Man or machine in psychiatric diagnosis
Abstract
The authors describe the previous studies of the stability of psychiatric diagnoses over time that have found such diagnoses to be unreliable, stating that the assumptions underlying these studies have been tested and disproved. On the other hand, the use of standardized interview techniques and categorization by computer yield reliable symptom ratings and precise diagnoses. The authors discuss the importance of these findings to the selection of the most appropriate treatment modality for individual patients.
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.- Personal login
- Institutional Login
- Sign in via OpenAthens
- Register for access
-
Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability.
Not a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).
