Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter March 16, 2021

Health protection messaging for populations susceptible to air pollution during landscape fire smoke events: an integrative review

  • Sheriden Amanda Keegan EMAIL logo and Kazi Mizanur Rahman

Abstract

Public health communication strategies to protect against the health impacts of air pollution due to landscape fire are becoming increasingly urgent in Australia. How well the public, particularly susceptible populations, are receiving, understanding and acting upon health protection messages related to smoke events is poorly understood. This integrative review sought literature relevant to health protection messaging for smoke events, including appropriate message content and suitable message delivery, with a focus on vulnerable and sensitive populations. Using an exhaustive search strategy of databases and grey literature, 26 relevant articles were identified and thematically analysed to produce a synthesis of findings on key themes. Findings indicated that a variety of traditional and modern communication channels are needed to ensure health messages are received by those most at-risk and should consider locally relevant information. A key theme to emerge in this review was the need for health messaging to susceptible populations to commence in advance of bushfire seasons to facilitate health protective actions being taken. During the acute-phase of smoke events, messages that were short with non-technical advice, were recalled and complied with more often. The need to improve the consistency of message content was a recurrent theme in the literature and suggested a need for greater interagency collaboration and communication. Preliminary evidence from smartphone app studies show promising results for targeted communication, however, more robust research is needed on the efficacy of these communication channels. Further research is also needed on the health impacts of smoke events, related compounding issues and strategies to reduce health risks, to better inform health protection messaging to susceptible populations.


Corresponding author: Sheriden Amanda Keegan, School of Medicine, Griffith University Griffith Health, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia, E-mail:

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Mr Greg Bell (Assistant Director, Public Health) and Mr Paul Corben (Director, Public Health) of North Coast Public Health Unit (NCPHU), New South Wales Health, Australia for their generous and timely support and advice on this research project that SK performed while being on placement within NCPHU under the supervision of KMR. We would also like to thank Ms Ernesta Sofija (Lecturer, Public Health and Health Promotion, Griffith University, Australia) for advising SK on her review, as being the Coordinator of the Public Health Practice course.

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: The local Institutional Review Board deemed the study exempt from review.

References

1. Hughes, L, Steffen, W, Mullins, G, Dean, A, Weisbrot, E, Rice, M. Summer of crisis. Climate Council of Australia; 2020. Available from: https://www.climatecouncil.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Crisis-Summer-Report-200311.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

2. Borchers-Arriagada, N, Palmer, AJ, Bowman, DM, Morgan, GG, Jalaludin, BB, Johnston, FH. Unprecedented smoke‐related health burden associated with the 2019–20 bushfires in eastern Australia. Med J Aust 2020;213:282–3. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50545.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Arriagada, NB, Horsley, JA, Palmer, AJ, Morgan, GG, Tham, R, Johnston, FH. Association between fire smoke fine particulate matter and asthma-related outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Res 2019;179:108777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108777.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Bowman, DM, Williamson, GJ, Abatzoglou, JT, Kolden, CA, Cochrane, MA, Smith, AM. Human exposure and sensitivity to globally extreme wildfire events. Nat Ecol Evol 2017;1:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-016-0058.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Elliott, C. Guidance for BC public health decision makers during wildfire smoke events; 2014. Available from: http://www.bccdc.ca/resource-gallery/Documents/Guidelines%20and%20Forms/Guidelines%20and%20Manuals/Health-Environment/WFSG_BC_guidance_2014_09_03trs.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

6. Abdo, M, Ward, I, O’Dell, K, Ford, B, Pierce, JR, Fischer, EV, et al.. Impact of wildfire smoke on adverse pregnancy outcomes in Colorado, 2007–2015. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2019;16:3720. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193720.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Cascio, WE, Long, TC. Ambient air quality and cardiovascular health translation of environmental research for public health and clinical care. N C Med J 2018;79:306–12. https://doi.org/10.18043/ncm.79.5.306.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Fish, JA, Peters, MDJ, Ramsey, I, Sharplin, G, Corsini, N, Eckert, M. Effectiveness of public health messaging and communication channels during smoke events: a rapid systematic review. J Environ Manag 2017;193:247–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.012.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Rappold, AG, Reyes, J, Pouliot, G, Cascio, WE, Diaz-Sanchez, D. Community vulnerability to health impacts of wildland fire smoke exposure. Environ Sci Technol 2017;51:6674–82. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06200.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Reid, CE, Brauer, M, Johnston, FH, Jerrett, M, Balmes, JR, Elliott, CT. Critical review of health impacts of wildfire smoke exposure. Environ Health Perspect 2016;124:1334–43. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1409277.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Liu, JC, Wilson, A, Mickley, LJ, Ebisu, K, Sulprizio, MP, Wang, Y, et al.. Who among the elderly is most vulnerable to exposure to and health risks of fine particulate matter from wildfire smoke? Am J Epidemiol 2017;186:730–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwx141.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Barn, PK. Evidence review: home and community clean air shelters to protect public health during wildfire smoke events: BC Centre for disease control; 2014. Available from: http://www.bccdc.ca/resource-gallery/Documents/Guidelines%20and%20Forms/Guidelines%20and%20Manuals/Health-Environment/WFSG_EvidenceReview_CleanAirShelters_FINAL_v3_edstrs.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

13. Stauffer, DA, Autenrieth, DA, Hart, JF, Capoccia, S. Control of wildfire-sourced PM2.5 in an office setting using a commercially available portable air cleaner. J Occup Environ Hyg 2020;17:109–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2020.1722314.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Johnston, FH. Understanding and managing the health impacts of poor air quality from landscape fires. Med J Aust 2017;207:229–30. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja17.00072.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Barn, PK, Elliott, CT, Allen, RW, Kosatsky, T, Rideout, K, Henderson, SB. Portable air cleaners should be at the forefront of the public health response to landscape fire smoke. Environ Health 2016;15:116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-016-0198-9.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Reisen, F, Powell, JC, Dennekamp, M, Johnston, FH, Wheeler, AJ. Is remaining indoors an effective way of reducing exposure to fine particulate matter during biomass burning events? J Air Waste Manag Assoc 2019;69:611–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2019.1567623.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Stone, S, Anderko, L, Berger, M, Butler, C, Cascio, W, Clune, A, et al.. Wildfire smoke: a guide for public health professionals, revised 2019. US EPA Office of Research and Development; 2019. Available from: https://www.airnow.gov/sites/default/files/2020-10/wildfire-smoke-guide-revised-2019_0.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

18. Shrestha, PM, Humphrey, JL, Carlton, EJ, Adgate, JL, Barton, KE, Root, ED, et al.. Impact of outdoor air pollution on indoor air quality in low-income homes during wildfire seasons. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2019;16:3535. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193535.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Cherrie, JW, Apsley, A, Cowie, H, Steinle, S, Mueller, W, Lin, C, et al.. Effectiveness of face masks used to protect Beijing residents against particulate air pollution. Occup Environ Med 2018;75:446. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2017-104765.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Laumbach, RJ. Clearing the air on personal interventions to reduce exposure to wildfire smoke. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2019;16:815–8. https://doi.org/10.1513/annalsats.201812-894ps.Search in Google Scholar

21. McDonald, F, Horwell, CJ, Wecker, R, Dominelli, L, Loh, M, Kamanyire, R, et al.. Facemask use for community protection from air pollution disasters: an ethical overview and framework to guide agency decision making. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2020;43:101376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101376.Search in Google Scholar

22. Vardoulakis, S, Jalaludin, BB, Morgan, GG, Hanigan, IC, Johnston, FH. Bushfire smoke: urgent need for a national health protection strategy. Med J Aust 2020;212:349–53. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50511.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Whittemore, R, Knafl, K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs 2005;52:546–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Ouzzani, M, Hammady, H, Fedorowicz, Z, Elmagarmid, A. Rayyan — a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2016;5:210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Dix-Cooper, L, Johnston, F, Hasselback, P, Rideout, K. Evidence review: reducing time outdoors during wildfire smoke events: advice to stay indoors, advice to reduce outdoor physical activity and cancelling. Vancouver BC: BC Centre for Disease Control; 2014.Search in Google Scholar

26. Fowler, M, Rad, AM, Utych, S, Adams, A, Alamian, S, Pierce, J, et al.. A dataset on human perception of and response to wildfire smoke. Sci Data 2019;6:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0251-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Sugerman, DE, Keir, JM, Dee, DL, Lipman, H, Waterman, SH, Ginsberg, M, et al.. Emergency health risk communication during the 2007 San Diego wildfires: comprehension, compliance, and recall. J Health Commun 2012;17:698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2011.635777.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Rose, KM, Toman, E, Olsen, CS. Public use of information about smoke emissions: application of the risk information seeking and processing (RISP) model. Can J For Res 2017;47:1527–37. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2017-0099.Search in Google Scholar

29. Lyth, A, Spinaze, A, Watson, P, Johnston, FH. Place, human agency and community resilience – considerations for public health management of smoke from prescribed burning. Local Environ 2018;23:975–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2018.1508205.Search in Google Scholar

30. Johnston, F, Wheeler, A, Williamson, G, Campbell, S, Jones, P, Koolhof, I, et al.. Using smartphone technology to reduce health impacts from atmospheric environmental hazards. Environ Res Lett 2018;13:044019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab1e6.Search in Google Scholar

31. Rappold, AG, Hano, MC, Prince, S, Wei, L, Huang, SM, Baghdikian, C, et al.. Smoke sense initiative leverages citizen science to address the growing wildfire-related public health problem. GeoHealth 2019;3:443–57. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gh000199.Search in Google Scholar

32. Vaidyanathan, A, Yip, F, Garbe, P. Developing an online tool for identifying at-risk populations to wildfire smoke hazards. Sci Total Environ 2018;619:376–83. https://doi.org/1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.270.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.270Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Errett, NA, Roop, HA, Pendergrast, C, Kramer, CB, Doubleday, A, Tran, KA, et al.. Building a practice-based research agenda for wildfire smoke and health: a report of the 2018 Washington wildfire smoke risk communication stakeholder synthesis symposium. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2019;16:2398. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132398.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

34. Hano, MC, Prince, SE, Wei, L, Hubbell, BJ, Rappold, AG. Knowing your audience: a typology of smoke sense participants to inform wildfire smoke health risk communication. Front Public Health 2020;8:143. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00143.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

35. Maguet, S. Public health planning for wildfire smoke; 2019. Available from: https://www.ncceh.ca/sites/default/files/PHPWE%20Summary%20Report_FINAL.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

36. Olsen, CS, Mazzotta, DK, Toman, E, Fischer, AP. Communicating about smoke from wildland fire: challenges and opportunities for managers. Environ Manag 2014;54:571–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0312-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Van Deventer, D, Marecaux, J, Doubleday, A, Errett, N, Isaksen, TMB. Wildfire smoke risk communication efficacy: a content analysis of Washington state’s 2018 statewide smoke event public health messaging. J Publ Health Manag Pract 2020 Apr 17. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001151 [Epub ahead of print].Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. WHO. Communicating risk in public emergenciesa; WHO guideline for emergency risk communication (ERC) policy and practice. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.Search in Google Scholar

39. Seeger, MW, Pechta, LE, Price, SM, Lubell, KM, Rose, DA, Sapru, S, et al.. A conceptual model for evaluating emergency risk communication in public health. Health Secur 2018;16:193–203. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2018.0020.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Cisneros, R, Schweize, DW. The efficacy of news releases, news reports, and public nuisance complaints for determining smoke impacts to air quality from wildland fire. Air Qual Atmos Health 2018;11:423–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-018-0545-9.Search in Google Scholar

41. Blades, JJ, Shook, SR, Hall, TE. Smoke management of wildland and prescribed fire: understanding public preferences and trade-offs. Can J For Res 2014;44:1344–55. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2014-0110.Search in Google Scholar

42. Maguet, S. Public health responses to wildfire smoke events. British Columbia Centre for Disease Control; 2018. Available from: https://www.ncceh.ca/sites/default/files/Responding%20to%20Wildfire%20Smoke%20Events%20EN.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

43. Rappold, AG, Fann, NL, Crooks, J, Huang, J, Cascio, WE, Devlin, RB, et al.. Forecast-based interventions can reduce the health and economic burden of wildfires. Environ Sci Technol 2014;48:10571–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5012725.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

44. Cascio, WE. Wildland fire smoke and human health. Sci Total Environ 2018;624:586–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.086.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

45. Dodd, W, Scott, P, Howard, C, Scott, C, Rose, C, Cunsolo, A, et al.. Lived experience of a record wildfire season in the Northwest Territories, Canada. Can J Public Health 2018;109:327–37. https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-018-0070-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

46. Whittaker, J, Taylor, M, Bearman, C. Why don’t bushfire warnings work as intended? Responses to official warnings during bushfires in New South Wales, Australia. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2020;45:101476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101476.Search in Google Scholar

47. Kim, G, Martel, A, Eisenman, D, Prelip, M, Arevian, A, Johnson, KL, et al.. Wireless emergency alert messages: influences on protective action behaviour. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 2019;27:374–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12278.Search in Google Scholar

48. D’Antoni, D, Smith, L, Auyeung, V, Weinman, J. Psychosocial and demographic predictors of adherence and non-adherence to health advice accompanying air quality warning systems: a systematic review. Environ Health 2017;16:100–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-017-0307-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

49. Ramírez, AS, Ramondt, S, Van Bogart, K, Perez-Zuniga, R. Public awareness of air pollution and health threats: challenges and opportunities for communication strategies to improve environmental health literacy. J Health Commun 2019;24:75–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2019.1574320.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

50. CDC. The health communicator’s social media toolkit: centres for disease control and prevention; 2011. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/socialmedia/tools/guidelines/pdf/socialmediatoolkit_bm.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

51. Hugelius, K, Adams, M, Romo-Murphy, E. The power of radio to promote health and resilience in natural disasters: a review. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2019;16:2526. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142526.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

52. Reid, CE, Maestas, MM. Wildfire smoke exposure under climate change: impact on respiratory health of affected communities. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2019;25:179–87. https://doi.org/10.1097/mcp.0000000000000552.Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2020-0134).


Received: 2020-10-02
Accepted: 2021-02-21
Published Online: 2021-03-16
Published in Print: 2021-12-20

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 27.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/reveh-2020-0134/html
Scroll to top button