Abstract
The efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol for labor induction of twins is unknown. We conducted a retrospective case-control study to evaluate the use of oral misoprostol in near term (≥35 weeks) twin pregnancies in nulliparas. Eligible cases were given 100 mcg oral misoprostol, which was repeated after 6 h if labor did not start. Either a third dose or diluted oxytocin infusion were given in intractable cases. Diluted oxytocin infusion was used for augmentation. Controls were nulliparas delivered at ≥35 weeks by elective cesarean section. The two groups were comparable in most aspects, except for fetal malpresentation, which was the major reason for avoiding induction. Of the 69 patients in whom labor was induced, 53 (76.8%) had a vaginal birth, 3 (4.3%) had a combined twin delivery, and 13 (18.8%) had a cesarean during labor. The mean length of stay of the neonates was significantly shorter among study cases, without significant difference in the frequency of delayed discharges as an overall proxy for neonatal complications. Labor induction with oral misoprostol could be offered to patients in whom near term vaginal twin delivery is unequivocally permitted and wish to deliver by the vaginal route.
References
1 ACOG Committee Opinion: Induction of labor with misoprostol. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 1999, N. 228Search in Google Scholar
2 ACOG Practice Bulletin: Induction of labor. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1999, N. 10Search in Google Scholar
3 ACOG Practice Bulletin: Multiple gestation: Complicated twin, triplet, and high-order multifetal pregnancy. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2003, N. 56Search in Google Scholar
4 Alfirevic Z: Oral misoprostol for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;(2):CD00133810.1002/14651858.CD001338Search in Google Scholar PubMed
5 Ananth CV, KS Joseph, WL Kinzler: The influence of obstetric intervention on trends in twin stillbirths: United States, 1989–99. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med15 (2004) 380Search in Google Scholar
6 Ananth CV, KS Joseph, JC Smulian: Trends in twin neonatal mortality rates in the United States, 1989 through 1999: influence of birth registration and obstetric intervention. Am J Obstet Gynecol190 (2004) 1313Search in Google Scholar
7 Blickstein I: Cesarean section for all twins? J Perinat Med28 (2000) 16910.1515/JPM.2000.024Search in Google Scholar PubMed
8 Colon I, K Clawson, K Hunter, ML Druzin, MM Taslimi: Prospective randomized clinical trial of inpatient cervical ripening with stepwise oral misoprostol vs vaginal misoprostol. Am J Obstet Gynecol192 (2005) 747Search in Google Scholar
9 Fausett MB, WH Barth Jr, BA Yoder, AL Satin: Oxytocin labor stimulation of twin gestations: effective and efficient. Obstet Gynecol90 (1997) 202Search in Google Scholar
10 Grobman WA, SL Dooley, AM Peaceman: Risk factors for cesarean delivery in twin gestations near term. Obstet Gynecol92 (1998) 940Search in Google Scholar
11 Langenegger EJ, HJ Odendaal, D Grove: Oral misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for induction of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet88 (2005) 242Search in Google Scholar
12 Manor M, I Blickstein, A Ben-Arie, A Weissman, Z Hagay: Case series of labor induction in twin gestations with an intrauterine balloon catheter. Gynecol Obstet Invest47 (1999) 244Search in Google Scholar
13 Nigam A, VK Singh, P Dubay, K Pandey, A Bhagoliwal, A Prakash: Misoprostol vs. oxytocin for induction of labor at term. Int J Gynaecol Obstet86 (2004) 398Search in Google Scholar
14 Papiernik E, Hessabi M, Dubourdieu C, Zeitlin J: Induction of labour and scheduled cesarean deliveries in twin pregnancies at the Port-Royal Maternity Hospital in Paris France. Twin Res4 (2001) 137Search in Google Scholar
15 Roberts CL, CS Algert, JM Morris, DJ Henderson-Smart: Trends in twin births in New South Wales, Australia, 1990–1999. Int J Gynaecol Obstet78 (2002) 213Search in Google Scholar
16 Schiff E, SB Cohen, M Dulitzky, I Novikov, SA Friedman, S Mashiach, et al.: Progression of labor in twin vs. singleton gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol179 (1998) 1181Search in Google Scholar
17 Shetty A, I Livingstone, S Acharya, P Rice, P Danielian, A Templeton: A randomised comparison of oral misoprostol and vaginal prostaglandin E2 tablets in labour induction at term. BJOG111 (2004) 436Search in Google Scholar
18 Silver RK, EI Haney, WA Grobman, SN MacGregor, HL Casele, MG Neerhof: Comparison of active phase labor between triplet, twin, and singleton gestations. J Soc Gynecol Investig7 (2000) 297Search in Google Scholar
19 Suzuki S, Y Otsubo, R Sawa, Y Yoneyama, T Araki: Clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in twin pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest49 (2000) 24Search in Google Scholar
20 Wing DA, MJ Fassett, C Guberman, S Tran, A Parrish, D Guinn: A comparison of orally administered misoprostol to intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with favorable cervical examinations. Am J Obstet Gynecol190 (2004) 1689Search in Google Scholar
©2005 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York
