Abstract
Background
Analysis of nursing theoretical works and its role in knowledge development is presented as an essential process of critical reflection. Health promotion model (HPM) focuses on helping people achieve higher levels of well-being and identifies background factors that influence health behaviors.
Objectives
This paper aims to evaluate, and critique HPM by Barnum’s criteria.
Methods
The present study reviewed books and articles derived from Proquest, PubMed, Blackwell Databases. The method of evaluation for this model is based on Barnum’s criteria for analysis, application and evaluation of nursing theories. The criteria selected by Barnum embrace both internal and external criticism. Internal criticism deals with how theory components fit with each other (internal construction of theory) and external criticism deals with the way in which theory relates to the extended world (which considers theory in its relationships to human beings, nursing, and health).
Results
The electronic database search yielded over 27,717 titles and abstracts. Following removal of duplicates, 18,963 titles and abstracts were screened using the inclusion criteria and 1278 manuscripts were retrieved. Of these, 80 were specific to HPM and 23 to analysis of any theory in nursing relating to the aim of this article. After final selection using the inclusion criteria for this review, 28 manuscripts were identified as examining the factors contributing to theory analysis. Evaluation of health promotion theory showed that the philosophical claims and their content are consistent and clear. HPM has a logical structure and was applied to diverse age groups from differing cultures with varying health concerns.
Conclusion
In conclusion, among the strategies for theory critique, the Barnum approach is structured and accurate, considers theory in its relationship to human beings, community psychiatric nursing, and health. While according to Pender, nursing assessment, diagnosis and interventions are utilized to operationalize the HPM through practical application and research.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the Nursing & Midwifery Faculty of Kerman University of Medical Sciences for supporting this work. Any conflict of interest declared.
References
[1] Alligood MR. Nursing theorists and their work, 8th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014.Search in Google Scholar
[2] Edwards SD. Critical review of RR Parse’s the human becoming school of thought. A perspective for nurses and other health professionals. J Adv Nurs. 2000;31:190–6.10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01246.xSearch in Google Scholar
[3] Chinn PL, Kramer MK. Integrated theory & knowledge development in nursing, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby/Elsevier; 2015.Search in Google Scholar
[4] Fawcett J, Desanto-Madeya S. Contemporary nursing knowledge: analysis and evaluation of nursing models and theories, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: FA Davis Company; 2013.Search in Google Scholar
[5] Walker LO, Avant KC. Strategies for theory construction in nursing, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice Hall; 2013. 241 pp.Search in Google Scholar
[6] An J-Y, Hayman LL, Panniers T, Carty B. Theory development in nursing and healthcare informatics: a model explaining and predicting information and communication technology acceptance by healthcare consumers. Adv Nurs Sci. 2007;30:E37–49.10.1097/01.ANS.0000286628.92386.40Search in Google Scholar
[7] Smith MJ, Liehr PR. Evaluation of middle range theories. In: Gaubard A, Rosen J, editors. Middle range theory for nursing. New York: Springer; 2008. p. 13.Search in Google Scholar
[8] Garcia DS. Evaluation of 3 behavioral theories for application in health promotion strategies for Hispanic women. Adv Nurs Sci. 2016;39:165–80.10.1097/ANS.0000000000000116Search in Google Scholar
[9] Mohsenipoua H, Majlessi F, Shojaeizadeh D, Rahimiforooshani A, Ghafari R, Habibi V. Predictors of health-promoting behaviors in coronary artery bypass surgery patients: an application of Pender’s health promotion model. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016;18:1–9.10.5812/ircmj.38871Search in Google Scholar
[10] Orem DE, Taylor SG, Renpenning KM. Nursing concepts of practice, 6th ed. St Louis,MO: Mosby; 2001.Search in Google Scholar
[11] Zare M, Asadi Z, Vahedian Shahroodi M, Bahrami-Taghanaki H. Investigating the relationship between components of Pender’s Health Promotion Model and self-care behaviors among patients with Smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis. Evidence Based Care. 2017;6:7–17.Search in Google Scholar
[12] Clark DJ. Old wine in new bottles: delivering nursing in the 21st century. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2000;32:11.10.1111/j.1547-5069.2000.00011.xSearch in Google Scholar
[13] Walker LO, Avant KC. Strategies for theory construction in nursing. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange; 1988.Search in Google Scholar
[14] Meleis AI. Theoretical nursing: development and progress. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.Search in Google Scholar
[15] Janík MZ, Hodboďová Z. The Vietnam War, Public Opinion and American Culture. Masaryk, University Brno: Faculty of education, Department of English Language and Literature; 2008.Search in Google Scholar
[16] Üstün BT, Jakob R. Calling a spade a spade: meaningful definitions of health conditions. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83:802.Search in Google Scholar
[17] Pender NJ. Heath Promotion Model Manual. 2011.10.1155/2011/519293Search in Google Scholar
[18] Crothers L, Hughes T, Morine K. Theory and cases in school-based consultation. New York: Routledge; 2008.Search in Google Scholar
[19] Eldredge LK, Markham CM, Kok G, Ruiter RA, Parcel GS. Planning health promotion programs: an intervention mapping approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2016.Search in Google Scholar
[20] Bandura A. Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychol Health 1998;13:623–49.10.1080/08870449808407422Search in Google Scholar
[21] Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav. 2004;31:143–64.10.1177/1090198104263660Search in Google Scholar
[22] Parsons MA, Pender NJ, Murdaugh CL. Health promotion in nursing practice. London: Pearson Higher Education; 2011.Search in Google Scholar
[23] Peterson SJ, Bredow TS. Middle range theories: application to nursing research. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.Search in Google Scholar
[24] Augoustinos M, Walker I, Donaghue N. Social cognition: an integrated introduction. London: Sage; 2014.Search in Google Scholar
[25] Painter JE, Borba CP, Hynes M, Mays D, Glanz K. The use of theory in health behavior research from 2000 to 2005: a systematic review. Ann Behav Med. 2008;35:358.10.1007/s12160-008-9042-ySearch in Google Scholar
[26] Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 2010;376:1923–58.10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5Search in Google Scholar
[27] Butts JB, Rich KL. Philosophies and theories for advanced nursing practice. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2013.Search in Google Scholar
[28] Mohamadian H, Eftekhar Ardebili H, Rahimi Foroushani A, Taghdisi M, Shojaiezade D. Evaluation of Pender’s health promotion model for predicting adolescent girls’ quality of life. J Sch Public Health Inst Public Health Res. 2011;8:1–13.Search in Google Scholar
[29] Brenda JS, Barbara Velsor F. Health promotion in adolescents: a review of Pender’s health promotion model. Nurs Sci Q. 2006;19:366–73.10.1177/0894318406292831Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[30] Barnum BS. Nursing theory: analysis, application, evaluation. Glenview: Scott Foresman & Company,; 1990.Search in Google Scholar
[31] Chinn PL, Kramer MK, Chin PL. Integrated knowledge development in nursing, 8th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby; 2004.Search in Google Scholar
[32] Sørensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan J, Slonska Z, et al. Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1.10.1186/1471-2458-12-80Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[33] Alpar ŞE, Şenturan L, Karabacak Ü, Sabuncu N. Change in the health promoting lifestyle behaviour of Turkish University nursing students from beginning to end of nurse training. Nurse Educ Pract. 2008;8:382–8.10.1016/j.nepr.2008.03.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[34] McCullagh M. Health promotion. In: Peterson SJ, Bredow TS, editors. Middle range theories: applications to nursing research. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. pp. 290–303.Search in Google Scholar
[35] Heydari A, Khorashadizadeh F. Pender’s health promotion model in medical research. Studies 2014;41:59.Search in Google Scholar
[36] McEwen M, Wills EM, Williams L. Theoretical basis for nursing. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.Search in Google Scholar
[37] Rawlett K. Analytical evaluation of the health belief model and the vulnerable populations conceptual model applied to a medically underserved, rural population. Int J Appl Sci Technol. 2011;1:6.Search in Google Scholar
[38] Fayers P, Machin D. Quality of life: the assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.Search in Google Scholar
[39] Williams A, Wold J, Dunkin J, Idleman L, Jackson C. CVD prevention strategies with urban and rural African American women. Appl Nurs Res. 2004;17:187–194. 10.1016/j.apnr.2004.06.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[40] Ronis DL, Hong OS, Lusk SL. Comparison of the original and revised structures of the health promotion model in predicting construction workers’ use of hearing protection. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29:3–17.10.1002/nur.20111Search in Google Scholar PubMed
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
