Skip to main content
Log in

Final results of the department of defense multicenter breast lymphatic mapping trial

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy have the potential to become the standard of care for nodal staging in breast cancer patients, but their widespread utility outside of university-based centers has not been determined. This study describes the final results from a national multi-institutional trial designed to determine the role of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in breast lymphatic mapping, the rate of success for finding an SLN, and the rate of skip metastasis for patients with invasive breast cancer across all practice scenarios.

Methods

Lymphatic mapping techniques involving the combined use of blue dye and radiocolloid were taught to participating surgeons through a formal 2-day training course at the Moffitt Cancer Center. In protocol 1, surgeons performed their first 20 to 25 cases of breast mapping with SLN biopsy followed by complete axillary lymph node dissection. In protocol 2, after the learning phase, surgeons did not perform axillary lymph node dissection unless a SLN was positive for metastatic disease.

Results

Forty-two institutions, including 12 university-based research centers participated in the trial. From July 1, 1997, through January 31, 1999, a total of 965 patients were accrued. Lymphoscintigraphy identified drainage to an axillary SLn 64% of the time, but by using sensitive handheld gamma probes at the time of the operation, an axillary SLN could be identified 86% of the time. The rate of success for finding an axillary SLN was 92.8% for cases performed at the Moffitt Cancer Center. For other university centers, the rate of success of identifying an axillary SLn was 91.4%, and for other community/regional hospitals in the study, it was 85.2%. For cases in which protocol 1 was followed, the rate of false-negative SLN biopsy was 4%. There was no axillary nodal recurrence after a negative SLN in protocol 2 when a negative SLN biopsy was followed by observation. The median follow-up for the patients on protocol 2 was 16 months.

Conclusions

These data show a high rate of success for finding an axillary SLN and a low rate of skip metastasis in a national multicenter study of lymphatic mapping for breast cancer. This study suggest that SLN biopsy for breast cancer can be performed successfully in community/regional hospitals, as well as in major university-based centers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hill AD, Tran KN, Akhurst T, et al. Lessons learned from 500 cases of lymphatic mapping for breast cancer.Ann Surg 1999;229: 528–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beitsch PD, Clifford E, Whitworth P, Abarca A. Improved lymphatic mapping technique for breast cancer.Breast J 2001;7:219–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Haddad FF, Costello D, Reintgen DS. Radioguided surgery for melanoma.Surg Oncol Clin North Am 1999;8:413–26.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Uren RF, Howman-Giles RB, Thompson JF. Mammary lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer.J. Nucl Med 1995;36:1775–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Krag D, Weaver D, Ashikaga T, et al. The sentinel node in breast cancer.N Engl J Med 1998;339:941–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas Reintgen MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shivers, S., Cox, C., Leight, G. et al. Final results of the department of defense multicenter breast lymphatic mapping trial. Annals of Surgical Oncology 9, 248–255 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02573062

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02573062

Key Words

Navigation