Summary
Generalizability of results is an important issue in academic research. We have attempted to identify some of the major issues related to this topic and to propose consequent guidelines for research practices. Any working researcher knows all too well how difficult it can be to gain access to data and get good samples. Fortunately, academic research can make good use of imperfect samples, but it is incumbent on us to be aware of this issue and make our best efforts.
References
Armstrong, J. Scott and Terry S. Overton. 1977. “Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys.”Journal of Marketing Research 14 (3): 396–402.
Bijmolt, Tammo H. A., Harald J. van Heerde, and Rik G. M. Pieters. 2005. “New Empirical Generalizations on the Determinants of Price Elasticity.’Journal of Marketing Research 42 (2): 141–156.
Dillman, D. A. 2000.Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 2d ed. New York: John Wiley.
Farley, John U., Donald R. Lehmann, and Lane H. Mann. 1998. “Designing the Next Study for Maximum Impact.”Journal of Marketing Research 35 (4): 496–501.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blair, E., Zinkhan, G.M. Nonresponse and generalizability in academic research. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 34, 4–7 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305283778
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305283778