Skip to main content
Log in

Using Multiple Assessments to Evaluate Medical Students’ Clinical Ability in Psychiatric Clerkships

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

No single assessment method can successfully evaluate the clinical ability of medical students in psychiatric clerkships; however, few studies have examined the efficacy of multiple assessments, especially in psychiatry. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship among different types of assessments of medical students’ clinical ability in psychiatric clerkships and whether it is reasonable to use multiple assessments.

Method

A group of 196 students were enrolled during their psychiatric clerkship between September 2008 and May 2009 in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. The mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) and standardized patient (SP)-based test were used to evaluate “does” and “show how” in psychiatric clinical ability. A multiple-choice examination was used to evaluate knowledge of psychiatry.

Results

There were statistically significant but weak correlations among the scores on the multiple-choice examination, SP-based test, and overall clinical competence domain on the mini-CEX.

Conclusion

A blended assessment composed of a multiple-choice examination, mini-CEX, and SP-based test can evaluate different dimensions of clinical ability. It is reasonable to use multiple methods to assess medical students’ competency in psychiatric clerkships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wass V, Van der Vleuten C, Shatzer J, et al: Assessment of clinical competence. Lancet 2001; 357:945–949

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller GE: The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med 1990; 65(9 Suppl):S63–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Norcini JJ, Swanson DB, Grosso LJ, et al: A comparison of knowledge, synthesis, and clinical judgment: multiple-choice questions in the assessment of physician competence. Eval Health Prof 1984; 7:485–499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Holsgrove GJ: Guide to postgraduate exams: multiple-choice questions. Br J Hosp Med 1992; 48:757–761

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schuwirth LW, van der Vleuten CP, Donkers HH: A closer look at cueing effects in multiple-choice questions. Med Educ 1996; 30:44–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McCloskey DI, Holland RA: A comparison of student performances in answering essay-type and multiple-choice questions. Med Educ 1976; 10:382–385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stillman PL, Regan MB, Swanson DB, et al: An assessment of the clinical skills of fourth-year students at four New England medical schools. Acad Med 1990; 65:320–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barrows HS: An overview of the uses of standardized patients for teaching and evaluating clinical skills: AAMC. Acad Med 1993; 68:443–451, Discussion, 51–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stillman P, Swanson D, Regan MB, et al: Assessment of clinical skills of residents utilizing standardized patients: a follow-up study and recommendations for application. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114:393–401

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bennett AJ, Arnold LM, Welge JA: Use of standardized patients during a psychiatry clerkship. Acad Psychiatry 2006; 30:185–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McNaughton N, Ravitz P, Wadell A, et al: Psychiatric education and simulation: a review of the literature. Can J Psychiatry (Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie) 2008; 53:85–93

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rao R: OSCEs in psychiatry: The Royal College of Psychiatrists; 2005

  13. Holmboe ES, Hawkins RE: Methods for evaluating the clinical competence of residents in internal medicine: a review. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129:42–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hauer KE: Enhancing feedback to students using the mini-CEX (Clinical Evaluation Exercise). Acad Med 2000; 75:524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kogan JR, Bellini LM, Shea JA: Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mCEX) in a medicine core clerkship. Acad Med 2003; 78(10: Suppl): S33–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Turnbull J, Gray J, MacFadyen J: Improving in-training evaluation programs. J Gen Intern Med 1998; 13:317–323

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hodges B, McNaughton N, Regehr G, et al: The challenge of creating new OSCE measures to capture the characteristics of expertise. Med Educ 2002; 36:742–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rose M, Wilkerson L: Widening the lens on standardized patient assessment: what the encounter can reveal about the development of clinical competence. Acad Med 2001; 76: 856–859

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Walters K, Osborn D, Raven P: The development, validity, and reliability of a multimodality objective Structured Clinical Examination in psychiatry. Med Educ 2005; 39:292–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Smee S: Skill-based assessment. BMJ 2003; 326:703–706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hatala R, Ainslie M, Kassen BO, et al: Assessing the mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise in comparison to a national specialty examination. Med Educ 2006; 40:950–956

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Duffy FD, et al: The mini-CEX: a method for assessing clinical skills. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138:476–481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Norman GR, Tugwell P, Feightner JW, et al: Knowledge and clinical problem-solving. Med Educ 1985; 19:344–356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sun B, McKenzie FD, Garcia HM, et al: Medical student evaluation using augmented standardized patients: new development and results. Stud Health Technol Inform 2007; 125:454–456

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng-Wei Wang M.D., M.S..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, PW., Cheng, CC., Chou, F.HC. et al. Using Multiple Assessments to Evaluate Medical Students’ Clinical Ability in Psychiatric Clerkships. Acad Psychiatry 35, 307–311 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.35.5.307

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.35.5.307

Keywords

Navigation