM. The aim of this study was to evaluate the inappropriateness of LVM in patients with PA. In 125 patients with PA (54 females; adrenal hyperplasia in 73 and adenoma in 52 patients) and in 125 age-, sex-, and blood pressure–matched, essential hypertensive patients, echocardiography was performed. The appropriateness of LVM was calculated by the ratio of observed LVM to the predicted value using a reference equation. In all of the subjects plasma renin activity and aldosterone, as well as clinic and 24-hour blood pressure, were measured. The prevalence of inappropriate LVM was greater in patients with traditionally defined left ventricular hypertrophy (70% and 44%, respectively; P=0.02) but also in patients without left ventricular hypertrophy (17% and 9%, respectively; P=0.085). In PA patients, a correlation was observed between the ratio of observed:predicted LVM and the ratio of aldosterone:plasma renin activity levels (r=0.29; P=0.003) or the postinfusion aldosterone concentration (r=0.44; P=0.004; n=42). In conclusion, in patients with PA, the prevalence of inappropriate LVM is increased, even in the absence of traditionally defined left ventricular hypertrophy. The increase in aldosterone levels could contribute to the increase of LV mass exceeding the amount needed to compensate hemodynamic load.

In hypertension, left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH) is initially a useful compensatory process to abnormal loading conditions, but it is also the first step toward the development of overt clinical disease.1–4 In the attempt to discriminate between normal (compensatory) and abnormal (noncompensatory) increase in LV mass (LVM), it has been recently proposed that researchers evaluate the LVM increase in hypertensive patients, taking into account gender and cardiac loading conditions, together with some measure of body size.5 Patients with inappropriate LVM, exceeding the amount needed to adapt to stroke work for a given gender and body size, tend to cluster with metabolic risk factors.6 More interestingly, the prevalence of low systolic myocardial function, as well as of abnormal relaxation, is greater in hypertensive patients with inappropriate LVM, suggesting that this condition may represent an accelerated phase of transition from compensatory LVH toward heart failure.7,8

Three studies have demonstrated that the presence of inappropriate LVM implies a greater risk of cardiovascular (CV) events, either in the presence or in the absence of traditionally defined LVH,9–11 and changes in LVM appropriateness may add prognostic information, mainly in patients with persistence or development of traditionally defined LVH.9,11

A substantial percentage of LV mass variance, however, remains unexplained, even when the influence of cardiac workload, body size, and gender are taken into account. In fact, other nonhemodynamic (genetic) or neurohumoral (renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system) factors may exert influence on the individual LVM. Recent experimental studies suggest that long-term exposure to increased aldosterone levels contributes to the development of cardiac, vascular, and renal damage,12,13 also independent of blood pressure (BP) increase.

In patients with primary aldosteronism (PA), a higher prevalence and degree of severity of CV structural and functional changes have been demonstrated,14–18 possibly influencing an excess rate of CV events, as suggested by 2 recent longitudinal studies of large cohorts comparing patients with essential hypertension and with PA.19,20 Therefore, we considered it worthwhile to investigate the appropriateness of LV mass in patients with PA and to evaluate whether the excess of LV mass could be related to aldosterone increase.

Methods

Subjects

A total of 125 consecutive uncomplicated patients with PA, aged 23 to 79 years (71 males and 54 females) were enrolled into the study: 52 of them had an aldosterone-producing adenoma, and in 73, idiopathic hyperaldosteronism was diagnosed. Basal evaluation was performed after discontinuation of any antihypertensive treatment for ≥4 weeks, except for calcium channel and α-adrenoceptor blockers, required in 30% of patients. Patients with hypokalemia had been given adequate oral potassium supplements before the hormonal evaluations.

During the years 1988–1995, only patients with a high suspicion for PA, such as those with spontaneous or diuretic-induced hypokalemia or hypertension and an adrenal mass, were further examined for PA; from 1996 to 2002, the aldosterone:renin ratio (ARR) was progressively used with a cutoff level of 40 ng/dL per ng·mL−1·h−1 plus an aldosterone level >150 pg/dL. A positive intravenous saline load (ie, posttest aldosterone levels >50 pg/dL)21,22 was considered a confirmatory test. In addition, a computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance of the adrenal glands were used as imaging techniques23,24 (for details, please see the data supplement available online at http://hyper.ahajournals.org).

Patients with PA were carefully matched for age, gender, body size, clinic BP values, and use of antihypertensive treatment at the time of the basal examination with 125 patients with essential hypertension, referred to our outpatient clinic for high BP diagnostic workup, including supine and standing plasma renin activity and aldosterone measurements. Eighteen patients with essential hypertension and 21 patients with PA had received previous treatment for various periods of time with a combination of 2 to 3 drugs (calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, diuretics, or β-blockers). Each subject provided informed consent for the study, which was approved by institutional ethics committee.

Clinical Evaluation

Patients underwent a thorough clinical examination. CV risk factors were carefully assessed, and a documented clinical history was collected. BP was measured using a mercury sphygmomanometer (Korotkoff phase V for diastolic BP), with a regular adult cuff, after the echocardiographic examination in a semirecumbent position and thereafter in a sitting position (3 measurements in each position).

Echocardiography

In all of the patients, a technically optimal M-mode echocardiogram (<2D control) was obtained at baseline and included in the study. M-mode echocardiographic tracings were recorded on a videotape and printed on a strip-chart recorder. Two different readers measured all of the echocardiograms, in a blind manner, and the average of the 2 calculations was considered for the study. The LV internal dimensions, interventricular septum, and posterior wall thicknesses were measured according to the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography,25 and derived anatomic variables were calculated26; LVM index (LVMI) was obtained by normalization of LVM for height to the 2.7 power,27 and LVH was prospectively defined as a value of LVMI ≥50 g/m2.7 in males and 47 g/m2.7 in females.27 End-diastolic relative wall thickness (RWT) was calculated as the ratio of posterior wall thickness to one half of the LV internal dimension, and concentric geometry was defined as RWT ≥0.42.28 Ejection fraction, endocardial, and midwall fractional shortening (FS) were calculated by standard methods.29 In addition, transmitral Doppler flow patterns recorded at the mitral valve tips were used to measure early and late-wave diastolic filling velocities, their ratio (early/late-wave ratio), and early wave deceleration time.30 LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were calculated with the Teicholz’s correction of the cube formula.31,32 Stroke work (SW) was estimated as systolic BP (measured in a semirecumbent position after the echocardiographic study) times stroke volume and converted into gram-meters by multiplying by 0.0144. The theoretical value of LVM was estimated using an equation developed previously5: Predicted LVM (pLVM)=55.37+6.64 × height (m2.7)+0.64×SW−18.07×gender (where gender was coded as male=1 and female=2).

LVM measured by M-mode tracing25 was divided by the predicted LVM and was expressed as a percentage (observed LVM/predicted LVM). Observed LVM/predicted LVM was categorized using the 97.5th percentiles of the distribution in the normotensive, normal weight reference adult population,5 and inappropriate LVM was defined as an excess of >35% from the predicted value (ie, observed LVM/predicted LVM >135%).

Statistical Analysis

The statistical significance of differences between the 2 groups (PA patients and controls) was assessed by unpaired t test. χ2 statistic was used to assess differences of categorical variables between groups.

Relationships between the ratio of observed:predicted LVM and urinary aldosterone or aldosterone:renin ratio were investigated calculating the Pearson’s coefficient. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to select the variables independently associated with the presence of inappropriate LV mass; entry in to the equations was restricted to variables whose partial F test was significant at the level of P<0.05. All of the statistical tests were 2-tailed at the 0.05 P value. Results are expressed as means±SDs. All of the analyses were carried out with the SPSS 13.01 statistical package.

Results

Patients With PA and Essential Hypertension

Demographic characteristics of patients with PA and with essential hypertension are shown in Table 1; by definition, no differences in age, gender distribution, BP, and heart rate values measured in the clinic were observed between patients with essential hypertension and PA. Heart rate and BP measured by 24-hour ambulatory monitoring were also similar in PA and essential hypertensive subjects.

Table 1. Demographic Characteristics and Laboratory Data of Patients

ParameterPrimary AldosteronismEssential HypertensionP
HR indicates heart rate; NS, not significant; MDRD, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Data are means±SDs unless otherwise specified.
*P<0.05.
P<0.001.
Age, y50±1151±110.59
Gender, male/female, %71/5471/54NS
Smokers, %2118NS
BMI, kg/h227.4±527.6±50.70
SBP/DBP clinic, mm Hg152±18/96±11148±16/94±90.12/0.09
HR clinic, bpm67±1070±120.07
SBP/DBP 24 h, mm Hg139±17/88±12133±16/84±120.08/0.11
HR 24 h, bpm71±1073±110.08
Glycemia, mg/dL97±2299±200.10
Total cholesterol, mg/dL207±42216±430.12
Triglycerides, mg/dL125±102137±1000.44
Creatinine, mg/dL0.96±0.270.98±0.240.5
Glomerular filtration rate MDRD, mL/min84±2580±190.21
Uric acid, mEq/dL4.8±1.6*5.3±1.70.04
Serum K+, mEq/dL3.7±0.574.15±0.280.001

Serum potassium was lower in patients with PA, as compared with patients with essential hypertension, whereas no significant differences in laboratory parameters were observed. LVMI was significantly higher in patients with PA, as compared with control subjects, whereas no differences in RWT were observed. LVH was observed in 57 of 125 PA patients and in 27 of 125 control subjects (45% and 22%, respectively; χ2P<0.001); concentric geometry was observed in 26 of 125 PA patients and in 31 of 125 control subjects (21% versus 25%; χ2P=0.45).

Prevalence of inappropriate LVM was greater in patients with PA with respect to those with essential hypertension (71% and 17%, respectively; χ2P<0.0001); this was true in patients with traditionally defined LVH (70% and 44%, respectively; Fisher’s exact test P=0.02) but also in patients without LVH (17% and 9%, respectively; Fisher’s exact test P=0.085; Figure). Among patients with PA, LVMI was 49±18 g/m2.7 and 51±16 g/m2.7, and RWT was 0.36±0.07 and 0.375±0.073 in the 74 patients with aldosterone-producing adenoma and in the 51 patients with adrenal hyperplasia, respectively. The prevalence of inappropriate LVM was 54% in patients with aldosterone-producing adenoma and 42.5% in patients with adrenal hyperplasia.

Figure. Prevalence of inappropriate LVM in subjects without (left panel) and with (right panel) traditionally defined LVH. PA indicates primary aldosteronism (gray bars); controls, essential hypertension (black bars).

The left atrium was larger in patients with PA, whereas the early:late-wave ratio, E wave deceleration time, and IVRT did not differ between groups (Table 2). The prevalence of diastolic dysfunction, diagnosed according to the European Society of Cardiology guidelines,33 was slightly greater in patients with PA as compared with essential hypertensive subjects (40% versus 32%), although the difference did not reach statistical significance.

Table 2. Echocardiographic Data of Patients

ParameterPrimary Aldosteronism, Mean±SDEssential Hypertension, Mean±SDP
IVRT, isovolumetric relaxation time.
*P<0.05.
P<0.001.
LVM, g/m2.750±1740±11<0.001
RWT0.37±0.070.36±0.070.45
FS endocardial, %40±741±70.43
FS midwall, %18.5±3.1*19±30.014
Left atrium, mm3.89±0.57*3.67±0.580.04
Early:late-wave ratio1.02±0.291.08±0.360.16
Early wave deceleration, ms195±51185±420.13
IVRT, ms87±2683±200.19

Patients With Appropriate and Inappropriate LVM

In patients with PA, the mean age, body mass index, and systolic and diastolic BP both measured in the clinic and during 24-hour BP monitoring did not differ between those with inappropriate or appropriate LVM (Table 3). Uric acid and the ARR were increased in patients with PA and inappropriate LVM. Relative wall thickness was higher, whereas midwall FS was lower in patients with inappropriate LVM (Table 4).

Table 3. Demographic Characteristics and Laboratory Data of Patients With Essential Hypertension and With PA, According to the Presence of Inappropriate or Appropriate LVM (Mass)

ParameterPA, Mean±SDEssential Hypertension, Mean±SD
Appropriate LVMInappropriate LVMAppropriate LVMInappropriate LVM
MDRD, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group.
*P<0.05 vs appropriate LVM.
P<0.01 vs appropriate LVM.
Age, y50±1151±1151±1251±11
BMI, kg/h226.5±428.5±5*27.5±428±5
SBP, mm Hg153±19150±18149±17144±13
DBP, mm Hg96±1195±1293±994±10
24 h SBP, mm Hg137±16141±20132±16140±15
24 h DBP, mm Hg88±1287±1183±1291±13
Glycemia, mg/dL95±20101±2499.5±2097±12
Glomerular filtration rate MDRD, mL/min87±2680±2182±1974±17*
Uric acid, mEq/dL4.4±1.35.4±1.75.2±1.75.8±2.04
Aldosterone:plasma renin activity ratio127±108187±16122.4±1818±24

Table 4. Echocardiographic Data of Patients With Essential Hypertension and With PA, According to the Presence of Inappropriate or Appropriate LVM (Mass)

ParameterPA, Mean±SDEssential Hypertension, Mean±SD
Appropriate LVMInappropriate LVMAppropriate LVMInappropriate LVM
IVRT, isovolumetric relaxation time.
*P<0.05 vs appropriate LVM.
P<0.01 vs appropriate LVM.
RWT0.34±0.060.41±0.060.35±0.060.43±0.06
Endocardial FS, %74±965±869±1271±10
Midwall FS, %20.2±2.616.2±2.0220.1±2.616.3±2.0
Left atrium, mm3.75±0.544.1±0.563.66±0.573.7±0.63
Early:late-wave ratio1.04±0.281.00±0.321.1±0.371.02±0.30
Early wave deceleration, ms186±46208±55*181±38211±49
IVRT, ms84±2692±2482±1989±21*

In essential hypertensive control subjects, systolic and diastolic BPs measured during 24-hour monitoring were higher in patients with inappropriate LVM, whereas no significant differences were observed in fasting glucose concentration, serum uric acid, and the ARR between patients with inappropriate LVM and appropriate LVM (Table 3). Relative wall thickness was higher, whereas midwall FS was lower in patients with inappropriate LVM (Table 4).

In both groups (PA and essential hypertensive control subjects) the glomerular filtration rate was slightly reduced in patients with inappropriate LVM, although differences reached statistical significance only in essential hypertensive subjects (Table 3). In patients with inappropriate LVM, patients with PA had a greater prevalence of diastolic dysfunction (54% versus 30%; χ2P=0.06). In patients with PA, LVMI was not related to ARR at univariate analysis (r=0.053; P=0.67), whereas a low, albeit statistically significant, correlation was observed between the degree of LVM inappropriateness and the ARR (r=0.29; P=0.001) or urinary aldosterone concentration (r=0.19; P=0.05). In patients with PA who underwent a saline infusion (n=42), a significant correlation was found between postinfusion aldosterone levels and LVMI (r=0.32; P=0.04) and the observed:predicted LVM ratio (r=0.44; P=0.004); such a correlation explained the 10% and 19% of the variation of LVMI and LV mass inappropriateness, respectively.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis performed in all of the patients (essential hypertensive subjects and PA) showed that only the presence of PA (hazard ratio: 2.33; 95% CI: 1.06 to 3.0; P=0.03) and the increase in 24-hour systolic BP (hazard ratio: 1.023; 95% CI: 1.004 to 1.044; P=0.02) were independently associated with LVM inappropriateness.

Discussion

LVH is more severe in PA than in essential hypertension and seems to develop early among all forms of end organ damage.13–20,34–38 Some evidence has accumulated supporting the concept that, in patients with PA, cardiac hypertrophy is not the simple consequence of a raised hemodynamic pressure and volume load. Available data with 24-hour BP monitoring have not supported the concept that a greater 24-hour load or a nondipping pattern could exert an influence on the increase in LV mass.17,37,38

The results of the present study indicate that the increase in aldosterone levels could contribute to the increase of LV mass exceeding the amount needed to compensate hemodynamic load. First, the prevalence of inappropriate LV mass was greater in patients with PA than in carefully matched essential hypertensive subjects, and this was evident both in patients with traditionally defined LVH and in those without LVH. Second, in patients with PA, 24-hour BP values were similar in patients with appropriate and inappropriate LV mass. Finally, in patients with PA, the amount of LV mass exceeding the amount needed to compensate for the hemodynamic load, but not LVMI as traditionally measured, was significantly related to the ARR and to 24-hour urinary aldosterone. In patients who underwent a saline infusion, the observed/predicted LV mass, and, to a lesser extent, LV mass index, were significantly related to postinfusion aldosterone levels. However, we were not able to find a correlation between the degree of LV mass inappropriateness and plasma aldosterone concentrations in essential hypertensive patients, as shown previously in the Insulin Carotids US Scandinavia Study.39

Aldosterone stimulates cell growth and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, which can evoke an increased LVM12,40,41; the chronotropic action of aldosterone, linked to an increase of T-channel activity, could contribute to the deleterious effect of aldosterone on cardiac function.42 Aldosterone also induces profound changes in the extracellular matrix, leading to collagen deposition, and, subsequently, to myocardial fibrosis,43–46 arterial stiffening,14,47 and vascular alterations in small resistance arteries.14,43

In animal models aldosterone has been demonstrated to influence LV remodeling independent of its impact on systemic BP, as cardiac fibrosis was prevented by treatment with nonantihypertensive doses of spironolactone. One speculation is that the excessive growth of LVM is associated with cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and with changes in myocardial structure, with a disproportionate increase in extracellular matrix and myocardial fibrosis,48 as observed in postmortem specimens of human hearts from a few patients with autopsy-proven adrenal adenoma.49

Rossi et al46 were able to demonstrate that PA patients exhibited greater alterations of videodensitometric indexes of LV myocardial texture compared with demographically and hemodynamically similar essential hypertensive patients. The videodensitometric parameter changes were evident despite the modest increase of LV mass and were inversely related to plasma renin activity, indicating that lower plasma renin activity values are associated with higher collagen deposition in the heart. In our study, impairment of midwall FS and LV filling and relaxation were more frequently documented in patients with PA and with inappropriate LV mass, suggesting that an augmented collagen content could alter the intrinsic contractile properties of the heart, as well as diastolic function, although it cannot be assumed by our study and requires further investigations, whether the inappropriate increase in LV mass is mainly because of abnormal growth of cardiomyocytes or LV fibrosis.

Previous studies have reported an association between metabolic risk factors and inappropriate LV mass in hypertensive patients with low or high CV risk and in normotensive subjects with metabolic syndrome.6 It may be hypothesized that metabolic risk factors for CV disease, such as abdominal obesity, impaired insulin sensitivity, and dyslipidemia, may increase the hemodynamic load to the heart, through their effect on arterial vascular wall, thus contributing to the development of inappropriate LV mass.

In PA patients, a high prevalence of the metabolic syndrome has been shown recently.50 Glucose intolerance and reduced insulin sensitivity in PA are probably attributable to a direct effect of aldosterone on insulin receptor function51 or could be mediated by hypokalemia,52 although the precise mechanisms of glucose disturbances in PA remain to be elucidated.

In this study, we could not observe any significant difference in metabolic parameters and, in particular, fasting glucose, between patients with PA and essential hypertension, although it should be kept in mind that patients were carefully matched for body size. In patients with PA, those with inappropriate LVM showed a significantly higher BMI and uric acid and a slight, albeit not statistically significant, increase in fasting glucose.

The influence of treatment on the inappropriateness of LV mass in essential hypertensive patients and in PA patients has not yet been established. To this regard, the potential confounding influence of pharmacological treatment on CV structure cannot be completely excluded in the small number of previously treated patients included in the study.

In 2 groups of PA patients,15,18 either the removal of an adrenal adenoma or antihypertensive treatment with a selective aldosterone antagonist may significantly reduce LV mass, possibly improving CV prognosis in patients with PA19,20; however, the effect of absence/antagonism of aldosterone cannot be differentiated from the one induced by the control in BP. It could be argued that, in PA patients, the decrease in BP may depend, at least in part, on the degree of concomitant vascular alterations in small resistance arteries, as reported recently.53

In conclusion, our results indicate that the increase in aldosterone levels could contribute to the increase of LV mass exceeding the amount needed to compensate for hemodynamic load.

Perspectives

The results of this study support the concept that hyperaldosteronism may induce an additional increase of LV mass beyond hemodynamic load and promotes further investigations to evaluate whether the inappropriate increase in LV mass is mainly because of abnormal growth of cardiomyocytes or LV fibrosis. The measurement of inappropriateness of LV mass should raise concern about the diagnosis of a secondary form of hypertension and a more appropriate choice of treatment, in addition to more strict BP control.

Continuing medical education (CME) credit is available for this article. Go to http://cme.ahajournals.org to take the quiz.

Disclosures

None.

Footnotes

Correspondence to Maria Lorenza Muiesan, Clinica Medica, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Brescia, 25100 Brescia, Italy. E-mail

References

  • 1 Frohlich ED. Risk mechanisms in hypertensive heart disease. Hypertension. 1999; 34: 782–789.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Agabiti Rosei E, Muiesan ML. Hypertensive Left ventricular hypertrophy: pathophysiological and clinical issues. Blood Press. 2001; 10: 288–298.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Vakili B, Okin P, Devereux RB. Prognostic implications of left ventricular hypertrophy. Am Heart J. 2001; 141: 334–341.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Devereux RB, Wachtell K, Gerdts E, Boman K, Nieminen MS, Papademetriou V, Rokkedal J, Harris K, Aurup P, Dahlöf B. Prognostic significance of left ventricular mass change during treatment of hypertension. JAMA. 2004; 292: 2350–2356.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 de Simone G, Devereux RB, Kimball TR, Mureddu F, Roman MJ, Contaldo F, Daniels S. Interaction between body size and cardiac workload. Influence on left ventricular mass during body growth and adulthood. Hypertension. 1998; 31: 1077–1082.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Palmieri V, de Simone G, Roman MJ, Schwartz JE, Pickering TG, Devereux RB. Ambulatory blood pressure and metabolic abnormalities in hypertensive subjects with inappropriately high left ventricular mass [published correction appears in Hypertension. 2000;36:147]. Hypertension. 1999; 34: 1032–1040.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Palmieri V, Watchell K, Gerdts E, Bella J, Papademetriou V, Tuxen C, Nieminen MS, Dahlof B, de Simone G, Devereux RB. Left ventricular function and hemodynamic features of inappropriate left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with systemic hypertension: the LIFE Study. Am Heart J. 2001; 141: 784–791.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 de Simone G, Gottdiener JS, Chinali M, Maurer MS. Left ventricular mass predicts heart failure not related to previous myocardial infarction: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Eur Heart J. 2008; 29: 741–747.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9 de Simone G, Palmieri V, Koren M, Mensah G, Roman MJ, Devereux RB. Prognostic implications of the compensatory nature of left ventricular mass in arterial hypertension. J Hypertens. 2001; 19: 119–125.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10 de Simone G, Verdecchia P, Pede S, Gorini M, Maggioni AP, on behalf of the MAVI investigators. Prognosis of inappropriate LV mass in hypertension: the MAVI Study. Hypertension. 2002; 40: 470–476.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Muiesan ML, Salvetti M, Paini A, Monteduro C, Galbassini G, Bonzi B, Poisa P, Belotti E, Agabiti Rosei C, Rizzoni D, Castellano M, Agabiti Rosei E. Inappropriate LV mass changes during treatment adversely affect cardiovascular prognosis in hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 2007; 49: 1077–1083.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Rocha R, Funder JW. The pathophysiology of aldosterone in the cardiovascular system. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002; 970: 89–100.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hollenberg NK. Aldosterone in the development and progression of renal injury. Kidney Int. 2004; 66: 1–9.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Rizzoni D, Muiesan ML, Porteri E, Salvetti M, Castellano M, Bettoni G, Tiberio G, Giulini SM, Monteduro C, Garavelli G, Agabiti-Rosei E. Relations between cardiac and vascular structure in patients with primary and secondary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 32: 985–992.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Rossi GP, Sacchetto A, Visentin P, Canali C, Graniero GR, Palatini P, Pessina AC. Changes in left ventricular anatomy and function in hypertension and primary aldosteronism. Hypertension. 1996; 27: 1039–1045.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Shigematsu Y, Hamada M, Okayama H, Hara Y, Hayashi Y, Kodama K, Kohara K, Hiwada K. Left ventricular hypertrophy precedes other target-organ damage in primary aldosteronism. Hypertension. 1997; 29: 723–727.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Matsumura K, Fujii K, Oniki H, Oka M, Iida M. Role of aldosterone in left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2006; 19: 13–18.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Catena C, Colussi G, Lapenna R, Nadalini E, Chiuch A, Gianfagna P, Sechi LA. Long-term cardiac effects of adrenalectomy or mineralocorticoid antagonists in patients with primary aldosteronism. Hypertension. 2007; 50: 911–918.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Milliez P, Girerd X, Plouin PF, Blacher J, Safar ME, Mourad JJ. Evidence for an increased rate of cardiovascular events in patients with primary aldosteronism. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45: 1243–1248.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Catena C, Colussi G, Nadalini E, Chiuch A, Baroselli S, Lapenna R, Sechi LA. Cardiovascular outcomes in patients with primary aldosteronism after treatment. Arch Intern Med. 2008; 168: 80–85.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Holland OB, Brown H, Kuhnert L, Fairchild C, Risk M, Gomez-Sanchez CE. Further evaluation of saline infusion for the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism. Hypertension. 1984; 6: 717–723.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Giacchetti G, Ronconi V, Lucarelli G, Boscaro M, Mantero F. Analysis of screening and confirmatory tests in the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism: need for a standardized protocol. J Hypertens. 2006; 24: 737–745.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Rizzoni D, Porteri E, Castellano M, Bettoni G, Muiesan ML, Muiesan P, Giulini SM, Agabiti-Rosei E. Vascular hypertrophy and remodeling in secondary hypertension. Hypertension. 1996; 28: 785–790.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Mantero F, Mattarello MJ, Albiger NM. Detecting and treating primary aldosteronism: primary aldosteronism. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2007; 115: 171–174.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A. The Committee on M-mode standardization of the American Society of echocardiography: recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography. Results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation. 1978; 58: 1072–1083.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, Gottlieb GJ, Campo E, Sachs I, Reicheck N. Echocardiographic assessment on left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol. 1986; 57: 450–458.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27 de Simone G, Devereux RB, Daniels SR, Koren MJ, Meyer RA, Laragh JH. Effect of growth on variability of left ventricular mass: assessment of allometric signals in adults and children and their capacity to predict cardiovascular risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 25: 1056–1062.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Lang R, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, Picard M, Roman MJ, Seward J, Shanewise J, Solomon S, Spencer K, St John Sutton M, Stewart W. Recommendations for chamber quantification. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2006; 7: 79–108.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Muiesan ML, Salvetti M, Rizzoni D, Monteduro C, Castellano M, Agabiti-Rosei E. Persistence of left ventricular hypertrophy is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular events than baseline left ventricular mass or systolic performance: 10 years follow-up. J Hypertens. 1996; 14 (suppl 5): S43–S49.Google Scholar
  • 30 Quinones MA, Otto C, Stoddard M, Waggoner A, Zoghbi W, Recommendations for quantifications of Doppler echocardiography: a report from the Doppler quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002; 15: 167–184.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Teicholz LE, Kreulen T, Herman MV, Gorlin R. Problems in echocardiographic volume determination: echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence or absence of asynergy. Am J Cardiol. 1976; 37: 7–12.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Wallerson DC, Ganau A, Roman MJ, Devereux RB. Measurement of cardiac output by M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiography; application to patients with hypertension. Eur Heart J. 1990; 11 (suppl 1): 67–78.Google Scholar
  • 33 Working Group Report. How to diagnose diastolic heart failure – European Study on Diastolic Heart Failure. Eur Heart J. 1998; 19: 990–1003.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Denolle T, Chatellier G, Julien J, Battaglia C, Luo P, Plouin PF. Left ventricular mass and geometry before and after etiologic treatment in renovascular hypertension, aldosterone-producing adenoma, and pheochromocytoma. Am J Hypertens. 1993; 6: 907–913.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Rossi GP, Sacchetto A, Pavan E, Palatini P, Graniero GR, Canali C, Pessina AC. Remodeling of the left ventricle in primary aldosteronism due to Conn’s adenoma. Circulation. 1997; 95: 1471–1478.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Shigematsu Y, Mareomi H, Hideki O, Hara Y, Hayashi Y, Kodama K, Katsuhiko K, Hiwada K. Left ventricular hypertrophy precedes other target-organ damage in primary aldosteronism. Hypertension. 1997; 29: 723–727.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Tanabe A, Naruse M, Naruse K, Hase M, Yoshimoto T, Tanaka M, Seki T, Demura R, Demura H. Left ventricular hypertrophy is more prominent in patients with primary aldosteronism than in patients with other types of secondary hypertension. Hypertens Res. 1997; 20: 85–90.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Penzo M, Palatini P, Rossi GP, Zanin L, Pessina AC. In primary aldosteronism the circadian blood pressure rhythm is similar to that in primary hypertension. Clin Experim Hypertens. 1994; 16: 659–673.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Olsen M, Wachtell K, de Simone G, Palmieri V, Dige-Petersen H, Devereux RB, Ibsen H, Rokkedal J. Is inappropriate left ventricular mass related to neurohormonal factors and/or arterial changes in hypertension? a LIFE substudy. J Hum Hypertens. 2004; 18: 437–443.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Fuller PJ, Young MJ. Mechanisms of mineralcorticoid action. Hypertension. 2005; 46: 1227–1235.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Okoshi M, Yan H, Okoshi K, Nakayama M, Adam JT, Schuldt A, O'Connel T, Simpson P, Lorell B. Aldosterone directly stimulates cardiac myocyte hypertrophy. J Cardiac Failure. 2004; 10: 511–518.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Lalevèe N, Rebsamen M, Barrère-Lemaire S, Perrier E, Nargeot J, Benitah JP, Rossier F. Aldosterone increases T-type calcium channel expression and in vitro beating frequency in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. Cardiovasc Res. 2005; 67: 216–224.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Rizzoni D, Paiardi S, Rodella L, Porteri E, De Ciuceis C, Rezzani R, Boari GEM, Zani F, Miclini M, Tiberio GAM, Giulini SM, Agabiti-Rosei C, Bianchi R, Agabiti-Rosei E. Changes in extracellular matrix in subcutaneous small resistance arteries of patients with primary aldosteronism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006; 91: 2638–2642.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Schmidt BM, Schmieder RE. Aldosterone-induced cardiac damage: focus on blood pressure independent effects. Am J Hypertens. 2003; 16: 80–86.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Lijnen P, Petrov V. Induction of cardiac fibrosis by aldosterone. J Moll Cell Cardiol. 2000; 32: 865–879.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Rossi GP, Di Bello V, Ganzaroli C, Sacchetto A, Cesari M, Bertini A, Giorgi D, Scognamiglio R, Mariani M, Pessina AC. Excess aldosterone is associated with alterations of myocardial texture in primary aldosteronism. Hypertension. 2002; 40: 23–27.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Strauch B, Petrak O, Wichterle D, Zelinka T, Holaj R, Widimsky J Jr. Increased arterial wall stiffness in primary aldosteronism in comparison with essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2006; 19: 909–914.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Lopez B, Gonzalez A, Querejeta R, Larman M, Diez J. Alterations in the pattern of collagen deposition may contribute to the deterioration of systolic function in hypertensive patients with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48: 89–96.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Campbell SE, Diaz-Arias AA, Weber KT. Fibrosis of the human heart and systemic organs in adrenal adenoma. Blood Press. 1992; 1: 149–156.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Fallo F, Veglio F, Bertello C, Sonino N, Della Mea P, Ermani M, Rabbia F, Federspil G, Mulatero P. Prevalence and characteristics of the metabolic syndrome in primary aldosteronism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006; 91: 454–459.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Colussi G, Catena C, Lapenna R, Nadalini E, Chiuch A, Sechi LA. Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia are related to plasma aldosterone levels in hypertensive patients. Diabetes Care. 2007; 30: 2349–2354.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Conn JW. Hypertension, the potassium ion and impaired carbohydrate tolerance. N Engl J Med. 1965; 273: 1135–1143.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Rossi GP, Bolognesi M, Rizzoni D, Seccia TM, Piva A, Porteri E, Tiberio GAM, Giulini SM, Agabiti-Rosei E, Pessina A. Vascular remodeling and duration of hypertension predict outcome of adrenalectomy in primary aldosteronism patients. Hypertension. 2008; 51: 1366–1371.LinkGoogle Scholar

eLetters(0)

eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.

Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.