Die Rolle von Verhaltensökonomik und experimenteller Forschung in Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Politikberatung

Literatur

Andersen, S., S. Ertaç, U. Gneezy, M. Hoffman und J.A. List (2011), Stakes matter in ultimatum games, American Economic Review 101(7), S. 3427–39.Search in Google Scholar

Bardsley, N. (2008), Dictator game giving: altruism or artefact?, Experimental Economics 11(2), S. 122–33.Search in Google Scholar

Barmettler, F., E. Fehr und Ch. Zehnder (2012), Big experimenter is watching you! Anonymity and prosocial behavior in the laboratory, Games and Economic Behavior 75(1), S. 17–34.Search in Google Scholar

Benartzi, S. und R.H. Thaler (2004), Save more tomorrow: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving, Journal of Political Economy 112(1), S. 164–87.Search in Google Scholar

Berg, J., J. Dickhaut und K. McCabe (1995), Trust, reciprocity, and social history, Games and Economic Behavior 10(1), S. 122–42.Search in Google Scholar

Binmore, K., A. Shaked und J. Sutton (1985), Testing noncooperative bargaining theory: A preliminary study, American Economic Review 75(5), S. 1178–80.Search in Google Scholar

Binmore, K. und A. Shaked (2010), Experimental economics: Where next?, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 73(1), S. 87–100.Search in Google Scholar

Blaufuß, K., M. Fochmann, J. Hundsdörfer, D. Kiesewetter und J. Weimann (2013), Net wage illusion in a real effort experiment, Skandinavian Journal of Economics 115(2), S. 476–84.Search in Google Scholar

Bolton, G.E., R. Zwick und E. Katok (1998), Dictator game giving: Rules of fairness versus acts of kindness, International Journal of Game Theory 27(2), S. 269–99.Search in Google Scholar

Bolton, G.E. und A. Ockenfels (2000), ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity and competition, American Economic Review 90(1), S. 166–93.Search in Google Scholar

Boockmann, B., C. Buch und M. Schnitzer (2014), Evidenzbasierte Wirtschaftspolitik in Deutschland: Defizite und Potentiale, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 15(4), S. 307–23.Search in Google Scholar

Brosig-Koch, J., H. Hennig-Schmidt, N. Kairies-Schwarz und D. Wiesen (2015): Using artefactual field and lab experiments to investigate how fee-for-service and capitation affect medical service provision, erscheint in: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.10.1016/j.jebo.2015.04.011Search in Google Scholar

Brosig, J., J. Weimann und C.L. Yang (2004), Communication, reputation and punishment in sequential bargaining experiments, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 160(4), S. 576–606.Search in Google Scholar

Brosig, J., J. Weimann und A. Ockenfels (2003), The effect of communication media on cooperation, German Economic Review 4(2), S. 217–41.Search in Google Scholar

Bruttel, L.V. und F. Stolley (2014), Ist es im Interesse der Bürger, wenn ihre Regierung Nudges implementiert?, Wirtschaftsdienst 94(11), S. 767–69.Search in Google Scholar

Bruni, L. und R. Sugden (2007), The road not taken: How psychology was removed from economics, and how it might be brought back, The Economic Journal 117(1), S. 146–73.Search in Google Scholar

Camerer, C.F. und R.M. Hogarth (1999), The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19(1–3), S. 7–42.Search in Google Scholar

Camerer, C.F. (2003), Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Search in Google Scholar

Camerer, C.F. und D. Lovallo (1999), Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach, American Economic Review, 89(1), S. 306–18.Search in Google Scholar

Carpenter J., E. Verhoogen und S. Burks (2005), The effect of stakes in distribution experiments, Economics Letters 86(3), S. 393–98.Search in Google Scholar

Chamberlin, E. (1948), An experimental imperfect market, Journal of Political Economy 56(2), S. 95–108.Search in Google Scholar

Charness, G. und M. Rabin (2002), Understanding social preferences with simple tests, Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(3), S. 817–69.Search in Google Scholar

Cherry, T.L., P. Frykblom und J.F. Shogren (2002), Hardnose the dictator, American Economic Review 92(4), S. 1218–21.Search in Google Scholar

Chetty, R. (2015), Behavioral economics and public policy: A pragmatic perspective, Discussion Paper Harvard University and NBER.10.3386/w20928Search in Google Scholar

Chetty, R., A. Looney und K. Kroft (2009), Salience and taxation: Theory and evidence, American Economic Review 99(4), S. 1145–77.Search in Google Scholar

Chetty, R., J.N. Friedman, S. Leth-Peterson, T. H. Nielsen und T. Olsen (2014), Active vs. passive decisions and crowd-out in retirement savings accounts: Evidence from Denmark, Quarterly Journal of Economics 129(3), S. 1141–219.Search in Google Scholar

Conlin, M., T. O’Donoghue und T.J. Vogelsang (2007), Projection bias in catalog orders, American Economic Review 97(4), S. 1217–49.Search in Google Scholar

Croson, R. und S. Gächter (2010), The science of experimental economics, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 73(1), S. 122–31.Search in Google Scholar

DellaVigna, S. und U. Malmendier (2006), Paying not to go to the gym, American Economic Review 96(3), S. 694–719.Search in Google Scholar

DellaVigna, S. (2009), Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field, Journal of Economic Literature 47(2), S. 315–372.Search in Google Scholar

Dohmen, T., A. Falk, D. Huffman und U. Sunde (2008), Representative trust and reciprocity: Prevalence and determinants, Economic Inquiry 46(1), S. 84–90.Search in Google Scholar

Falk, A., S. Meier und C. Zehnder (2013), Do lab experiments misrepresent social preferences? The case of self-selected student samples, Journal of the European Economic Association 11(4), S. 839–52.Search in Google Scholar

Falk, A. und U. Fischbacher (2006), A theory of reciprocity, Games and Economic Behavior 54(2), S. 293–315.Search in Google Scholar

Falk, A. und J. Heckman (2009), Lab experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences, Science 326, S. 535–38.Search in Google Scholar

Fehr, E., U. Fischbacher und E. Tougareva (2002), Do high stakes and competition undermine fairness? Evidence from Russia, IEW Working Papers 120, Universität Zürich.10.2139/ssrn.320384Search in Google Scholar

Fehr, E., S. Gächter und G. Kirchsteiger (1997), Reciprocity as a contract enforcement device: Experimental evidence, Econometrica 65(4), S. 833–60.Search in Google Scholar

Fehr, E. und K.M. Schmidt (2003), Theories of fairness and reciprocity, Evidence and economic application, in: Dewatripont, M., L.P. Hansen und S.J. Turnovsky (Hrsg.), Advances in Economics and Econometrics, 8th World Congress, Econometric Society Monographs, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, S. 208–57.Search in Google Scholar

Fehr, E. und K.M. Schmidt (1999), A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(3), S. 817–68.10.1162/003355399556151Search in Google Scholar

Feltovich, N. (2012), What’s to know about laboratory experimentation in economics? Journal of Economic Surveys 25(2), S. 371–79.Search in Google Scholar

Fochmann, M. und J. Weimann (2013), The effects of tax salience and tax experience on individual work efforts in a framed field experiment, Finanzarchiv/Public Finance Analysis 69(4), S. 1–32.Search in Google Scholar

Garicano, L., I. Palacios-Huerta und C. Prendergast (2005), Favoritism under social pressure, Review of Economics and Statistics 87(2), S. 208–16.Search in Google Scholar

Goeree, J. und C.A. Holt (2001), Ten little treasures of game theory and ten intuitive contradictions, American Economic Review 91(5), S. 1402–22.Search in Google Scholar

Güth, W., R. Schmittberger und B. Schwarze (1982), An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 3(4), S. 367–88.Search in Google Scholar

Hamermesh, D.S. (2013), Six decades of top economics publishing: Who and how?, Journal of Economic Literature, 51(1), S. 162–72.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffman, E., K. McCabe, K. Shachat und V.L. Smith (1994), Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games, Games and Economic Behavior 7(3), 346–80.10.1006/game.1994.1056Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, S., B. Mihm und J. Weimann (2015), To commit or not to commit? An experimental investigation of pre-commitments in bargaining situations with asymmetric information, Journal of Public Economics 121(1), S. 95–105.Search in Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. und A. Tversky (1979), Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica 47(2), S. 263–91.Search in Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., J.L. Knetsch und R.H. Thaler (1990), Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase Theorem, Journal of Political Economy 98(6), S. 1325–48.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, E.H., A. Morse und L. Zingales (2006), What has mattered to economics since 1970, Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(4), S. 189–202.Search in Google Scholar

Konrad, K. und M. Thum (2014), Climate policy negotiations with incomplete information, Economica 81(3), S. 244–56.Search in Google Scholar

Kruger, J. (1999), Lake Wobegon be gone! The ‘below-average effect’ and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77(2), S. 221–32.Search in Google Scholar

Krupka, E. und R. Weber (2013), Identifying social norms using coordination games: Why does dictator game sharing vary?, Journal of the European Economic Association 11(3), S. 495–524.Search in Google Scholar

Levine, D.K. (1998), Modeling altruism and spitefulness in experiment, Review of Economic Dynamics 1(3), S. 593–622.Search in Google Scholar

Levitt, S.D. und J.A. List (2008), Homo economicus evolves, Science 31 (Feb.), S. 909.Search in Google Scholar

Levitt, S.D. und J.A. List (2007), What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world?, Journal of Econonomic Perspectives 21(2), S. 153–74.Search in Google Scholar

List, J.A. (2003), Does market experience eliminate market anomalies?, Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(1), S. 41–71.Search in Google Scholar

List, J.A. (2004), Neoclassical theory versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the marketplace, Econometrica 72(2), S. 615–25.Search in Google Scholar

List, J.A. (2007), On the interpretation of giving in dictator games, Journal of Political Economy 115(3), S. 482–93.Search in Google Scholar

Madrian, B.C. und D.F. Shea (2001), The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior, Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(4), S. 1149–87.Search in Google Scholar

Madrian, B.C. (2014), Applying insights from behavioral economics to policy design, Annual Review of Economics 6(1), S. 663–88.Search in Google Scholar

Mas, A. und E. Moretti (2009), Peers at Work, American Economic Review 99(1), S. 112–45.Search in Google Scholar

Mitropoulos, A., J. Weimann und C.L. Yang (2007), An alternative approach to explaining bargaining behavior in simple sequential games, Pacific Economic Review 11(2), S. 201–22.Search in Google Scholar

Nash, J.F. (1950), Equilibrium points in n-person games, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 36(1), S. 48–9.Search in Google Scholar

Neumann, J. von und O. Morgenstern (1944), Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Search in Google Scholar

Nowak, M.A. und S. Roch (2006), Upstream reciprocity and the evolution of gratitude. Proceedings of the Royal Society 274 (1610), S. 605–09.Search in Google Scholar

Nowak, M.A., und K. Siegmund (2005), Evolution of indirect reciprocity, Nature 10, S. 1291–98.Search in Google Scholar

O’Donoghue, T. und M. Rabin (1999), Doing it now or later, American Economic Review 89(1), S. 103–24.Search in Google Scholar

Plott, C.R. und K. Zeiler (2005), The willingness to pay-willingness to accept gap, the ‘endowment effect,’ subject misconceptions, and experimental procedures for eliciting valuations, American Economic Review 95(3), S. 530–45.Search in Google Scholar

Rabin, M. (1993), Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics, American Economic Review 83(5), S. 1281–302.Search in Google Scholar

Read, D. und B. van Leeuwen (1998), Predicting hunger: The effects of appetite and delay on choice, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76(2), S. 89–205.Search in Google Scholar

Riechmann, T. und J. Weimann (2008), Competition as a coordination device: Experimental evidence from a minimum effort coordination game, European Journal of Political Economy 24(2), S. 437–54.Search in Google Scholar

Roth, A.E. (1995), Bargaining Experiments, in: J. Kagel und A.E. Roth (Hrsg.), Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, S. 253–348.Search in Google Scholar

Samuelson, L. (2005), Economic Theory and Experimental Economics, Journal of Economic Literature 43(1), S. 65–107.Search in Google Scholar

Sass, M. und J. Weimann (2015a), Moral self-licensing and the direct touch effect, Cesifo Working Paper 5174.10.2139/ssrn.2559713Search in Google Scholar

Sass, M. und J. Weimann (2015b), The peculiar power of pairs, Cesifo Working Paper 5246.10.2139/ssrn.2584886Search in Google Scholar

Sass, M., F. Timme und J. Weimann (2015), The dynamics of dictator behavior, CESifo Working Paper 5348.10.2139/ssrn.2607954Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, C.M. (2014), Wirkungstreffer erzielen – Die Rolle der evidenzbasierten Politikberatung in einer aufgeklärten Gesellschaft, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 15(3), S. 219–33.Search in Google Scholar

Simonsohn, U. (2010), Weather to go to college, Economic Journal 120(543), S. 270–80.Search in Google Scholar

Slonim, R. und A.E. Roth (1998), Learning in high stakes ultimatum games: An experiment in the Slovak Republic, Econometrica 66(3), S. 569–96.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, V.L. (1962), An experimental study of competitive market behavior, Journal of Political Economy 70(2), S. 111–37.Search in Google Scholar

Sugden, R. (2005), Introduction: Experiment, theory, world: A symposium on the role of experiments in economics, Journal of Economic Methodology 12(2), S. 177–184.Search in Google Scholar

Thaler, R.H. und C.R. Sunstein (2008), Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness, Penguin Books, London.Search in Google Scholar

Thaler, R.H. und S. Benartzi (2004), Save more tomorrow: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving, Journal of Political Economy 112(1), S. 164–87.Search in Google Scholar

Van Huyck, J., R.C. Battalio, R.O. Beil (1990), Tacit coordination games, strategic uncertainty, and coordination failure, American Economic Review 80(1), S. 234–48.Search in Google Scholar

Weimann, J., A. Knabe und R. Schöb (2012), Geld macht doch glücklich. Wo die ökonomische Glücksforschung irrt, Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart.Search in Google Scholar

Weimann, J., A. Knabe und R. Schöb (2015), Measuring Happiness, The Economics of Well-being, MIT Press, Cambridge.10.7551/mitpress/10036.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Weimann, J. (2015), Verhaltensökonomik und Politikberatung, in: Held, M., G. Kubon-Gilke und R. Sturn (Hrsg.), Reformen und ihre politisch-ökonomischen Fallstricke, Jahrbuch normative und institutionelle Grundfragen der Ökonomik, Bd. 14.Search in Google Scholar

Weimann, J. (2014), Nudging: Missbrauch der Verhaltensökonomie oder sinnvolle Politikberatung?, Wirtschaftsdienst 94(11), S. 779–781.Search in Google Scholar

White, H. (1980), A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity, Econometrica 48(4), S. 817–838Search in Google Scholar