Abstract
To extend the indications of intramedullary nails for distal or proximal fractures, nails with angle stable locking options have been developed. Studies on the mechanical efficacy of these systems have been inconsistent likely due to confounding variables such as number, geometry, or orientation of the screws, as well as differences in the loading mode. Therefore, the aim of this study was to quantify the effect of angular stability on the mechanical performance of intramedullary nails. The results could then be compared with the effects of various locking screw parameters and loading modes. A generic model was developed consisting of artificial bone material and titanium intramedullary nail that provided the option to systematically modify the locking screw configuration. Using a base configuration, the following parameters were varied: number of screws, distance and orientation between screws, blocking of screws, and simulation of freehand locking. Tension/compression, torsional, and bending loads were applied. Stiffness and clearance around the zero loading point were determined. Angular stability had no effect on stiffness but completely blocked axial clearance (p=0.003). Simulation of freehand locking reduced clearance for all loading modes by at least 70% (p<0.003). The greatest increases in torsional and bending stiffness were obtained by increasing the number of locking screws (up to 80%, p<0.001) and by increasing the distance between them (up to 70%, p<0.001). In conclusion, our results demonstrate that the mechanical performance of IM nailing can be affected by various locking parameters of which angular stability is only one. While angular stability clearly reduces clearance of the screw within the nail, mechanical stiffness depends more on the number of screws and their relative distance. Thus, optimal mechanical performance in IM nailing could potentially be obtained by combining angular stability with optimal arrangement of locking screws.
Acknowledgments
The project received financial support by Stryker Trauma & Extremities. The Institute of Biomechanics Murnau received financial support from Stryker Trauma & Extremities (Germany). The authors thank Spencer Hernandez for proof reading the manuscript.
References
[1] Augat P, Burger J, Schorlemmer S, Henke T, Peraus M, Claes L. Shear movement at the fracture site delays healing in a diaphyseal fracture model. J Orthop Res 2003; 21: 1011–1017.10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00098-6Search in Google Scholar
[2] Bong MR, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ, Egol KA. Intramedullary nailing of the lower extremity: biomechanics and biology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007; 15: 97–106.10.5435/00124635-200702000-00004Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[3] Burstein AH, Reilly DT, Martens M. Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976; 58: 82–86.10.2106/00004623-197658010-00015Search in Google Scholar
[4] Chan DS, Nayak A, Blaisdell G, et al. Effect of distal interlocking screw number and position after intramedullary nailing of distal tibial fractures: a biomechanical study simulating immediate weight-bearing. J Orthop Trauma 2014; Epub ahead of print (DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000195, PMID: 25072288).10.1097/BOT.0000000000000195Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[5] Duda GN, Mandruzzato F, Heller M, Schuetz M, Claes L, Haas NP. Mechanical borderline indications in the treatment of unreamed tibial nailing. Der Unfallchirurg 2003; 106: 683–689.10.1007/s00113-003-0633-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[6] Freeman AL, Craig MR, Schmidt AH. Biomechanical comparison of tibial nail stability in a proximal third fracture: do screw quantity and locked, interlocking screws make a difference? J Orthop Trauma 2011; 25: 333–339.10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181f982e5Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[7] Gollwitzer H, Karampour K, Hauschild M, Diehl P, Busch R, Mittelmeier W. Biomechanical investigation of the primary stability of intramedullary compression nails in the proximal tibia: experimental study using interlocking screws in cryopreserved human tibias. J Orthop Sci 2004; 9: 22–28.10.1007/s00776-003-0731-xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[8] Gueorguiev B, Ockert B, Schwieger K, et al. Angular stability potentially permits fewer locking screws compared with conventional locking in intramedullary nailed distal tibia fractures: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Trauma 2011; 25: 340–346.10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182163345Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[9] Gueorguiev B, Waehnert D, Albrecht D, Ockert B, Windolf M, Schwieger K. Effect on dynamic mechanical stability and interfragmentary movement of angle-stable locking of intramedullary nails in unstable distal tibia fractures: a biomechanical study. J Trauma 2011; 70: 358–365.10.1097/TA.0b013e3181dbaaafSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[10] Hansen M, Blum J, Mehler D, Hessmann MH, Rommens PM. Double or triple interlocking when nailing proximal tibial fractures? A biomechanical investigation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009; 129: 1715–1719.10.1007/s00402-009-0954-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[11] Hoegel FW, Hoffmann S, Weninger P, Buehren V, Augat P. Biomechanical comparison of locked plate osteosynthesis, reamed and unreamed nailing in conventional interlocking technique, and unreamed angle stable nailing in distal tibia fractures. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012; 73: 933–938.10.1097/TA.0b013e318251683fSearch in Google Scholar
[12] Hoentzsch D, Blauth M, Attal R. Angle-stable fixation of intramedullary nails using the Angular Stable Locking System (ASLS). Operative Orthopaedie und Traumatologie 2011; 23: 387–396.Search in Google Scholar
[13] Horn J, Linke B, Hoentzsch D, Gueorguiev B, Schwieger K. Angle stable interlocking screws improve construct stability of intramedullary nailing of distal tibia fractures: a biomechanical study. Injury 2009; 40: 767–771.10.1016/j.injury.2009.01.117Search in Google Scholar
[14] Kneifel T, Buckley R. A comparison of one versus two distal locking screws in tibial fractures treated with unreamed tibial nails: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Injury 1996; 27: 271–273.10.1016/0020-1383(95)00116-6Search in Google Scholar
[15] Laflamme GY, Heimlich D, Stephen D, Kreder HJ, Whyne CM. Proximal tibial fracture stability with intramedullary nail fixation using oblique interlocking screws. J Orthop Trauma 2003; 17: 496–502.10.1097/00005131-200308000-00004Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[16] Lenz M, Gueorguiev B, Richards RG, et al. Fatigue performance of angle-stable tibial nail interlocking screws. Int Orthop 2013; 37: 113–118.10.1007/s00264-012-1633-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[17] Lucas BL, Chong AC, Buhr BR, Jones TL, Wooley PH. Biomechanical comparison of distal locking screws for distal tibia fracture intramedullary nailing. J Biomed Sci Eng 2011; 4: 235–241.10.4236/jbise.2011.44032Search in Google Scholar
[18] McCalden RW, McGeough JA, Barker MB, Court-Brown. Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone. The relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization, and microstructure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75: 1193–1205.10.2106/00004623-199308000-00009Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[19] Sayana MK, Davis BJ, Kapoor B, Rahmatalla A, Maffulli N. Fracture strain and stability with additional locking screws in intramedullary nailing: a biomechanical study. J Trauma 2006; 60: 1053–1057.10.1097/01.ta.0000197600.46577.37Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[20] Thelen S, Betsch M, Grassmann JP, et al. Angle stable locking nails versus conventionally locked intramedullary nails in proximal tibial shaft fractures: a biomechanical study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2012; 132: 57–63.10.1007/s00402-011-1380-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[21] Vallier HA, Cureton BA, Patterson BM. Randomized, prospective comparison of plate versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibia shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2011; 25: 736–741.10.1097/BOT.0b013e318213f709Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[22] Waehnert D, Hoffmeier KL, von Oldenburg G, Froeber R, Hofmann GO, Mueckley T. Internal fixation of type-C distal femoral fractures in osteoporotic bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92: 1442–1452.10.2106/JBJS.H.01722Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[23] Wehner T, Claes L, Simon U. Internal loads in the human tibia during gait. Clin Biomech 2009; 24: 299–302.10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.12.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[24] Wild M, Thelen S, Spoor V, et al. Do locked compression intramedullary nails improve the biomechanical stability of distal femoral fractures? J Trauma 2011; 70: 832–837.10.1097/TA.0b013e3181f6f170Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[25] Wolinsky PR, Dennis D, Crist BD, Curtiss S, Hazelwood SJ. The biomechanics of varied proximal locking screw configurations in a synthetic model of proximal third tibial fracture fixation. J Orthop Trauma 2011; 25: 175–179.10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181e47d0fSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
©2015 by De Gruyter
