Skip to content
Publicly Available Published by De Gruyter June 23, 2015

On the role of the extracellular space on the holistic behavior of the brain

  • Manuela Marcoli EMAIL logo , Luigi F. Agnati EMAIL logo , Francesco Benedetti , Susanna Genedani , Diego Guidolin , Luca Ferraro , Guido Maura and Kjell Fuxe

Abstract

Multiple players are involved in the brain integrative action besides the classical neuronal and astrocyte networks. In the past, the concept of complex cellular networks has been introduced to indicate that all the cell types in the brain can play roles in its integrative action. Intercellular communication in the complex cellular networks depends not only on well-delimited communication channels (wiring transmission) but also on diffusion of signals in physically poorly delimited extracellular space pathways (volume transmission). Thus, the extracellular space and the extracellular matrix are the main players in the intercellular communication modes in the brain. Hence, the extracellular matrix is an ‘intelligent glue’ that fills the brain and, together with the extracellular space, contributes to the building-up of the complex cellular networks. In addition, the extracellular matrix is part of what has been defined as the global molecular network enmeshing the entire central nervous system, and plays important roles in synaptic contact homeostasis and plasticity. From these premises, a concept is introduced that the global molecular network, by enmeshing the central nervous system, contributes to the brain holistic behavior. Furthermore, it is suggested that plastic ‘brain compartments’ can be detected in the central nervous system based on the astrocyte three-dimensional tiling of the brain volume and on the existence of local differences in cell types and extracellular space fluid and extracellular matrix composition. The relevance of the present view for neuropsychiatry is discussed. A glossary box with terms and definitions is provided.

General premises

A basic aspect of the integrative action of the central nervous system (CNS; see Table 1 for the list of abbreviations) to be investigated is the morphological and functional organization that allows the holistic behavior of such a heterogeneous system. Actually, in the brain, different types of cells (neurons, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, microglia, ependymal cells, pericytes) and liquids (extracellular fluid, cerebro-spinal fluid, blood) operate as a synergic contraption to fulfill different tasks such as the homeostasis of the interstitial space fluid (ISF) of the brain and its handling of information. It was clear from the beginning of the last century, mainly thanks to the work of Golgi and Cajal, that one and likely, the first fundamental issue to be investigated is the process of intercellular communication. In fact, this is a prerequisite for the synergic behavior of the system and hence a basic step toward the understanding of the brain integrative action. For recent proposals on the relevance but also on the limits of the classical views of the neural circuitry for brain integrative functions, see Agnati and Fuxe (2000), Agnati et al. (2007a), Fuxe et al. (2007b), and Cook et al. (2014).

Table 1

Abbreviations used.

AISAxon initial segment
ALSAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis
AQPsAquaporins
BBBBlood brain barrier
BCsBrain compartments
BDBipolar disorder
CAMsCell adhesion molecules
CCNsComplex cellular networks
CNSCentral nervous system
CSFCerebrospinal fluid
ECFExtracellular fluid
ECMExtracellular matrix
ECSExtracellular space
GMGray matter
GMNGlobal molecular network
ISFInterstitial space fluid
LTPLong-term potentiation
MMPsMetallo-proteases
NVUNeuro-vascular unit
PAPsPerisynaptic astrocyte processes
RT-VTRoamer-type of VT
SCsSynaptic clusters
VTVolume transmission
WMWhite matter
WTWiring transmission

Let us briefly discuss this aspect and a possible perspective that has also been previously introduced on the roles of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and the extracellular space (ECS) in the integrative actions of the CNS (Nicholson and Sykova, 1998; Agnati and Fuxe, 2000; Agnati et al., 2002, 2004b, 2005c, 2006a; Rauch, 2004; Kamali-Zare and Nicholson, 2013).

Intercellular communication modes in the brain: wiring transmission and volume transmission

Brain is a highly effective integrator and processor of sensory-motor signaling, which results from the synergistic and coordinated actions of neuronal networks, and, as Faingold and Blumenfeld (2014) point out, an understanding of the brain’s neural networks is a critical requirement for understanding normal brain function, as well as CNS disorders. From a very general standpoint, networks are basically formed by nodes (recognizing and decoding signals) and connections among nodes (transmitting signals). Thus, the functional organization of the nodes and of the connecting pathways as well as the type of exchanged signals has to be considered to describe networks.

Our group has suggested a dichotomy classification of the intercellular communication modes (Agnati et al., 1986, 2010a; Agnati and Fuxe 2000):

  • The wiring transmission (WT; see Table 2 for Glossary: terms and definitions) mode that is characterized by signal transmission via physically well-delimited communication channels. This is the case of synaptic contacts and gap junctions.

  • The volume transmission (VT) mode that is characterized by the diffusion of signals in physically poorly delimited ECS pathways. This type of communication mode has been observed, e.g., for monoamines in various brain areas (Fuxe et al., 2010). VT signals move from the source to the target cells by diffusion and convection along energy gradients allowing a widespread intercellular communication that occurs in the ECS through the meshes of the ECM of the brain as well as in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (Agnati and Fuxe 2000; Agnati et al., 2010a).

Table 2

Glossary: terms and definitions.

Brain compartment (BC)Brain volume differing from the neighboring tissue in terms of cellular, interstitial fluid and extracellular matrix composition. The BC is a plastic and sometimes rapidly changing functional structure since it can open up its boundaries exchanging signals with the neighboring tissue. Basic examples of BC are tetra-partite synapses and synaptic clusters, which in turn are assembled in higher level integrative structures in the CCNs.

As mentioned in the text, when an increase in the perviousness of VT pathways across the BC boundaries takes place an opening of the BC can occur.
Complex cellular network (CCN)A set of cells of any type exploiting the entire spectrum of intercellular communication modes to coordinate their outputs and to support each other’s survival.
Global molecular network (GMN)Three-dimensional molecular network filling up the intra- and extracellular spaces of the central nervous system (CNS) and interacting with the molecular networks located at the plasma membrane. It is composed of proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, whose physical interactions often lead to high molecular weight complexes.
LebensraumLiterally ‘vital space’. In the CNS, the morphological structure of the extracellular space together with the ion composition of the interstitial space fluid (ISF) and the molecular arrangement of the extracellular matrix form the ‘Lebensraum’ of the system.
Perisynaptic astrocyte processes (PAPs)Astrocyte processes enwrapping pre- and postsynaptic sides of most synapses. They modulate the synaptic activity by providing a balanced and easily tunable feedback or feed-forward response. Thus, astrocytes and neurons become structurally and functionally strictly interconnected.

The synaptic wrapping is highly dynamic and activity-dependent.
Synaptic clusters (SCs)The term ‘synaptic cluster’ classically describes brain environments in which the density of synapses is relatively high when compared to other close brain regions. Thus, a crosstalk of neighboring synapses is possible. SCs are especially present on the same dendritic branch.
Tetra-partite synapseBasic integrative structure formed by four interacting components: (i) the presynaptic side; (ii) the postsynaptic side; (iii) the PAPs; (iv) the extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules.
Volume transmission (VT)Intercellular communication mode characterized by the diffusion of signaling molecules in the extracellular space (ECS) of the brain and/or in the cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF). A particular example is the so-called roamer type of VT (RT-VT), characterized by the intercellular exchange of micro-vesicles.
Wiring transmission (WT)Intercellular communication modes characterized by signal transmission via physically well-delimited communication channels (a ‘virtual wire’). Examples include synaptic contacts and gap junctions.

The concept can be extended to molecular networks (systems of interacting proteins) to describe a signal progressing through transient changes in the conformation of the downstream proteins.

As far as neuronal networks are concerned, brain neurons communicate via chemical and electrical synapses, and, to some extent, through ephaptic transmission (i.e., electrical coupling and potential fields among closely apposed bundles of nerve fibers or neuronal membranes) (Arvanitaky, 1942; Kamermans and Fahrenfort, 2004). As far as astrocyte networks are concerned, nodes are astrocytes (or possibly clusters of astrocyte processes) and connecting pathways are astrocyte VT signals (i.e., gliotransmission) and gap junctions (Nagy et al., 2004; Parpura and Zorec, 2010).

WT and especially VT allow the assemblage of complex cellular networks (CCNs), while the newly discovered roamer-type of VT can allow the emergence of phenotype plastic CCNs

The concept of VT has implied a revision of how the brain carries out its integrative action. In particular, it has allowed us to introduce the concept of CCNs (Agnati and Fuxe, 2000), i.e., the set of cells of any type, which by exploiting the entire spectrum of intercellular communication modes are capable of integrating multiple inputs to give out appropriate outputs and to support each other’s survival (Agnati and Fuxe, 2000; Agnati et al., 2014). It can be surmised that an interplay between astrocytes and neurons occurs in organizing the CCNs especially via astrocytic release of gliotransmitters that are similar to known neurotransmitters and interact with target receptors similar to those targeted by neurotransmitters. Thus, as recently proposed (see Araque et al., 2014), astrocytes represent an additional neuromodulatory system that acts in complement to the neuronal ones, but with its own time and space domains based upon the particular intrinsic properties of Ca2+ signaling that encode and integrate incoming inputs from neurons and other environmental sources. According to such a view, Ca2+ signaling provides an intermediate regulation between the direct neuronal modulation and the slow but long-lasting ‘hormonal-like’ regulation carried out by astrocytic VT signaling. Araque and collaborators suggest that astrocyte processes in close proximity to synapses provide a balanced and easily tunable feedback or feed-forward response that regulates neuronal communication in a different time domain with respect to the more classical pre- and postsynaptic controls. Thus, astrocytes and neurons are structurally and functionally strictly interconnected since astrocytes enwrap neuronal processes, and it has been shown that at an ultra-structural level, the astrocytic process is opposed to the pre- and postsynaptic neuronal compartments of most synapses. Actually, an astrocyte can contact about 100,000 synapses. In agreement with these morphological data, it has been demonstrated that astrocytes are essential for a number of supportive functions, such as synaptic glutamate uptake, glutamate recycling, K+ buffering, and lactate secretion (Halassa et al., 2014). In addition, astrocytes are capable of releasing gliotransmitters such as Adenosine triphosphate (ATP), d-serine, glutamate, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, and Neuropeptide Y (NPY) in a vesicular manner. Notably, d-serine released by astrocytes acts as a co-agonist of synaptic N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors to boost NMDA-mediated currents; in addition to d-serine, astrocytes release glutamate that can act on both pre- and postsynaptic metabotropic and ionotropic glutamate receptors.

A peculiar type of CCN is the neuro-vascular unit (NVU) that has been defined as the assembly of elements of a certain brain region involved in the cell survival, allowing optimal interactions between that brain volume and capillaries. Thus, NVU was defined by Harder et al. (2002) as a structure formed by neurons, inter-neurons, microglia, astrocytes, basal lamina covered with smooth muscular cells and pericytes, endothelial cells, and the ECM. Each component fulfills its own special task but thanks to strong and reciprocal interactions among the components, the NVU operates as an anatomical and functional device allowing a highly efficient regulation of the local cerebral blood flow (Muoio et al., 2014). This interplay between different cell types is made possible by gap junctions, adhesion molecules (such as cadherins and integrins), and ionic channels (such as Ca2+ and K+ channels), as well as VT signals (such as glutamate and ATP) (Duchemin et al., 2012). In view of the high energy and sophisticated homeostatic requirements of neurons, these cells likely operate as pacemaker of the NVU (Koehler et al., 2006; Banerjee and Bhat, 2007). In fact, neurons detect very small variations in the supply of nutrients and oxygen and transform these signals into electrical and chemical messages to adjacent inter-neurons and/or astrocytes (Figley and Stroman, 2011). Anatomically, neurovascular communication takes place mainly through the astrocyte endfoots that are specialized astrocyte extensions in contact with the surface of the smooth muscular cells and pericytes (Kacem et al., 1998). Thus, the endfoots provide a broad surface contact with both these cell types, wrapping them and acting as a fast and efficient surface for the exchange of signals. Therefore, astrocytes could act as versatile organizers of the NVU allowing the proper VT and WT communications between neurons and other NVU components, in particular, blood vessels (see references in Muoio et al., 2014). As Nedergaard points out, arrays of astrocyte-delimited micro-domains along the capillary microvasculature allow the formation of higher order gliovascular units, which serve to match local neural activity and blood flow while regulating neuronal firing thresholds through coordinative glial signaling (Nedergaard et al., 2003). On the other hand, pericytes and endothelial cells seem mainly act as effectors of the NVU and their role is still matter of investigations. In particular, pericytes are rounded and isolated cells that are in close anatomical and functional contact with endothelial cells that contract in response to ATP increases and secrete adhesion molecules. There is also evidence that the pericytes constrict in a synchronized manner when calcium waves spread across the NVU, leading to a constriction on their contiguous capillaries (Fernandez-Klett et al., 2010). Pericytes and endothelial cells also play a fundamental role in the blood-brain barrier and produce both vasodilators (e.g., nitric oxide) and vasoconstrictors (e.g., endothelin and thromboxane) (Furchgott and Zawadzki, 1980; Emanueli et al., 2003; Duchemin et al., 2012). In addition, it should be underlined that these cells also produce trophic factors that play a role in angiogenesis (Armulik et al., 2010). Thus, the NVU by means of WT and VT communication modes among its components maintains the homeostasis of composition and volume of the external milieu (i.e., ECS plus ECM) playing a crucial role for brain cell survival and cell functions in a certain brain region.

As mentioned above, the main criterion which allows differentiating WT from VT are the characteristics of the communication channel, especially the absence or the presence of well-defined physical boundaries of the channel, which are well delimited for WT (axons and their chemical synapses, gap junctions) but not for VT (the fluid-filled channels of the ECS and the CSF). It should be noted that the concept of VT gave a new unitary functional meaning to the ECS and the ventricular system (i.e., the CSF) pointing out that they work as important channels for chemical transmission in the CNS. Furthermore, VT signals could not only interconnect any cells of CCNs of the brain but also allow brain-body crosstalk (Agnati et al., 2012b; see also Bechter, 2011), especially thanks to lipophilic blood-born signals as well as to brain regions outside the blood brain barrier (BBB). The basic dichotomous classification of intercellular communication in the brain proposed almost three decades ago (Agnati et al., 1986; see also Agnati and Fuxe, 2000) can also easily accommodate recent evidence concerning the existence of other specialized structures for intercellular communication, such as micro-vesicles for a well-demonstrated VT type (Agnati et al., 2010a) and tunneling nanotubes for a WT that is not yet in vivo demonstrated in the brain (Rustom et al., 2004). Thus, recently a more complete classification has been suggested for both VT and WT (see Agnati et al., 2010a, 2014). As far as the VT is concerned, the distinction has been proposed between ‘classical VT’ (migration of chemical and physical signals) and roamer type of VT (RT-VT) (migration of micro-vesicles, see below). Both types of VT imply the diffusion in the brain mass, in the ECS pathways as well as in the CSF (Agnati et al., 2014). The RT-VT is mediated by exosomes, shedding vesicles, exosome-like vesicles, and apoptotic bodies. These membrane-bound structures can transfer not only a single message but even a set of messages. It has been shown that plasma membrane receptors (Canonico et al., 2012; Guescini et al., 2012; Luchetti et al., 2012), mRNA (Skog et al., 2008), miRNA (Valadi et al., 2007), DNA (Balaj et al., 2011), and mtDNA (Guescini et al., 2010a,b) can be sent via microvesicles (acting as protective containers) that by diffusing into the ECS can reach the proper targets (Simons and Raposo, 2009; Agnati et al., 2010a).

The following energy gradients allow the migration of VT and RT-VT signals in the ECS of the brain: concentration gradients (diffusion of uncharged signals), gradients of electrical potentials (for charged signals), thermal gradients, and pressure gradients (vector-mediated migration for charged and uncharged signals). It should be noted that electrical, thermal, and pressure gradients can operate both as VT signals producing ‘waves’ in the ECS which can affect brain cell function sensitive to these physical signals and energy gradients favoring other VT signal migration (Agnati et al., 1995b). In addition, VT does not need a dedicated channel; hence, it represents a space sparing intercellular communication mode. In fact, VT takes advantage of the ECS and CSF that accomplish other functional roles especially related to the brain cells’ internal medium homeostasis. Thus, VT signaling in the brain has the important feature of an optimal use of the energy gradients and of the ECS.

Furthermore, two important aspects differentiate the brain from the other body organs as far as diffusion of VT signals in the mass of the organ is concerned:

  • The existence of the BBB that tends to confine hydrophilic signals in the ECS of the brain. Thus, the BBB, until a certain extent, prevents the migration of hydrophilic VT signals into the capillaries, favoring their migration toward target cells within the CNS.

  • The pulses in the cerebral arteries (see above) that induce a piston-like movement of the brain toward the occipital foramen (Greitz, 1993; Agnati et al., 1995a). This phenomenon induces movements in the extracellular fluid (ECF) and hence VT-signal migration. It could be interesting to evaluate possible differences in these movements in the case of clinostatic vs. orthostatic posture of the subject as well as in the aged subjects in view of the alterations that have been detected in the Young’s modulus (describing a material resistance to be deformed under mechanical stress) in some brain areas during the aging processes (Sack et al., 2011; Tyler, 2012).

A schematic representation of the main steps in the evolution of the concepts on intercellular communication modes is given in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Schematic representations of the historical development of the proposals of brain network organization. For further details, see the text. CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; VT, volume transmission.
Figure 1:

Schematic representations of the historical development of the proposals of brain network organization. For further details, see the text. CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; VT, volume transmission.

The main functional characteristics of the ECM and of the ECS

In the brain, ECM molecules are synthesized by neurons, glia, and non-neural cells, and are secreted into the ECS where they could associate with cell surface receptors and form heterogeneous aggregates that regulate diverse cell functions. These ECM molecules included reelin, tenascin R, tenascin C, chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans and laminins, and the major ECM receptors, integrins. They play a role in long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) at excitatory glutamatergic synapses in the hippocampus (Dityatev et al., 2010a). Specific enzymes are constantly remodeling the ECM in particular metallo-proteases (MMPs) that are a major class of protein enzymes (24 different versions) that can cut the ECM proteins producing signals that can influence many processes, such as differentiation of stem cells and cell death pathways (Scemes and Spray, 2012). In the MMP family, MMP9 is the best-characterized member and it has been shown that it is involved in activity-dependent structural and functional changes at glutamatergic synapses especially related to learning and memory since increased neuronal activity enhances MMP9 expression in various experimental paradigms, from the cellular level to animal models of learning and memory. In agreement with the ECM actions on glutamatergic synapses, it has been shown that effects on learning are inhibited by blocking NMDA receptors or MMP9 expression or activity, demonstrating the essential role of MMP9 in establishing and maintaining LTP and learning (Thalhammer and Cingolani, 2014).

A great relevance for synaptic function has the area between the presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons, the synaptic cleft, which contains a variety of cleft proteins, including proteins of the ECMs, receptor ectodomains, and cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) (see Figure 2). Focalized proteolysis of synaptic ECMs and CAMs by serine proteases and MMPs might participate in a mechanical and signaling conversion system during neural plasticity (Yoshida and Shiosaka, 1999; Shiosaka, 2004; Shiosaka and Ishikawa, 2011). The advantage of this system is the quick and local activation of extracellular zymogen, fine-tuning of cellular responses by altering protease/inhibitor balance, and, in some cases, simultaneous induction of multiple signals (Tamura et al., 2013). Actually, pre- and postsynaptic sides get in direct contact with each other via CAMs that can regulate synaptic efficacy, by recruiting scaffolding proteins, neurotransmitter receptors, and synaptic vesicles in response to the binding of counter-receptors across the synaptic cleft. Furthermore, there are CAMs that mediate neuron-astrocyte interactions at the synapse. Although adhesion complexes between astrocytes and nerve terminals do not cross the synaptic cleft, and are therefore not strictly synaptic, they are likely to be as important as trans-synaptic CAMs in determining synaptic structure and function (Volterra and Meldolesi, 2005; Thalhammer and Cingolani, 2014). The neuronal CAM Thy-1, interacting with integrins in astrocytes and triggering neurite retraction and inhibition of axonal growth, affects cell-cell or cell-matrix interactions; although lacking a cytoplasmic domain, it affects intracellular signaling cascades through interactions with molecules within lipid raft micro-domains (Leyton and Hagood, 2014). It can, therefore, be surmised that direct interactions via CAMs may inform presynaptic terminals of changes in postsynaptic efficacy and initiate presynaptic homeostatic adaptations (Thalhammer and Cingolani, 2014). The term ‘tetra-partite synapse’ has been introduced to underlie the importance of the ECM in shaping synaptic function by mediating interaction and signaling between neurons and astrocytes (see Figure 2). Thus, the concept of chemical synapses has evolved from a two-component structure playing a key role in the information transfer and storage of information to a complex multi-component device. In fact, it was realized that a tri-partite model that involves the intimate association of astroglial contacts could better explain the experimental data; now, in agreement with our proposal of the fundamental role of ECM in intercellular communication modes, recent evidence suggests the more complex model of a ‘tetra-partite synapse’ that also includes synaptic and perisynaptic ECM complexes as schematically illustrated in Figure 2 (Agnati et al., 2006a,b; Dityatev and Rusakov, 2011; Guidolin et al., 2013).

Figure 2: Schematic representation of the tetra-partite synapse formed by pre- and postsynaptic membranes but also the ECM molecules and the astrocyte processes. The tetra-partite synapse operates as an inter-neuronal communication device endowed with a high plasticity hence capable of multiple integrative functions. For further details, see the text and Figure 3. CAM, cell adhesion molecules; ECM, extracellular matrix; HMN, horizontal molecular network; NTs, neurotransmitters; VMN, vertical molecular network.
Figure 2:

Schematic representation of the tetra-partite synapse formed by pre- and postsynaptic membranes but also the ECM molecules and the astrocyte processes. The tetra-partite synapse operates as an inter-neuronal communication device endowed with a high plasticity hence capable of multiple integrative functions. For further details, see the text and Figure 3. CAM, cell adhesion molecules; ECM, extracellular matrix; HMN, horizontal molecular network; NTs, neurotransmitters; VMN, vertical molecular network.

Aim of the present paper: an integrative view of the brain morpho-functional organization

In this paper, the role of the ECM for the creation of plastic compartments that can be visualized in the brain is discussed. In agreement with this proposal, a recent paper shows that the distribution of the ECM components marked the territories of the circumventricular organs (see Pócsai and Kálmán, 2014).

Cell networks and the extracellular environment cooperate in the brain holistic behavior

Astrocytes, ECM, and ECS characteristics give rise to plastic brain compartments (BCs): tetra-partite synapses and synaptic clusters (SCs) are basic components of BCs

A BC can be defined as a brain volume that is relatively isolated and differs from the neighboring tissue for the composition of CCNs (relative density of different cell types), ISF (volume and ions composition), and ECM (different molecules present and their peculiar interactions). The BC is a plastic and sometimes rapidly changing functional structure since it can open up its boundaries exchanging signals with the neighboring tissue.

A peculiar type of BC is formed by the astrocyte morphological and functional organization (Robertson, 2013). Thus, recent anatomical studies show that human protoplasmic astrocytes form innumerable uniform polyhedral tessellating domains (i.e., compartments) that are arranged three-dimensionally and individual protoplasmic astrocytes occupy separate three-dimensional not overlapping domains. Each domain subtends approximately 2,000,000 human tetra-partite synapses that signal to perisynaptic astrocyte processes, which encode and integrate synaptic information allowing a neuron to astrocyte rapid and reciprocal signaling (Robertson, 2013). In principle, astrocyte-tessellating domains can exchange signals being interconnected not only by VT signals but also by gap junctions that allow the exchange of molecules that can transiently affect cell phenotypes. This adds an additional level of complexity to interactions between astrocyte domains that may extend over large areas including the entire neocortex. Thus, these domain-domain interconnections can lead to the formation of different and very large BCs, with the emergence of new integrative actions of these ‘contraptions’ (see Jacob, 1977; Anderson, 2010; Agnati et al., 2013). It has been pointed out that astrocytes receive signals from synaptic contacts, and also receive multiple signals and homeostatic information from different cellular sources, including neurons, vascular cells, other astrocytes, and even different types of glial cells (see the concept of NVU). Thus, it can be surmised that astrocytes play fundamental roles in the BC homeostasis by linking neuronal metabolic requirements and supply, sensing neuronal activity. In particular, astrocytes provide energy support to neurons through the glucose/glycogen pathways (Pellerin and Magistretti, 1994; Magistretti et al., 1999) and regulate blood flow (Zonta et al., 2003; Mulligan and MacVicar, 2004; Haydon and Carmignoto, 2006; Takano et al., 2006; Gordon et al., 2008; Attwell et al., 2010; Araque et al., 2014). In addition, astrocytes exchange information concerning immune state with microglia and detect local pH and osmolality changes allowing the proper control of breathing (Gourine et al., 2010) and water homeostasis, respectively (Haj-Yasein et al., 2011; Araque et al., 2014). As a whole, astrocytes act as integrators of metabolic, neuronal, and other cell signals but with different characteristics according to the organization and the metabolic conditions of that brain volume, i.e., of that plastic BC. The role of astrocytes in the plastic assembly of BCs is markedly affected by the ECM that actually also controls the polarized localization of ion channels and transporters in astrocytic membranes. Astrocytic processes contact neurons, blood vessels, and other astrocytes with a polarized distribution of membrane proteins, a feature that is considered essential for astrocytic function. For example, inwardly rectifying K+ channels (Kir) and aquaporins (AQPs) are enriched in astrocytic endfeets that contact blood vessels, and the local ECM controls their expression levels. Thus, ECM components influence astrocytic function and regulate water and K+ homeostasis by affecting the density of astrocytic membrane proteins. As mentioned above, the heterogeneity of the ECM throughout the brain and during different developmental stages is one of the features that demark the BCs; hence, the ECM serves not only as an extracellular scaffold but also as a barrier for reducing the diffusion of soluble and membrane-associated molecules between neighboring BCs. The ECM, therefore, contributes to the clustering of signaling molecules in functional micro-domains in neurons and glial cells (Dityatev et al., 2010b). Axons also harbor several highly specialized sub-compartments, such as the axon initial segment (AIS), and the juxta-paranode and internode segments of the nodes of Ranvier, which are covered by specific ECM components. The formation of most of these axonal sub-compartments is dependent on interactions with other cells (e.g., myelinating glia). However, the AIS is unique in that the recruitment and retention of AIS proteins is mainly specified intrinsically via axonal cytoskeletal and scaffolding proteins (Dityatev et al., 2010b).

The tetra-partite synapse and the synaptic clusters can be considered basic brain compartments. In particular, several synapses can interact directly or through soluble signaling molecules, with the ECM that can incorporate molecular signatures of both glial and synaptic elements and ECM molecules modulate activities of pre- and postsynaptic receptors and ion channels (see Figure 2). The ECM can respond to network activity either by incorporating secreted molecules and shed extracellular domains of transmembrane molecules, or by freeing products of its activity-dependent proteolytic cleavage as signaling messengers. As mentioned above, these observations have suggested that the ECM is a fourth essential element of what has been termed the ‘tetra-partite synapse’. Theoretically, including the ECM as a fourth player increases the number of interaction pathways in a synapse (Dityatev and Rusakov, 2011) and give further evidence to the concept of basic BCs made by tetra-partite synapses and likely at a higher integrative level by SCs.

It should be underlined that enwrapping of synapses by perisynaptic astrocyte processes (PAPs) is an important feature that allows high efficiency and privacy of the transmission (see Figure 3). These astrocytes’ fine ramifications account for 70–80% of the astrocytic plasma membrane and often surround spine synapses, sometimes completely encapsulating them; however, even if PAPs are found in all brain regions, the proportion of synapses having them and the level of synaptic coverage vary significantly. Thus, the function and efficacy of synaptic transmission are determined not only by the composition and activity of pre- and postsynaptic components but also by the features of the PAPs that enwrap the synapse. In fact, astrocytes can sense neuronal activity by elevating their intracellular Ca2+ in response to neurotransmitters and may communicate with neurons even if a detailed model of the role of astrocytes in synaptic function and plasticity remains to be established (see also above). A further functionally important aspect is the PAPs’ ability to rapidly restructure their thin-branched processes modifying their coverage of the synaptic elements (Bernardinelli et al., 2014). PAPs have been described by several studies as plastic structures able to change their morphology within minutes, thus modifying their coverage of pre- and postsynaptic elements (Reichenbach et al., 2010; Bernardinelli et al., 2014). In other words, astrocytic PAP insulation of the synapses constitutes a plastic physical barrier controlling the transmitter spillover from the synaptic cleft. The opening of this barrier allows extra-synaptic diffusion and hence hetero-synaptic signaling that can lead to the transient formation of a crosstalk between neighboring synapses and hence to a functional cluster of synaptic contacts especially at the level of dendritic spines (Agnati et al., 2014). In agreement with the concept of plastic BCs, it could be surmised that PAPs’ structural changes can give rise to different BCs each of which composed of a different number and/or location of tetra-partite synapses and hence of SCs that are confined in an astrocyte three-dimensional domain. Light and EM immunochemistry have shown that PAPs surrounding excitatory spine synapses have an important role not only on synaptic privacy but also on the functional characteristics of the tetra-partite synapse. In fact, PAPs can express several proteins that deeply affect morphology and function of the quadripartite synapse such as glutamine synthetase, astrocytic glutamate transporters, metabotropic glutamate receptors, CAMs, K+ channels, and aquaporins that may regulate ‘adaptive’ swelling of PAPs (Bernardinelli et al., 2014). Thus, by enwrapping a synapse, astroglia not only constitutes a physical barrier for transmitter diffusion and helps to retain a high level of neurotransmitter around that synapse but also, through the expression of specific proteins in perisynaptic processes, can sense and modulate synaptic activity.

Figure 3: The tetra-partite synapse can operate both according to the ‘classical WT mode’ and (following plastic changes of the perisynaptic astrocytic processes) as a device that by means of a ‘perisynaptic VT’ can affect extra-synaptic, neighboring receptors. NT, neurotransmitter; VT, volume transmission; WT, wiring transmission.
Figure 3:

The tetra-partite synapse can operate both according to the ‘classical WT mode’ and (following plastic changes of the perisynaptic astrocytic processes) as a device that by means of a ‘perisynaptic VT’ can affect extra-synaptic, neighboring receptors. NT, neurotransmitter; VT, volume transmission; WT, wiring transmission.

In view of these data, we propose (see Figure 3) that a sophisticated control of the PAPs’ plasticity (especially at excitatory synapses) allows moving from a high privacy of the synaptic transmission (close enwrap of the tetra-partite synapse) to a more or less broad opening of the enwrapping. This leads to transmitter diffusion (i.e., extra-synaptic VT) with diffusion to neighboring synapses especially along dendrites allowing integrative activity of SCs and hence the formation of BCs that have been supposed to play a crucial role in the vertical elaboration of the information in a functional module (Agnati et al., 2012a; Bernardinelli et al., 2014). It could also be surmised that neurotransmitter spillover out of the tetra-partite synapse leads to the formation of local transmitter clouds (see Greer’s proposal; Greer, 2007) that allows a complex activation in the neighboring tissue of receptor mosaics formed by heteromers (see Agnati et al., 2005a,b, 2007b; Fuxe et al., 2009). This view broadens up Lehre and Rusakov’s (2002) proposal that some synapses can undergo transitory morpho-functional changes that allow a large spillover of neurotransmitters hence a VT inter-synaptic crosstalk. The possible overlaps of transmitter clouds in different functional conditions and their overlapping actions on the cognate receptors sometimes forming receptor mosaics (Agnati et al., 2010b) could be suggested as an interesting field of investigation.

The concept of ‘Lebensraum’ and the role of astrocytes in its homeostasis – focus on the extracellular GMN as an ‘intelligent glue’ that fills up the ECS

In agreement with the hypothesis of a global molecular network (GMN) enmeshing the CNS, it has been demonstrated that neurons, astrocytes, microglia, and macrophages secrete ECM molecules that can interact with each other and have major effects on neural and astrocyte networks’ topological organization and functions (Agnati et al., 2006b, 2007a). For instance, hyaluronan membrane receptors (such as CD44) can trigger cellular responses to changes in the external matrix composition (Ghosh and Guidolin, 2002), and, similarly, a major receptor on the membrane, integrin, interacts with the matrix molecules reelin, tenascin, chondroitin proteoglycans, and laminins (Arnoys and Wang, 2007).

As illustrated in Figures 3 and 4, the ECS may play a central role in the intercellular communication processes not simply thanks to the ECS pathways but also in view of the actions of chemical (ECM molecules and ions) present in this space and its interconnections with the CSF. Thus, ECS and ECM are active players of the integrative action of the brain and there are reciprocal interactions between these two systems and the CCNs that, in turn, control both the ECS volume and geometry and secrete the ECM.

Figure 4: Proposal that ECS, CSF, and ECM form the ‘Lebensraum’ (vital space) of the CCNs. Thus, these components not only represent the combined environment allowing the survival of the brain cells but also are media for their communication processes. For further details, see the text. CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; ECM, extracellular matrix; ECS, extracellular space; VT, volume transmission; WT, wiring transmission.
Figure 4:

Proposal that ECS, CSF, and ECM form the ‘Lebensraum’ (vital space) of the CCNs. Thus, these components not only represent the combined environment allowing the survival of the brain cells but also are media for their communication processes. For further details, see the text. CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; ECM, extracellular matrix; ECS, extracellular space; VT, volume transmission; WT, wiring transmission.

In broad terms, it can be stated that the ECS together with the ECM (Agnati et al., 2009) forms the ‘Lebensraum’ of the CCNs (see Figure 4). In particular, it should be pointed out that many other unique large molecules such as trophic factors (e.g., IGFs, FGFs, TGF-βs, and HGF) have been found to be associated with ECM proteins or heparin sulfate (Taipale and Keski-oja, 1997). Thus, the ECM is not a simple amorphous filling between the different cell types of the CNS. On the contrary, it is characterized by three-dimensionally organized peculiar molecules, which determine the geometry of the ECS pathways, and their chemical interactions with the VT signals. For example, a VT peptide can be modified or even split by ecto-enzymes (Konkoy and Davis, 1996) with the possible formation of different sets of fragments from the same parent peptide that can differentially modulate the various cells of CCNs eliciting different types of integrative responses (Agnati and Fuxe, 2000; Agnati et al., 2004a, 2005c; Fuxe et al., 2007a). Fuxe et al. (2012) suggested that galanin (1–15) can play a specific role in depression in view of its high diffusion capabilities [lower molecular weight with respect to galanin (1–29)] and hence its possible extra-synaptic modulatory actions on GalR-5-HT1A heteroreceptor complexes. Such a view underlines our proposal that GMN by regulating diffusion of VT signals in the ECS has a fundamental role in the brain holistic behavior. Furthermore, the GMN contributes to the structural and functional organization of the brain since the ECM component of the GMN has both a scaffolding role enabling the appropriate location of the CNS components and a functional role in cooperating to the maintenance of the microenvironment around cells and in providing a specific trophic support to the CCNs. As mentioned above, an increasing number of growth factors have been found to be associated with ECM proteins or heparin sulfate (Taipale and Keski-oja, 1997). Summing up, the GMN, thanks to its ECM component, can regulate the geometry/viscosity of the diffusion pathways in the ECS and could be the storage of growth factors that, via a proteolytic release and activation, generate rapid and highly localized trophic signals.

The ECS is in contact with CSF at the ventricles, and ECF and CSF have a similar composition that plays a role in allowing neuronal electrical and chemical activity as well as a fundamental role in the extracellular signaling via VT. As far as the ions present in the ECS are concerned, they should be mentioned for both their effects on local field potential diffusion and cell membrane electrical potential. In fact, external cations, particularly divalent ones, attracted by negative membrane surface potential, form a thin, diffuse double ionic layer near the membrane surface that acts as an electric screen reducing the cell surface potential and affect the charged chemical VT diffusion. Furthermore, at chemical synapses, an increase in [Ca2+] in the ECF facilitates, but an increase in [Mg2+] inhibits, neurotransmitter release. Thus, physiological concentrations of Mg2+ in the ECF (about 1 mm) play an important role in the regulation of neurotransmitter release, neuronal excitability, and electrolyte kinetics (Rausche et al., 1990). It should also be mentioned in view of the relevance for protein conformations and for the ASIC 1a receptor activation that glia cells play an important role in maintaining the ECF pH since transporters for H+ and HCO3- are found on the astrocyte membrane (see also above). As a matter of fact, composition and abnormalities in the function of astrocytes are associated with certain neurological disorders such as neuropathic pain, epilepsy, Alzheimer’s disease, schizophrenia, and depression.

Nicholson’s group has given fundamental contributions to a better understanding of the multi-facet basic role of the ECS in the brain (Kamali-Zare and Nicholson, 2013). It should be noticed that the ECS represents up to 20% of the total brain volume and provides an essential medium for the transport of nutrients, ions, and oxygen. It should be underlined that the entire vascular system in the brain occupies only about 3% of the brain volume but with a much higher turnover of the fluid (i.e., the blood) flowing in small-diameter channels (i.e., the capillaries) that respond to a regional control (see above NVU).

Summing up, besides the energy gradients the key players involved in VT signaling are as follows (Kamali-Zare and Nicholson, 2013):

  • ECS pathway size that has a width of about 20–60 nm (Thorne and Nicholson, 2006);

  • ECS pathway geometry in particular ‘tortuosity’. Tortuosity of the ECS pathways describes hindrance posed to the diffusion process by a geometrically complex medium in comparison to an environment free of any obstacles (for a detailed study and for a discussion of its importance, see Tao and Nicholson, 2004; Kamali-Zare and Nicholson, 2013).

  • ECM composition. As a matter of fact, the matrix may increase local viscosity or act more specifically on molecules that undergo steric or electrostatic binding with some molecules of the matrix. As pointed out above, this gives ECS the potential to regulate diffusion of signals and vesicles.

In this respect, it is interesting to note that there is a functional relationship between neuronal network activity and ECS/ECM characteristics since at sites of high neuronal activity, ECS shrinks by more than 30% (Kamali-Zare and Nicholson, 2013). This use-dependent change in the ECS volume could result from the glial response to the focal extracellular K ion accumulation by a depolarization of the exposed membrane and its propagation along the glial syncytium to sites where the extracellular K ion concentration has not yet increased. In other words, a focal increase in the ECF [K+]o increases K+-influx into glial cells and causes an osmolality decreases of ECF, and hence a shrinkage of the ECS volume. At remote sites, K+-efflux and the consequent increase of the ECS volume are expected.

Thus, a complex interplay between the molecular and topological organization of ECS&ECM and the intercellular WT and VT occurs with the optimal tuning of the CNS integrative actions. It should be noticed that our proposal has some common aspects with Beaumont’s hypothesis, in particular on the possible role of the ECF as a medium playing a fundamental role for the integrative action of the brain. In fact, Beaumont suggests that the brain ECF could be considered “a sponge-like ‘inverse cell’ that surrounds all the cells. During neuronal resting and action potentials, sodium and potassium ions shuttle into, and out of, this “Reciprocal Domain” within the brain. This localised flux of ions is the counterpart to all the neuronal electrochemical activity, so a complementary version of all that potential information is integrated into this space within the brain” (Beaumont, 2014). However, our proposal points out that there are plastic BCs that can also be a result of the local brain cell activity in that brain region creating local compartments of the reciprocal domain. Furthermore, the RT-VT and likely the tunneling-nanotube WT can be intercellular communication modes not directly affected by the reciprocal domain.

Concluding remarks and perspectives

The active role of the GMN and of the ECS pathways in the holistic behavior of the brain

Because of these data and of the evidence of PAPs’ plasticity, we introduce a hypothesis that during sleep there is an ‘opening of the basic BCs’ (i.e., tetra-partite synapses and SCs), namely an increase in the perviousness of VT pathways across the BC boundaries essentially based on PAPs’ plastic changes (Bernardinelli et al., 2014), with a dramatic change in some aspects of synaptic functions and of the VT signaling. This hypothesis is based on a very important paper published by Xie et al. (2013). These authors have demonstrated that natural sleep or anesthesia is associated with a 60% increase in the interstitial space, resulting in a striking increase in convective exchange of CSF with ISF favoring the clearance of waste products (e.g., amyloid β) during sleep. This process depends on the glymphatic system that has one of the main molecular effectors in AQP4 water channels. Xie and collaborators report interesting data on the ISF volume and tortuosity of the diffusion pathways. Thus, the cortical interstitial volume fraction has been evaluated to be between 13% and 15% in the awake state as compared to 22% and 24% in sleeping or anesthetized mice. The tortuosity of the interstitial space did not differ significantly according to changes in the state of brain activity; awake, sleeping, and anesthetized mice all exhibited a λ value in the range of 1.3–1.8. (The dimensionless parameter tortuosity, λ, may be used to characterize the hindrance to diffusion where λ=(D/D*)1/2. The magnitude of D* reflects the hindrance imposed by the geometry of the path; therefore D*<D, where D is the free diffusion coefficient. In addition to being affected by the geometry, the diffusing molecule may also interact with the matrix; this too can be incorporated into the tortuosity; Nicholson et al., 2011). Our hypothesis maintains that λ does not decrease during sleep notwithstanding the increase in the ECS for the opening of excitatory synapses enwrapped by PAPs with the creation of a number of ‘local voids’, that is the synaptic gaps, which increase the tortuosity of the ECS. As far as the temporal aspects of these phenomena are concerned, it has already been pointed out that PAPs have the ability to rapidly restructure their thin-branched processes modifying their coverage of the synaptic elements (Bernardinelli et al., 2014). Thus, PAPs are plastic structures which can change their morphology within minutes, thus modifying their coverage of pre- and postsynaptic elements (Reichenbach et al., 2010). According to our hypothesis, these plastic changes can create new ‘voids’; hence, they lead to a tortuosity increase that does not occur since it is compensated by the ECS increase.

The possible relevance of the brain GMN in psychiatry and neurology

Early investigations in psychiatric neurobiology, carried out from the vantage point of therapeutics, first associated some clear-cut mechanisms of effective psychotropic drugs with psychopathological domains, and lately raised awareness that during effective treatment of psychiatric conditions the expected changes of monoaminergic neurotransmission are paralleled by profound changes in brain metabolism, neural responses to stimuli, sleep architecture, biological rhythms, and, at the intracellular level, neuronal signaling pathways regulating gene expression, neuroplasticity, and neurotrophic mechanisms (Millan, 2006; Benedetti and Smeraldi, 2009). Taking advantage of functional and structural brain imaging methods, in the last decade consistent findings associated major psychoses with distinctive patterns of disruption of gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) integrity which, notwithstanding regional brain areas differences between the illnesses, progressively spread in the whole brain (Honea et al., 2005; Benedetti and Bollettini, 2014). A reduced timing and synchrony in the modular relationships between the component processes of the human brain (Gazzaniga, 1989), possibly due to altered myelination and GM microstructural changes (Bartzokis, 2012), could in turn lead to abnormal functional connectivity and altered mood and cognition (Benedetti and Bollettini, 2014; Vai et al., 2014). Notwithstanding classical findings about single neurotransmitters and regional abnormalities, a research focus on brain holistic behavior, and considering the key role of GMN and ECM in structuring the brain tissue microenvironment, might help to better frame these recent perspectives about the biological underpinnings of psychiatric disorders.

Bipolar disorder (BD) offers a good example of the above. Signs of disruption of WM integrity spread in most tracts contributing to alterations in the functional integrity of the brain. Thus, in vivo diffusion tensor imaging suggests an increased space between fibers due to demyelination or dysmyelination (Benedetti and Bollettini, 2014) as well as a 40% reduction of the GM mainly in hippocampus (Yildiz-Yesiloglu and Ankerst, 2006) and in subgenual and orbitofrontal cortex. It should be pointed out that the number of neurons is preserved but there is a marked reduction of glial cell number and a reduction of synapses (Drevets et al., 2008). The imbalanced network biomarkers which have been identified up to now share the unique common feature of paracrine VT signaling. Both the neurotransmitters serotonin (5-HT) and noradrenaline, functionally associated with depressive states (Millan, 2006; Sharp and Cowen, 2011), and dopamine, hyperactive in mania (Cousins et al., 2009), are modulating the wired brain via VT (Fuxe et al., 2010) and are the target of treatment options aimed at modifying mood states, which could then be dependent on signal-receptor coupling through the ECM. Neurotrophic signaling cascades, which have been associated with cell atrophy and loss in BD (Shaltiel et al., 2007), require the diffusion in the ECM of neurotrophins (Lessmann et al., 2003). An increased systemic cortisol metabolism, coupled with altered brain glucocorticoid sensitivity (Spijker and van Rossum, 2012), has been associated with pathophysiology, stress vulnerability, and progressive allostatic load in BD (Steen et al., 2011; Grande et al., 2012). A substantial fraction of the transcriptome is under circadian regulation (Koike et al., 2012), with evidence in patients with BD suggesting a high dependence of behavior and psychopathology on the characteristics of the biological clock (Harvey, 2008; Benedetti and Terman, 2013; McClung, 2013): both neurons and glia express cellular circadian rhythms, coordinated in the brain by the suprachiasmatic nuclei by a diffusible signal (Slat et al., 2013), and with a thermolabile circulating factor influencing the endogenous rhythm of the clock molecular machinery to produce circadian behaviors (Pagani et al., 2011). An activated monocyte pro-inflammatory state, with a high inflammatory set point of circulating monocytes at the transcriptome level (Padmos et al., 2008) and in vivo activation of brain microglia (Haarman et al., 2014), has been associated with BD and parallels development in the offspring of patients with BD (Padmos et al., 2009; Mesman et al., 2015); again, pro-inflammatory cytokines diffuse into the brain via VT in the ECM. Lithium, the mainstay for the long-term treatment of BD and the only drug able to specifically counteract the signs of both WM and GM disruption associated with the illness (Benedetti et al., 2013, 2015), has major effects on water homeostasis and increases the water content of the brain (Phatak et al., 2006; Regenold, 2008; Benedetti et al., 2015), thus probably also modifying the structure of the ECM and influencing the metabolite clearance which is coupled with changes of the interstitial fluid volume (Xie et al., 2013).

It has been suggested that together with neurotrophins, cytokines and other factors could be stored in the ECM which might serve as a natural, intermittent-release matrix for their delivery (Brightman, 2002). Beyond this possible mechanism, in more general terms the definition of the structure of the GMN in psychiatric conditions could help to understand the relationship between pathophysiological mechanisms globally affecting the brain, and regional changes possibly related to the boundaries of plastic brain compartments limiting the diffusion of toxic or trophic substances in the diseased brain. Still in its infancy, the computational investigation of subject-specific cerebrospinal fluid flow (Kurtcuoglu et al., 2007) could provide hints about the preferential diffusion of compounds in the ECM of specific brain regions, by combining data on cerebrospinal fluid circulation (Bechter, 2011) and preferential ways for diffusion in the GMN. Accordingly, it has been shown that a progressive alteration in the GMN could be a necessary correlate of the specific progression of damage typical of psychiatric illnesses, such as the temporal and spatial progression of regional GM shrinking during the transition to psychosis and the lifetime course of schizophrenia (Farrow et al., 2005; Honea et al., 2005; Takahashi et al., 2009), or the progressive volume reduction of hippocampus and subgenual cortex in BD. The definition of these mechanisms could then lead to new insights about the still unexplained course of illness progression, and provide unexpected targets to treat and prevent the detrimental effects of psychiatric illnesses on the structure and function of the brain.

Not limited to psychiatric diseases, a research perspective focusing on the analysis of subtle alteration of GMN might help to better conceptualize early changes in magnetic resonance imaging measures and histopathology to detect, differentiate, and individually quantify axon injury/loss, demyelination, and inflammation, which parallel onset and course of multiple sclerosis (Wang et al., 2015), to better understand the pathophysiology of the early stages of the illness and identify biomarkers and targets for treatment.

Age-related changes might also affect the ECM composition and the perviousness of the extracellular pathways, with remarkable consequences on the onset and development of the most common neurodegenerative disorder, Alzheimer’s disease. In fact, β-amyloid, like other proteins linked to neurodegenerative diseases, is released in the interstitial space (Cirrito et al., 2005), and can be cleared from the brain by the convective exchange of CSF and interstitial fluid through the ECM (Malkki, 2013) according to a circadian pattern. Thus, it has been shown that in animal models increased convective fluxes of interstitial fluid during sleep favor an increased rate of β-amyloid clearance (Xie et al., 2013). In humans poor sleep quality in older adults is associated with increased brain levels of β-amyloid (Spira et al., 2013), while unfragmented sleep could reduce the risk of AD and attenuate age-related cognitive decline and development of neurofibrillary tangles in individuals at genetic risk (Lim et al., 2013). These findings point toward the circadian β-amyloid clearance and hence to an important role of the ECM structure and topology in affecting resilience to Alzheimer’s disease. Actually, several data support a complex and important role of the extracellular part of GMN in neurodegeneration. In this context, the abnormal deposition of sulfated proteoglycans in the formation of the histopathological lesions characterizing Alzheimer’s disease should be mentioned (Bruinsma et al., 2010; Morawski et al., 2014).

Furthermore, a balance between MMPs and the tissue inhibitor of MMPs plays a pivotal role in the maintenance of the normal structure and function of the CNS (Wright et al., 2002). Chronic activation of MMPs has also been implicated in stroke, multiple sclerosis, and Alzheimer’s disease (Wright et al., 2002). As far as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is concerned, important recent findings (Kaplan et al., 2014) demonstrate that the matrix MMP9 is expressed only by fast motor neurons, which are selectively vulnerable. In ALS model mice expressing mutant superoxide dismutase (SOD1), reduction of MMP9 function using gene ablation, viral gene therapy, or pharmacological inhibition significantly delayed muscle denervation.

A focus on the GMN structure and its subtle changes could then become a new, yet unexploited basis for prevention and potential therapeutic options in psychiatric and neurologic diseases.


This paper is dedicated to Prof. Eugenio Muller, brilliant colleague and dear friend.



Corresponding authors: Manuela Marcoli, Department of Pharmacy and Center of Excellence for Biomedical Research, University of Genova, viale Cembrano 4, I-16148 Genova, Italy, e-mail: ; and Luigi F. Agnati, Department of Diagnostic, Clinical Medicine and Public Health, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, via Giuseppe Campi 287, I-41125 Modena, Italy; and Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden, e-mail:
aThese two authors have contributed equally.

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the Grant 60A06-7024/14 from University of Padova to D.G. and by a Grant PRA of the University of Genova to M.M. We thank Dr Marco Romano (Exom Group SRL) for useful discussions.

References

Agnati, L.F. and Fuxe, K. (2000). Volume transmission as a key feature of information handling in the central nervous system possible new interpretative value of the Turing’s B-type machine. Prog. Brain Res. 125, 3–19.10.1016/S0079-6123(00)25003-6Search in Google Scholar

Agnati, L.F., Fuxe, K., Zoli, M., Ozini, I., Toffano, G., and Ferraguti, F. (1986). A correlation analysis of the regional distribution of central enkephalin and beta endorphin immunoreactive terminals and of opiate receptors in adult and old male rats. Evidence for the existence of two main types of communication in the central nervous system: the volume transmission and the wiring transmission. Acta Physiol. Scand. 128, 201–207.10.1111/j.1748-1716.1986.tb07967.xSearch in Google Scholar

Agnati, L.F., Bjelke, B., and Fuxe, K. (1995a). Volume versus wiring transmission in the brain: a new theoretical frame for neuropsychopharmacology. Med. Res. Rev. 15, 33–45.10.1002/med.2610150104Search in Google Scholar

Agnati, L.F., Cortelli, P., Pettersson, R., and Fuxe, K. (1995b). The concept of trophic units in the central nervous system. Prog. Neurobiol. 46, 561–574.10.1016/0301-0082(95)00017-PSearch in Google Scholar

Agnati, L.F., Santarossa, L., Benfenati, F., Ferri, M., Morpurgo, A., Apolloni, B., and Fuxe, K. (2002). Molecular Basis of Learning and Memory: Modelling Based on Receptor Mosaics. From Synapses to Rules. B. Apolloni and F. Kurfes, eds. (New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers), pp. 165–196.10.1007/978-1-4615-0705-5_9Search in Google Scholar

Agnati, L.F., Ferré, S., Leo, G., Lluis, C., Canela, E.I., Franco, R., and Fuxe, K. (2004a). On the molecular basis of the receptor mosaic hypothesis of the engram. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 24, 501–516.10.1023/B:CEMN.0000023626.35717.5dSearch in Google Scholar

Agnati, L.F., Santarossa, L., Genedani, S. Canela, E.I., Leo, G., Franco, R., Woods, A., Lluis, C., Ferré, S., and Fuxe, K. (2004b). On the Nested Hierarchical Organization of CNS: Basic Characteristics of Neuronal Molecular Networks. Computational Neuroscience: Cortical Dynamics, Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences. P. Erdi, A. Esposito, M. Marinaro and S. Scarpetta, eds. (Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer), pp. 24–54.10.1007/978-3-540-27862-7_2Search in Google Scholar

Agnati, L.F., Fuxe, K., and Ferré, S. (2005a). How receptor mosaics decode transmitter signals. Possible relevance of cooperativity. Trends Biochem. Sci. 30, 88–193.10.1016/j.tibs.2005.02.010Search in Google Scholar

Agnati, L.F., Genedani, S., Lenzi, P.L., Leo, G., Mora, F., Ferré, S., and Fuxe, K. (2005b). Energy gradients for the homeostatic control of brain ECF composition and for VT signal migration: introduction of the tide hypothesis. J. Neural. Transm. 112, 45–63.10.1007/s00702-004-0180-5Search in Google Scholar

Agnati, L.F., Tarakanov, A.O., Ferré, S., Fuxe, K., and Guidolin, D. (2005c). Receptor-receptor interactions, receptor mosaics, and basic principles of molecular network organization: possible implications for drug development. J. Mol. Neurosci. 26, 193–208.10.1385/JMN:26:2-3:193Search in Google Scholar

Agnati, L.F., Leo, G., Zanardi, A., Genedani, S., Rivera, A., Fuxe, K., and Guidolin, D. (2006a). Volume transmission and wiring transmission from cellular to molecular networks: history and perspectives. Acta Physiol. 187, 329–344.10.1111/j.1748-1716.2006.01579.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Agnati, L.F., Zunarelli, E., Genedani, S., and Fuxe, K. (2006b). On the existence of a global molecular network enmeshing the whole central nervous system: physiological and pathological implications. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 7, 3–15.10.2174/138920306775474086Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Agnati, L.F., Genedani, S., Leo, G., Rivera, A., Guidolin, D., and Fuxe, K. (2007a). One century of progress in neuroscience founded on Golgi and Cajal’s outstanding experimental and theoretical contributions. Brain Res. Rev. 55, 167–189.10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.03.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Agnati, L.F., Guidolin, D., Leo, G., and Fuxe, K. (2007b). A boolean network modelling of receptor mosaics relevance of topology and cooperativity. J. Neural Transm. 114, 77–92.10.1007/s00702-006-0567-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Agnati, L.F., Fuxe, K., Baluska, F., and Guidolin, D. (2009). Implications of the ‘Energide’ concept for communication and information handling in the central nervous system. J. Neural Transm. 116, 1037–1052.10.1007/s00702-009-0193-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Agnati, L.F., Guidolin, D., Guescini, M., Genedani, S., and Fuxe, K. (2010a). Understanding wiring and volume transmission. Brain Res. Rev. 64, 137–159.10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.03.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Agnati, L.F., Guidolin, D., Leo, G., Carone, C., Genedani, S., and Fuxe, K. (2010b). Receptor – receptor interactions: a novel concept in brain integration. Prog. Neurobiol. 90, 157–175.10.1016/j.pneurobio.2009.10.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Agnati, L.F., Guidolin, D., Cortelli, P., Genedani, S., Cela-Conde, C., and Fuxe, K. (2012a). Neuronal correlates to consciousness. The “Hall of Mirrors” metaphor describing consciousness as an epiphenomenon of multiple dynamic mosaics of cortical functional modules. Brain Res. 476, 3–21.10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Agnati, L.F., Guidolin, D., Guescini, M., Battistin, L., Stocchi V., De Caro R., Genedani, S., and Fuxe, K. (2012b). Aspects on the integrative actions of the brain from neural networks to “brain-body medicine”. J. Recept. Sig. Transd. 32, 163–180.10.3109/10799893.2012.687748Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Agnati, L.F., Guidolin, D., Battistin, L., Pagnoni, G., and Fuxe, K. (2013). The neurobiology of imagination: possible role of interaction-dominant dynamics and default mode network. Front. Psychol. 4, 296.10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00296Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Agnati, L.F., Guidolin, D., Maura, G., Marcoli, M., Leo, G., Carone, C., De Caro, R., Genedani, S., Borroto-Escuela, D.O., and Fuxe, K. (2014). Information handling by the brain: proposal of a new “paradigm” involving the roamer type of volume transmission and the tunneling nanotube type of wiring transmission J. Neural. Transm. 121, 1431–1449.10.1007/s00702-014-1240-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Anderson, M.L. (2010). Neural reuse: a fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behav. Brain Sci. 33, 245–313.10.1017/S0140525X10000853Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Araque, A., Carmignoto, G., Haydon, P.G., Oliet, S.H., Robitaille, R., and Volterra, A. (2014). Gliotransmitters travel in time and space. Neuron 81, 728–739.10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Armulik, A., Genové, G., Mae, M., Nisancioglu, M.H., Wallgard, E., Niaudet, C., He, L., Norlin, J., Lindblom, P., Strittmatter, K., et al. (2010). Pericytes regulate the blood-brain barrier. Nature 468, 557–561.10.1038/nature09522Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Arnoys, E.J. and Wang, J.L. (2007). Dual localization: proteins in extracellular and intracellular compartments. Acta Histochem. 109, 89–110.10.1016/j.acthis.2006.10.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Arvanitaky, A. (1942). Effects evoked in an axon by the activity of a contiguous one. J. Neurophysiol. 5, 89–108.10.1152/jn.1942.5.2.89Search in Google Scholar

Attwell, D., Buchan, A.M., Charpak, S., Lauritzen, M., Macvicar, B.A., and Newman, E.A. (2010). Glial and neuronal control of brain blood flow. Nature 468, 232–243.10.1038/nature09613Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Balaj, L., Lessard, R., Dai, L., Cho, Y.J., Pomeroy, S.L., Breakefield, X.O., and Skog, J. (2011). Tumour microvesicles contain retrotransposon elements and amplified oncogene sequences. Nat. Commun. 2, 180.10.1038/ncomms1180Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Banerjee, S. and Bhat, M.A. (2007). Neuron-glial interactions in blood-brain barrier formation. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 30, 235–258.10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094345Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Bartzokis, G. (2012). Neuroglialpharmacology: myelination as a shared mechanism of action of psychotropic treatments. Neuropharmacology 62, 2137–2153.10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.01.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Beaumont, N.J. (2014). Neuronal activity causes a reciprocal cationic flux in the extracellular space in the brain: a hypothesis. Peer J 3, e765v2.10.7287/peerj.preprints.765v1Search in Google Scholar

Bechter, K. (2011). The peripheral cerebrospinal fluid outflow pathway – physiology and pathophysiology of CSF recirculation: a review and hypothesis. Neurol. Psychiatry Brain Res. 17, 51–66.10.1016/j.npbr.2011.06.003Search in Google Scholar

Benedetti, F. and Bollettini, I. (2014). Recent findings on the role of white matter pathology in bipolar disorder. Harv. Rev. Psychiatry 22, 338–341.10.1097/HRP.0000000000000007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Benedetti, F. and Smeraldi, E. (2009). Neuroimaging and genetics of antidepressant response to sleep deprivation: implications for drug development. Curr. Pharm. Des. 15, 2637–2649.10.2174/138161209788957447Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Benedetti, F. and Terman, M. (2013). Much ado about...a moody clock. Biol. Psychiatry 74, 236–237.10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.05.037Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Benedetti, F., Bollettini, I., Barberi, I., Radaelli, D., Poletti, S., Locatelli, C., Pirovano, A., Lorenzi, C., Falini, A., Colombo, C., et al. (2013). Lithium and GSK3-β promoter gene variants influence white matter microstructure in bipolar disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 38, 313–327.10.1038/npp.2012.172Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Benedetti, F., Poletti, S., Radaelli, D., Locatelli, C., Pirovano, A., Lorenzi, C., Vai, B., Bollettini, I., Falini, A., Smeraldi, E., et al. (2015). Lithium and GSK3-β promoter gene variants influence cortical grey matter volumes in bipolar disorder. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 232, 1325–1336.10.1007/s00213-014-3770-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Bernardinelli, Y., Muller, D., and Nikonenko, I. (2014). Astrocyte-synapse structural plasticity. Neural Plast. 2014, 232105.10.1155/2014/232105Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Brightman, M.W. (2002). The brain’s interstitial clefts and their glial walls. J. Neurocytol. 31, 595–603.10.1023/A:1025783326667Search in Google Scholar

Bruinsma, I.B., te Riet, L., Gevers, T., ten Dam, G.B., van Kuppevelt, T.H., David, G., Küsters, B., de Waal, R.M., and Verbeek M.M. (2010). Sulfation of heparan sulfate associated with amyloid-beta plaques in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 119, 211–220.10.1007/s00401-009-0577-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Canonico, B., Luchetti, F., Arcangeletti, M., Guescini, M., Degli Esposti, M., and Papa, S. (2012). Flow cytometric analyses disclose intercellular communications in FasL-stimulated T cells: results and trouble shooting. Cytometry A 81, 5–8.10.1002/cyto.a.21151Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Cirrito, J.R., Yamada, K.A., Finn, M.B., Sloviter, R.S., Bales, K.R., May, P.C., Schoepp, D.D., Paul, S.M., Mennerick, S., and Holtzman, D.M. (2005). Synaptic activity regulates interstitial fluid amyloid-β levels in vivo. Neuron 48, 913–922.10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.028Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Cook, N.D., Carvalho, G.B., and Damasio, A. (2014). From membrane excitability to metazoan psychology. Trends Neurosci. 37, 698–705.10.1016/j.tins.2014.07.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Cousins, D.A., Butts, K., and Young, A.H. (2009). The role of dopamine in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 11, 787–806.10.1111/j.1399-5618.2009.00760.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Dityatev, A. and Rusakov, D. (2011). Molecular signals of plasticity at the tetrapartite synapse. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 21, 353–359.10.1016/j.conb.2010.12.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Dityatev, A., Schachner, M., and Sonderegger, P. (2010a). The dual role of the extracellular matrix in synaptic plasticity and homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 735–746.10.1038/nrn2898Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Dityatev, A., Seidenbecher, C.I., and Schachner, M. (2010b). Compartmentalization from the outside: the extracellular matrix and functional microdomains in the brain. Trends Neurosci. 33, 503–512.10.1016/j.tins.2010.08.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Drevets, W.C., Savitz, J., and Trimble, M. (2008). The subgenual anterior cingulate cortex in mood disorders. CNS Spectr. 13, 663–681.10.1017/S1092852900013754Search in Google Scholar

Duchemin, S., Boily, M., Sadekova, N., and Girouard, H. (2012). The complex contribution of NOS interneurons in the physiology of cerebrovascular regulation. Front Neural. Circ. 6, 51.10.3389/fncir.2012.00051Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Emanueli, C., Schratzberger, P., Kirchmair, R., and Madeddu, P. (2003). Paracrine control of vascularization and neurogenesis by neurotrophins. Br. J. Pharmacol. 140, 614–619.10.1038/sj.bjp.0705458Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Faingold, C.L. and Blumenfeld, H. (2014). Introduction to Neuronal Networks of the Brain. Neuronal Networks in Brain Function, CNS Disorders, and Therapeutics. C.L. Faingold and H. Blumenfeld, eds. (Amsterdam: Elsevier/Academic Press), pp. 1–10.10.1016/B978-0-12-415804-7.00001-0Search in Google Scholar

Farrow, T.F., Whitford, T.J., Williams, L.M., Gomes, L., and Harris, A.W. (2005). Diagnosis-related regional gray matter loss over two years in first episode schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 58, 713–723.10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.04.033Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Fernandez-Klett, F., Offenhauser, N., Dirnagl, U., Priller, J., and Lindauer, U. (2010). Pericytes in capillaries are contractile in vivo, but arterioles mediate functional hyperemia in the mouse brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 22290–22295.10.1073/pnas.1011321108Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Figley, C.R. and Stroman, P.W. (2011). The role(s) of astrocytes and astrocyte activity in neurometabolism, neurovascular coupling, and the production of functional neuroimaging signals. Eur. J. Neurosci. 33, 577–588.10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07584.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Furchgott, R.F. and Zawadzki, J.V. (1980). The obligatory role of endothelial cells in the relaxation of arterial smooth muscle by acetylcholine. Nature 288, 373–376.10.1038/288373a0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Fuxe, K., Canals, M., Torvinen, M., Marcellino, D., Terasmaa, A., Genedani, S., Leo, G., Guidolin, D., Diaz-Cabiale, Z., Rivera, A., et al. (2007a). Intramembrane receptor-receptor interactions: a novel principle in molecular medicine. J. Neural Transm. 114, 49–75.10.1007/s00702-006-0589-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Fuxe, K., Dahlström, A., Höistad, M., Marcellino, D., Jansson, A., Rivera, A., Diaz-Cabiale, Z., Jacobsen, K., Tinner-Staines, B., Hagman, B., et al. (2007b). From the Golgi-Cajal mapping to the transmitter-based characterization of the neuronal networks leading to two modes of brain communication: wiring and volume transmission. Brain Res. Rev. 55, 17–54.10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.02.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Fuxe, K., Marcellino, D., Woods, A.S., Leo, G., Antonelli, T., Ferraro, L., Tanganelli, S., and Agnati, L.F. (2009). Integrated signaling in heterodimers and receptor mosaics of different types of GPCRs of the forebrain: relevance for schizophrenia. J. Neural Transm. 116, 923–939.10.1007/s00702-008-0174-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Fuxe, K., Dahlström, A.B., Jonsson, G., Marcellino, D., Guescini, M., Dam, M., Manger, P., and Agnati, L.F. (2010). The discovery of central monoamine neurons gave volume transmission to the wired brain. Prog. Neurobiol. 90, 82–100.10.1016/j.pneurobio.2009.10.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Fuxe, K., Borroto-Escuela, D.O., Romero-Fernandez, W., Tarakanov, A.O., Calvo, F., Garriga, P., Tena, M., Narvaez, M., Millón, C., Parrado, C., et al. (2012). On the existence and function of galanin receptor heteromers in the central nervous system. Front. Endocrinol. 3, 127.10.3389/fendo.2012.00127Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Gazzaniga, M.S. (1989). Organization of the human brain. Science 245, 947–952.10.1126/science.2672334Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Ghosh, P. and Guidolin, D. (2002). Potential mechanism of action of intra-articular hyaluronan therapy in osteoarthritis: are the effects molecular weight dependent? Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 32, 10–37.10.1053/sarh.2002.33720Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Gordon, G.R., Choi, H.B., Rungta, R.L., Ellis-Davies, G.C., and MacVicar, B.A. (2008). Brain metabolism dictates the polarity of astrocyte control over arterioles. Nature 456, 745–749.10.1038/nature07525Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Gourine, A.V., Kasymov, V., Marina, N., Tang, F., Figueiredo, M.F., Lane, S., Teschemacher, A.G., Spyer, K.M., Deisseroth, K., and Kasparov, S. (2010). Astrocytes control breathing through pH-dependent release of ATP. Science 329, 571–575.10.1126/science.1190721Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Grande, I., Magalhaes, P.V., Kunz, M., Vieta, E., and Kapczinski, F. (2012). Mediators of allostasis and systemic toxicity in bipolar disorder. Physiol. Behav. 106, 46–50.10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.10.029Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Greer, D.S. (2007). Neurotransmitter Fields. Artificial Neural Networks – ICANN 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Volume 4669 (Berlin Heidelberg: Springer), pp. 19–28.10.1007/978-3-540-74695-9_3Search in Google Scholar

Greitz, D. (1993). Cerebrovascular fluid circulation and associated intracranial dynamics, a radiographic investigation using MR imaging and radionuclide cisternography. Acta Radiol. Suppl. 386, 1–23.Search in Google Scholar

Guescini, M., Genedani, S., Stocchi, V., and Agnati, L.F. (2010a). Astrocytes and Glioblastoma cells release exosomes carrying mtDNA. J. Neural Transm. 117, 1–4.10.1007/s00702-009-0288-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Guescini, M., Guidolin, D., Vallorani, L., Casadei, L., Gioacchini, A.M., Tibollo, P., Battistelli, M., Falcieri, E., Battistin, L., Agnati, L.F., et al. (2010b). C2C12 myoblasts release microvesicles containing mtDNA and proteins involved in signal transduction. Exp. Cell Res. 316, 1977–1984.10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.04.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Guescini, M., Leo, G., Genedani, S., Carone, C., Pederzoli, F., Ciruela, F., Guidolin, D., Stocchi, V., Mantuano, M., Borroto-Escuela, D.O., et al. (2012). Microvesicle and tunneling nanotube mediated intercellular transfer of G-protein coupled receptors in cell cultures. Exp. Cell Res. 318, 603–613.10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.01.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Guidolin, D., Guescini, M., Stocchi, V., Genedani, S., Fuxe, K., and Agnati, L.F. (2013). Extra-cellular Proteins are Key Elements of a Global Molecular Network Enmeshing the Whole Central Nervous System: Physiological and Pathological Implications. Advances in Protein and Peptide Sciences. B.M. Dunn, ed. (Bentham Science eISBN: 978-1-60805-487-9), pp. 792–832.Search in Google Scholar

Haarman, B.C., Riemersma-Van der Lek, R.F., de Groot, J.C., Ruhe, H.G., Klein, H.C., Zandstra, T.E., Burger, H., Schoevers, R.A., de Vries, E.F., Drexhage, H.A., et al. (2014). Neuroinflammation in bipolar disorder – a [(11)C]-(R)-PK11195 positron emission tomography study. Brain Behav. Immun. 40, 219–225.10.1016/j.bbi.2014.03.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Haj-Yasein, N.N., Vindedal, G.F., Eilert-Olsen, M., Gundersen, G.A., Skare, O., Laake, P., Klungland, A., Thorén, A.E., Burkhardt, J.M., Ottersen, O.P., et al. (2011). Glial-conditional deletion of aquaporin-4 (Aqp4) reduces blood-brain water uptake and confers barrier function on perivascular astrocyte endfeet. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 17815–17820.10.1073/pnas.1110655108Search in Google Scholar

Halassa, M.M., D’Ascenzo M., Boccaccio A., and Fellin, T. (2014). Astrocytic Regulation of Synapses, Neuronal Networks, and Behavior. Neuronal Networks in Brain Function, CNS Disorders, and Therapeutics. C.L. Faingold and H. Blumenfeld, eds. (Amsterdam: Elsevier/Academic Press), pp. 157–165.10.1016/B978-0-12-415804-7.00012-5Search in Google Scholar

Harder, D.R., Zhang, C., and Gebremedhin, D. (2002). Astrocytes function in matching blood flow to metabolic activity. News Physiol. Sci. 16, 27–31.10.1152/physiologyonline.2002.17.1.27Search in Google Scholar

Harvey, A.G. (2008). Sleep and circadian rhythms in bipolar disorder: seeking synchrony, harmony, and regulation. Am. J. Psychiatry 165, 820–829.10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08010098Search in Google Scholar

Haydon, P.G. and Carmignoto, G. (2006). Astrocyte control of synaptic transmission and neurovascular coupling. Physiol. Rev. 86, 1009–1031.10.1152/physrev.00049.2005Search in Google Scholar

Honea, R., Crow, T.J., Passingham, D., and Mackay, C.E. (2005). Regional deficits in brain volume in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of voxel-based morphometry studies. Am. J. Psychiatry 162, 2233–2245.10.1176/appi.ajp.162.12.2233Search in Google Scholar

Jacob, F. (1977). Evolution and tinkering. Science 196, 1161–1166.10.1126/science.860134Search in Google Scholar

Kacem, K., Lacombe, P., Seylaz, J., and Bonvento, G. (1998). Structural organization of the perivascular astrocyte endfeet and their relationship with the endothelial glucose transporter: a confocal microscopy study. Glia 23, 1–10.10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199805)23:1<1::AID-GLIA1>3.0.CO;2-BSearch in Google Scholar

Kamali-Zare, P. and Nicholson, C. (2013). Editorial: brain extracellular space: geometry, matrix and physiological importance. Basic Clin. Neurosci. 4, 4–8.Search in Google Scholar

Kamermans, M. and Fahrenfort, I. (2004). Ephaptic interactions within a chemical synapse: hemichannel-mediated ephaptic inhibition in the retina. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14, 531–541.10.1016/j.conb.2004.08.016Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, A., Spiller, K.J., Towne, C., Kanning, K.C., Choe, G.T., Geber, A., Akay, T., Aebischer, P., and Henderson, C.E. (2014). Neuronal matrix metalloproteinase-9 is a determinant of selective neurodegeneration. Neuron 81, 333–348.10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.009Search in Google Scholar

Koehler, R.C., Gebremedhin, D., and Harder, D.R. (2006). Role of astrocytes in cerebrovascular regulation. J. Appl. Physiol. 1985, 307–317.10.1152/japplphysiol.00938.2005Search in Google Scholar

Koike, N., Yoo, S.H., Huang, H.C., Kumar, V., Lee, C., Kim, T.K., and Takahashi, J.S. (2012). Transcriptional architecture and chromatin landscape of the core circadian clock in mammals. Science 338, 349–354.10.1126/science.1226339Search in Google Scholar

Konkoy, C.S. and Davis T.P. (1996). Ectoenzymes as sites of peptide regulation. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 17, 288–294.10.1016/0165-6147(96)10036-5Search in Google Scholar

Kurtcuoglu, V., Soellinger, M., Summers, P., Boomsma, K., Poulikakos, D., Boesiger, P., and Ventikos, Y. (2007). Computational investigation of subject-specific cerebrospinal fluid flow in the third ventricle and aqueduct of Sylvius. J. Biomech. 40, 1235–1245.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.05.031Search in Google Scholar

Lehre, K.R. and Rusakov, D.A. (2002). Asymmetry of glia near central synapses favors presynaptically directed glutamate escape. Biophys. J. 83, 125–134.10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75154-0Search in Google Scholar

Lessmann, V., Gottmann, K., and Malcangio, M. (2003). Neurotrophin secretion: current facts and future prospects. Prog. Neurobiol. 69, 341–374.10.1016/S0301-0082(03)00019-4Search in Google Scholar

Leyton, L. and Hagood, J.S. (2014) Thy-1 modulates neurological cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions through multiple molecular interactions. Adv. Neurobiol. 8, 3–20.Search in Google Scholar

Lim, A.S., Yu, L., Kowgier, M., Schneider, J.A., Buchman, A.S., and Bennett, D.A. (2013). Modification of the relationship of the apolipoprotein E epsilon4 allele to the risk of Alzheimer disease and neurofibrillary tangle density by sleep. J. Am. Med. Assoc. Neurol. 70, 1544–1551.Search in Google Scholar

Luchetti, F., Canonico, B., Arcangeletti, M., Guescini, M., Cesarini, E., Stocchi, V., Degli Esposti, M., and Papa, S. (2012). Fas signalling promotes intercellular communication in T cells. PloS One 7, e35766.10.1371/journal.pone.0035766Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Magistretti, P.J., Pellerin, L., Rothman, D.L., and Shulman, R.G. (1999). Energy on demand. Science 283, 496–497.10.1126/science.283.5401.496Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Malkki, H. (2013). Alzheimer disease: sleep alleviates AD-related neuropathological processes. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 9, 657.10.1038/nrneurol.2013.230Search in Google Scholar PubMed

McClung, C. (2013). How might circadian rhythms control mood? Let me count the ways… Biol. Psychiatry 74, 242–249.Search in Google Scholar

Mesman, E., Hillegers, M.H., Ambree, O., Arolt, V., Nolen, W.A., and Drexhage, H.A. (2015). Monocyte activation, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and S100B in bipolar offspring: a follow-up study from adolescence into adulthood. Bipolar Disord. 17, 39–49.10.1111/bdi.12231Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Millan, M.J. (2006). Multi-target strategies for the improved treatment of depressive states: conceptual foundations and neuronal substrates, drug discovery and therapeutic application. Pharmacol. Ther. 110, 135–370.10.1016/j.pharmthera.2005.11.006Search in Google Scholar

Morawski, M., Filippov, M., Tzinia, A., Tsilibary, E., and Vargova, L. (2014). ECM in brain aging and dementia. Prog. Brain Res. 214, 207–227.10.1016/B978-0-444-63486-3.00010-4Search in Google Scholar

Mulligan, S.J. and MacVicar, B.A. (2004). Calcium transients in astrocyte endfeet cause cerebrovascular constrictions. Nature 431, 195–199.10.1038/nature02827Search in Google Scholar

Muoio, V., Persson, P.B., and Sendeski, M.M. (2014). The neurovascular unit – concept review. Acta Physiol. 210, 790–798.10.1111/apha.12250Search in Google Scholar

Nagy, J.I., Dudek, F.E., and John, E.R. (2004). Update on connexins and gap junctions in neurons and glia in the mammalian nervous system. Brain Res. Rev. 47, 191–215.10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.05.005Search in Google Scholar

Nedergaard, M., Ransom, B., and Goldman, S.A. (2003). New roles for astrocytes: redefining the functional architecture of the brain. Trends Neurosci. 26, 523–530.10.1016/j.tins.2003.08.008Search in Google Scholar

Nicholson, C. and Sykova, E. (1998). Extracellular space structure revealed by diffusion analysis. Trends Neurosci. 21, 207–215.10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01261-2Search in Google Scholar

Nicholson, C., Kamali-Zare, P., and Tao, L. (2011). Brain extracellular space as a diffusion barrier. Comput. Vis. Sci. 14, 309–325.10.1007/s00791-012-0185-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Padmos, R.C., Hillegers, M.H., Knijff, E.M., Vonk, R., Bouvy, A., Staal, F.J., de Ridder, D., Kupka, R.W., Nolen, W.A., and Drexhage, H.A. (2008). A discriminating messenger RNA signature for bipolar disorder formed by an aberrant expression of inflammatory genes in monocytes. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 65, 395–407.10.1001/archpsyc.65.4.395Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Padmos, R.C., Van Baal, G.C., Vonk, R., Wijkhuijs, A.J., Kahn, R.S., Nolen, W.A., and Drexhage, H.A. (2009). Genetic and environmental influences on pro-inflammatory monocytes in bipolar disorder: a twin study. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 66, 957–965.10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.116Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Pagani, L., Schmitt, K., Meier, F., Izakovic, J., Roemer, K., Viola, A., Cajochen, C., Wirz-Justice, A., Brown, S.A., and Eckert, A. (2011). Serum factors in older individuals change cellular clock properties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 7218–7223.10.1073/pnas.1008882108Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Parpura, V. and Zorec, R. (2010). Exocytotic release from astrocytes. Brain Res. Rev. 63, 83–92.10.1016/j.brainresrev.2009.11.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Pellerin, L. and Magistretti, P.J. (1994). Glutamate uptake into astrocytes stimulates aerobic glycolysis: a mechanism coupling neuronal activity to glucose utilization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 10625–10629.10.1073/pnas.91.22.10625Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Phatak, P., Shaldivin, A., King, L.S., Shapiro, P., and Regenold, W.T. (2006). Lithium and inositol: effects on brain water homeostasis in the rat. Psychopharmacology 186, 41–47.10.1007/s00213-006-0354-ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Pócsai, K. and Kálmán, M. (2014). Extracellular matrix components mark the territories of circumventricular organs. Neurosci. Lett. 566, 36–41.10.1016/j.neulet.2014.02.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Rauch, U. (2004). Extracellular matrix components associated with remodelling processes brain. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 61, 2031–2045.10.1007/s00018-004-4043-xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Rausche, G, Igelmund, P., and Heinemann, U. (1990). Effects of changes in extracellular potassium, magnesium and calcium concentration on synaptic transmission in area CA1 and the dentate gyrus of rat hippocampal slices. Pflüger’s Arch. 415, 588–593.10.1007/BF02583510Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Regenold, W.T. (2008). Lithium and increased hippocampal volume-more tissue or more water? Neuropsychopharmacology 33, 1773–1774.10.1038/sj.npp.1301524Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Reichenbach, A., Derouiche, A., and Kirchhoff, F. (2010). Morphology and dynamics of perisynaptic glia. Brain Res. Rev. 63, 11–25.10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.02.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Robertson, J.M. (2013). Astrocyte domains and the three-dimensional and seamless expression of consciousness and explicit memories. Med. Hypotheses 81, 1017–1024.10.1016/j.mehy.2013.09.021Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Rustom, A., Saffrich, R., Markovic, I., Walther, P., and Gerdes, H.-H. (2004). Nanotubular highways for intercellular organelle transport. Science 303, 1007–1010.10.1126/science.1093133Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Sack, I., Streitberger, K.-J., Krefting, D., Friedemann, P., and Jurgen, B. (2011). The Influence of physiological aging and atrophy on brain viscoelastic properties in humans. PLoS One 6, e23451.10.1371/journal.pone.0023451Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Scemes, E. and Spray, D.C. (2012). Extracellular K+ and astrocyte signaling via connexin and pannexin channels. Neurochem. Res. 37, 2310–2316.10.1007/s11064-012-0759-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Shaltiel, G., Chen, G., and Manji, H.K. (2007). Neurotrophic signaling cascades in the pathophysiology and treatment of bipolar disorder. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 7, 22–26.10.1016/j.coph.2006.07.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Sharp, T. and Cowen, P.J. (2011). 5-HT and depression: is the glass half-full? Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 11, 45–51.10.1016/j.coph.2011.02.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Shiosaka, S. (2004). Serine proteases regulating synaptic plasticity. Anat. Sci. Int. 79, 137–144.10.1111/j.1447-073x.2004.00080.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Shiosaka, S. and Ishikawa, Y. (2011). Neuropsin- a possible modulator of synaptic plasticity. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 42, 24–29.10.1016/j.jchemneu.2011.05.014Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Simons, M. and Raposo, G. (2009). Exosomes-vesicular carriers for intercellular communication. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 575–581.10.1016/j.ceb.2009.03.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Skog, J., Wurdinger, T., van Rijn, S., Meijer, D.H., Gainche, L., Sena-Esteves, M., Curry, W.T., Jr, Carter, B.S., Krichevsky, A.M., and Breakefield, X.O. (2008). Glioblastoma microvesicles transport RNA and proteins that promote tumour growth and provide diagnostic biomarkers. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 1470–1476.10.1038/ncb1800Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Slat, E., Freeman, G.M., Jr, and Herzog, E.D. (2013). The clock in the brain: neurons, glia, and networks in daily rhythms. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 217, 105–123.10.1007/978-3-642-25950-0_5Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Spijker, A.T. and van Rossum, E.F. (2012). Glucocorticoid sensitivity in mood disorders. Neuroendocrinology 95, 179–186.10.1159/000329846Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Spira, A.P., Gamaldo, A.A., An, Y., Wu, M.N., Simonsick, E.M., Bilgel, M., Zhou, Y., Wong, D.F., Ferrucci, L., and Resnick, S.M. (2013). Self-reported sleep and β-amyloid deposition in community-dwelling older adults. J. Am. Med. Assoc. Neurol. 70, 1537–1543.10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.4258Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Steen, N.E., Methlie, P., Lorentzen, S., Hope, S., Barrett, E.A., Larsson, S., Mork, E., Almas, B., Lovas, K., Agartz, I., et al. (2011). Increased systemic cortisol metabolism in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a mechanism for increased stress vulnerability? J. Clin. Psychiatry 72, 1515–1521.10.4088/JCP.10m06068yelSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Takahashi, T., Wood, S.J., Yung, A.R., Soulsby, B., McGorry, P.D., Suzuki, M., Kawasaki, Y., Phillips, L.J., Velakoulis, D., and Pantelis, C. (2009). Progressive gray matter reduction of the superior temporal gyrus during transition to psychosis. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 66, 366–376.10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.12Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Takano, T., Tian, G.-F., Peng, W., Lou, N., Libionka, W., Han, X., and Nedergaard, M. (2006). Astrocyte-mediated control of cerebral blood flow. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 260–267.10.1038/nn1623Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Taipale, J. and Keski-oja, J. (1997). Growth factors in the extracellular matrix. FASEB J. 11, 51–59.10.1096/fasebj.11.1.9034166Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Tamura, H., Ishikawa, Y., and Shiosaka, S. (2013). Does extracellular proteolysis control mammalian cognition? Rev. Neuroscience 24, 365–374.Search in Google Scholar

Tao, L. and Nicholson, C. (2004). Maximum geometrical hindrance to diffusion in brain extracellular space surrounding uniformly spaced convex cells. J. Theor. Biol. 229, 59–68.10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.03.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Thalhammer, A. and Cingolani, L.A. (2014). Cell adhesion and homeostatic synaptic plasticity. Neuropharmacology 78, 23–30.10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.03.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Thorne, R.G. and Nicholson, C. (2006). In vivo diffusion analysis with quantum dots and dextrans predicts the width of brain extracellular space. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 5567–5572.10.1073/pnas.0509425103Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Tyler, W.J. (2012). The mechanobiology of brain function. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 867–878.10.1038/nrn3383Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Vai, B., Bollettini, I., and Benedetti, F. (2014). Corticolimbic connectivity as a possible biomarker for bipolar disorder. Expert Rev. Neurother. 14, 631–650.10.1586/14737175.2014.915744Search in Google Scholar

Valadi, H., Ekstrom, K., Bossios, A., Sjostrand, M., Lee, J.J., and Lotvall, J.O. (2007). Exosome mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 654–659.10.1038/ncb1596Search in Google Scholar

Volterra, A. and Meldolesi, J. (2005). Astrocytes, from brain glue to communication elements: the revolution continues. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 626–640.10.1038/nrn1722Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Sun, P., Wang, Q., Trinkaus, K., Schmidt, R.E., Naismith, R.T., Cross, A.H., and Song, S.K. (2015). Differentiation and quantification of inflammation, demyelination and axon injury or loss in multiple sclerosis. Brain 138, 1223–1238.10.1093/brain/awv046Search in Google Scholar

Wright, J.W., Kramar, E.A., Meighan, S.E., and Harding, J.W. (2002). Extracellular matrix molecules, long-term potentiation, memory consolidation and the brain angiotensin system. Peptides 23, 221–246.10.1016/S0196-9781(01)00599-XSearch in Google Scholar

Xie, L., Kang, H., Xu, Q., Chen, M.J., Liao, Y., Thiyagarajan, M., O’Donnell, J., Christensen, D.J., Nicholson, C., Iliff, J.J., et al. (2013). Sleep drives metabolite clearance from the adult brain. Science 342, 373–377.10.1126/science.1241224Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Yildiz-Yesiloglu, A. and Ankerst, D.P. (2006). Neurochemical alterations of the brain in bipolar disorder and their implications for pathophysiology: a systematic review of the in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy findings. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 30, 969–995.10.1016/j.pnpbp.2006.03.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Yoshida, S. and Shiosaka, S. (1999). Plasticity-related serine proteases in the brain. Int. J. Mol. Med. 3, 405–409.10.3892/ijmm.3.4.405Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Zonta, M., Angulo, M.C., Gobbo, S., Rosengarten, B., Hossmann, K.-A., Pozzan, T., and Carmignoto, G. (2003). Neuron-to-astrocyte signaling is central to the dynamic control of brain microcirculation. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 43–50.10.1038/nn980Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2015-1-28
Accepted: 2015-4-11
Published Online: 2015-6-23
Published in Print: 2015-10-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 27.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/revneuro-2015-0007/html
Scroll to top button