Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter January 6, 2015

Relationship between antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin and conventional antiphospholipid antibodies in primary antiphospholipid syndrome

  • Ariela Hoxha EMAIL logo , Amelia Ruffatti , Elena Mattia , Lauro Meneghel , Marta Tonello , Elisa Salvan , Vittorio Pengo and Leonardo Punzi

Abstract

Background: Antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin complex (aPS/PT) antibodies are emerging as an important marker for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). We aimed to compare their performance with that of conventional antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) such as lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL), and anti-β2-glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI) in APS and to assess their frequency in APS-negative (APS-ne) patients.

Methods: We considered 160 APS patients and 128 APS-ne patients with clinical criteria for APS but tested negative for conventional aPL. Immunoglobulin (Ig)G/IgM aPS/PT, IgG/IgM aCL, and IgG/IgM anti-β2GPI were detected using ELISA assay and LA with a series of coagulation tests.

Results: IgG aPS/PT were significantly associated with IgG aCL, IgG anti-β2GPI, and LA (p<0.0001 for all). IgM aPS/PT were significantly associated only with LA (p<0.0001) instead. There was a significant correlation between IgG aPS/PT and both IgG aCL and IgG anti-β2GPI levels (ρ=0.42 and ρ=0.40, respectively). Both IgG aPS/PT and IgM aPS/PT positivity significantly correlated with LA (ρ=0.44 and ρ=0.5, respectively). IgG and IgM aPS/PT were significantly more frequent in triple than in double and in single positivity (p<0.0001). According to multivariate analysis, IgG and/or IgM aPS/PT were independent risk factors for LA. APS/PT antibodies were found in 9.4% of the APS-ne patients vs. 2% of healthy control (p=0.043); those antibodies were significantly more frequent in the thrombosis with respect to the pregnancy morbidity subset (p=0.01).

Conclusions: Our data attribute a clinical relevance to both IgG and IgM aPS/PT antibodies. In particular, the significant prevalence of aPS/PT in APS-ne patients suggests including them as additional laboratory criterion for APS.


Corresponding author: Ariela Hoxha, UOC di Reumatologia, Policlinico Universitario, Via Giustiniani, 2-35128 Padova, Italy, Phone: +39 49 8212192; Fax: +39 49 8212191, E-mail: ; and Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy

References

1. Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, Branch DW, Brey RL, Cervera R, et al. International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). J Thromb Haemost 2006;4:295–306.10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01753.xSearch in Google Scholar

2. Bertolaccini ML, Amengual O, Atsumi T, Binder WL, de Laat B, Forastiero R, et al. ‘Non-criteria’ aPL tests: report of a task force and preconference workshop at the 13th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies, Galveston, TX, USA, April 2010. Lupus 2011;20:191–205.10.1177/0961203310397082Search in Google Scholar

3. Atsumi T, Ieko M, Bertolaccini ML, Ichikawa K, Tsutsumi A, Matsuura E, et al. Assosiation of autoantibodies against the phosphatidylserine-prothrombin complex with manifestations of the antiphospholipid syndrome and with the presence of lupus anticoagulant. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:1982–93.10.1002/1529-0131(200009)43:9<1982::AID-ANR9>3.0.CO;2-2Search in Google Scholar

4. Bertolaccini ML, Atsumi T, Koike T, Hughes GR, Khamashta MA. Antiprothrombin antibodies detected in two different assay systems. Prevalence and clinical significance in systemic lupus erythematosus. Thromb Haemost 2005;93:289–97.10.1160/TH04-06-0382Search in Google Scholar

5. Hoxha A, Ruffatti A, Tonello M, Bontadi A, Salvan E, Banzato A, et al. Antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies in primary antiphospholipid syndrome. Lupus 2012;21:787–9.10.1177/0961203312441983Search in Google Scholar

6. Pengo V, Denas G, Bison E, Banzato A, Padayattil Jose S, Gresele P, et al., on behalf of participating centers of Italian Federation of Thrombosis Centers (FCSA). Prevalence and significance of anti-prothrombin (aPT) antibodies in patients with lupus anticoagulant (LA). Thromb Res 2010;126:150–3.10.1016/j.thromres.2010.05.018Search in Google Scholar

7. Jaskowski TD, Wilson AR, Hill HR, Branch WD, Tebo AE. Autoantibodies against phosphatidylserine, prothrombin and phosphatidylserine-prothrombin complex: identical or distinct diagnostic tools for antiphospholipid syndrome? Clin Chim Acta 2009;410:19–24.10.1016/j.cca.2009.09.006Search in Google Scholar

8. Tincani A, Morozzi G, Afeltra A, Alessandri C, Allegri F, Bistoni O, et al. Forum Interdisciplinareper la Ricerca nelle Malattie Reumatiche (FIRMA) Antiprothrombinantibodies: a comparative analysis of homemade and commercial methods. A collaborative study by the Forum Interdisciplinare per la Ricerca nelle Malattie Autoimmuni (FIRMA). Clin Exp Rheumatol 2007;25:268–74.Search in Google Scholar

9. Arvieux J, Darnige L, Caron C, Reber G, Bensa JC, Colomb MG. Development of an ELISA for autoantibodies to prothrombin showing their prevalence in patients with lupus anticoagulant. Thromb Haemost 1995;74:1120–5.10.1055/s-0038-1649891Search in Google Scholar

10. Matsuda J, Sanaka T, Nishizawa A, Gotoh M, Gohchi K. Two antiprothrombin antibodies against prothrombin and prothrombin-phosphatidyl serine show partial but not total identity. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2002;8:697–702.10.1097/00001721-200212000-00005Search in Google Scholar

11. Nojima J, Iwatani Y, Suehisa E, Kuratsune H, Kanakura Y. The presence of anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies as risk factor for both arterial and venous thrombosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Haematologica 2006;91:699–702.Search in Google Scholar

12. Tsutsumi A, Hayashi T, Chino Y, Mamura M, Goto D, Matsumoto I, et al. Significance of antiprothrombin antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: clinical evaluation of the antiprothrombin assay and the antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin assay, and comparison with other antiphospholipid antibody assays. Mod Rheumatol 2006;16:158–64.10.3109/s10165-006-0481-7Search in Google Scholar

13. Bertolaccini ML, Sciascia S, Murru V, Garcia-Fernandez C, Sanna G, Khamashta MA. Prevalence of antibodies to prothrombin in solid phase (aPT) and to phosphatidylserine-prothrombin complex (aPS/PT) in patients with and without lupus anticoagulant. Thromb Haemost 2013;109:207–13.10.1160/TH12-07-0527Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Vlagea A, Gil A, Cuesta MV, Arribas F, Diez J, Lavilla P, et al. Antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) as potential markers of antiphospholipid syndrome. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2013;19:289–96.10.1177/1076029612437578Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Ruffatti A, Olivieri S, Tonello M, Bortolatti M, Bison E, Salvan E, et al. Influence of different IgG anticardiolipin antibody cut-off values on antiphospholipid syndrome classification. J Thromb Haemost 2008;6:1693–6.10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03121.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Cavazzana A, Ruffatti A, Tonello M, Bortolatti M, De Moerloose P, Reber G. An analysis of experimental conditions influencing the anti-beta2-glycoprotein I ELISA assay results. Ann NY Acad Sci 2007;1109:484–92.10.1196/annals.1398.054Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Pengo V, Tripodi A, Reber G, Rand JH, Ortel TL, Galli M, et al.; Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibody of the Scientific and Standardisation Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Update of the guidelines for lupus anticoagulant detection. Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibody of the Scientific and Standardisation Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. J Thromb Haemost 2009;7:1737–40.10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03555.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Galli M, Reber G, de Moerloose P, de Groot PG. Invitation to a debate on the serological criteria that define the antiphospholipid syndrome. J Thromb Haemost 2008;6:399–401.10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.02862.xSearch in Google Scholar

19. Galli M, Borrelli G, Jacobsen EM, Marfisi RM, Finazzi G, Marchioli R, et al. Clinical significance of different antiphospholipid antibodies in the WAPS (warfarin in the antiphospholipid syndrome) study. Blood 2007;110:1178–83.10.1182/blood-2007-01-066043Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Naess IA, Christiansen SC, Cannegieter SC, Rosendaal FR, Hammerstroem J. A prospective study of anticardiolipin antibodies as a risk factor for venous thrombosis in a general population (the HUNT study). J Thromb Haemost 2006;4:44–9.10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01691.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Runchey SS, Folsom AR, Tsai MY, Cushman M, McGovern PD. Anticardiolipin antibodies as a risk factor for venous thromboembolism in a population-based prospective study. Br J Haematol 2002;119:1005–10.10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03949.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Devreese KM, Pierangeli SS, de Laat B, Tripodi A, Atsumi T, Ortel TL; Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Phospholipid/Dependent Antibodies. Testing for antiphospholipid antibodies with solid phase assays: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 2014;12:792–5.10.1111/jth.12537Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Sciascia S, Sanna G, Murru V, Khamashta MA, Bertolaccini ML. Validation of a commercially available kit to detect anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies in a cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Thromb Res 2014;133:451–4.10.1016/j.thromres.2013.12.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Ruffatti A, Tonello M, Cavazzana A, Bagatella P, Pengo V. Laboratory classification categories and pregnancy outcomes in patient with antiphospholipid syndrome prescribed antithrombotic therapy. Thromb Res 2009;123:482–7.10.1016/j.thromres.2008.03.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Ruffatti A, Calligaro A, Hoxha A, Trevisanuto D, Ruffatti AT, Gervasi MT, et al. Laboratory and clinical features of pregnant women with antiphospholipid syndrome and neonatal outcome. Arthritis Care Res 2010;62:302–7.10.1002/acr.20098Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Sciascia S, Murru V, Sanna G, Roccatello D, Khamashta MA, Bertolaccini ML. Clinical accuracy for diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome in systemic lupus erythematosus: evaluation of 23 possible combinations of antiphospholipid antibody specificities. J Thromb Haemost 2012;10:2512–8.10.1111/jth.12014Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Sciascia S, Sanna G, Murru V, Roccatello D, Khamashta MA, Bertolaccini ML. GAPSS: the Global Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome Score. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2013;52:1397–403.10.1093/rheumatology/kes388Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Sciascia S, Sanna G, Murru V, Roccatello D, Khamashta MA, Bertolaccini ML. Anti-prothrombin (aPT) and anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies and the risk of thrombosis in the antiphospholipid syndrome. A systematic review. Thromb Haemost 2014;111:354–64.10.1160/TH13-06-0509Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Atsumi T, Ozaki Y, Koike T, Suzumori K. Phosphatidylserine-dependent antiprothrombin antibodies are not useful markers for high-risk women with recurrent miscarriages. Fertil Steril 2004;82:1440–2.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.06.034Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Tsutsumi A, Atsumi T, Yamada H, Hirayamma Kato E, Ichikawa K, Fujimoto S, et al. Antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies are not frequently found in patients with unexplained recurrent miscarriages. Am J Reprod Immun 2001;46:242–4.10.1034/j.1600-0897.2001.d01-8.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2014-9-8
Accepted: 2014-12-2
Published Online: 2015-1-6
Published in Print: 2015-7-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 27.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2014-1129/html
Scroll to top button