Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter December 9, 2015

Hacking the hospital environment: young adults designing youth-friendly hospital rooms together with young people with cancer experiences

  • Kirsten A. Boisen EMAIL logo , Anne Boisen , Stine Legarth Thomsen , Simon Meggers Matthiesen , Maiken Hjerming and Pernille Grarup Hertz

Abstract

Background:

There is a need for youth-friendly hospital environments as the ward environment may affect both patient satisfaction and health outcomes.

Objective:

To involve young people in designing youth-friendly ward environment.

Methods:

We arranged a design competition lasting 42 h (Hackathon). Students in architecture, design, engineering, communication and anthropology participated (27 young adults) – forming eight groups. Adolescents and young adults (AYA) with current or former cancer experience participated as sparring partners. We provided workspace and food during the weekend. The groups presented their products to a jury and relevant stakeholders.

Results:

The groups created eight unique design concepts. The young designers were extremely flexible listening to ideas and experiences from the young patients, which led to common features including individual and flexible design, privacy in two-bed wardrooms and social contact with other hospitalized AYA. The winning project included an integrated concept for both wardrooms and the AYA day room, including logos and names for the rooms and an ‘energy wall’ in the day room.

Conclusion:

A hackathon event was an effective mode of youth participation. The design concepts and ideas were in line with current evidence regarding pleasing hospital environment and youth-friendly inpatient facilities and may be applicable to other young patients.


Corresponding author: Kirsten A. Boisen, Center of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 4101, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark, Phone: +45 35 45 44 33, Fax: +45 35 45 65 43, E-mail:

  1. Conflict of interest statement: All authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Christie D, Viner R. Adolescent development. Br Med J 2005;330:301–4.10.1136/bmj.330.7486.301Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Ambresin AE, Bennett K, Patton GC, Sanci LA, Sawyer SM. Assessment of youth-friendly health care: a systematic review of indicators drawn from young people’s perspectives. J Adolesc Health 2013;52:670–81.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.12.014Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Wu Z, Robson S, Hollis B. The application of hospitality elements in hospitals. J Healthc Manag Am Coll Healthc Exec 2013;58:47–62.10.1097/00115514-201301000-00009Search in Google Scholar

4. United Nations. Convention on the Rights of the Child. 1989. Available at: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CRC.aspx.Search in Google Scholar

5. Department of Health. You’re welcome: quality criteria for young people friendly health services. 2011. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/quality-criteria-for-young-people-friendly-health-services.Search in Google Scholar

6. Wood D, Turner G, Straw F. Not just a phase: a guide to the participation of children and young people in health services. 2010. Available at: http://www.rcpch.ac.uk/what-we-do/children-and-youth-participation/not-just-phase-guide-participation-children-and-young-pe.Search in Google Scholar

7. Rehling ES, Blix C, Hertz PG, Larsen JH, Noergaard VM, et al. The magic of a youth advisory board. Turk Arch Ped 2013;(Suppl 2):122.Search in Google Scholar

8. Hackday manifesto. Available at: http://hackdaymanifesto.com/.Search in Google Scholar

9. The marshmallow challenge. Available at: http://marshmallowchallenge.com/Instructions.html.Search in Google Scholar

10. McIntyre P, Department of Child and Adolescent Health and Development WHO Geneva, Williams G, Peattie S. WHO. Adolescent Friendly Health Services. An agenda for change 2002. Available at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2003/WHO_FCH_CAH_02.14.pdf_.Search in Google Scholar

11. World Health Organization. Making health services adolescent friendly. Developing national quality standards for adolescent-friendly health services. 2012. Available at: http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/adolescent_friendly_services/en/.Search in Google Scholar

12. Hedstrom M, Skolin I, von EL. Distressing and positive experiences and important aspects of care for adolescents treated for cancer. Adolescent and nurse perceptions. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2004;8:6–17.10.1016/j.ejon.2003.09.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Bolte S, Zebrack B. Sexual issues in special populations: adolescents and young adults. Semin Oncol Nurs 2008;24:115–9.10.1016/j.soncn.2008.02.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Britto MT, DeVellis RF, Hornung RW, DeFriese GH, Atherton HD, et al. Health care preferences and priorities of adolescents with chronic illnesses. Pediatrics 2004;114:1272–80.10.1542/peds.2003-1134-LSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Kari JA, Donovan C, Li J, Taylor B. Teenagers in hospital: what do they want? Nurs Stand 1999;13:49–51.10.7748/ns.13.23.49.s61Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Marris S, Morgan S, Stark D. “Listening to Patients”: what is the value of age-appropriate care to teenagers and young adults with cancer? Eur J Cancer Care 2011;20:145–51.10.1111/j.1365-2354.2010.01186.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Rutishauser C, Esslinger A, Bond L, Sennhauser FH. Consultations with adolescents: the gap between their expectations and their experiences. Acta Paediatr 2003;92:1322–6.10.1111/j.1651-2227.2003.tb00503.xSearch in Google Scholar

18. Teilmann G, Hertz PG, Blix C, Boisen KA. [Young patients in hospitals are pinched into a corner]. Läkartidningen 2012;109:817–20.Search in Google Scholar

19. Van Staa AAL, Jedeloo S, van der Stege H. “What we want”: chronically ill adolescents’ preferences and priorities for improving health care. Patient Prefer Adherence 2011;5:291–305.10.2147/PPA.S17184Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Ulrich RS, Zimring C, Zhu X, DuBose J, Seo H-B, et al. A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design. HERD 2008;1:61–125.10.1177/193758670800100306Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Rowlands J, Noble S. How does the environment impact on the quality of life of advanced cancer patients? A qualitative study with implications for ward design. Palliat Med 2008;22:768–74.10.1177/0269216308093839Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Harris PB, McBride G, Ross C, Curtis L. A Place to Heal: Environmental sources of satisfaction among hospital patients. J Appl Soc Psychol 2002;32:1276–99.10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01436.xSearch in Google Scholar

23. Swan JE, Richardson LD, Hutton JD. Do appealing hospital rooms increase patient evaluations of physicians, nurses, and hospital services? Health Care Manage Rev 2003;28: 254–64.10.1097/00004010-200307000-00006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Hutton A. How adolescent patients use ward space. J Adv Nurs 2010;66:1802–9.10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05333.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Whelan J. Where should teenagers with cancer be treated? Eur J Cancer 2003;39:2573–8.10.1016/j.ejca.2003.09.014Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Hutton A. Consumer perspectives in adolescent ward design. J Clin Nurs 2005;14:537–45.10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01106.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Coad J, Coad N. Children and young people’s preference of thematic design and colour for their hospital environment. J Child Health Care 2008;12:33–48.10.1177/1367493507085617Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2015-7-17
Accepted: 2015-10-10
Published Online: 2015-12-9

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijamh-2015-0072/html
Scroll to top button