Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Overutilization and Cost of Advanced Imaging for Long-Bone Cartilaginous Lesions

  • Healthcare Policy and Outcomes
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The prevalence and cost of unnecessary advanced imaging studies (AIS) in the evaluation of long bone cartilaginous lesions have not been studied previously.

Methods

A total of 105 enchondromas and 19 chondrosarcomas arising in long bones from July 2008 until April 2012 in 121 patients were reviewed. Advanced imaging was defined as MRI, CT, bone scan, skeletal survey, or CT biopsy. Two blinded radiologists independently reviewed the initial imaging study and determined if further imaging was indicated based on that imaging study alone. The cost of imaging was taken from our institution’s global charge list. Imaging was deemed unnecessary if it was not recommended by our radiologists after review of the initial imaging study. The difference in cost was calculated by subtracting the cost of imaging recommended by each radiologist from the cost of unnecessary imaging. The sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing enchondromas from chondrosarcomas was calculated. A minimum of 2 years from diagnosis of an enchondroma was required to monitor for malignant transformation.

Results

Of patients diagnosed with an enchondroma, 85 % presented with AIS. The average enchondroma patient presented with one unnecessary AIS. The radiologists’ interpretations agreed 85 % of the time for enchondromas and 100 % for chondrosarcomas. The sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing enchondromas from chondrosarcomas was 95 % for one radiologist and 87 and 95 % for the other. The average unnecessary cost per enchondroma patient was $1,346.18.

Conclusions

Unnecessary AIS are frequently performed and are a significant source of expense. The imaging algorithms outlined in this study may reduce unnecessary AIS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Campanacci M. Bone and soft tissue tumors. New York: Springer; 1990.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Choi BB, Jee WH, Sunwoo HJ, Cho JH, Kim JY, Chun KA, Hong SJ, Chung HW, Sung MS, Lee YS, Chung YG. MR differentiation of low-grade chondrosarcoma from enchondroma. Clin Imaging. 2013;37:542–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. De Beuckeleer LH, De Schepper AM, Ramon F. Magnetic resonance imaging of cartilaginous tumors: is it useful or necessary? Skelet Radiol. 1996;25:137–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dorman DD, Bogdan C. Bone tumors. St. Louis: Mosby; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eefting, D, Schrage Y, Geirnaerdt M, Le Cessie S, Taminiau A, Bovee J, Hogendoorn P. Assessment of interobserver variability and histologic parameters to improve reliability in classification and grading of central cartilagenous tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(1):50–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Espeland A, Natvig NL, Løge I, Engebretsen L, Ellingsen J. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee in Norway 2002-2004 (national survey): rapid increase, older patients, large geographic differences. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;22:7:115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferrer-Santacreu EM, Ortiz-Cruz EJ, Gonzalez-Lopez JM, Fernandez EP. Enchondroma versus low-grade chondrosarcoma in appendicular skeleton: clinical and radiological criteria. J Oncol. 2012;2012:437958.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Geirnaerdt MJ, Hermans J, Bloem JL, Kroon HM, Pope TL, Taminiau AH, Hogendoorn PC. Usefulness of radiography in differentiating enchondroma from central grade 1 chondrosarcoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:1097–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hong ED, Carrino JA, Weber KL, Fayad LM. Prevalence of shoulder enchondromas on routine MR imaging. Clin Imaging. 2011;35:378–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Inglehart JK. Health insurers and medical-imaging policy -a work in progress. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1030–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kendell SD, Collins MS, Adkins MC, Sundaram M, Unni KK. Radiographic differentiation of enchondroma from low-grade chondrosarcoma in the fibula. Skelet Radiol. 2004;33:458–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kobayashi H, Kotoura Y, Hosono M, Sakahara H, Hosono M, Yao ZS, Tsuboyama T, Yamamuro T, Endo K, Konishi J. Diagnostic value of Tc-99 m (V) DMSA for chondrogenic tumors with positive Tc-99 m HMDP uptake on bone scintigraphy. Clin Nucl Med. 1995;20:361–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee FY, Yu J, Chang SS, Fawwaz R, Parisien MV. Diagnostic value and limitations of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for cartilaginous tumors of bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2677–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller RA, Sampson NR, Flynn JM. The prevalence of defensive orthopaedic imaging: a prospective practice audit in Pennsylvania. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:e18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mirra JM. Intramedullary cartilage and chondroid-producing tumors. In: Mirra JM ed. Bone tumors: clinical, radiologic, and pathologic correlations. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1989:439–535.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Murphey MD, Flemming DJ, Boyea SR, Bojescul JA, Sweet DE, Temple HT. Enchondroma versus chondrosarcoma in the appendicular skeleton: differentiating features. Radiographics. 1998;18:1213–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Parlier-Cuau C, Bousson V, Ogilvie CM, Lackman RD, Laredo JD. When should we biopsy a solitary central cartilaginous tumor of long bones? Literature review and management proposal. Eur J Radiol. 2011;77:6–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sethi MK, Obremskey WT, Natividad H, Mir HR, Jahangir AA. Incidence and costs of defensive medicine among orthopedic surgeons in the United States: a national survey study. Am J Orthop. 2012;41:69–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Skeletal Lesions Interobserver Correlation among Expert Diagnosticians (SLICED) Study Group. Reliability of histopathologic and radiologic grading of cartilaginous neoplasms in long bones. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(10):2113–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Lee C, Feigelson HS, Flynn M, Greenlee RT, Kruger RL, Hornbrook MC, Roblin D, Solberg LI, Vanneman N, Weinmann N, Williams AE. Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010. JAMA. 2012;307(22):2400–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Statistics Norway. Statistical yearbook of Norway 2004. Available at: http://www.ssb.no/a/en/histstat/aarbok/2004_en.pdf. Accessed 16 Jan 2014.

  22. United States Census Bureau. Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for the United States, Regions, States, and Puerto Rico: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2013. http://www.census.gov/popest/data/state/totals/2013/index.html. Accessed 16 Jan 2014.

  23. Unni KK. Dahlin’s bone tumors: general aspects and data on 11,087 cases, 5th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vanel D, Kreshak J, Larousserie F, Alberghini M, Mirra J, De Paolis M, Picci P. Enchondroma vs. chondrosarcoma: a simple, easy-to-use, new magnetic resonance sign. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:2154–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Varma DG, Ayala AG, Carrasco CH, Guo SQ, Kumar R, Edeiken J. Chondrosarcoma: MR imaging with pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 1992;12:687–704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Walden MJ, Murphey MD, Vidal JA. Incidental enchondromas of the knee. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:1611–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. World Health Organization Global Health Expenditure Atlas. 2010 statistics. http://www.who.int/nha/atlas.pdf. Accessed January 16, 2014.

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Lisa Raines for providing financial data. No outside source of funding was used for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ginger E. Holt MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wilson, R.J., Zumsteg, J.W., Hartley, K.A. et al. Overutilization and Cost of Advanced Imaging for Long-Bone Cartilaginous Lesions. Ann Surg Oncol 22, 3466–3473 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4325-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4325-y

Keywords

Navigation