Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Implication of the prevalence of needlestick injuries in a general hospital in Malaysia and its risk in clinical practice

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine Aims and scope

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the prevalence of cases and episodes of needlestick injury among three groups of health care workers in the past one-year, the level of knowledge on blood-borne diseases and universal precautions and the practice of universal precautions. Other factors associated with the occurrence of needlestick injuries and the reporting of needlestick injuries were also analysed.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in May 2003 to study the needlestick injuries among 285 health care workers (doctors, nurses, medical students) in a public teaching hospital in Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia.

Results

The prevalence of needlestick injuries among the respondents was 24.6% involving 71 cases i.e. 48.0% among doctors, 22.4% among medical students, and 18.7% among nurses and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). There were a total of 174 episodes of needlestick injury. Prevalence of episode of needlestick injuries was highest among doctors (146%), followed by nurses (50.7%) and medical students (29.4%). Cases of needlestick injuries attained lower scores on practice of universal precautions compared to non-cases (p<0.001). About 59% of cases of needlestick injury did not report their injuries.

Conclusions

The study showed that needlestick injuries pose a high risk to health care workers and it is underreported most of the time. Many needlestick injuries can be prevented by strictly following the practice of universal precautions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ippolito G, Puro V, De Carli G. The risk of job occupational human immunodefiency virus infection in health care workers. Italian Multicenter Study. The Italian Study Group on Job occupational Risk of HIV infection. Arch Intern Med. 1993; 153: 1451–1458.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. International Health Care Worker Safety Center. Exposure Prevention Information Network (EPINet) Data Reports. Charlottesville: University of Virginia (online), 1998.http://www.med.virginia.edu/medentr/centers/epinet/estimates.html (3 January 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Perry J. CDC Releases National Needlestick Estimates. Advances in Exposure Prevention 2000; 5: 19 (online)http://www.med.virginia.edu/medcntr/centers/epinet/edcestim.html (6 January 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Norsayani MY, Neor Hassim I. Study on incidence of needle stick injury and factors associated with this problem among medical students. J Occup Healtl. 2003; 45: 172–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yassi A, McGill M. Determinants of blood and body fluid exposure in a large teaching hospital: hazards of the intermittent intravenous procedure. Am J Infect Control. 1991; 19: 12–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ng LN, Lim HL, Chan YH, Bachok D. Analysis of sharps injury occurrences at a hospital in Singapore. Int J Nurs Pract. 2002; 8: 274–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Preventing Needlestick Injuries in Health Care Settings. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2000-108. 1999.http://www.ede.gov/niosh/pdfs/2000-108.pdf

  8. Newsom DH, Kiwanuka JP. Needle-stick injuries in an Ugandan teaching hospital. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2002; 96: 517–522.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Naing NN, Ahmad Z, Kamaruzzaman I. Puncture injuries during undergraduate medical training. Journal of Islamic Medical Association 1999; 31: 270–273.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jagger J, Hunt EH, Brand-Elnaggar J, Pearson RD. Rates of needlestick injury caused by various devices in a university hospital. N Engl J Med. 1988; 319: 284–288.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Heald AE, Ransohoff DF. Needlestick injuries among resident physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 1990; 5: 389–393.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Immunization of health care workers: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). MMWR 1997; 46: 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Resnic FS, Noerdlinger MA. 1995. Job occupational exposures among medical students and house staff at a New York City Medical Center. Arch Intern Med. 1995; 155; 75–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Neill TM, Abbott AV, Radecki SE. Risk of needlesticks and job occupational exposures among residents and medical students. Arch Intern Med. 1992; 152: 1451–1456.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ministry of Health Malaysia. Incidence rate of needlestick injuries among health care workers within the Ministry of Health. Quality Assurance Indicator; Dec 1998.

  16. Department of Health. Standard principles for preventing hospital-acquired infections. J Hosp Infect. 2001; 47 (Supplement): S21-S37. Available online athttp://www.needlestickforum.net/6bestprac/pdfs/EPIC-Standard-Principles-HAI.pdf (5 October 2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, L.K., Hassim, I.N. Implication of the prevalence of needlestick injuries in a general hospital in Malaysia and its risk in clinical practice. Environ Health Prev Med 10, 33–41 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1265/ehpm.10.33

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1265/ehpm.10.33

Key words

Navigation